Automated Optimization of Bacterial Tracking Pipelines with TrackMate 8

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Quantitative analysis of bacterial dynamics in time-lapse microscopy requires robust tracking pipelines, yet selecting and optimizing algorithms for specific experiments remains challenging. Indeed, Microbiologists are confronted with numerous algorithms that must be carefully chosen and parameterized to achieve optimal tracking for their experiments. We present an automated methodology to determine optimal tracking configurations for microbiological applications. It is based on TrackMate 8, a novel version of the TrackMate Fiji plugin extended with microbiology-specific tools. Our approach systematically evaluates algorithm-parameter combinations optimizing biologically relevant metrics (e.g., cell-cycle accuracy, bacteria morphology) and includes: (1) integration of deep-learning algorithms (Omnipose, YOLO, Trackastra) adequate for bacteria images in TrackMate, (2) a TrackMate-Helper extension for parameter optimization, and (3) a tracking and segmentation editor for tracking ground-truth generation. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the methodology on two use cases showing its adaptability to diverse experimental conditions. This methodology enables microbiologists with a widely applicable, automated framework to optimize tracking pipelines, facilitating quantitative analysis in bacterial imaging.
Full text 1,483 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Quantitative analysis of bacterial dynamics in time-lapse microscopy requires robust tracking pipelines, yet selecting and optimizing algorithms for specific experiments remains challenging. Indeed, Microbiologists are confronted with numerous algorithms that must be carefully chosen and parameterized to achieve optimal tracking for their experiments. We present an automated methodology to determine optimal tracking configurations for microbiological applications. It is based on TrackMate 8, a novel version of the TrackMate Fiji plugin extended with microbiology-specific tools. Our approach systematically evaluates algorithm-parameter combinations optimizing biologically relevant metrics (e.g., cell-cycle accuracy, bacteria morphology) and includes: (1) integration of deep-learning algorithms (Omnipose, YOLO, Trackastra) adequate for bacteria images in TrackMate, (2) a TrackMate-Helper extension for parameter optimization, and (3) a tracking and segmentation editor for tracking ground-truth generation. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the methodology on two use cases showing its adaptability to diverse experimental conditions. This methodology enables microbiologists with a widely applicable, automated framework to optimize tracking pipelines, facilitating quantitative analysis in bacterial imaging. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Fixed upload of badly formatted Supplemental Information file.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0