Abstract
This paper identifies the primary neurocognitive bases of experiencing human beauty. Based on a systematic review of recent articles analyzing brain activity during the experience of beauty in both the arts and human faces, we propose a neurocognitive model, which includes five different stages of visual information processing, that encompasses both the beauty of the visual arts and human beauty. 1. Primary visual processing 2. Secondary visual processing 3. Sensorimotor coupling of visual perception 4. High-level visual processing: Appraisal and reward 5. Neurocognitive visual resonance with the default mode network (DMN) Based on our analysis, a two-part classification was developed. The first differentiates the perception of beauty in the visual arts from that in human faces. The second classification distinguishes between the subjective, objective, and intersubjective components of beauty perception for both faces and visual arts. The study yields three main conclusions: 1. The experience of human beauty involves five complementary neurocognitive processes. 2. The experience of facial beauty activates neurocognitive processes that are partially distinct from those involved in the experience of visual arts. 3. While innate and universal neurocognitive mechanisms exist for the objective perception of human beauty, this perception is significantly modulated by higher neurocognitive instances on which subjective and intersubjective perception is based. Keywords: : neurocognitive bases, human beauty, beauty of the arts, aesthetic medicine, objective perception, subjective perception, intersubjective perception.
Full text
6,955 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Planck-Scale Periodicity C. R. Gimarelli (December 25, 2025) \affiliation Independent Researcher The neurocognitive basis of beauty: Human beauty and the beauty of the arts. An integrative review | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 10 February 2026 V1 Latest version Share on Planck-Scale Periodicity C. R. Gimarelli (December 25, 2025) \affiliation Independent Researcher The neurocognitive basis of beauty: Human beauty and the beauty of the arts. An integrative review Author : Luis de Garrido Talavera 0000-0003-0076-3115 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177070518.89977067/v1 100 views 61 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract This paper identifies the primary neurocognitive bases of experiencing human beauty. Based on a systematic review of recent articles analyzing brain activity during the experience of beauty in both the arts and human faces, we propose a neurocognitive model, which includes five different stages of visual information processing, that encompasses both the beauty of the visual arts and human beauty. 1. Primary visual processing 2. Secondary visual processing 3. Sensorimotor coupling of visual perception 4. High-level visual processing: Appraisal and reward 5. Neurocognitive visual resonance with the default mode network (DMN) Based on our analysis, a two-part classification was developed. The first differentiates the perception of beauty in the visual arts from that in human faces. The second classification distinguishes between the subjective, objective, and intersubjective components of beauty perception for both faces and visual arts. The study yields three main conclusions: 1. The experience of human beauty involves five complementary neurocognitive processes. 2. The experience of facial beauty activates neurocognitive processes that are partially distinct from those involved in the experience of visual arts. 3. While innate and universal neurocognitive mechanisms exist for the objective perception of human beauty, this perception is significantly modulated by higher neurocognitive instances on which subjective and intersubjective perception is based. Keywords : neurocognitive bases, human beauty, beauty of the arts, aesthetic medicine, objective perception, subjective perception, intersubjective perception. Supplementary Material File (+neurocognitive bases of beauty with images.docx) Download 3.70 MB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 10 February 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Authors Affiliations Luis de Garrido Talavera 0000-0003-0076-3115 [email protected] Universidad Politecnica de Madrid Escuela Tecnica Superior de Ingenieria Aeronautica y del Espacio View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 100 views 61 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Luis de Garrido Talavera. Planck-Scale Periodicity C. R. Gimarelli (December 25, 2025) \affiliation Independent Researcher The neurocognitive basis of beauty: Human beauty and the beauty of the arts. An integrative review. Authorea . 10 February 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177070518.89977067/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.177070518.89977067/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fdf82c78b194193',t:'MTc3OTE1NjA1Ng=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.