Suppressing DBNDD2 promotes neuron growth and axon regeneration in adult mammals

Suppressing DBNDD2 promotes neuron growth and axon regeneration in adult mammals | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Suppressing DBNDD2 promotes neuron growth and axon regeneration in adult mammals Lan Zhang, WenYu Dai, Yucong Wu, Tianyun Chen, Yuyue Qian, Yiming Tang, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5265998/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Effective axon regeneration is essential for the successful recovery of nerve functions in patients with axon injury-associated neurological diseases. Certain self-regeneration occurs in injured peripheral axonal branches of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons but does not occur in their central axonal branches. By performing rat sciatic nerve or dorsal root axotomy, we determined the expression of the dysbindin domain containing 2 (DBNDD2) in the DRGs after the regenerative peripheral axon injury or the non-regenerative central axon injury, respectively, and found that DBNDD2 is down-regulated in the DRGs after peripheral axon injury but up-regulated after central axon injury. Moreover, we found that DBNDD2 expression differs in neonatal and adult rat DRGs and is gradually increased during development. DBNDD2 knockdown promotes the outgrowth of neurites in both neonatal and adult rat DRG neurons and stimulates robust axon regeneration in adult rats after sciatic nerve crush injury. Bioinformatic analysis data showed that transcription factor estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) interacts with DBNDD2, exhibits a similar expression trend as DBNDD2 after axon injury, and may targets DBDNN2. These studies indicate that reduced level of DBNDD2 after peripheral axon injury and low abundance of DBNDD2 in neonates contribute to axon regeneration and thus suggest the manipulation of DBNDD2 expression as a promising therapeutic approach for improving recovery after axon damage. axon damage peripheral axon injury central axon injury RNA sequencing development single-cell sequencing DBNDD2 DRG neuron neuron growth axon regeneration Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Introduction Axon damage interrupts neuronal communications and signal communications between neurons and their target cells, disrupts the physiological functions of neurons, results in partial or complete loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions, and normally induces neuropathological disorders(Winter et al. 2022; Williams et al. 2020). Success axon growth and regeneration is fundamental for the re-establishment of neural circuits and the recovery of impaired nerve functions. Unfortunately, in the adult mammalian central nervous system, injured axons are incapable of regenerating, leading to failure of the restoration of normal nerve function(Uyeda and Muramatsu 2020; Li et al. 2020a; Bradke 2022). On the contrast, in immature mammals, injured central nerves are able to regrow following axon injury, indicating that adult mammals process certain inherent regeneration potential (Montero and Huang 2022). More importantly, except for immature mammalian central nerves, mammalian peripheral nerves have a regenerative ability following axon injury, albeit their regeneration is limited and the regeneration outcome is often incomplete, especially after severe axon injury such as nerve transection with long distance(He and Jin 2016) (Mahar and Cavalli 2018; Robinson 2022). Exploring the intrinsic factors underpinning successful axon regrowth following peripheral nerve injury as well as the unsuccessful axon regrowth following central nerve injury is therefore essential for the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that controls the neuronal intrinsic regeneration capacity(Mahar and Cavalli 2018). Sensory neurons in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) are pseudounipolar neurons with peripheral axonal branches that proceed along peripheral nerves and central axonal branches that proceed along the dorsal roots into the spinal cord(Hutson et al. 2019) (Zhao et al. 2024). Peripheral and central axonal branches behave differently after axon injury. The regeneration rate of injured dorsal roots is only at half the rate of injured peripheral axonal branches and the regrowth of injured dorsal roots stops at the dorsal root entry zone(Avraham et al. 2021). DRG neurons are thus commonly used to discriminate injury responses in the same neuronal soma following damage to the regenerative peripheral axonal branches or the non-regenerative central axonal branches(Avraham et al. 2021; Kong et al. 2020; Palmisano et al. 2019). For instance, the comparison of the levels of reactive oxygen species after sciatic nerve crush or dorsal column crush demonstrates that the production of reactive oxygen species is increased in DRGs after peripheral axon injury but not altered after central axon injury(Hervera et al. 2019). Elevated reactive oxygen species promotes the outgrowth of axons and the recovery of nerve functions, indicating that the assessment of diverse molecular changes after peripheral or central axon injury is critical for the identification of regeneration-associated molecules(Hervera et al. 2019). Likewise, calcium activation of protein phosphatase 4 and protein phosphatase 4–dependent de-phosphorylation of histone deacetylase 3, a process that inhibits the activity of histone deacetylase 3, are only detected after peripheral axon injury but not observed after central axon injury(Hervera et al. 2019). Histone deacetylase 3 inhibition modulates several regenerative pathways, activates the regenerative program, benefits neurite outgrowth, and is even capable of promoting the regeneration of sensory axons following spinal cord injury(Hervera et al. 2019). Deeper understanding of differentially expressed molecules after the regenerative peripheral axon injury and the non-regenerative central axon injury of DRG neurons is hence crucial for revealing novel regeneration associated factors and developing successful therapeutics. The dysbindin domain containing 2 (DBNDD2), also named casein kinase-1 binding protein, is a dysbindin protein family member involved in the negative regulation of casein kinase-1 activity(Yin et al. 2006). A recent study demonstrates that by binding to casein kinase-1 and inhibiting casein kinase-1 activity, DBNDD2 reduces the amounts of total and insoluble α-synuclein and thus may be conductive to the treatment of Parkinsons's disease(Elsholz et al. 2021). However, the biological effects of DBDNN2 on axon regeneration during nerve injury and regeneration process remains to be explored. Taking advantage of high throughput sequencing data, in the current study, we found that in adult rats, DBNDD2 expression is reduced after peripheral axon injury but increased after central axon injury and thus predicted that DBNDD2 might be a negative regulator of axon regeneration. Indeed, we showed that DBNDD2 knockdown in neurons facilitates neurite growth and axon elongation. Our results uncover the functional roles of DBNDD2 in axon regeneration and imply that drugs targeting DBNDD2 may be of benefit in treating traumatic nerve injury as well as other axon damage-associated neurological disorders such as stroke and glaucoma. Materials and methods Animal surgery Specific pathogen-free degree Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats used in this study were purchased from the Animal Center of Nantong University (animal licenses No. SCXK [Su] 2014-0001 and SYXK [Su] 2012-0031). All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committees of Experimental Animals, Jiangsu Province, China (approval ID: S20231219-041) and performed in accordance with the guidelines of Nantong University Institutional Animal Care. Male adult SD rats (8-week-old, weighting 180–220 g) were subjected to sciatic nerve axotomy-induced peripheral axon injury or dorsal root axotomy-induced central axon injury, as previously described with modifications(Avraham et al. 2021). Briefly, for sciatic nerve axotomy, after anesthetization, a skin incision on the lateral aspect of the mid-thigh of rat hind limb was made and exposed rat sciatic nerves were subjected to a sharp axotomy. For dorsal root axotomy, a midline incision at the lumbar (L)2-L3 vertebral level was made, the dura mater was removed, and exposed rat L4 and L5 dorsal roots were subjected to axotomy. Rats underwent sciatic nerve or dorsal root exposure without axotomy were designated as sham-operated. L4 and L5 DRGs were collected at 1 day after axotomy or sham surgery and subjected to RNA sequencing. Sequencing RNA sequencing of L4 and L5 DRGs following sciatic nerve injury versus sciatic nerve sham surgery and dorsal root injury versus dorsal root sham surgery has been published with sequencing data stored in Genome Sequence Archive database (accession number CRA006070)(Cao et al. 2022). RNA sequencing was performed on an HiSeq™ 4000 by Genedenovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China). Transcripts abundances were quantified using StringTie and differential expression testing was performed using edgeR(Robinson et al. 2010). Single-cell sequencing of 1-day-old neonatal and 8-week-old adult rat DRGs was performed as previously described with sequencing data stored in NCBI database (accession number GSE147615)(Zhang et al. 2021). Digested single cell suspensions were loaded on the 10 × Chromium system, libraries were prepared using 10 × Genomics GemCode Single-Cell 3′ Gel Bead and Library Kit, and sequencing was conducted using Illumina NovaSeq platform by NovelBioinformatics Ltd., Co. (Shanghai, China). Raw data was processed by fastp quality control and analyzed with Cell Ranger (v3.0.0) for barcode identification, mapping, and gene counting. Transcripts abundances were quantified after normalization. Sequencing data were categorized to clusters using Seurat 3.1 software package. Clusters were presented in a t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plot using a dimensional reduction algorithm. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) Total RNA of collected DRG tissues or cultured DRG neurons was extracted using RNA-Quick Purification Kit (Yeasen Biotechnology Co., Beijing, China) or Cell RNA Extraction Kit (UU-Bio Technology Co., Suzhou, Jiangsu, China), respectively, and then treated with amplification-grade DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After RNA quantification using a Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware, USA), total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using HiScript®ⅡQ RT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative RT-PCR was then performed using ChamQ™ SYBR® qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme) on an ABI StepOne system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Experiments were repeated in triplicate. The Ct values of target gene DBNDD2 were compared with the Ct values of the internal control glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The relative abundance of DBNDD2 was quantitated using the comparative 2 −ΔΔCt method. Primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The sequences of specific primers for target gene DBNDD2 were DBNDD2 (forward) 5’-CGTCAGACAGGACCACATCC-3’ and DBNDD2 (reverse) 5’-TGTCTCCTCCCCCATCACTT-3’ while the sequences of specific primers for reference gene GAPDH were GAPDH (forward) 5’-ACAGCAACAGGGTGGTGGAC-3’ and GAPDH (reverse) 5’-TTTGAGGTGCAGCGAACTT-3’. Immunohistochemistry Rat L4 and L5 DRGs were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and cryoprotected using 30% sucrose. Rat DRGs were then embedded in O.C.T., frozen, and cut to tissue sections. DRG sections were incubated with anti-Tuj1 (1:1000; Abcam, catalog # ab18207, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA), anti-DBNDD2 (1:200; Proteintech, catalog # 27623-1-AP, Rosemont, Illinois, USA), anti-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP; 1:100; Abcam, catalog # ab184601), or anti-superior cervical ganglion-10 protein (SCG10; 1:500; Novus Biologicals, catalog # NBP1-49461, Littleton, Colorado, USA) primary antibodies at 4°C overnight and subsequently with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (1:500; Proteintech, catalog # SA00013-5), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:500; Proteintech, catalog # SA00013-6), Cy3 goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (1:500; Proteintech, catalog #SA00009-1), or Cy3 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (1:500; Proteintech, catalog #SA00009-2) secondary antibodies. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI Fluoromount-G stain (SouthernBiotech, catalog # 0100 − 20, Birmingham, Alabama, USA). Immunofluorescence images were captured using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope (Jena, Germany). Exposure time and gain were maintained constant for each fluorescence channel during image capture. Primary DRG neuron isolation and culture DRGs collected from 1-day-old neonatal and 8-week-old adult rats were dissected into small pieces and subjected to tissue digestion. For neonatal rats, dissected DRGs were digested with 3 mg/ml collagenaseⅠfor 30 minutes and 0.25% trypsin for 20 minutes while for adult rats, DRGs were digested with 3 mg/ml collagenaseⅠfor 90 minutes and 0.25% trypsin for 5 minutes. After adding complete culture medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum albumin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to terminate digestion, cells were filtered through a 70-µm cell strainer. Cell pellets were re-suspended in 15% BSA Albumine Bovine V (BioFroxx, Einhausen, Germany) and then subjected to centrifugation. Seperated neonatal or adult rat DRG neurons were cultured in Neurobasal medium (Gibco, Grand Island, New York, USA) containing 2% B27 supplement (Gibco) and 2 mM L-glutamine (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and plated in cell culture dishes pre-coated with poly-L-lysine (PLL). DRG neuron transfection Primary cultured neonatal or adult rat DRG neurons were transfected with the small interfering RNA (siRNA) fragments against DBNDD2 to knockdown DBNDD2 expression in neurons. DRG neurons were transfected with siRNAs targeting DBNDD2 (si-DBNDD2) or a control scrambled siRNA with a random sequence using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequences of siRNAs targeting DBNDD2 were as follows: DBNDD2-siRNA-1, 5’-GAAGTTCTTCGAGGACATT-3’; DBNDD2-siRNA-2, 5’-GGTGGAATTTATTGACCTT-3’; and DBNDD2-siRNA-3, 5’-GCAGTCCAAATCCAAGTGA-3’. The sequence of the control siRNA was 5’-GGCUCUAGAAAAGCCUAUGC-3’. The siRNA fragments were synthesized by RibiBio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China). Western blot Cultured DRG neurons were lysed with RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After measuring the concentrations of protein extracts using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), equal amounts of protein samples were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE and then transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were incubated with anti-DBNDD2 (1:200; Proteintech, catalog # 27623-1-AP) or anti-β-actin (1:1000) primary antibodies at 4°C overnight and subsequently with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Protein bands were developed using the ECL Western blotting detection kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In vitro neurite growth assay Cultured neonatal rat DRG neurons were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 36 hours after transfection and subjected to anti-Tuj1 immunostaining. Adult rat DRG neurons were replaced by trypsin treatment and seeded on to glass coverslips pre-coated with PLL. At 24 hours after cell culture, neurons were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and immunostained with anti-Tuj1 antibody. The longest and total lengths of neurites from each neonatal or adult rat DRG neuron were measured and quantified using the Image J software. For myelin experiments, myelin fractions were extracted from adult rat brain tissues as previously described with modifications(Ma et al. 2019). Briefly, adult rat brain tissues were homogenized in 0.30 M sucrose, layered over 0.83 M sucrose, and centrifuged to gather the crude myelin layers between the interfaces. The process was repeated to purify collected myelin extracts and the glass coverslips were coated with PLL and myelin extracts. In vitro neurite regeneration assay Adult rat DRG neurons were cultured onto the somal compartments of microfluidic chambers pre-coated with PLL (catalog # SND150, Xona 2-compartment SND 150, Xona Microfluidics LLC). Neurites that entered the axonal compartments after cell culture were dissected and removed using a 0.08 mpa vacuum suction 3 times with 20 seconds each time. Dissected neurites were cultured for additional 24 hours, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and immunostained with anti-Tuj1 antibody to observe neurite elongation and regeneration. The lengths of regenerated neurites were measured and quantified using the Image J software. Intrathecal injection of adeno-associated virus (AAVs) Adult SD rats were anesthetized, shaved to expose the skin around the lumbar region, and injected with AAV that carry shRNA against DBNDD2 (pAAV-U6-shRNA(DBNDD2)-CMV-EGFP-WPRE) or a control AAV (pAAV-U6-shRNA(NC)-CMV-EGFP-WPRE). The AAVs were packaged by OBiO Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). A total of 10 µl of AAV solution was slowly injected into the cerebrospinal fluid between vertebrae L4 and L5 using a 25 µL Hamilton syringe and the needle was left in place for additional 2 minutes. After leaving rats injected with AAVs to recover for 21 days, the left sciatic nerve at 10 mm above the bifurcation into the tibial and common fibular nerves was crushed with forceps as previously described(Yi et al. 2015). At 3 days after sciatic nerve crush injury, sciatic nerve tissues were collected and then subjected to SCG10 immunostaining. The lengths of regenerated nerves were measured and quantified using the Image J software. Bioinformatic analysis Molecules that interact with DBNDD2 were discovered and visualized using the STRING data resource(Szklarczyk et al. 2023). Molecules that interact with DBNDD2 or controls the expression of DBNDD2 were determined using the Pathway Commons(Rodchenkov et al. 2020). Upstream transcription factors of DBNDD2 were predicted using JASPAR database(Castro-Mondragon et al. 2022), animalTFDB 3.0 database(Hu et al. 2019), Gene Transcription Regulation database (GTRD)(Kolmykov et al. 2021), and hTFtarget database(Zhang et al. 2020). The intersection of potential upstream transcription factors of DBNDD2 was obtained using Venny ( https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html ). The binding of transcription factor estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) to the promoter region of DBNDD2 was generated using motif-based sequence analysis tool FIMO-MEME Suite(Bailey et al. 2009). Statistical analysis All quantitative data were presented as the mean ± the standard error of the mean (SEM). The numbers of independent experiments were indicated in the figure legends. Unpaired two-tailed student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s or a Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was performed using GraphPad Prism, and significance was set at p-value < 0.05. Results DBNDD2 is differentially expressed in adult rat DRGs following nerve injury We analyzed sequencing data of rat DRGs after sciatic nerve or dorsal root axotomy and examined the expression levels of DBNDD2 gene in rat DRGs after peripheral and central axon injuries. At 24 hours after sciatic nerve injury, the expression of DBNDD2 gene in rat DRGs was dropped by more than 65% as compared with its expressions in sciatic nerve sham injured animals. Following dorsal root injury, the expression of DBNDD2 gene in rat DRGs increased to 1.85 folds as compared to the baseline expression of DBNDD2 gene in sciatic dorsal root injured animals (Fig. 1A). In consistent with sequencing data, RT-PCR results showed that DBNDD2 gene expression in the DRGs was remarkably decreased after sciatic nerve injury but significantly increased after dorsal root injury (Fig. 1B). DBNDD2 protein expression in the DRGs was also found to be affected by axonal injury. The fluorescence intensity of DBNDD2 in the DRGs seemed to be much lower following sciatic nerve injury relative to that of DBNDD2 in the DRGs under the uninjured naïve state while the intensity of DBNDD2 seemed to be much higher following dorsal root injury (Fig. 1C). These observations from RNA sequencing, RT-PCR validation, and immunohistochemistry immunostaining fully demonstrate that in the DRGs, DBNDD2 presented an opposite following injury to the peripheral and central axonal branches. In addition, DBNDD2 signal was found to co-localized with those of a neuronal cell marker Tuj1 (Fig. 1C). It demonstrates that injury to peripheral and central axonal branches of the DRGs elicits different changes of DBNDD2 in DRG neuronal somas and hints that differentially expressed DBNDD2 contribute to the different regeneration capacity of injured peripheral and central axons. DBNDD2 is differentially expressed in the DRGs at different developmental stages We next compared the expression levels of DBNDD2 gene in the DRG neurons of neonatal and adult rats, rats at two diverse developmental stages with different regeneration capacities. Using single-cell sequencing, a high-throughput analysis tool that identifies cellular heterogeneity and seperates diverse cell populations, neurons were distinguished from other cell types in the DRGs and DRG neurons in neonatal and adult rats were recognized (Fig. 2A). The tSNE plot showed that DBNDD2 gene was expressed in DRG neurons of both neonatal and adult rats and was present in a larger number of DRG neurons in adult rats as compared with in neonatal rats (Fig. 2B). Quantification of DBNDD2 gene expression in the DRG neurons of neonatal and adult rats demonstrated an obviously higher expression level of DBNDD2 gene in adult rats (Fig. 2C). Besides 1-old-old neonatal and 8-week-old adult rats, the temporal expression pattern of DBNDD2 gene in 2-week-old and 4-week-old rats were also determined. Similar as in 8-week-old adult rats, elevated expression of DBNDD2 gene was detected in the DRGs of 2-week-old and 4-week-old rats as compared with the DRGs of neonatal rats (Fig. 2D). The observed elevation of DBNDD2 gene expression in developing animals with reduced regeneration capacity implies that DBNDD2 may be a negative regulator of axon regeneration. DBNDD2 deficiency promotes the growth of neonatal rat DRG neurons Primary neonatal rat DRG neurons were isolated, cultured, and gene manipulated to assess the role of DBNDD2 (Fig. 3A). RT-PCR experiments showed that transfection of neonatal rat DRG neurons with three siRNA fragments against DBNDD2 successfully reduced DBNDD2 gene expression to less than 20% (Fig. 3B). DBNDD2-siRNA-1 and DBNDD2-siRNA-2, two siRNA fragments with relative higher knockdown efficiency, were subsequently used for functional investigation. Following the transfection of DBNDD2-siRNA-1, the intrinsic axon growth ability of neonatal rat DRG neurons seemed to be activated and the neurites of neonatal neurons were noticeably much longer (Fig. 3C). Summarized data of more than 400 DRG neurons showed that the transfection of DBNDD2-siRNA-1 increased the lengths of total neurites from 180.09 µm in the control-siRNA treated group to 247.44 µm in the DBNDD2-siRNA-1-siRNA transfected group. The lengths of the longest neurites also increased from 113.68 µm in the control-siRNA treated group to 142.20 µm in the DBNDD2-siRNA-1-siRNA transfected group (Fig. 3D). DBNDD2-siRNA-2 transfection induces comparable cellular responses, with the lengths of total neurites increased from 167.06 µm in the control-siRNA treated group to 255.98 µm in the DBNDD2-siRNA-1-siRNA transfected group and the length of the longest neurites increased from 109.85 µm to 154.40 µm (Figs. 3C and 3D). These data indicate that in neonatal DRG neurons, silencing DBNDD2 is able to enhance neuronal sprouting and neurite growth. DBNDD2 deficiency promotes the growth of adult rat DRG neurons and the elongation of injured axons Next, we explored the effects of DBNDD2 knockdown on primary cultured adult DRG neurons. Given that adult neurons have diminished growth ability relative to neonatal rats, adult DRG neurons were subjected to a culture-and-replating protocol to recapitulate nerve injury process and to boost the intrinsic growth capacity of adult neurons (Fig. 4A). Transfection of adult DRG neurons with DBNDD2-siRNA-1 and DBNDD2-siRNA-2 decreased the expression of DBNDD2 gene to less than 50% (Fig. 4B). Western blot result also demonstrates that the protein abundance of DBNDD2 was effectively reduced after siRNA transfection (Figure S1 ). Similar as neonatal DRG neurons, in adult DRG neurons, decline expression of DBNDD2 contributed to significantly enhanced neurite extension (Figs. 4C and 4D). The growth conditions of adult DRG neurons cultured on myelin inhibitory substrates were further investigated. For adult DRG neurons transfected with the control siRNA, compared with neurons cultured on PLL-coated plates, the total lengths and the longest lengths of neurites of adult DRG neurons cultured on plates coated with PLL and extracted myelin were reduced by approximately 25%. Knockdown of DBNDD2 not only boosted the growth of neurons cultured on LL-coated plates, but also supported the elongation of neurites when adult DRG neurons were cultured on myelin substrates (Figs. 4E and 4F). These results show that myelin substrates considerably suppress neuronal growth while DBNDD2 silencing prominently augments neuronal growth on myelin substrates. In addition to the culture-and-replating cell model, by using a two-compartment microfluidic chamber, the axons of adult DRG neurons were directly severed in vitro and the subsequent regrowth of injured neurites were visualized. In control siRNA-transfected neurons, regenerated neurites were observed in the axonal compartments. Adult DRG neurons transfected with DBNDD2-siRNA-1 had elongated neurites as compared with neurons transfected with the control siRNA. Likewise, following the transfection of DBNDD2-siRNA-2, the average lengths of regenerated neurites seemed to be longer relative to the control group, although not significant (Figs. 4G and 4H). These straightforward observations demonstrate that knockdown of DBNDD2 in DRG neurons advances the regrowth and elongation of injured neurites, indicating that DBNDD2 may function as an important molecular target for enhancing the intrinsic regeneration capacity of adult neurons. DBNDD2 deficiency facilitates nerve regeneration after sciatic nerve injury To determine the in vivo roles of DBNDD2 knockdown, a AAV-EGFP-DBNDD2 shRNA or a control AAV was intrathecally administered to adult rats (Fig. 5A). RT-PCR results showed that at 21 days after the injection of AAV-DBNDD2-shRNA, the expression of DBNDD2 gene in the DRGs was much lower relative to in the DRGs of rats injected with the control AAV (Fig. 5B). Immunostaining images displayed the co-labelling of EGFP and neuronal marker Tuj1 in rat DRGs (Fig. 5C) as well as noticeably diminished immunofluorescence signals of DBNDD2 in Tuj1-labelled neurons (Fig. 5D), indicating that AAV delivery of DBNDD2shRNA effectively silenced DBNDD2 expression in neurons. After the validation of success knockdown of DBNDD2 in DRG neurons, rats were subjected to sciatic nerve crush injury. We collected rat sciatic nerves at 3 days after crush injury, labelled sciatic nerves with regenerating sensory axon marker SCG10, and observed that in rats injected with AAV expressing DBNDD2 shRNA, the length of regenerated axons increased to roughly 1.5-fold relative to rats injected with control AAV (Figs. 5E and 5F). Observations from animal studies indicate that AAV delivery of shRNA against DBNDD2 benefits axon elongation and nerve regeneration. Identification of DBNDD2-associated molecules To determine molecules that interact with DBNDD2, top 5 STRING interactants of DBNDD2 calculated based experimental scores, including casein kinase 1 isoform delta (CSNK1D), casein kinase 1 epsilon (CSNK1E), casein kinase 1 isoform gamma 2 (CSNK1G2), casein kinase 1 isoform gamma 3 (CSNK1G3), and secreted frizzled related protein 2 (SFRP2), were displayed in a STRING interaction network (Fig. 6A). DBNDD2 closely interacts with CSNK1D and CSNK1G2 while CSNK1D and CSNK1G2 have combined confidence of the functional interactions with CSNK1E and CSNK1G3, respectively(Yin et al. 2006). A more comprehensive DBNDD2-centered molecular network was generated using the integrated Pathway Commons web resource (Fig. 6B). Besides molecules in the STRING protein-protein network, DBNDD2 is found to be interacted with vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 2 (VIRP2), angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AGTR1), lamin A/C (LMNA), and calcium binding and coiled-coil domain 2 (CALCOCO2). DBNDD2 is also identified to be controlled by zine finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), forkhead box F2 (FOXF2), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1), signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B (STAT5B), ESR1, myocyte enhancer factor 2A (MEF2A), MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus (MECOM), paired box 4 (PAX4), forkhead box O4 (FOXO4), transcription factor CP2 (TFCP2), androgen receptor (AR), and forkhead box O1 (FOXO1). Next, we explored the expression levels of these DBNDD2-associated molecules in the DRGs after peripheral or central axon injury according to sequencing data. The heatmap displayed the relative fold changes of these DBNDD2-associated molecules and labeled genes with an elevated expression relative to the corresponding sham control with red color and genes with a reduced expression relative to the corresponding sham control with green color. It is demonstrated that although many of these DBNDD2-associated molecules did not show apparent expression changes after dorsal root axotomy-induced central axon injury, some molecules were differentially expressed in the DRGs after sciatic nerve axotomy-induced peripheral axon injury. For instance, VIPR2, AGTR1A, AGTR1B, ESR1, MECOM had a similar expression trend as DBNDD2 and were down-regulated in the DRGs after sciatic nerve injury. On the contrast, SFRP2 and PAX4 exhibited an opposite expression pattern as DBNDD2 and were up-regulated in the DRGs after sciatic nerve injury (Fig. 6C). Given that many DBNDD2-associated molecules that exhibit similar expression trends as DBNDD2 are transcription factor-coding genes, we then predicted the potential upstream transcription factors of DBNDD2. A total of 23, 5330, 1490, and 268 transcription factors of DBNDD2 were screened using JASPAR, animalTFDB 3.0, GTRD, and hTFtarget databases. Three common elements, including CAMP responsive element binding protein 1 (CREB1), transcription factor specificity protein 1 (SP1), and ESR1, a molecule that controls DBNDD2 according to Pathway Commons web resource, located at the intersection of these databases (Fig. 6D). Transcription factor ESR1 may directly bind to the putative binding site located at -1915 ~ -1898 in the promoter region of DBNDD2 and regulate DBNDD2 expression (Fig. 6E). Discussion The molecular functions of DBNDD2, a protein that is highly expressed in the nervous system, are largely unclear besides its casein kinase-1 binding and inhibiting roles(Elsholz et al. 2021). Herein, we examined the expression changes of DBNDD2 in rat DRGs during regeneration and development by sequencing, RT-PCR, and immunostaining, studied the biological effects of DBNDD2 on DRG neurons by siRNA transfection, and found that DBNDD2 knockdown is beneficial for axon growth and nerve regeneration. Rats subjected to partial or complete nerve injury are widely applied as appropriate models to explore the pathological basis of nerve injury and to assess novel medications and profound treatment strategies(Gordon and Borschel 2017). DRG neurons process peripheral and central axon branches with different regeneration capacities and thus are valuable for the investigation of the intrinsic mechanisms underlying success axon regeneration. The peripheral projecting axons of rat L4 and L5 DRGs, together with nerve fibers of spinal cord motor neurons, make up peripheral nerves with the largest diameters, that are sciatic nerves(Bobkiewicz et al. 2017). Hence, surgeries such as crush, stretch, percussion, and transection to sciatic nerves induce injuries to peripheral axonal branches of L4 and L5 DRG neurons. The central axonal branches projected from L4 and L5 DRG neuronal somas extend along dorsal roots, enter the spinal cord via the dorsal root entry zone, and then bifurcate to ascending central axonal branches towards the brain and descending central axonal branches towards the cauda equine(Smith et al. 2012; Zheng et al. 2019). Compared with spinal cord injury that impairs the ascending central axonal branches only, injury at the dorsal root before the branch point impairs the whole central axonal branches and is considered as a well suited surgical model to study central axon regeneration(Smith et al. 2012). Consequently, in the current study, we first investigated sequencing data of rat L4 and L5 DRGs after sciatic nerve axotomy-induced peripheral axon injury and dorsal root axotomy-induced central axon injury, aiming to decipher the expression changes of DBNDD2 gene after injury to DRG neuron peripheral and central axonal branches with dissimilar generation capacities. RNA bulk sequencing, together with consistent validation outcomes, showed that DBNDD2 gene expression in rat DRGs is substantially reduced after peripheral axon injury but elevated after central axon injury. It is worth noting that besides DRG neurons, there exist a large number of different cell types in rat DRGs whereas RNA bulk sequencing determines the global gene expression in tissues and organs without distinguishing the transcriptional heterogeneity of cell populations. To verify whether DBNDD2 is indeed altered expressed in DRG neurons, we collected L4 and L5 DRGs from rats underwent peripheral or central axon injury as well as uninjured rats, double immunostained rat DRGs with DBNDD2 and neuronal marker Tuj1 in frozen DRG specimens, and then determined the expression of DBNDD2 protein in Tuj1-labelled neurons. The fact that compared with uninjured rats, obviously weaker signals of DBNDD2 protein that are co-labeled with Tuj1 are observed in peripheral axon-injured rats indicates that reduced DBNDD2 expression in DRG neurons may contribute to enhanced axon regeneration. On the other hand, stronger signals of DBNDD2 protein that are co-labeled with Tuj1 observed in central axon-injured rats indicates that increased DBNDD2 expression in DRG neurons may contribute to compromised axon regeneration. Tissue and organ regeneration shares common mechanisms with morphogenesis and, to certain degree, recapitulates the development process. Actually, neonatal mammals, different from adult mammals, have remarkable regeneration potentials after both peripheral and central nerve injuries(Li et al. 2020b). Along with the down-regulation of many regeneration promoting molecules and the up-regulation of many regeneration inhibiting molecules during development, the regeneration capacity of the nervous system decline step wisely(Park et al. 2010). Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is one of the most well-known neuron-intrinsic inhibitors whose deletion is capable of enhancing the regeneration ability of retinal ganglion cells, corticospinal neurons, and DRG neurons in adult mammals(Park et al. 2008) (Liu et al. 2010; Zhou et al. 2020). The investigation of the expression patterns of PTEN during regeneration and development showed that showed that during regeneration, PTEN expressions is reduced in peripheral nerves while during development, PTEN is expressed at low levels in DRG neuronal cell bodies and axons during the early prenatal stages but expressed at higher levels as the nerves system develops(Chen et al. 2018). Given that similar as PTEN, DBNDD2 is differentially expressed after nerve injury, we next evaluated that whether the expression levels of DBNDD2 is altered during development. We compared the abundances of DBNDD2 in neonatal and adult rat DRGs using single-cell sequencing data, determined the expression trends of DBNDD2 in the DRGs of rats at different ages (1-day-old neonatal, 2-week-old, and 4-week-old) using RT-PCR, and found development-dependent increase of DBNDD2 gene expression. The application of single-cell sequencing separates neurons from other different types of cells and allows the identification of the transcription programs in neurons under various physiological and pathological conditions(Zeisel et al. 2018; Renthal et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2021a). Here, using single-cell sequencing data, we distinguished DRG neurons from glial cells and immune cells in neonatal and adult rat DRGs and found that DRG neurons occupy a large cell population in the DRGs of rats at different ages. Using t-SNE plot, we visualized the presence of DBNDD2 in both neonatal and adult rat DRGs and found the obviously higher expression of DBNDD2 in adult rats. The increased expression trend of DBNDD2 in DRG neurons during development, together with the elevated amount of DBNDD2 after the non-regenerative central axon injury and the reduced amount of DBNDD2 after the regenerative peripheral axon injury, imply that DBNDD2 may be an inhibitory factor for neuron growth and axon regeneration. To explore the biological effects of DBNDD2 on neurons, RNA interference, an effective technology that mediates sequence-specific gene knockdown, was applied and rat DRG neurons were transfected with siRNA segments against DBNDD2. Three siRNA segments targeting different portions of the target gene DBNDD2 and a siRNA segment targeting sequences altered from the target were utilized to examine the knockdown efficiency. DBNDD2-siRNA-1 and DBNDD2-siRNA-2, two siRNA segments that robustly suppressed DBNDD2 gene expression, were utilized together for the success manipulation of DBNDD2 gene expression. In vitro monitoring of neurite outgrowth showed that DBNDD2 siRNA transfection leads to enhanced neuron growth in both neonatal rat DRG neurons with certain regeneration capacity and adult rat DRG neurons with limited regeneration capacity. More importantly, in adult rats, via an intrathecal injection of DBNDD2 shRNA-expressing AAV, it is found that silencing DBNDD2 is sufficient to promote the elongation of injured axons of cultured adult DRG neurons as well as the regeneration of injured sciatic nerves. These studies fully indicate that DBNDD2 is a key regulating factor of neuron growth and axon regeneration and imply that knocking down DBNDD2 in neurons is an effective strategy for restoring impaired nerve functions. It is worth raising that in the current study, the in vivo roles of reduced DBNDD2 expression in DRG neurons is examined by immunostained the regenerating sciatic nerves with SCG10 at 3 days after rat sciatic nerve crush injury. Sciatic nerve crush injury, as previous mentioned, is a commonly used peripheral nerve injury model. Crush injury induces a modest damage and elicits axonotmesis without disrupting the epineurium. Nerve regeneration following crush injury is hence more rapid and effective as compared with transection injury that disrupts the entire nerve stump, including the endoneurium, the perineurium, as well as the epineurium(Renthal et al. 2020; Yi et al. 2020). To further evaluate the clinical potential of the manipulation of DBNDD2, the functional roles of DBNDD2 knockdown in axon regeneration after a more severe injury to peripheral axon branches of DRG neurons can be determined using a transection injury model and a long gap peripheral nerve injury model. The effects of DBNDD2 deficiency on axon regeneration following injury to central axon branches of DRG neurons and even injury to central nerves can be further assessed to examine whether DBNDD2 deficiency is capable of triggering central axon-injured DRG neurons and/or central neurons to switch to a pro-regenerative state. Actually, the fact that DBNDD2 knockdown boosts the regenerative axon growth of DRG neurons cultured on myelin, a well demonstrated inhibitor in axonal repair(Lee and Zheng 2012), implies that DBNDD2 deficiency may be able to enabling neurons to overcome the inhibitory microenvironment in the nervous system. The construction of molecular interaction network is valuable for the discovery of functionally associated molecules and the systemic understanding of biological processes(Cowen et al. 2017). For the investigation of DBNDD2-associated molecules, in the current study, we analyzed molecules that interact with DBNDD2 using the STRING data resource and the Pathway Commons website and screened transcription factors targeting DBNDD2 using JASPAR, animalTFDB 3.0, GTRD, and hTFtarget databases. It is worth mention that databases of human transcriptional regulatory interactions are comprehensive while there are less number of databases that recognize the regulations of rat transcription factors and their downstream target genes. Still, it is demonstrated that the cis-regulatory modules and transcription factor binding locations among species are relatively conserved(Ballester et al. 2014). Hence, except for selecting rat species in JASPAR database, we used all animal species in animalTFDB 3.0 database, human species in GTRD database, and human species in hTFtarget database to predict potential upstream transcription factors targeting DBNDD2 and then discovered ESR1 as a potential upstream regulator of DBNDD2. Transcription factors are important gene regulating factors in numerous biological phenomena, including nerve injury and regeneration(Lambert et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2023). For instance, activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) and AP-1 transcription factor subunit Jun proto-oncogene (JUN), two transcription factors that are up-regulated in the DRGs after sciatic nerve injury, regulates many regeneration-associated molecules and enhances neurite outgrowth(Chandran et al. 2016; Renthal et al. 2020). It has been demonstrated that, in the nervous system, transcription factor ESR1 in glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons is important for normal puberty phenotype(Cheong et al. 2015). The effect of ESR1 on axon growth and regeneration remains largely undetermined. Notably, emerging studies demonstrate that ESR1 is expressed at low abundance in various types of cancers, such as hepatocellular carcinoma(Hishida et al. 2013), endometrioid endometrial cancer(Backes et al. 2016), breast cancer(Król et al. 2018), non-small cell lung cancer(Aresti et al. 2014), and bladder cancer(Ge et al. 2019). Overexpression of ESR1 mediates cellular apoptosis and hinders cellular proliferation and invasion(Tu et al. 2013; Zhou et al. 2013). On the other hand, reduced ESR1 expression stimulates cellular proliferation, migration, and invasion(Wang et al. 2021b). The reduced expression patterns of ESR1 in tumor tissues as compared with in non-tumor tissues as well as the inhibiting roles of ESR1 on cell growth indicate that ESR1 functions as a tumor suppressor gene(Hishida et al. 2013; Li et al. 2021). Tumor suppressor genes may be key regulators of nerve regeneration as the reduced expressions of many tumor suppressor genes, including PTEN, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), and retinoblastoma (Rb), modulates neurite plasticity, supports axon regeneration, and facilities the recovery of injured nerves(Christie et al. 2014; Duraikannu et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2010; Meyer Zu Reckendorf et al. 2022). Our bioinformatic analysis indicates that it is likely that tumor suppressor gene ESR1 is also a negative regulator of nerve regeneration and ESR1 may inhibit neurite growth and axon regeneration by targeting DBNDD2. Whether knockdown or deletion of ESR1 would lead to reduced DBNDD2 expression and drive axon regeneration may be explored in further studies. Taken together, our study reveals that in the DRGs, DBNDD2 shows reduced expression after peripheral axotomy but elevated expression after central axotomy to adult rats and exhibits an increased expression trend during development. We find that reduced expression of DBNDD2 contributes to enhanced neurite growth and nerve regeneration and demonstrate that DBNDD2, as well as its potential upstream regulator ESR1, may be novel suppressors of success axon regeneration. Molecular manipulation approaches that decrease DBNDD2 expression represents an attractive therapeutic strategy to modify the regeneration ability of neurons and to improve nerve regeneration. Declarations Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Authors contributions L.Z., W.D., Y.W., T.C., Y.Q., Y.T. and P.Y. collected data, prepared figure, and analyzed data. S.Y. and L.G. conceived the project and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. Funding and additional information This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China [2022YFC2409800 and 2022YFC2409802], Collegiate Natural Science Fund of Jiangsu Province [23KJA180006], and Nantong University College Students’ Innovative Entrepreneurial Training Plan Program [2023159]. References Aresti U, Carrera S, Iruarrizaga E, Fuente N, Marrodan I, de Lobera AR, Muñoz A, Buque A, Condori E, Ugalde I, Calvo B, Vivanco GL (2014) Estrogen receptor 1 gene expression and its combination with estrogen receptor 2 or aromatase expression predicts survival in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One 9 (10):e109659. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109659 Avraham O, Feng R, Ewan EE, Rustenhoven J, Zhao G, Cavalli V (2021) Profiling sensory neuron microenvironment after peripheral and central axon injury reveals key pathways for neural repair. Elife 10. doi:10.7554/eLife.68457 Backes FJ, Walker CJ, Goodfellow PJ, Hade EM, Agarwal G, Mutch D, Cohn DE, Suarez AA (2016) Estrogen receptor-alpha as a predictive biomarker in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 141 (2):312–317. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.006 Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, Noble WS (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37 (Web Server issue):W202-208. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp335 Ballester B, Medina-Rivera A, Schmidt D, Gonzàlez-Porta M, Carlucci M, Chen X, Chessman K, Faure AJ, Funnell AP, Goncalves A, Kutter C, Lukk M, Menon S, McLaren WM, Stefflova K, Watt S, Weirauch MT, Crossley M, Marioni JC, Odom DT, Flicek P, Wilson MD (2014) Multi-species, multi-transcription factor binding highlights conserved control of tissue-specific biological pathways. Elife 3:e02626. doi:10.7554/eLife.02626 Bobkiewicz A, Cwykiel J, Siemionow M (2017) Anatomic variations of brachial and lumbosacral plexus models in different rat strains. Microsurgery 37 (4):327–333. doi:10.1002/micr.30078 Bradke F (2022) Mechanisms of Axon Growth and Regeneration: Moving between Development and Disease. J Neurosci 42 (45):8393–8405. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1131-22.2022 Cao HJ, Huang L, Zheng MR, Zhang T, Xu LC (2022) Characterization of circular RNAs in dorsal root ganglia after central and peripheral axon injuries. Front Cell Neurosci 16:1046050. doi:10.3389/fncel.2022.1046050 Castro-Mondragon JA, Riudavets-Puig R, Rauluseviciute I, Lemma RB, Turchi L, Blanc-Mathieu R, Lucas J, Boddie P, Khan A, Manosalva Pérez N, Fornes O, Leung TY, Aguirre A, Hammal F, Schmelter D, Baranasic D, Ballester B, Sandelin A, Lenhard B, Vandepoele K, Wasserman WW, Parcy F, Mathelier A (2022) JASPAR 2022: the 9th release of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 50 (D1):D165-d173. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1113 Chandran V, Coppola G, Nawabi H, Omura T, Versano R, Huebner EA, Zhang A, Costigan M, Yekkirala A, Barrett L, Blesch A, Michaelevski I, Davis-Turak J, Gao F, Langfelder P, Horvath S, He Z, Benowitz L, Fainzilber M, Tuszynski M, Woolf CJ, Geschwind DH (2016) A Systems-Level Analysis of the Peripheral Nerve Intrinsic Axonal Growth Program. Neuron 89 (5):956–970. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.034 Chen H, Xiang J, Wu J, He B, Lin T, Zhu Q, Liu X, Zheng C (2018) Expression patterns and role of PTEN in rat peripheral nerve development and injury. Neurosci Lett 676:78–84. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.04.016 Cheong RY, Czieselsky K, Porteous R, Herbison AE (2015) Expression of ESR1 in Glutamatergic and GABAergic Neurons Is Essential for Normal Puberty Onset, Estrogen Feedback, and Fertility in Female Mice. J Neurosci 35 (43):14533–14543. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1776-15.2015 Christie KJ, Krishnan A, Martinez JA, Purdy K, Singh B, Eaton S, Zochodne D (2014) Enhancing adult nerve regeneration through the knockdown of retinoblastoma protein. Nat Commun 5:3670. doi:10.1038/ncomms4670 Cowen L, Ideker T, Raphael BJ, Sharan R (2017) Network propagation: a universal amplifier of genetic associations. Nat Rev Genet 18 (9):551–562. doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.38 Duraikannu A, Krishnan A, Chandrasekhar A, Zochodne DW (2019) Beyond Trophic Factors: Exploiting the Intrinsic Regenerative Properties of Adult Neurons. Front Cell Neurosci 13:128. doi:10.3389/fncel.2019.00128 Elsholz L, Wasser Y, Ziegler P, Habib P, Voigt A (2021) CK1BP Reduces α-Synuclein Oligomerization and Aggregation Independent of Serine 129 Phosphorylation. Cells 10 (11). doi:10.3390/cells10112830 Ge Q, Lu M, Ju L, Qian K, Wang G, Wu CL, Liu X, Xiao Y, Wang X (2019) miR-4324-RACGAP1-STAT3-ESR1 feedback loop inhibits proliferation and metastasis of bladder cancer. Int J Cancer 144 (12):3043–3055. doi:10.1002/ijc.32036 Gordon T, Borschel GH (2017) The use of the rat as a model for studying peripheral nerve regeneration and sprouting after complete and partial nerve injuries. Exp Neurol 287 (Pt 3):331–347. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.01.014 He Z, Jin Y (2016) Intrinsic Control of Axon Regeneration. Neuron 90 (3):437–451. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.022 Hervera A, Zhou L, Palmisano I, McLachlan E, Kong G, Hutson TH, Danzi MC, Lemmon VP, Bixby JL, Matamoros-Angles A, Forsberg K, De Virgiliis F, Matheos DP, Kwapis J, Wood MA, Puttagunta R, Del Río JA, Di Giovanni S (2019) PP4-dependent HDAC3 dephosphorylation discriminates between axonal regeneration and regenerative failure. Embo j 38 (13):e101032. doi:10.15252/embj.2018101032 Hishida M, Nomoto S, Inokawa Y, Hayashi M, Kanda M, Okamura Y, Nishikawa Y, Tanaka C, Kobayashi D, Yamada S, Nakayama G, Fujii T, Sugimoto H, Koike M, Fujiwara M, Takeda S, Kodera Y (2013) Estrogen receptor 1 gene as a tumor suppressor gene in hepatocellular carcinoma detected by triple-combination array analysis. Int J Oncol 43 (1):88–94. doi:10.3892/ijo.2013.1951 Hu H, Miao YR, Jia LH, Yu QY, Zhang Q, Guo AY (2019) AnimalTFDB 3.0: a comprehensive resource for annotation and prediction of animal transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res 47 (D1):D33-d38. doi:10.1093/nar/gky822 Hutson TH, Kathe C, Palmisano I, Bartholdi K, Hervera A, De Virgiliis F, McLachlan E, Zhou L, Kong G, Barraud Q, Danzi MC, Medrano-Fernandez A, Lopez-Atalaya JP, Boutillier AL, Sinha SH, Singh AK, Chaturbedy P, Moon LDF, Kundu TK, Bixby JL, Lemmon VP, Barco A, Courtine G, Di Giovanni S (2019) Cbp-dependent histone acetylation mediates axon regeneration induced by environmental enrichment in rodent spinal cord injury models. Sci Transl Med 11 (487). doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw2064 Kolmykov S, Yevshin I, Kulyashov M, Sharipov R, Kondrakhin Y, Makeev VJ, Kulakovskiy IV, Kel A, Kolpakov F (2021) GTRD: an integrated view of transcription regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 49 (D1):D104-d111. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1057 Kong G, Zhou L, Serger E, Palmisano I, De Virgiliis F, Hutson TH, McLachlan E, Freiwald A, La Montanara P, Shkura K, Puttagunta R, Di Giovanni S (2020) AMPK controls the axonal regenerative ability of dorsal root ganglia sensory neurons after spinal cord injury. Nat Metab 2 (9):918–933. doi:10.1038/s42255-020-0252-3 Król MB, Galicki M, Grešner P, Wieczorek E, Jabłońska E, Reszka E, Morawiec Z, Wąsowicz W, Gromadzińska J (2018) The ESR1 and GPX1 gene expression level in human malignant and non-malignant breast tissues. Acta Biochim Pol 65 (1):51–57. doi:10.18388/abp.2016_1425 Lambert SA, Jolma A, Campitelli LF, Das PK, Yin Y, Albu M, Chen X, Taipale J, Hughes TR, Weirauch MT (2018) The Human Transcription Factors. Cell 172 (4):650–665. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.029 Lee JK, Zheng B (2012) Role of myelin-associated inhibitors in axonal repair after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 235 (1):33–42. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.05.001 Li F, Chen Q, Yang Y, Li M, Zhang L, Yan Z, Zhang J, Wang K (2021) ESR1 as a recurrence-related gene in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a weighted gene coexpression network analysis. Cancer Cell Int 21 (1):225. doi:10.1186/s12935-021-01929-5 Li F, Sami A, Noristani HN, Slattery K, Qiu J, Groves T, Wang S, Veerasammy K, Chen YX, Morales J, Haynes P, Sehgal A, He Y, Li S, Song Y (2020a) Glial Metabolic Rewiring Promotes Axon Regeneration and Functional Recovery in the Central Nervous System. Cell Metab 32 (5):767–785.e767. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2020.08.015 Li Y, He X, Kawaguchi R, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Monavarfeshani A, Yang Z, Chen B, Shi Z, Meng H, Zhou S, Zhu J, Jacobi A, Swarup V, Popovich PG, Geschwind DH, He Z (2020b) Microglia-organized scar-free spinal cord repair in neonatal mice. Nature 587 (7835):613–618. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2795-6 Liu K, Lu Y, Lee JK, Samara R, Willenberg R, Sears-Kraxberger I, Tedeschi A, Park KK, Jin D, Cai B, Xu B, Connolly L, Steward O, Zheng B, He Z (2010) PTEN deletion enhances the regenerative ability of adult corticospinal neurons. Nat Neurosci 13 (9):1075–1081. doi:10.1038/nn.2603 Ma JJ, Ju X, Xu RJ, Wang WH, Luo ZP, Liu CM, Yang L, Li B, Chen JQ, Meng B, Yang HL, Zhou FQ, Saijilafu (2019) Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase and p53 Regulate Mammalian Peripheral Nervous System and CNS Axon Regeneration Downstream of c-Myc. J Neurosci 39 (46):9107–9118. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0419-19.2019 Mahar M, Cavalli V (2018) Intrinsic mechanisms of neuronal axon regeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci 19 (6):323–337. doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0001-8 Meyer Zu Reckendorf S, Moser D, Blechschmidt A, Joga VN, Sinske D, Hegler J, Deininger S, Catanese A, Vettorazzi S, Antoniadis G, Boeckers T, Knöll B (2022) Motoneuron-Specific PTEN Deletion in Mice Induces Neuronal Hypertrophy and Also Regeneration after Facial Nerve Injury. J Neurosci 42 (12):2474–2491. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1305-21.2022 Montero AM, Huang AH (2022) The regenerative capacity of neonatal tissues. Development 149 (12). doi:10.1242/dev.199819 Palmisano I, Danzi MC, Hutson TH, Zhou L, McLachlan E, Serger E, Shkura K, Srivastava PK, Hervera A, Neill NO, Liu T, Dhrif H, Wang Z, Kubat M, Wuchty S, Merkenschlager M, Levi L, Elliott E, Bixby JL, Lemmon VP, Di Giovanni S (2019) Epigenomic signatures underpin the axonal regenerative ability of dorsal root ganglia sensory neurons. Nat Neurosci 22 (11):1913–1924. doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0490-4 Park KK, Liu K, Hu Y, Kanter JL, He Z (2010) PTEN/mTOR and axon regeneration. Exp Neurol 223 (1):45–50. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.12.032 Park KK, Liu K, Hu Y, Smith PD, Wang C, Cai B, Xu B, Connolly L, Kramvis I, Sahin M, He Z (2008) Promoting axon regeneration in the adult CNS by modulation of the PTEN/mTOR pathway. Science 322 (5903):963–966. doi:10.1126/science.1161566 Renthal W, Tochitsky I, Yang L, Cheng YC, Li E, Kawaguchi R, Geschwind DH, Woolf CJ (2020) Transcriptional Reprogramming of Distinct Peripheral Sensory Neuron Subtypes after Axonal Injury. Neuron 108 (1):128–144.e129. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.07.026 Robinson LR (2022) Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve 66 (6):661–670. doi:10.1002/mus.27706 Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26 (1):139–140. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 Rodchenkov I, Babur O, Luna A, Aksoy BA, Wong JV, Fong D, Franz M, Siper MC, Cheung M, Wrana M, Mistry H, Mosier L, Dlin J, Wen Q, O'Callaghan C, Li W, Elder G, Smith PT, Dallago C, Cerami E, Gross B, Dogrusoz U, Demir E, Bader GD, Sander C (2020) Pathway Commons 2019 Update: integration, analysis and exploration of pathway data. Nucleic Acids Res 48 (D1):D489-d497. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz946 Smith GM, Falone AE, Frank E (2012) Sensory axon regeneration: rebuilding functional connections in the spinal cord. Trends Neurosci 35 (3):156–163. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.10.006 Szklarczyk D, Kirsch R, Koutrouli M, Nastou K, Mehryary F, Hachilif R, Gable AL, Fang T, Doncheva NT, Pyysalo S, Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C (2023) The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res 51 (D1):D638-d646. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000 Tu CC, Kumar VB, Day CH, Kuo WW, Yeh SP, Chen RJ, Liao CR, Chen HY, Tsai FJ, Wu WJ, Huang CY (2013) Estrogen receptor α (ESR1) over-expression mediated apoptosis in Hep3B cells by binding with SP1 proteins. J Mol Endocrinol 51 (1):203–212. doi:10.1530/jme-13-0085 Uyeda A, Muramatsu R (2020) Molecular Mechanisms of Central Nervous System Axonal Regeneration and Remyelination: A Review. Int J Mol Sci 21 (21). doi:10.3390/ijms21218116 Wang K, Wang S, Chen Y, Wu D, Hu X, Lu Y, Wang L, Bao L, Li C, Zhang X (2021a) Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of somatosensory neurons uncovers temporal development of neuropathic pain. Cell Res 31 (8):904–918. doi:10.1038/s41422-021-00479-9 Wang L, Cui M, Cheng D, Qu F, Yu J, Wei Y, Cheng L, Wu X, Liu X (2021b) miR-9-5p facilitates hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting ESR1. Mol Cell Biochem 476 (2):575–583. doi:10.1007/s11010-020-03927-z Williams PR, Benowitz LI, Goldberg JL, He Z (2020) Axon Regeneration in the Mammalian Optic Nerve. Annu Rev Vis Sci 6:195–213. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-022720-094953 Winter CC, He Z, Jacobi A (2022) Axon Regeneration: A Subcellular Extension in Multiple Dimensions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 14 (3). doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040923 Yi S, Zhang H, Gong L, Wu J, Zha G, Zhou S, Gu X, Yu B (2015) Deep Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis of Lesioned Sciatic Nerves after Crush Injury. PLoS One 10 (12):e0143491. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143491 Yi S, Zhang Y, Gu X, Huang L, Zhang K, Qian T, Gu X (2020) Application of stem cells in peripheral nerve regeneration. Burns Trauma 8:tkaa002. doi:10.1093/burnst/tkaa002 Yin H, Laguna KA, Li G, Kuret J (2006) Dysbindin structural homologue CK1BP is an isoform-selective binding partner of human casein kinase-1. Biochemistry 45 (16):5297–5308. doi:10.1021/bi052354e Zeisel A, Hochgerner H, Lönnerberg P, Johnsson A, Memic F, van der Zwan J, Häring M, Braun E, Borm LE, La Manno G, Codeluppi S, Furlan A, Lee K, Skene N, Harris KD, Hjerling-Leffler J, Arenas E, Ernfors P, Marklund U, Linnarsson S (2018) Molecular Architecture of the Mouse Nervous System. Cell 174 (4):999–1014.e1022. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021 Zhang Q, Liu W, Zhang HM, Xie GY, Miao YR, Xia M, Guo AY (2020) hTFtarget: A Comprehensive Database for Regulations of Human Transcription Factors and Their Targets. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 18 (2):120–128. doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2019.09.006 Zhang R, Chen S, Wang X, Gu X, Yi S (2021) Cell populations in neonatal rat peripheral nerves identified by single-cell transcriptomics. Glia 69 (3):765–778. doi:10.1002/glia.23928 Zhang Y, Zhao Q, Chen Q, Xu L, Yi S (2023) Transcriptional Control of Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Mol Neurobiol 60 (1):329–341. doi:10.1007/s12035-022-03090-0 Zhao Q, Jiang C, Zhao L, Dai X, Yi S (2024) Unleashing Axonal Regeneration Capacities: Neuronal and Non-neuronal Changes After Injuries to Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuron Central and Peripheral Axonal Branches. Mol Neurobiol 61 (1):423–433. doi:10.1007/s12035-023-03590-7 Zheng B, Lorenzana AO, Ma L (2019) Understanding the axonal response to injury by in vivo imaging in the mouse spinal cord: A tale of two branches. Exp Neurol 318:277–285. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.04.008 Zhou J, Teng R, Xu C, Wang Q, Guo J, Xu C, Li Z, Xie S, Shen J, Wang L (2013) Overexpression of ERα inhibits proliferation and invasion of MKN28 gastric cancer cells by suppressing β-catenin. Oncol Rep 30 (4):1622–1630. doi:10.3892/or.2013.2610 Zhou LY, Han F, Qi SB, Ma JJ, Ma YX, Xie JL, Zhang HC, Fu XY, Chen JQ, Li B, Yang HL, Zhou F, Saijilafu (2020) Inhibition of PTEN activity promotes IB4-positive sensory neuronal axon growth. J Cell Mol Med 24 (18):11012–11017. doi:10.1111/jcmm.15648 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files DBNDD2.figureS1.tif Figure S1. SiRNA transfection reduced the protein expression of DBNDD2. Western blot images of the protein expressions of DBNDD2 in adult rat DRG neurons transfected with DBNDD2-siRNA-1 or control siRNA. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5265998","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":366804592,"identity":"40eaf78a-1530-43ae-855e-1f6c03a61280","order_by":0,"name":"Lan Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lan","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":366804593,"identity":"5ee95f3b-a4de-4324-a2fe-4af6fd194db1","order_by":1,"name":"WenYu Dai","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"WenYu","middleName":"","lastName":"Dai","suffix":""},{"id":366804594,"identity":"79fd77d2-fde7-4a76-aacb-a5a47b274260","order_by":2,"name":"Yucong Wu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Medical School of Nantong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yucong","middleName":"","lastName":"Wu","suffix":""},{"id":366804595,"identity":"04e37de0-ab8a-4966-be01-bc44ff05ed56","order_by":3,"name":"Tianyun Chen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Medical School of Nantong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tianyun","middleName":"","lastName":"Chen","suffix":""},{"id":366804596,"identity":"6b88b1da-451f-4430-98f3-c457422def8c","order_by":4,"name":"Yuyue Qian","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xinlin College, Nantong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yuyue","middleName":"","lastName":"Qian","suffix":""},{"id":366804598,"identity":"f2239707-d1be-45b3-8104-2a39ae9a157b","order_by":5,"name":"Yiming Tang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xinlin College, Nantong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yiming","middleName":"","lastName":"Tang","suffix":""},{"id":366804599,"identity":"b2d516c1-a48b-4145-9e3b-9d304f9d9ece","order_by":6,"name":"Peng Yang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Peng","middleName":"","lastName":"Yang","suffix":""},{"id":366804600,"identity":"fdda6b31-4d95-409f-89bf-521d1da11fd3","order_by":7,"name":"Sheng Yi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sheng","middleName":"","lastName":"Yi","suffix":""},{"id":366804602,"identity":"a221648b-a548-43f0-89a5-e7d877e2fdca","order_by":8,"name":"Leilei Gong","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Engineering Research Center of Integration and Application of Digital Learning Technology, Ministry of Education","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Leilei","middleName":"","lastName":"Gong","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-10-15 06:23:18","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5265998/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5265998/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":67292902,"identity":"985d8157-7e79-476c-b839-b70543d8bb04","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 10:31:57","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":7623220,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eDBNDD2 is down-regulated after peripheral axon injury but up-regulated in adult rat DRGs after central axon injury. (A) Relative expression levels of DBNDD2 in adult rat DRGs at 1 day after sciatic nerve or dorsal root axotomy determined by RNA sequencing. The relative abundances of DBNDD2 in adult rat DRGs after sciatic nerve or dorsal root axotomy were normalized to its abundances after corresponding sham surgeries. SN-sham, sciatic nerve sham surgery; SNI, sciatic nerve injury; DR-sham, dorsal root sham surgery; DRI, dorsal root injury. (B) RT-PCR analysis of the expression levels of DBNDD2 in adult rat DRGs at 1 day after sciatic nerve or dorsal root axotomy. The relative gene expressions of DBNDD2 were compared with GAPDH and normalized to corresponding sham surgeries. *, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.05; **, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.01; mean ± SEM, unpaired two-tailed student’s t-test, n = 3 biologically independent experiments. (C) Representative fluorescence images of immunostaining for Tuj1 and DBNDD2 in the uninjured adult rat DRGs and adult rat DRGs at 1 day after sciatic nerve or dorsal root axotomy. Red color indicates Tuj1 staining, green color indicates DBNDD2 staining, and blue color indicates DAPI staining. Scale bar, 100 μm.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"DBNDD2.figure1.tif.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5265998/v1/874ea6bc975dc9e86a6e023b.png"},{"id":67293937,"identity":"532d7f26-e031-4a1e-aca9-cd569f750536","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 10:39:57","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2524754,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eDBNDD2 in rat DRGs is up-regulated during development. (A) The tSNE visualization of neurons in the DRGs of neonatal and adult SD rats. Cyan color indicates neonatal SD rats and red color indicates adult SD rats. (B) The tSNE visualization of DBNDD2 in the DRGs of neonatal and adult SD rats. (C) Violin plot distribution of DBNDD2 in DRG neurons of neonatal and adult SD rats. (D) RT-PCR analysis of the expression level of DBNDD2 in the DRGs of 1-day-old neonatal, 2-week-old, and 4-week-old SD rats. The relative gene expression of DBNDD2 was compared with GAPDH and normalized to neonatal SD rats. *, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.05; mean ± SEM, one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparison post hoc test, n = 3 biologically independent experiments.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"DBNDD2.figure2.tif.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5265998/v1/db6579380c322e4e110575d4.png"},{"id":67292908,"identity":"af31690c-569c-4f6e-a049-d9ffea47bab3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 10:31:58","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1691548,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eReduced DBNDD2 in neonatal rat DRG neurons supports neurite growth. (A) Schematic of the transfection and culture protocol. (B) RT-PCR analysis of the expression levels of DBNDD2 in neonatal rat DRG neurons transfected with siRNAs targeting DBNDD2 (DBNDD2-siRNA-1, DBNDD2-siRNA-2, or DBNDD2-siRNA-3) or control siRNA. The relative gene expressions of DBNDD2 were compared with GAPDH and normalized to control siRNA. ****, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.0001; mean ± SEM, one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparison post hoc test, n = 3 biologically independent experiments. (C) Representative fluorescence images of immunostaining for Tuj1 in cultured neonatal rat DRG neurons transfected with DBNDD2-siRNA-1, DBNDD2-siRNA-2, or control siRNA. Scale bar, 50 μm. (D) Quantification of the total and the longest neurite growth from cultured neonatal rat DRG neurons transfected with DBNDD2-siRNA-1, DBNDD2-siRNA-2, or control siRNA. ***, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.001; ****, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.0001; mean ± SEM, unpaired two-tailed student’s t-test, n \u0026gt; 400 neonatal DRG neurons from 4-6 biologically independent experiments.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"DBNDD2.figure3.tif.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5265998/v1/b0221a79be36a4ffbffe558c.png"},{"id":67292905,"identity":"d48633c3-c321-4fcc-b757-d666fd3b239a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 10:31:57","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":4116999,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eReduced DBNDD2 in adult rat DRG neurons supports neurite growth and regeneration. (A) Schematic of the transfection, culture, and replate protocol. (B) RT-PCR analysis of the expression levels of DBNDD2 in adult rat DRG neurons transfected with DBNDD2-siRNA-1, DBNDD2-siRNA-2, or control siRNA. The relative gene expressions of DBNDD2 were compared with GAPDH and normalized to control siRNA. **, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.01; mean ± SEM, one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparison post hoc test, n = 3 biologically independent experiments. (C) Representative fluorescence images of immunostaining for Tuj1 in replated adult rat DRG neurons transfected with DBNDD2-siRNA-1, DBNDD2-siRNA-2, or control siRNA. Scale bar, 50 μm. (D) Quantification of the total and the longest neurite growth from replated adult rat DRG neurons transfected with DBNDD2-siRNA-1, DBNDD2-siRNA-2, or control siRNA. ****, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.0001; mean ± SEM, unpaired two-tailed student’s t-test, n \u0026gt; 300 adult DRG neurons from 3-4 biologically independent experiments. (E) Representative fluorescence images of immunostaining for Tuj1 in DBNDD2-siRNA-1- or control siRNA-transfected adult rat DRG neurons cultured on myelin inhibitory substrates. Scale bar, 50 μm. (F) Quantification of the total and the longest neurite growth from DBNDD2-siRNA-1- or control siRNA-transfected adult rat DRG neurons cultured on myelin inhibitory substrates. **, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.01; ***, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.001; ****, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.0001; mean ± SEM, one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test, n \u0026gt; 250 adult DRG neurons from 3 biologically independent experiments. (G) Representative fluorescence images of immunostaining for Tuj1 in regenerated adult rat DRG neurons transfected with DBNDD2-siRNA-1, DBNDD2-siRNA-2, or control siRNA. Scale bar, 100 μm. (H) Quantification of the total neurite growth from replated adult rat DRG neurons transfected with DBNDD2-siRNA-1, DBNDD2-siRNA-2, or control siRNA. **, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.01; mean ± SEM, unpaired two-tailed student’s t-test, n = 4-5 biologically independent experiments.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"DBNDD2.figure4.tif.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5265998/v1/9361986fb766c9f161d6a9dd.png"},{"id":67292904,"identity":"f87813a8-c844-4263-a28f-a0b76aa0be0e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 10:31:57","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":6706297,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eReduced DBNDD2 in adult rat DRGs promotes axon regeneration\u003cem\u003e in vivo\u003c/em\u003e. (A) Schematic of the virus injection and sciatic nerve crush injury protocol. (B) RT-PCR analysis of the expression levels of DBNDD2 in adult rat DRGs at 21 days after intrathecal injection of AAV expressing DBNDD2 shRNA or control shRNA. ***, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.001; mean ± SEM, unpaired two-tailed student’s t-test, n = 3 biologically independent experiments. (C) Representative fluorescence images of immunostaining for Tuj1 and EGFP in adult rat DRGs at 21 days after intrathecal injection of AAV expressing DBNDD2 shRNA or control shRNA. Red color indicates Tuj1 staining, green color indicates EGFP staining, and blue color indicates DAPI staining. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Representative fluorescence images of immunostaining for Tuj1 and DBNDD2 in adult rat DRGs at 21 days after intrathecal injection of AAV expressing DBNDD2 shRNA or control shRNA. Red color indicates Tuj1 staining, green color indicates DBNDD2 staining, and blue color indicates DAPI staining. Scale bar, 100 μm. (E) Representative fluorescence images of immunostaining for SCG10 in longitudinal sections from injured sciatic nerves at 3 days after sciatic nerve crush injury. The dotted line indicates the crush site. Scale bar, 1000 μm. (F) Relative lengths of regenerated nerve fibers in adult rats injected with AAV expressing DBNDD2 shRNA or control shRNA. The lengths of regenerated axons in adult rats injected with AAV expressing DBNDD2 shRNA at 3 days after sciatic nerve crush injury were normalized to axon lengths in adult rats injected with AAV expressing control shRNA. *, \u003cem\u003ep-value \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.05; mean ± SEM, unpaired two-tailed student’s t-test, n = 3 biologically independent experiments.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"DBNDD2.figure5.tif.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5265998/v1/ab9f0e65bff5283c2fb6e949.png"},{"id":67292901,"identity":"f3fc338e-b5f2-4f45-a3fe-201583770829","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 10:31:57","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2271948,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eBioinformatic analysis of DBNDD2-related molecules. (A) The DBNDD2-centered protein-protein interaction network. CSNK1D, casein kinase 1 isoform delta; CSNK1E, casein kinase 1 epsilon; CSNK1G2, casein kinase 1 isoform gamma 2; CSNK1G3, casein kinase 1 isoform gamma 3; SFRP2, secreted frizzled related protein 2. (B) The DBNDD2-centered molecular network. Blue line indicates that the specific molecule interacts with DBNDD2 and pink line indicates that the specific molecule controls the expression of DBNDD2. ZEB1, zine finger E-box binding homeobox 1; FOXF2, forkhead box F2; VIPR2, vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 2; TGFB1, transforming growth factor beta 1; STAT5B, signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B; AGTR1, angiotensin II receptor type 1; ESR1, estrogen receptor 1; MEF2A, myocyte enhancer factor 2A; MECOM, MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus; PAX4, paired box 4; LMNA, lamin A/C; FOXO4, forkhead box O4; TFCP2, transcription factor CP2; CALCOCO2, calcium binding and coiled-coil domain 2; AR, androgen receptor; FOXO1, forkhead box O1. (C) Heatmap of the relative expression levels of molecules associated with DBNDD2 in adult rat DRGs at 1 day after dorsal root or sciatic nerve axotomy. The relative abundances of DBNDD2 in adult rat DRGs after sciatic nerve or dorsal root axotomy were normalized to its abundances after corresponding sham surgeries. Red color indicates up-regulation and green color indicates down-regulation. (D) The venn diagram of JASPAR-, animalTFDB-, GTRD-, and hTFtarget-predicted upstream transcription factors of DBNDD2. (E) Sequence logo plots and transcription factor binding sites of potential transcription factor ESR1 in DBDNN2 promoter region.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"DBNDD2.figure6.tif.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5265998/v1/70e75caa8889cc3df06726f9.png"},{"id":68711617,"identity":"b10927f1-00ab-49b2-b25a-51e86b5fa074","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-11 09:17:27","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":23571805,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5265998/v1/d841f142-3bae-403b-a41e-6984c797a7fa.pdf"},{"id":67293938,"identity":"c7b9034d-999c-428d-93ca-41cf24c36d9d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 10:39:57","extension":"tif","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1080020,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFigure S1. SiRNA transfection reduced the protein expression of DBNDD2. Western blot images of the protein expressions of DBNDD2 in adult rat DRG neurons transfected with DBNDD2-siRNA-1 or control siRNA.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"DBNDD2.figureS1.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5265998/v1/f5fca520d765a06308309cd8.tif"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Suppressing DBNDD2 promotes neuron growth and axon regeneration in adult mammals","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eAxon damage interrupts neuronal communications and signal communications between neurons and their target cells, disrupts the physiological functions of neurons, results in partial or complete loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions, and normally induces neuropathological disorders(Winter et al. 2022; Williams et al. 2020). Success axon growth and regeneration is fundamental for the re-establishment of neural circuits and the recovery of impaired nerve functions. Unfortunately, in the adult mammalian central nervous system, injured axons are incapable of regenerating, leading to failure of the restoration of normal nerve function(Uyeda and Muramatsu 2020; Li et al. 2020a; Bradke 2022). On the contrast, in immature mammals, injured central nerves are able to regrow following axon injury, indicating that adult mammals process certain inherent regeneration potential (Montero and Huang 2022). More importantly, except for immature mammalian central nerves, mammalian peripheral nerves have a regenerative ability following axon injury, albeit their regeneration is limited and the regeneration outcome is often incomplete, especially after severe axon injury such as nerve transection with long distance(He and Jin 2016) (Mahar and Cavalli 2018; Robinson 2022). Exploring the intrinsic factors underpinning successful axon regrowth following peripheral nerve injury as well as the unsuccessful axon regrowth following central nerve injury is therefore essential for the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that controls the neuronal intrinsic regeneration capacity(Mahar and Cavalli 2018).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensory neurons in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) are pseudounipolar neurons with peripheral axonal branches that proceed along peripheral nerves and central axonal branches that proceed along the dorsal roots into the spinal cord(Hutson et al. 2019) (Zhao et al. 2024). Peripheral and central axonal branches behave differently after axon injury. The regeneration rate of injured dorsal roots is only at half the rate of injured peripheral axonal branches and the regrowth of injured dorsal roots stops at the dorsal root entry zone(Avraham et al. 2021). DRG neurons are thus commonly used to discriminate injury responses in the same neuronal soma following damage to the regenerative peripheral axonal branches or the non-regenerative central axonal branches(Avraham et al. 2021; Kong et al. 2020; Palmisano et al. 2019). For instance, the comparison of the levels of reactive oxygen species after sciatic nerve crush or dorsal column crush demonstrates that the production of reactive oxygen species is increased in DRGs after peripheral axon injury but not altered after central axon injury(Hervera et al. 2019). Elevated reactive oxygen species promotes the outgrowth of axons and the recovery of nerve functions, indicating that the assessment of diverse molecular changes after peripheral or central axon injury is critical for the identification of regeneration-associated molecules(Hervera et al. 2019). Likewise, calcium activation of protein phosphatase 4 and protein phosphatase 4\u0026ndash;dependent de-phosphorylation of histone deacetylase 3, a process that inhibits the activity of histone deacetylase 3, are only detected after peripheral axon injury but not observed after central axon injury(Hervera et al. 2019). Histone deacetylase 3 inhibition modulates several regenerative pathways, activates the regenerative program, benefits neurite outgrowth, and is even capable of promoting the regeneration of sensory axons following spinal cord injury(Hervera et al. 2019). Deeper understanding of differentially expressed molecules after the regenerative peripheral axon injury and the non-regenerative central axon injury of DRG neurons is hence crucial for revealing novel regeneration associated factors and developing successful therapeutics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe dysbindin domain containing 2 (DBNDD2), also named casein kinase-1 binding protein, is a dysbindin protein family member involved in the negative regulation of casein kinase-1 activity(Yin et al. 2006). A recent study demonstrates that by binding to casein kinase-1 and inhibiting casein kinase-1 activity, DBNDD2 reduces the amounts of total and insoluble α-synuclein and thus may be conductive to the treatment of Parkinsons's disease(Elsholz et al. 2021). However, the biological effects of DBDNN2 on axon regeneration during nerve injury and regeneration process remains to be explored.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTaking advantage of high throughput sequencing data, in the current study, we found that in adult rats, DBNDD2 expression is reduced after peripheral axon injury but increased after central axon injury and thus predicted that DBNDD2 might be a negative regulator of axon regeneration. Indeed, we showed that DBNDD2 knockdown in neurons facilitates neurite growth and axon elongation. Our results uncover the functional roles of DBNDD2 in axon regeneration and imply that drugs targeting DBNDD2 may be of benefit in treating traumatic nerve injury as well as other axon damage-associated neurological disorders such as stroke and glaucoma.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAnimal surgery\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpecific pathogen-free degree Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats used in this study were purchased from the Animal Center of Nantong University (animal licenses No. SCXK [Su] 2014-0001 and SYXK [Su] 2012-0031). All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committees of Experimental Animals, Jiangsu Province, China (approval ID: S20231219-041) and performed in accordance with the guidelines of Nantong University Institutional Animal Care.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale adult SD rats (8-week-old, weighting 180\u0026ndash;220 g) were subjected to sciatic nerve axotomy-induced peripheral axon injury or dorsal root axotomy-induced central axon injury, as previously described with modifications(Avraham et al. 2021). Briefly, for sciatic nerve axotomy, after anesthetization, a skin incision on the lateral aspect of the mid-thigh of rat hind limb was made and exposed rat sciatic nerves were subjected to a sharp axotomy. For dorsal root axotomy, a midline incision at the lumbar (L)2-L3 vertebral level was made, the dura mater was removed, and exposed rat L4 and L5 dorsal roots were subjected to axotomy. Rats underwent sciatic nerve or dorsal root exposure without axotomy were designated as sham-operated. L4 and L5 DRGs were collected at 1 day after axotomy or sham surgery and subjected to RNA sequencing.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eSequencing\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRNA sequencing of L4 and L5 DRGs following sciatic nerve injury versus sciatic nerve sham surgery and dorsal root injury versus dorsal root sham surgery has been published with sequencing data stored in Genome Sequence Archive database (accession number CRA006070)(Cao et al. 2022). RNA sequencing was performed on an HiSeq\u0026trade; 4000 by Genedenovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China). Transcripts abundances were quantified using StringTie and differential expression testing was performed using edgeR(Robinson et al. 2010).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSingle-cell sequencing of 1-day-old neonatal and 8-week-old adult rat DRGs was performed as previously described with sequencing data stored in NCBI database (accession number GSE147615)(Zhang et al. 2021). Digested single cell suspensions were loaded on the 10 \u0026times; Chromium system, libraries were prepared using 10 \u0026times; Genomics GemCode Single-Cell 3\u0026prime; Gel Bead and Library Kit, and sequencing was conducted using Illumina NovaSeq platform by NovelBioinformatics Ltd., Co. (Shanghai, China). Raw data was processed by fastp quality control and analyzed with Cell Ranger (v3.0.0) for barcode identification, mapping, and gene counting. Transcripts abundances were quantified after normalization. Sequencing data were categorized to clusters using Seurat 3.1 software package. Clusters were presented in a t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plot using a dimensional reduction algorithm.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eQuantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTotal RNA of collected DRG tissues or cultured DRG neurons was extracted using RNA-Quick Purification Kit (Yeasen Biotechnology Co., Beijing, China) or Cell RNA Extraction Kit (UU-Bio Technology Co., Suzhou, Jiangsu, China), respectively, and then treated with amplification-grade DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After RNA quantification using a Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware, USA), total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using HiScript\u0026reg;ⅡQ RT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) according to the manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instructions. Quantitative RT-PCR was then performed using ChamQ\u0026trade; SYBR\u0026reg; qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme) on an ABI StepOne system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Experiments were repeated in triplicate. The Ct values of target gene DBNDD2 were compared with the Ct values of the internal control glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The relative abundance of DBNDD2 was quantitated using the comparative 2\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;ΔΔCt\u003c/sup\u003e method. Primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The sequences of specific primers for target gene DBNDD2 were DBNDD2 (forward) 5\u0026rsquo;-CGTCAGACAGGACCACATCC-3\u0026rsquo; and DBNDD2 (reverse) 5\u0026rsquo;-TGTCTCCTCCCCCATCACTT-3\u0026rsquo; while the sequences of specific primers for reference gene GAPDH were GAPDH (forward) 5\u0026rsquo;-ACAGCAACAGGGTGGTGGAC-3\u0026rsquo; and GAPDH (reverse) 5\u0026rsquo;-TTTGAGGTGCAGCGAACTT-3\u0026rsquo;.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eImmunohistochemistry\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRat L4 and L5 DRGs were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and cryoprotected using 30% sucrose. Rat DRGs were then embedded in O.C.T., frozen, and cut to tissue sections. DRG sections were incubated with anti-Tuj1 (1:1000; Abcam, catalog # ab18207, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA), anti-DBNDD2 (1:200; Proteintech, catalog # 27623-1-AP, Rosemont, Illinois, USA), anti-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP; 1:100; Abcam, catalog # ab184601), or anti-superior cervical ganglion-10 protein (SCG10; 1:500; Novus Biologicals, catalog # NBP1-49461, Littleton, Colorado, USA) primary antibodies at 4\u0026deg;C overnight and subsequently with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (1:500; Proteintech, catalog # SA00013-5), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:500; Proteintech, catalog # SA00013-6), Cy3 goat anti-mouse IgG (H\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;L) (1:500; Proteintech, catalog #SA00009-1), or Cy3 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;L) (1:500; Proteintech, catalog #SA00009-2) secondary antibodies. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI Fluoromount-G stain (SouthernBiotech, catalog # 0100\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;20, Birmingham, Alabama, USA). Immunofluorescence images were captured using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope (Jena, Germany). Exposure time and gain were maintained constant for each fluorescence channel during image capture.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePrimary DRG neuron isolation and culture\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDRGs collected from 1-day-old neonatal and 8-week-old adult rats were dissected into small pieces and subjected to tissue digestion. For neonatal rats, dissected DRGs were digested with 3 mg/ml collagenaseⅠfor 30 minutes and 0.25% trypsin for 20 minutes while for adult rats, DRGs were digested with 3 mg/ml collagenaseⅠfor 90 minutes and 0.25% trypsin for 5 minutes. After adding complete culture medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum albumin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to terminate digestion, cells were filtered through a 70-\u0026micro;m cell strainer. Cell pellets were re-suspended in 15% BSA Albumine Bovine V (BioFroxx, Einhausen, Germany) and then subjected to centrifugation. Seperated neonatal or adult rat DRG neurons were cultured in Neurobasal medium (Gibco, Grand Island, New York, USA) containing 2% B27 supplement (Gibco) and 2 mM L-glutamine (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and plated in cell culture dishes pre-coated with poly-L-lysine (PLL).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDRG neuron transfection\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrimary cultured neonatal or adult rat DRG neurons were transfected with the small interfering RNA (siRNA) fragments against DBNDD2 to knockdown DBNDD2 expression in neurons. DRG neurons were transfected with siRNAs targeting DBNDD2 (si-DBNDD2) or a control scrambled siRNA with a random sequence using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instructions. The sequences of siRNAs targeting DBNDD2 were as follows: DBNDD2-siRNA-1, 5\u0026rsquo;-GAAGTTCTTCGAGGACATT-3\u0026rsquo;; DBNDD2-siRNA-2, 5\u0026rsquo;-GGTGGAATTTATTGACCTT-3\u0026rsquo;; and DBNDD2-siRNA-3, 5\u0026rsquo;-GCAGTCCAAATCCAAGTGA-3\u0026rsquo;. The sequence of the control siRNA was 5\u0026rsquo;-GGCUCUAGAAAAGCCUAUGC-3\u0026rsquo;. The siRNA fragments were synthesized by RibiBio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eWestern blot\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCultured DRG neurons were lysed with RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After measuring the concentrations of protein extracts using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), equal amounts of protein samples were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE and then transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were incubated with anti-DBNDD2 (1:200; Proteintech, catalog # 27623-1-AP) or anti-β-actin (1:1000) primary antibodies at 4\u0026deg;C overnight and subsequently with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Protein bands were developed using the ECL Western blotting detection kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eIn vitro neurite growth assay\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCultured neonatal rat DRG neurons were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 36 hours after transfection and subjected to anti-Tuj1 immunostaining. Adult rat DRG neurons were replaced by trypsin treatment and seeded on to glass coverslips pre-coated with PLL. At 24 hours after cell culture, neurons were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and immunostained with anti-Tuj1 antibody. The longest and total lengths of neurites from each neonatal or adult rat DRG neuron were measured and quantified using the Image J software.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor myelin experiments, myelin fractions were extracted from adult rat brain tissues as previously described with modifications(Ma et al. 2019). Briefly, adult rat brain tissues were homogenized in 0.30 M sucrose, layered over 0.83 M sucrose, and centrifuged to gather the crude myelin layers between the interfaces. The process was repeated to purify collected myelin extracts and the glass coverslips were coated with PLL and myelin extracts.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eIn vitro neurite regeneration assay\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdult rat DRG neurons were cultured onto the somal compartments of microfluidic chambers pre-coated with PLL (catalog # SND150, Xona 2-compartment SND 150, Xona Microfluidics LLC). Neurites that entered the axonal compartments after cell culture were dissected and removed using a 0.08 mpa vacuum suction 3 times with 20 seconds each time. Dissected neurites were cultured for additional 24 hours, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and immunostained with anti-Tuj1 antibody to observe neurite elongation and regeneration. The lengths of regenerated neurites were measured and quantified using the Image J software.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eIntrathecal injection of adeno-associated virus (AAVs)\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdult SD rats were anesthetized, shaved to expose the skin around the lumbar region, and injected with AAV that carry shRNA against DBNDD2 (pAAV-U6-shRNA(DBNDD2)-CMV-EGFP-WPRE) or a control AAV (pAAV-U6-shRNA(NC)-CMV-EGFP-WPRE). The AAVs were packaged by OBiO Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). A total of 10 \u0026micro;l of AAV solution was slowly injected into the cerebrospinal fluid between vertebrae L4 and L5 using a 25 \u0026micro;L Hamilton syringe and the needle was left in place for additional 2 minutes. After leaving rats injected with AAVs to recover for 21 days, the left sciatic nerve at 10 mm above the bifurcation into the tibial and common fibular nerves was crushed with forceps as previously described(Yi et al. 2015). At 3 days after sciatic nerve crush injury, sciatic nerve tissues were collected and then subjected to SCG10 immunostaining. The lengths of regenerated nerves were measured and quantified using the Image J software.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eBioinformatic analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMolecules that interact with DBNDD2 were discovered and visualized using the STRING data resource(Szklarczyk et al. 2023). Molecules that interact with DBNDD2 or controls the expression of DBNDD2 were determined using the Pathway Commons(Rodchenkov et al. 2020). Upstream transcription factors of DBNDD2 were predicted using JASPAR database(Castro-Mondragon et al. 2022), animalTFDB 3.0 database(Hu et al. 2019), Gene Transcription Regulation database (GTRD)(Kolmykov et al. 2021), and hTFtarget database(Zhang et al. 2020). The intersection of potential upstream transcription factors of DBNDD2 was obtained using Venny (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e). The binding of transcription factor estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) to the promoter region of DBNDD2 was generated using motif-based sequence analysis tool FIMO-MEME Suite(Bailey et al. 2009).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll quantitative data were presented as the mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;the standard error of the mean (SEM). The numbers of independent experiments were indicated in the figure legends. Unpaired two-tailed student\u0026rsquo;s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett\u0026rsquo;s or a Tukey\u0026rsquo;s multiple comparison post hoc test was performed using GraphPad Prism, and significance was set at \u003cem\u003ep-value\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDBNDD2 is differentially expressed in adult rat DRGs following nerve injury\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe analyzed sequencing data of rat DRGs after sciatic nerve or dorsal root axotomy and examined the expression levels of DBNDD2 gene in rat DRGs after peripheral and central axon injuries. At 24 hours after sciatic nerve injury, the expression of DBNDD2 gene in rat DRGs was dropped by more than 65% as compared with its expressions in sciatic nerve sham injured animals. Following dorsal root injury, the expression of DBNDD2 gene in rat DRGs increased to 1.85 folds as compared to the baseline expression of DBNDD2 gene in sciatic dorsal root injured animals (Fig.\u0026nbsp;1A). In consistent with sequencing data, RT-PCR results showed that DBNDD2 gene expression in the DRGs was remarkably decreased after sciatic nerve injury but significantly increased after dorsal root injury (Fig.\u0026nbsp;1B). DBNDD2 protein expression in the DRGs was also found to be affected by axonal injury. The fluorescence intensity of DBNDD2 in the DRGs seemed to be much lower following sciatic nerve injury relative to that of DBNDD2 in the DRGs under the uninjured na\u0026iuml;ve state while the intensity of DBNDD2 seemed to be much higher following dorsal root injury (Fig.\u0026nbsp;1C). These observations from RNA sequencing, RT-PCR validation, and immunohistochemistry immunostaining fully demonstrate that in the DRGs, DBNDD2 presented an opposite following injury to the peripheral and central axonal branches. In addition, DBNDD2 signal was found to co-localized with those of a neuronal cell marker Tuj1 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;1C). It demonstrates that injury to peripheral and central axonal branches of the DRGs elicits different changes of DBNDD2 in DRG neuronal somas and hints that differentially expressed DBNDD2 contribute to the different regeneration capacity of injured peripheral and central axons.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDBNDD2 is differentially expressed in the DRGs at different developmental stages\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe next compared the expression levels of DBNDD2 gene in the DRG neurons of neonatal and adult rats, rats at two diverse developmental stages with different regeneration capacities. Using single-cell sequencing, a high-throughput analysis tool that identifies cellular heterogeneity and seperates diverse cell populations, neurons were distinguished from other cell types in the DRGs and DRG neurons in neonatal and adult rats were recognized (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2A). The tSNE plot showed that DBNDD2 gene was expressed in DRG neurons of both neonatal and adult rats and was present in a larger number of DRG neurons in adult rats as compared with in neonatal rats (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2B). Quantification of DBNDD2 gene expression in the DRG neurons of neonatal and adult rats demonstrated an obviously higher expression level of DBNDD2 gene in adult rats (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2C). Besides 1-old-old neonatal and 8-week-old adult rats, the temporal expression pattern of DBNDD2 gene in 2-week-old and 4-week-old rats were also determined. Similar as in 8-week-old adult rats, elevated expression of DBNDD2 gene was detected in the DRGs of 2-week-old and 4-week-old rats as compared with the DRGs of neonatal rats (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2D). The observed elevation of DBNDD2 gene expression in developing animals with reduced regeneration capacity implies that DBNDD2 may be a negative regulator of axon regeneration.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e\u003cb\u003eDBNDD2 deficiency promotes the growth of neonatal rat DRG neurons\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrimary neonatal rat DRG neurons were isolated, cultured, and gene manipulated to assess the role of DBNDD2 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3A). RT-PCR experiments showed that transfection of neonatal rat DRG neurons with three siRNA fragments against DBNDD2 successfully reduced DBNDD2 gene expression to less than 20% (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3B). DBNDD2-siRNA-1 and DBNDD2-siRNA-2, two siRNA fragments with relative higher knockdown efficiency, were subsequently used for functional investigation. Following the transfection of DBNDD2-siRNA-1, the intrinsic axon growth ability of neonatal rat DRG neurons seemed to be activated and the neurites of neonatal neurons were noticeably much longer (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3C). Summarized data of more than 400 DRG neurons showed that the transfection of DBNDD2-siRNA-1 increased the lengths of total neurites from 180.09 \u0026micro;m in the control-siRNA treated group to 247.44 \u0026micro;m in the DBNDD2-siRNA-1-siRNA transfected group. The lengths of the longest neurites also increased from 113.68 \u0026micro;m in the control-siRNA treated group to 142.20 \u0026micro;m in the DBNDD2-siRNA-1-siRNA transfected group (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3D). DBNDD2-siRNA-2 transfection induces comparable cellular responses, with the lengths of total neurites increased from 167.06 \u0026micro;m in the control-siRNA treated group to 255.98 \u0026micro;m in the DBNDD2-siRNA-1-siRNA transfected group and the length of the longest neurites increased from 109.85 \u0026micro;m to 154.40 \u0026micro;m (Figs.\u0026nbsp;3C and 3D). These data indicate that in neonatal DRG neurons, silencing DBNDD2 is able to enhance neuronal sprouting and neurite growth.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eDBNDD2 deficiency promotes the growth of adult rat DRG neurons and the elongation of injured axons\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNext, we explored the effects of DBNDD2 knockdown on primary cultured adult DRG neurons. Given that adult neurons have diminished growth ability relative to neonatal rats, adult DRG neurons were subjected to a culture-and-replating protocol to recapitulate nerve injury process and to boost the intrinsic growth capacity of adult neurons (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4A). Transfection of adult DRG neurons with DBNDD2-siRNA-1 and DBNDD2-siRNA-2 decreased the expression of DBNDD2 gene to less than 50% (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4B). Western blot result also demonstrates that the protein abundance of DBNDD2 was effectively reduced after siRNA transfection (Figure \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Similar as neonatal DRG neurons, in adult DRG neurons, decline expression of DBNDD2 contributed to significantly enhanced neurite extension (Figs.\u0026nbsp;4C and 4D). The growth conditions of adult DRG neurons cultured on myelin inhibitory substrates were further investigated. For adult DRG neurons transfected with the control siRNA, compared with neurons cultured on PLL-coated plates, the total lengths and the longest lengths of neurites of adult DRG neurons cultured on plates coated with PLL and extracted myelin were reduced by approximately 25%. Knockdown of DBNDD2 not only boosted the growth of neurons cultured on LL-coated plates, but also supported the elongation of neurites when adult DRG neurons were cultured on myelin substrates (Figs.\u0026nbsp;4E and 4F). These results show that myelin substrates considerably suppress neuronal growth while DBNDD2 silencing prominently augments neuronal growth on myelin substrates.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition to the culture-and-replating cell model, by using a two-compartment microfluidic chamber, the axons of adult DRG neurons were directly severed \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e and the subsequent regrowth of injured neurites were visualized. In control siRNA-transfected neurons, regenerated neurites were observed in the axonal compartments. Adult DRG neurons transfected with DBNDD2-siRNA-1 had elongated neurites as compared with neurons transfected with the control siRNA. Likewise, following the transfection of DBNDD2-siRNA-2, the average lengths of regenerated neurites seemed to be longer relative to the control group, although not significant (Figs.\u0026nbsp;4G and 4H). These straightforward observations demonstrate that knockdown of DBNDD2 in DRG neurons advances the regrowth and elongation of injured neurites, indicating that DBNDD2 may function as an important molecular target for enhancing the intrinsic regeneration capacity of adult neurons.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e\u003cb\u003eDBNDD2 deficiency facilitates nerve regeneration after sciatic nerve injury\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo determine the \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e roles of DBNDD2 knockdown, a AAV-EGFP-DBNDD2 shRNA or a control AAV was intrathecally administered to adult rats (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5A). RT-PCR results showed that at 21 days after the injection of AAV-DBNDD2-shRNA, the expression of DBNDD2 gene in the DRGs was much lower relative to in the DRGs of rats injected with the control AAV (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5B). Immunostaining images displayed the co-labelling of EGFP and neuronal marker Tuj1 in rat DRGs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5C) as well as noticeably diminished immunofluorescence signals of DBNDD2 in Tuj1-labelled neurons (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5D), indicating that AAV delivery of DBNDD2shRNA effectively silenced DBNDD2 expression in neurons. After the validation of success knockdown of DBNDD2 in DRG neurons, rats were subjected to sciatic nerve crush injury. We collected rat sciatic nerves at 3 days after crush injury, labelled sciatic nerves with regenerating sensory axon marker SCG10, and observed that in rats injected with AAV expressing DBNDD2 shRNA, the length of regenerated axons increased to roughly 1.5-fold relative to rats injected with control AAV (Figs.\u0026nbsp;5E and 5F). Observations from animal studies indicate that AAV delivery of shRNA against DBNDD2 benefits axon elongation and nerve regeneration.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eIdentification of DBNDD2-associated molecules\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo determine molecules that interact with DBNDD2, top 5 STRING interactants of DBNDD2 calculated based experimental scores, including casein kinase 1 isoform delta (CSNK1D), casein kinase 1 epsilon (CSNK1E), casein kinase 1 isoform gamma 2 (CSNK1G2), casein kinase 1 isoform gamma 3 (CSNK1G3), and secreted frizzled related protein 2 (SFRP2), were displayed in a STRING interaction network (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6A). DBNDD2 closely interacts with CSNK1D and CSNK1G2 while CSNK1D and CSNK1G2 have combined confidence of the functional interactions with CSNK1E and CSNK1G3, respectively(Yin et al. 2006). A more comprehensive DBNDD2-centered molecular network was generated using the integrated Pathway Commons web resource (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6B). Besides molecules in the STRING protein-protein network, DBNDD2 is found to be interacted with vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 2 (VIRP2), angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AGTR1), lamin A/C (LMNA), and calcium binding and coiled-coil domain 2 (CALCOCO2). DBNDD2 is also identified to be controlled by zine finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), forkhead box F2 (FOXF2), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1), signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B (STAT5B), ESR1, myocyte enhancer factor 2A (MEF2A), MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus (MECOM), paired box 4 (PAX4), forkhead box O4 (FOXO4), transcription factor CP2 (TFCP2), androgen receptor (AR), and forkhead box O1 (FOXO1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNext, we explored the expression levels of these DBNDD2-associated molecules in the DRGs after peripheral or central axon injury according to sequencing data. The heatmap displayed the relative fold changes of these DBNDD2-associated molecules and labeled genes with an elevated expression relative to the corresponding sham control with red color and genes with a reduced expression relative to the corresponding sham control with green color. It is demonstrated that although many of these DBNDD2-associated molecules did not show apparent expression changes after dorsal root axotomy-induced central axon injury, some molecules were differentially expressed in the DRGs after sciatic nerve axotomy-induced peripheral axon injury. For instance, VIPR2, AGTR1A, AGTR1B, ESR1, MECOM had a similar expression trend as DBNDD2 and were down-regulated in the DRGs after sciatic nerve injury. On the contrast, SFRP2 and PAX4 exhibited an opposite expression pattern as DBNDD2 and were up-regulated in the DRGs after sciatic nerve injury (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6C).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGiven that many DBNDD2-associated molecules that exhibit similar expression trends as DBNDD2 are transcription factor-coding genes, we then predicted the potential upstream transcription factors of DBNDD2. A total of 23, 5330, 1490, and 268 transcription factors of DBNDD2 were screened using JASPAR, animalTFDB 3.0, GTRD, and hTFtarget databases. Three common elements, including CAMP responsive element binding protein 1 (CREB1), transcription factor specificity protein 1 (SP1), and ESR1, a molecule that controls DBNDD2 according to Pathway Commons web resource, located at the intersection of these databases (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6D). Transcription factor ESR1 may directly bind to the putative binding site located at -1915 ~ -1898 in the promoter region of DBNDD2 and regulate DBNDD2 expression (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6E).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe molecular functions of DBNDD2, a protein that is highly expressed in the nervous system, are largely unclear besides its casein kinase-1 binding and inhibiting roles(Elsholz et al. 2021). Herein, we examined the expression changes of DBNDD2 in rat DRGs during regeneration and development by sequencing, RT-PCR, and immunostaining, studied the biological effects of DBNDD2 on DRG neurons by siRNA transfection, and found that DBNDD2 knockdown is beneficial for axon growth and nerve regeneration.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRats subjected to partial or complete nerve injury are widely applied as appropriate models to explore the pathological basis of nerve injury and to assess novel medications and profound treatment strategies(Gordon and Borschel 2017). DRG neurons process peripheral and central axon branches with different regeneration capacities and thus are valuable for the investigation of the intrinsic mechanisms underlying success axon regeneration. The peripheral projecting axons of rat L4 and L5 DRGs, together with nerve fibers of spinal cord motor neurons, make up peripheral nerves with the largest diameters, that are sciatic nerves(Bobkiewicz et al. 2017). Hence, surgeries such as crush, stretch, percussion, and transection to sciatic nerves induce injuries to peripheral axonal branches of L4 and L5 DRG neurons. The central axonal branches projected from L4 and L5 DRG neuronal somas extend along dorsal roots, enter the spinal cord via the dorsal root entry zone, and then bifurcate to ascending central axonal branches towards the brain and descending central axonal branches towards the cauda equine(Smith et al. 2012; Zheng et al. 2019). Compared with spinal cord injury that impairs the ascending central axonal branches only, injury at the dorsal root before the branch point impairs the whole central axonal branches and is considered as a well suited surgical model to study central axon regeneration(Smith et al. 2012).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConsequently, in the current study, we first investigated sequencing data of rat L4 and L5 DRGs after sciatic nerve axotomy-induced peripheral axon injury and dorsal root axotomy-induced central axon injury, aiming to decipher the expression changes of DBNDD2 gene after injury to DRG neuron peripheral and central axonal branches with dissimilar generation capacities. RNA bulk sequencing, together with consistent validation outcomes, showed that DBNDD2 gene expression in rat DRGs is substantially reduced after peripheral axon injury but elevated after central axon injury. It is worth noting that besides DRG neurons, there exist a large number of different cell types in rat DRGs whereas RNA bulk sequencing determines the global gene expression in tissues and organs without distinguishing the transcriptional heterogeneity of cell populations. To verify whether DBNDD2 is indeed altered expressed in DRG neurons, we collected L4 and L5 DRGs from rats underwent peripheral or central axon injury as well as uninjured rats, double immunostained rat DRGs with DBNDD2 and neuronal marker Tuj1 in frozen DRG specimens, and then determined the expression of DBNDD2 protein in Tuj1-labelled neurons. The fact that compared with uninjured rats, obviously weaker signals of DBNDD2 protein that are co-labeled with Tuj1 are observed in peripheral axon-injured rats indicates that reduced DBNDD2 expression in DRG neurons may contribute to enhanced axon regeneration. On the other hand, stronger signals of DBNDD2 protein that are co-labeled with Tuj1 observed in central axon-injured rats indicates that increased DBNDD2 expression in DRG neurons may contribute to compromised axon regeneration.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTissue and organ regeneration shares common mechanisms with morphogenesis and, to certain degree, recapitulates the development process. Actually, neonatal mammals, different from adult mammals, have remarkable regeneration potentials after both peripheral and central nerve injuries(Li et al. 2020b). Along with the down-regulation of many regeneration promoting molecules and the up-regulation of many regeneration inhibiting molecules during development, the regeneration capacity of the nervous system decline step wisely(Park et al. 2010). Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is one of the most well-known neuron-intrinsic inhibitors whose deletion is capable of enhancing the regeneration ability of retinal ganglion cells, corticospinal neurons, and DRG neurons in adult mammals(Park et al. 2008) (Liu et al. 2010; Zhou et al. 2020). The investigation of the expression patterns of PTEN during regeneration and development showed that showed that during regeneration, PTEN expressions is reduced in peripheral nerves while during development, PTEN is expressed at low levels in DRG neuronal cell bodies and axons during the early prenatal stages but expressed at higher levels as the nerves system develops(Chen et al. 2018).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGiven that similar as PTEN, DBNDD2 is differentially expressed after nerve injury, we next evaluated that whether the expression levels of DBNDD2 is altered during development. We compared the abundances of DBNDD2 in neonatal and adult rat DRGs using single-cell sequencing data, determined the expression trends of DBNDD2 in the DRGs of rats at different ages (1-day-old neonatal, 2-week-old, and 4-week-old) using RT-PCR, and found development-dependent increase of DBNDD2 gene expression. The application of single-cell sequencing separates neurons from other different types of cells and allows the identification of the transcription programs in neurons under various physiological and pathological conditions(Zeisel et al. 2018; Renthal et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2021a). Here, using single-cell sequencing data, we distinguished DRG neurons from glial cells and immune cells in neonatal and adult rat DRGs and found that DRG neurons occupy a large cell population in the DRGs of rats at different ages. Using t-SNE plot, we visualized the presence of DBNDD2 in both neonatal and adult rat DRGs and found the obviously higher expression of DBNDD2 in adult rats. The increased expression trend of DBNDD2 in DRG neurons during development, together with the elevated amount of DBNDD2 after the non-regenerative central axon injury and the reduced amount of DBNDD2 after the regenerative peripheral axon injury, imply that DBNDD2 may be an inhibitory factor for neuron growth and axon regeneration.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo explore the biological effects of DBNDD2 on neurons, RNA interference, an effective technology that mediates sequence-specific gene knockdown, was applied and rat DRG neurons were transfected with siRNA segments against DBNDD2. Three siRNA segments targeting different portions of the target gene DBNDD2 and a siRNA segment targeting sequences altered from the target were utilized to examine the knockdown efficiency. DBNDD2-siRNA-1 and DBNDD2-siRNA-2, two siRNA segments that robustly suppressed DBNDD2 gene expression, were utilized together for the success manipulation of DBNDD2 gene expression. \u003cem\u003eIn vitro\u003c/em\u003e monitoring of neurite outgrowth showed that DBNDD2 siRNA transfection leads to enhanced neuron growth in both neonatal rat DRG neurons with certain regeneration capacity and adult rat DRG neurons with limited regeneration capacity. More importantly, in adult rats, via an intrathecal injection of DBNDD2 shRNA-expressing AAV, it is found that silencing DBNDD2 is sufficient to promote the elongation of injured axons of cultured adult DRG neurons as well as the regeneration of injured sciatic nerves. These studies fully indicate that DBNDD2 is a key regulating factor of neuron growth and axon regeneration and imply that knocking down DBNDD2 in neurons is an effective strategy for restoring impaired nerve functions. It is worth raising that in the current study, the \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e roles of reduced DBNDD2 expression in DRG neurons is examined by immunostained the regenerating sciatic nerves with SCG10 at 3 days after rat sciatic nerve crush injury. Sciatic nerve crush injury, as previous mentioned, is a commonly used peripheral nerve injury model. Crush injury induces a modest damage and elicits axonotmesis without disrupting the epineurium. Nerve regeneration following crush injury is hence more rapid and effective as compared with transection injury that disrupts the entire nerve stump, including the endoneurium, the perineurium, as well as the epineurium(Renthal et al. 2020; Yi et al. 2020). To further evaluate the clinical potential of the manipulation of DBNDD2, the functional roles of DBNDD2 knockdown in axon regeneration after a more severe injury to peripheral axon branches of DRG neurons can be determined using a transection injury model and a long gap peripheral nerve injury model. The effects of DBNDD2 deficiency on axon regeneration following injury to central axon branches of DRG neurons and even injury to central nerves can be further assessed to examine whether DBNDD2 deficiency is capable of triggering central axon-injured DRG neurons and/or central neurons to switch to a pro-regenerative state. Actually, the fact that DBNDD2 knockdown boosts the regenerative axon growth of DRG neurons cultured on myelin, a well demonstrated inhibitor in axonal repair(Lee and Zheng 2012), implies that DBNDD2 deficiency may be able to enabling neurons to overcome the inhibitory microenvironment in the nervous system.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe construction of molecular interaction network is valuable for the discovery of functionally associated molecules and the systemic understanding of biological processes(Cowen et al. 2017). For the investigation of DBNDD2-associated molecules, in the current study, we analyzed molecules that interact with DBNDD2 using the STRING data resource and the Pathway Commons website and screened transcription factors targeting DBNDD2 using JASPAR, animalTFDB 3.0, GTRD, and hTFtarget databases. It is worth mention that databases of human transcriptional regulatory interactions are comprehensive while there are less number of databases that recognize the regulations of rat transcription factors and their downstream target genes. Still, it is demonstrated that the cis-regulatory modules and transcription factor binding locations among species are relatively conserved(Ballester et al. 2014). Hence, except for selecting rat species in JASPAR database, we used all animal species in animalTFDB 3.0 database, human species in GTRD database, and human species in hTFtarget database to predict potential upstream transcription factors targeting DBNDD2 and then discovered ESR1 as a potential upstream regulator of DBNDD2.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTranscription factors are important gene regulating factors in numerous biological phenomena, including nerve injury and regeneration(Lambert et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2023). For instance, activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) and AP-1 transcription factor subunit Jun proto-oncogene (JUN), two transcription factors that are up-regulated in the DRGs after sciatic nerve injury, regulates many regeneration-associated molecules and enhances neurite outgrowth(Chandran et al. 2016; Renthal et al. 2020). It has been demonstrated that, in the nervous system, transcription factor ESR1 in glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons is important for normal puberty phenotype(Cheong et al. 2015). The effect of ESR1 on axon growth and regeneration remains largely undetermined. Notably, emerging studies demonstrate that ESR1 is expressed at low abundance in various types of cancers, such as hepatocellular carcinoma(Hishida et al. 2013), endometrioid endometrial cancer(Backes et al. 2016), breast cancer(Kr\u0026oacute;l et al. 2018), non-small cell lung cancer(Aresti et al. 2014), and bladder cancer(Ge et al. 2019). Overexpression of ESR1 mediates cellular apoptosis and hinders cellular proliferation and invasion(Tu et al. 2013; Zhou et al. 2013). On the other hand, reduced ESR1 expression stimulates cellular proliferation, migration, and invasion(Wang et al. 2021b). The reduced expression patterns of ESR1 in tumor tissues as compared with in non-tumor tissues as well as the inhibiting roles of ESR1 on cell growth indicate that ESR1 functions as a tumor suppressor gene(Hishida et al. 2013; Li et al. 2021). Tumor suppressor genes may be key regulators of nerve regeneration as the reduced expressions of many tumor suppressor genes, including PTEN, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), and retinoblastoma (Rb), modulates neurite plasticity, supports axon regeneration, and facilities the recovery of injured nerves(Christie et al. 2014; Duraikannu et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2010; Meyer Zu Reckendorf et al. 2022). Our bioinformatic analysis indicates that it is likely that tumor suppressor gene ESR1 is also a negative regulator of nerve regeneration and ESR1 may inhibit neurite growth and axon regeneration by targeting DBNDD2. Whether knockdown or deletion of ESR1 would lead to reduced DBNDD2 expression and drive axon regeneration may be explored in further studies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTaken together, our study reveals that in the DRGs, DBNDD2 shows reduced expression after peripheral axotomy but elevated expression after central axotomy to adult rats and exhibits an increased expression trend during development. We find that reduced expression of DBNDD2 contributes to enhanced neurite growth and nerve regeneration and demonstrate that DBNDD2, as well as its potential upstream regulator ESR1, may be novel suppressors of success axon regeneration. Molecular manipulation approaches that decrease DBNDD2 expression represents an attractive therapeutic strategy to modify the regeneration ability of neurons and to improve nerve regeneration.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of interest:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eL.Z., W.D., Y.W., T.C., Y.Q., Y.T. and P.Y. collected data, prepared figure, and analyzed data. S.Y. and L.G. conceived the project and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding and additional information\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by National Key R\u0026amp;D Program of China [2022YFC2409800 and 2022YFC2409802], Collegiate Natural Science Fund of Jiangsu Province [23KJA180006], and Nantong University College Students\u0026rsquo; Innovative Entrepreneurial Training Plan Program [2023159].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAresti U, Carrera S, Iruarrizaga E, Fuente N, Marrodan I, de Lobera AR, Mu\u0026ntilde;oz A, Buque A, Condori E, Ugalde I, Calvo B, Vivanco GL (2014) Estrogen receptor 1 gene expression and its combination with estrogen receptor 2 or aromatase expression predicts survival in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One 9 (10):e109659. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109659\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAvraham O, Feng R, Ewan EE, Rustenhoven J, Zhao G, Cavalli V (2021) Profiling sensory neuron microenvironment after peripheral and central axon injury reveals key pathways for neural repair. Elife 10. doi:10.7554/eLife.68457\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBackes FJ, Walker CJ, Goodfellow PJ, Hade EM, Agarwal G, Mutch D, Cohn DE, Suarez AA (2016) Estrogen receptor-alpha as a predictive biomarker in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 141 (2):312\u0026ndash;317. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.006\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, Noble WS (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37 (Web Server issue):W202-208. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp335\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBallester B, Medina-Rivera A, Schmidt D, Gonz\u0026agrave;lez-Porta M, Carlucci M, Chen X, Chessman K, Faure AJ, Funnell AP, Goncalves A, Kutter C, Lukk M, Menon S, McLaren WM, Stefflova K, Watt S, Weirauch MT, Crossley M, Marioni JC, Odom DT, Flicek P, Wilson MD (2014) Multi-species, multi-transcription factor binding highlights conserved control of tissue-specific biological pathways. Elife 3:e02626. doi:10.7554/eLife.02626\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBobkiewicz A, Cwykiel J, Siemionow M (2017) Anatomic variations of brachial and lumbosacral plexus models in different rat strains. Microsurgery 37 (4):327\u0026ndash;333. doi:10.1002/micr.30078\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBradke F (2022) Mechanisms of Axon Growth and Regeneration: Moving between Development and Disease. J Neurosci 42 (45):8393\u0026ndash;8405. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1131-22.2022\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCao HJ, Huang L, Zheng MR, Zhang T, Xu LC (2022) Characterization of circular RNAs in dorsal root ganglia after central and peripheral axon injuries. Front Cell Neurosci 16:1046050. doi:10.3389/fncel.2022.1046050\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCastro-Mondragon JA, Riudavets-Puig R, Rauluseviciute I, Lemma RB, Turchi L, Blanc-Mathieu R, Lucas J, Boddie P, Khan A, Manosalva P\u0026eacute;rez N, Fornes O, Leung TY, Aguirre A, Hammal F, Schmelter D, Baranasic D, Ballester B, Sandelin A, Lenhard B, Vandepoele K, Wasserman WW, Parcy F, Mathelier A (2022) JASPAR 2022: the 9th release of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 50 (D1):D165-d173. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1113\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChandran V, Coppola G, Nawabi H, Omura T, Versano R, Huebner EA, Zhang A, Costigan M, Yekkirala A, Barrett L, Blesch A, Michaelevski I, Davis-Turak J, Gao F, Langfelder P, Horvath S, He Z, Benowitz L, Fainzilber M, Tuszynski M, Woolf CJ, Geschwind DH (2016) A Systems-Level Analysis of the Peripheral Nerve Intrinsic Axonal Growth Program. Neuron 89 (5):956\u0026ndash;970. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.034\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen H, Xiang J, Wu J, He B, Lin T, Zhu Q, Liu X, Zheng C (2018) Expression patterns and role of PTEN in rat peripheral nerve development and injury. Neurosci Lett 676:78\u0026ndash;84. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.04.016\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCheong RY, Czieselsky K, Porteous R, Herbison AE (2015) Expression of ESR1 in Glutamatergic and GABAergic Neurons Is Essential for Normal Puberty Onset, Estrogen Feedback, and Fertility in Female Mice. J Neurosci 35 (43):14533\u0026ndash;14543. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1776-15.2015\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChristie KJ, Krishnan A, Martinez JA, Purdy K, Singh B, Eaton S, Zochodne D (2014) Enhancing adult nerve regeneration through the knockdown of retinoblastoma protein. Nat Commun 5:3670. doi:10.1038/ncomms4670\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCowen L, Ideker T, Raphael BJ, Sharan R (2017) Network propagation: a universal amplifier of genetic associations. Nat Rev Genet 18 (9):551\u0026ndash;562. doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.38\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDuraikannu A, Krishnan A, Chandrasekhar A, Zochodne DW (2019) Beyond Trophic Factors: Exploiting the Intrinsic Regenerative Properties of Adult Neurons. Front Cell Neurosci 13:128. doi:10.3389/fncel.2019.00128\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eElsholz L, Wasser Y, Ziegler P, Habib P, Voigt A (2021) CK1BP Reduces α-Synuclein Oligomerization and Aggregation Independent of Serine 129 Phosphorylation. Cells 10 (11). doi:10.3390/cells10112830\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGe Q, Lu M, Ju L, Qian K, Wang G, Wu CL, Liu X, Xiao Y, Wang X (2019) miR-4324-RACGAP1-STAT3-ESR1 feedback loop inhibits proliferation and metastasis of bladder cancer. Int J Cancer 144 (12):3043\u0026ndash;3055. doi:10.1002/ijc.32036\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGordon T, Borschel GH (2017) The use of the rat as a model for studying peripheral nerve regeneration and sprouting after complete and partial nerve injuries. Exp Neurol 287 (Pt 3):331\u0026ndash;347. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.01.014\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHe Z, Jin Y (2016) Intrinsic Control of Axon Regeneration. Neuron 90 (3):437\u0026ndash;451. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.022\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHervera A, Zhou L, Palmisano I, McLachlan E, Kong G, Hutson TH, Danzi MC, Lemmon VP, Bixby JL, Matamoros-Angles A, Forsberg K, De Virgiliis F, Matheos DP, Kwapis J, Wood MA, Puttagunta R, Del R\u0026iacute;o JA, Di Giovanni S (2019) PP4-dependent HDAC3 dephosphorylation discriminates between axonal regeneration and regenerative failure. Embo j 38 (13):e101032. doi:10.15252/embj.2018101032\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHishida M, Nomoto S, Inokawa Y, Hayashi M, Kanda M, Okamura Y, Nishikawa Y, Tanaka C, Kobayashi D, Yamada S, Nakayama G, Fujii T, Sugimoto H, Koike M, Fujiwara M, Takeda S, Kodera Y (2013) Estrogen receptor 1 gene as a tumor suppressor gene in hepatocellular carcinoma detected by triple-combination array analysis. Int J Oncol 43 (1):88\u0026ndash;94. doi:10.3892/ijo.2013.1951\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHu H, Miao YR, Jia LH, Yu QY, Zhang Q, Guo AY (2019) AnimalTFDB 3.0: a comprehensive resource for annotation and prediction of animal transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res 47 (D1):D33-d38. doi:10.1093/nar/gky822\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHutson TH, Kathe C, Palmisano I, Bartholdi K, Hervera A, De Virgiliis F, McLachlan E, Zhou L, Kong G, Barraud Q, Danzi MC, Medrano-Fernandez A, Lopez-Atalaya JP, Boutillier AL, Sinha SH, Singh AK, Chaturbedy P, Moon LDF, Kundu TK, Bixby JL, Lemmon VP, Barco A, Courtine G, Di Giovanni S (2019) Cbp-dependent histone acetylation mediates axon regeneration induced by environmental enrichment in rodent spinal cord injury models. Sci Transl Med 11 (487). doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw2064\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKolmykov S, Yevshin I, Kulyashov M, Sharipov R, Kondrakhin Y, Makeev VJ, Kulakovskiy IV, Kel A, Kolpakov F (2021) GTRD: an integrated view of transcription regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 49 (D1):D104-d111. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1057\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKong G, Zhou L, Serger E, Palmisano I, De Virgiliis F, Hutson TH, McLachlan E, Freiwald A, La Montanara P, Shkura K, Puttagunta R, Di Giovanni S (2020) AMPK controls the axonal regenerative ability of dorsal root ganglia sensory neurons after spinal cord injury. Nat Metab 2 (9):918\u0026ndash;933. doi:10.1038/s42255-020-0252-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKr\u0026oacute;l MB, Galicki M, Grešner P, Wieczorek E, Jabłońska E, Reszka E, Morawiec Z, Wąsowicz W, Gromadzińska J (2018) The ESR1 and GPX1 gene expression level in human malignant and non-malignant breast tissues. Acta Biochim Pol 65 (1):51\u0026ndash;57. doi:10.18388/abp.2016_1425\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLambert SA, Jolma A, Campitelli LF, Das PK, Yin Y, Albu M, Chen X, Taipale J, Hughes TR, Weirauch MT (2018) The Human Transcription Factors. Cell 172 (4):650\u0026ndash;665. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.029\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLee JK, Zheng B (2012) Role of myelin-associated inhibitors in axonal repair after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 235 (1):33\u0026ndash;42. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.05.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi F, Chen Q, Yang Y, Li M, Zhang L, Yan Z, Zhang J, Wang K (2021) ESR1 as a recurrence-related gene in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a weighted gene coexpression network analysis. Cancer Cell Int 21 (1):225. doi:10.1186/s12935-021-01929-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi F, Sami A, Noristani HN, Slattery K, Qiu J, Groves T, Wang S, Veerasammy K, Chen YX, Morales J, Haynes P, Sehgal A, He Y, Li S, Song Y (2020a) Glial Metabolic Rewiring Promotes Axon Regeneration and Functional Recovery in the Central Nervous System. Cell Metab 32 (5):767\u0026ndash;785.e767. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2020.08.015\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi Y, He X, Kawaguchi R, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Monavarfeshani A, Yang Z, Chen B, Shi Z, Meng H, Zhou S, Zhu J, Jacobi A, Swarup V, Popovich PG, Geschwind DH, He Z (2020b) Microglia-organized scar-free spinal cord repair in neonatal mice. Nature 587 (7835):613\u0026ndash;618. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2795-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu K, Lu Y, Lee JK, Samara R, Willenberg R, Sears-Kraxberger I, Tedeschi A, Park KK, Jin D, Cai B, Xu B, Connolly L, Steward O, Zheng B, He Z (2010) PTEN deletion enhances the regenerative ability of adult corticospinal neurons. Nat Neurosci 13 (9):1075\u0026ndash;1081. doi:10.1038/nn.2603\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMa JJ, Ju X, Xu RJ, Wang WH, Luo ZP, Liu CM, Yang L, Li B, Chen JQ, Meng B, Yang HL, Zhou FQ, Saijilafu (2019) Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase and p53 Regulate Mammalian Peripheral Nervous System and CNS Axon Regeneration Downstream of c-Myc. J Neurosci 39 (46):9107\u0026ndash;9118. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0419-19.2019\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMahar M, Cavalli V (2018) Intrinsic mechanisms of neuronal axon regeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci 19 (6):323\u0026ndash;337. doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0001-8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMeyer Zu Reckendorf S, Moser D, Blechschmidt A, Joga VN, Sinske D, Hegler J, Deininger S, Catanese A, Vettorazzi S, Antoniadis G, Boeckers T, Kn\u0026ouml;ll B (2022) Motoneuron-Specific PTEN Deletion in Mice Induces Neuronal Hypertrophy and Also Regeneration after Facial Nerve Injury. J Neurosci 42 (12):2474\u0026ndash;2491. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1305-21.2022\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMontero AM, Huang AH (2022) The regenerative capacity of neonatal tissues. Development 149 (12). doi:10.1242/dev.199819\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePalmisano I, Danzi MC, Hutson TH, Zhou L, McLachlan E, Serger E, Shkura K, Srivastava PK, Hervera A, Neill NO, Liu T, Dhrif H, Wang Z, Kubat M, Wuchty S, Merkenschlager M, Levi L, Elliott E, Bixby JL, Lemmon VP, Di Giovanni S (2019) Epigenomic signatures underpin the axonal regenerative ability of dorsal root ganglia sensory neurons. Nat Neurosci 22 (11):1913\u0026ndash;1924. doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0490-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePark KK, Liu K, Hu Y, Kanter JL, He Z (2010) PTEN/mTOR and axon regeneration. Exp Neurol 223 (1):45\u0026ndash;50. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.12.032\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePark KK, Liu K, Hu Y, Smith PD, Wang C, Cai B, Xu B, Connolly L, Kramvis I, Sahin M, He Z (2008) Promoting axon regeneration in the adult CNS by modulation of the PTEN/mTOR pathway. Science 322 (5903):963\u0026ndash;966. doi:10.1126/science.1161566\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRenthal W, Tochitsky I, Yang L, Cheng YC, Li E, Kawaguchi R, Geschwind DH, Woolf CJ (2020) Transcriptional Reprogramming of Distinct Peripheral Sensory Neuron Subtypes after Axonal Injury. Neuron 108 (1):128\u0026ndash;144.e129. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.07.026\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRobinson LR (2022) Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve 66 (6):661\u0026ndash;670. doi:10.1002/mus.27706\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRobinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26 (1):139\u0026ndash;140. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRodchenkov I, Babur O, Luna A, Aksoy BA, Wong JV, Fong D, Franz M, Siper MC, Cheung M, Wrana M, Mistry H, Mosier L, Dlin J, Wen Q, O'Callaghan C, Li W, Elder G, Smith PT, Dallago C, Cerami E, Gross B, Dogrusoz U, Demir E, Bader GD, Sander C (2020) Pathway Commons 2019 Update: integration, analysis and exploration of pathway data. Nucleic Acids Res 48 (D1):D489-d497. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz946\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSmith GM, Falone AE, Frank E (2012) Sensory axon regeneration: rebuilding functional connections in the spinal cord. Trends Neurosci 35 (3):156\u0026ndash;163. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.10.006\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSzklarczyk D, Kirsch R, Koutrouli M, Nastou K, Mehryary F, Hachilif R, Gable AL, Fang T, Doncheva NT, Pyysalo S, Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C (2023) The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res 51 (D1):D638-d646. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTu CC, Kumar VB, Day CH, Kuo WW, Yeh SP, Chen RJ, Liao CR, Chen HY, Tsai FJ, Wu WJ, Huang CY (2013) Estrogen receptor α (ESR1) over-expression mediated apoptosis in Hep3B cells by binding with SP1 proteins. J Mol Endocrinol 51 (1):203\u0026ndash;212. doi:10.1530/jme-13-0085\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUyeda A, Muramatsu R (2020) Molecular Mechanisms of Central Nervous System Axonal Regeneration and Remyelination: A Review. Int J Mol Sci 21 (21). doi:10.3390/ijms21218116\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang K, Wang S, Chen Y, Wu D, Hu X, Lu Y, Wang L, Bao L, Li C, Zhang X (2021a) Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of somatosensory neurons uncovers temporal development of neuropathic pain. Cell Res 31 (8):904\u0026ndash;918. doi:10.1038/s41422-021-00479-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang L, Cui M, Cheng D, Qu F, Yu J, Wei Y, Cheng L, Wu X, Liu X (2021b) miR-9-5p facilitates hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting ESR1. Mol Cell Biochem 476 (2):575\u0026ndash;583. doi:10.1007/s11010-020-03927-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWilliams PR, Benowitz LI, Goldberg JL, He Z (2020) Axon Regeneration in the Mammalian Optic Nerve. Annu Rev Vis Sci 6:195\u0026ndash;213. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-022720-094953\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWinter CC, He Z, Jacobi A (2022) Axon Regeneration: A Subcellular Extension in Multiple Dimensions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 14 (3). doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040923\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYi S, Zhang H, Gong L, Wu J, Zha G, Zhou S, Gu X, Yu B (2015) Deep Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis of Lesioned Sciatic Nerves after Crush Injury. PLoS One 10 (12):e0143491. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143491\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYi S, Zhang Y, Gu X, Huang L, Zhang K, Qian T, Gu X (2020) Application of stem cells in peripheral nerve regeneration. Burns Trauma 8:tkaa002. doi:10.1093/burnst/tkaa002\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYin H, Laguna KA, Li G, Kuret J (2006) Dysbindin structural homologue CK1BP is an isoform-selective binding partner of human casein kinase-1. Biochemistry 45 (16):5297\u0026ndash;5308. doi:10.1021/bi052354e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZeisel A, Hochgerner H, L\u0026ouml;nnerberg P, Johnsson A, Memic F, van der Zwan J, H\u0026auml;ring M, Braun E, Borm LE, La Manno G, Codeluppi S, Furlan A, Lee K, Skene N, Harris KD, Hjerling-Leffler J, Arenas E, Ernfors P, Marklund U, Linnarsson S (2018) Molecular Architecture of the Mouse Nervous System. Cell 174 (4):999\u0026ndash;1014.e1022. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang Q, Liu W, Zhang HM, Xie GY, Miao YR, Xia M, Guo AY (2020) hTFtarget: A Comprehensive Database for Regulations of Human Transcription Factors and Their Targets. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 18 (2):120\u0026ndash;128. doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2019.09.006\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang R, Chen S, Wang X, Gu X, Yi S (2021) Cell populations in neonatal rat peripheral nerves identified by single-cell transcriptomics. Glia 69 (3):765\u0026ndash;778. doi:10.1002/glia.23928\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang Y, Zhao Q, Chen Q, Xu L, Yi S (2023) Transcriptional Control of Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Mol Neurobiol 60 (1):329\u0026ndash;341. doi:10.1007/s12035-022-03090-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhao Q, Jiang C, Zhao L, Dai X, Yi S (2024) Unleashing Axonal Regeneration Capacities: Neuronal and Non-neuronal Changes After Injuries to Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuron Central and Peripheral Axonal Branches. Mol Neurobiol 61 (1):423\u0026ndash;433. doi:10.1007/s12035-023-03590-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZheng B, Lorenzana AO, Ma L (2019) Understanding the axonal response to injury by in vivo imaging in the mouse spinal cord: A tale of two branches. Exp Neurol 318:277\u0026ndash;285. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.04.008\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhou J, Teng R, Xu C, Wang Q, Guo J, Xu C, Li Z, Xie S, Shen J, Wang L (2013) Overexpression of ERα inhibits proliferation and invasion of MKN28 gastric cancer cells by suppressing β-catenin. Oncol Rep 30 (4):1622\u0026ndash;1630. doi:10.3892/or.2013.2610\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhou LY, Han F, Qi SB, Ma JJ, Ma YX, Xie JL, Zhang HC, Fu XY, Chen JQ, Li B, Yang HL, Zhou F, Saijilafu (2020) Inhibition of PTEN activity promotes IB4-positive sensory neuronal axon growth. J Cell Mol Med 24 (18):11012\u0026ndash;11017. doi:10.1111/jcmm.15648\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"axon damage, peripheral axon injury, central axon injury, RNA sequencing, development, single-cell sequencing, DBNDD2, DRG neuron, neuron growth, axon regeneration","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5265998/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5265998/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eEffective axon regeneration is essential for the successful recovery of nerve functions in patients with axon injury-associated neurological diseases. Certain self-regeneration occurs in injured peripheral axonal branches of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons but does not occur in their central axonal branches. By performing rat sciatic nerve or dorsal root axotomy, we determined the expression of the dysbindin domain containing 2 (DBNDD2) in the DRGs after the regenerative peripheral axon injury or the non-regenerative central axon injury, respectively, and found that DBNDD2 is down-regulated in the DRGs after peripheral axon injury but up-regulated after central axon injury. Moreover, we found that DBNDD2 expression differs in neonatal and adult rat DRGs and is gradually increased during development. DBNDD2 knockdown promotes the outgrowth of neurites in both neonatal and adult rat DRG neurons and stimulates robust axon regeneration in adult rats after sciatic nerve crush injury. Bioinformatic analysis data showed that transcription factor estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) interacts with DBNDD2, exhibits a similar expression trend as DBNDD2 after axon injury, and may targets DBDNN2. These studies indicate that reduced level of DBNDD2 after peripheral axon injury and low abundance of DBNDD2 in neonates contribute to axon regeneration and thus suggest the manipulation of DBNDD2 expression as a promising therapeutic approach for improving recovery after axon damage.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Suppressing DBNDD2 promotes neuron growth and axon regeneration in adult mammals","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-10-23 10:31:52","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5265998/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"8be26de2-77a3-46c3-82bd-4a014c627ae0","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 23rd, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-11-11T09:09:05+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-10-23 10:31:52","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5265998","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5265998","identity":"rs-5265998","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}