The collapse of environmental predictability erodes reproductive success in a Tropical seabird

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Climate change can alter not only when seasonal events occur on average, but also how predictable they are from year to year. Many long-lived seabirds show a paradox: breeding dates remain stable even as populations decline. Using two decades of data from Blue-footed Boobies (Sula nebouxii), we tested whether loss of environmental predictability could reduce reproductive success even when mean timing remained stable. Mean timing of the winter–spring phytoplankton bloom and mean breeding mismatch showed no clear trend, but year-to-year variability in bloom timing increased markedly. Mismatch relative to bloom onset became more variable, and both expected nest success and its consistency declined. These results show that predictability loss can erode synchrony and demography even when mean timing appears unchanged
Full text 2,073 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Climate change can alter not only when seasonal events occur on average, but also how predictable they are from year to year. Many long-lived seabirds show a paradox: breeding dates remain stable even as populations decline. Using two decades of data from Blue-footed Boobies (Sula nebouxii), we tested whether loss of environmental predictability could reduce reproductive success even when mean timing remained stable. Mean timing of the winter–spring phytoplankton bloom and mean breeding mismatch showed no clear trend, but year-to-year variability in bloom timing increased markedly. Mismatch relative to bloom onset became more variable, and both expected nest success and its consistency declined. These results show that predictability loss can erode synchrony and demography even when mean timing appears unchanged https://doi.org/10.32942/X2W37C Life Sciences climate change, phenology, environmental predictability, variation Published: 2026-03-27 00:24 Last Updated: 2026-03-27 00:24 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: All data, code, and materials needed to evaluate the conclusions of this paper are publicly available. The project GitHub repository and companion website provide a fully documented, step-by-step workflow for reproducing all analyses and figures. The GitHub repository is available at https://github.com/Santiago-0rtega/Collapse_environmental_predictability_erodes_reproductive_success, and the companion site is available at https://santiago-0rtega.github.io/Collapse_environmental_predictability_erodes_reproductive_success/. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0