Performing continuous quality improvement for a digital health sciences library through an electronic mail analysis

Observational OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-07 ⓘ

An analysis of 500 electronic mail messages to a digital health sciences library revealed that patient and layperson requests for medical advice comprised the largest sender category, highlighting the need to serve their broad information needs.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this prospective, cross-sectional study was to determine the user demographics of a digital health sciences library (DHSL), motives for use, the nature of users information requests, and success rate in finding answers. METHODS: The content of 500 consecutive electronic mail messages (e-mails) submitted to a DHSL were analyzed using a predetermined coding scheme. Data were entered into a database and frequency analysis was performed. RESULTS: The number of information requests from the 500 e-mail messages was 751. The largest sender category was patients and laypersons followed by students, then physicians. Motivations for use were primarily medical advice (42.8%) and patient care (13.8%). E-mail subject areas were mainly medical (61.8%) and technical (20.6%). Answers to information requests were found 54.3% of the time and senders felt the DHSL was valuable (97.8%). CONCLUSIONS: A DHSL is a valuable medical resource. DHSLs must serve the broad information needs of patients and laypersons in addition to health care providers. Developers and managers of DHSLs can use this information to guide future development of DHSL information content and services, as has been done at The University of Iowa.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Computer Communication Networks Information Services Information Services Internet Libraries, Medical Adult Child Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Libraries, Medical Libraries, Medical Male Prospective Studies Quality Control

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T22:00:48.437354+00:00