Abstract
Nanopore read-out, that is the current signals measured across nanometer-sized openings in dielectric membranes or through natural protein channels, enables the detection, identification and sequencing of individual molecules. The detection can take place by analyzing the events of single biomolecules interacting with the pore. The accuracy in the detection of these single events is key for identification of physicochemical properties of analyte molecules. To this end, we further develop a very simple, fast, almost parameter-free, and adaptable cluster-based event detection (CBED) algorithm that clusters the nanopore signals prior to detecting nanopore events. The algorithm is validated against two other event detection schemes with respect to simplicity and efficiency. For this, nanopore data from four different experiments stemming from different laboratories that vary in the nanopore type, size, and analyte are considered. The comparison is made on the basis of the number of events detected, their quality, and the most important features extracted from nanopore events. Our results underline the higher efficiency and less noise of the CBED detected events for biological nanopore data and the need for an on-the-fly adaptivity of the baseline current for a class of solid-state nanopore data.
Full text
1,399 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Abstract
Nanopore read-out, that is the current signals measured across nanometer-sized openings in dielectric membranes or through natural protein channels, enables the detection, identification and sequencing of individual molecules. The detection can take place by analyzing the events of single biomolecules interacting with the pore. The accuracy in the detection of these single events is key for identification of physicochemical properties of analyte molecules. To this end, we further develop a very simple, fast, almost parameter-free, and adaptable cluster-based event detection (CBED) algorithm that clusters the nanopore signals prior to detecting nanopore events. The algorithm is validated against two other event detection schemes with respect to simplicity and efficiency. For this, nanopore data from four different experiments stemming from different laboratories that vary in the nanopore type, size, and analyte are considered. The comparison is made on the basis of the number of events detected, their quality, and the most important features extracted from nanopore events. Our results underline the higher efficiency and less noise of the CBED detected events for biological nanopore data and the need for an on-the-fly adaptivity of the baseline current for a class of solid-state nanopore data.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.