Generation of epithelial-stromal assembloids as an advanced in vitro model of impaired adenomyosis-related endometrial receptivity

other OA: green public-domain-us
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-13

This study generated epithelial-stromal assembloids from endometrial biopsies to model adenomyosis-related impaired receptivity, finding reduced stromal LIF and HOXA10 and absent pinopodes in adenomyotic models.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 · read from full text

The study developed a 3D epithelial-stromal assembloid in vitro model from human endometrial glandular fragments (organoid fragments) and stromal fibroblasts collected from 12 women, including six with adenomyosis, and then subjected the constructs to hormonal stimulation intended to mimic the window of implantation. Using immunohistochemistry for glycodelin, LIF, and HOXA10, ELISA for prolactin secretion, and scanning electron microscopy for pinopode development, the authors found that hormonal treatment induced secretory-phase-like features in assembloids from both groups, including glycodelin, LIF, and HOXA10 positivity, and an upward trend in prolactin secretion. However, adenomyosis-derived assembloids showed significantly lower LIF and HOXA10 levels in the stromal compartment after stimulation and failed to form fully developed pinopodes, a key marker distinguishing healthy from adenomyosis responses. This paper centrally about adenomyosis — it uses epithelial-stromal assembloids to model impaired adenomyosis-related endometrial receptivity, focusing on hormone-dependent receptivity markers and pinopode formation.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To create a novel, more advanced in vitro model of human endometrium, using so-called assembloids, looking to explore endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis. DESIGN: Evaluation of assembloid responsiveness to hormonal stimulation by immunohistochemistry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and scanning electron microscopy. SUBJECTS: Twelve women, six of whom were affected by adenomyosis. EXPOSURE: Organoids (in the form of glandular fragments) and stromal fibroblasts were collected from endometrial biopsies. The two populations were combined inside an extracellular matrix to create 3D assembloids, which were then exposed to hormonal stimulation (β-estradiol for 48 hours, followed by β-estradiol/progesterone/cyclic adenosine monophosphate for 72 hours) to mimic the window of implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Glycodelin, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), and homeobox A10 (HOXA10) expression, prolactin secretion, and pinopode development. RESULT(S): Endometrial organoids and stromal cells were successfully isolated from women with and without adenomyosis and combined to generate the assembloid model. On stimulation, assembloids from both groups acquired a more secretory phase-like phenotype, as demonstrated by histology, and were shown to be positive for glycodelin, LIF, and HOXA10 by immunohistochemistry. Adenomyotic assembloids expressed significantly lower levels of LIF and HOXA10 within the stromal compartment after stimulation than did healthy assembloids in the same condition. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay revealed prolactin secretion in vitro, showing an upward trend in hormonally treated assembloids from both healthy and affected women. By scanning electron microscopy, fully formed pinopodes were discerned on the epithelial surface of healthy assembloids after stimulation, but they were absent in case of adenomyosis. CONCLUSION(S): Primary assembloids can be generated from endometrial biopsies from both healthy subjects and women affected by adenomyosis. These assembloids are amenable to hormonal stimulation and mimic secretory phase-specific characteristics of endometrial tissue in vivo, including glycodelin, LIF, and HOXA10 expression, and pinopode formation. Assembloids from adenomyosis appear to be less sensitive to hormonal treatment, showing reduced expression of LIF and HOXA10 in the stromal compartment and failing to form pinopodes. All in all, endometrial assembloids may serve as an advanced preclinical model of adenomyosis-related impaired endometrial receptivity, opening up new horizons in understanding and treating the condition.
Full text 3,498 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Generation of epithelial-stromal assembloids as an advanced in vitro model of impaired adenomyosis-related endometrial receptivity. (2025) Fertility and sterility — Vol. 123, n° 2, p. 350-360 (2025) (2025) Fertility and sterility — Vol. 123, n° 2, p. 350-360 (2025) Open Access - Adobe PDF - 2.4 MB - Authors - Author Stratopoulou, Christina Anna UCLouvain - Author Rossi, Margherita UCLouvain - Author Beaussart, Chloé UCLouvain - Author Zipponi, Margherita UCLouvain - Author Camboni, Alessandra UCLouvain - Author - Abstract - To create a novel, more advanced in vitro model of human endometrium, using so-called assembloids, looking to explore endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis. Evaluation of assembloid responsiveness to hormonal stimulation by immunohistochemistry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and scanning electron microscopy. University-based research unit in gynecology. Twelve women, six of whom were affected by adenomyosis. Organoids (in the form of glandular fragments) and stromal fibroblasts were collected from endometrial biopsies. The two populations were combined inside an extracellular matrix to create 3D assembloids, which were then exposed to hormonal stimulation (β-estradiol for 48 hours, followed by β-estradiol/progesterone/cyclic adenosine monophosphate for 72 hours) to mimic the window of implantation. Glycodelin, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), and homeobox A10 (HOXA10) expression, prolactin secretion, and pinopode development. Endometrial organoids and stromal cells were successfully isolated from women with and without adenomyosis and combined to generate the assembloid model. On stimulation, assembloids from both groups acquired a more secretory phase-like phenotype, as demonstrated by histology, and were shown to be positive for glycodelin, LIF, and HOXA10 by immunohistochemistry. Adenomyotic assembloids expressed significantly lower levels of LIF and HOXA10 within the stromal compartment after stimulation than did healthy assembloids in the same condition. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay revealed prolactin secretion in vitro, showing an upward trend in hormonally treated assembloids from both healthy and affected women. By scanning electron microscopy, fully formed pinopodes were discerned on the epithelial surface of healthy assembloids after stimulation, but they were absent in case of adenomyosis. Primary assembloids can be generated from endometrial biopsies from both healthy subjects and women affected by adenomyosis. These assembloids are amenable to hormonal stimulation and mimic secretory phase-specific characteristics of endometrial tissue in vivo, including glycodelin, LIF, and HOXA10 expression, and pinopode formation. Assembloids from adenomyosis appear to be less sensitive to hormonal treatment, showing reduced expression of LIF and HOXA10 in the stromal compartment and failing to form pinopodes. All in all, endometrial assembloids may serve as an advanced preclinical model of adenomyosis-related impaired endometrial receptivity, opening up new horizons in understanding and treating the condition. - Affiliations - APA - Chicago - FWB Stratopoulou, C. A., Rossi, M., Beaussart, C., Zipponi, M., Camboni, A., Donnez, J., & Dolmans, M.-M. (2025). Generation of epithelial-stromal assembloids as an advanced in vitro model of impaired adenomyosis-related endometrial receptivity. Fertility and sterility, 123(2), 350-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.339 (Original work published 2025)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-20T06:14:21.026120+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-20T06:11:58.753953+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine