Trachelectomy: Removal of Cervical Stump Following Supracervical Hysterectomy

In: Hysterectomy · 2017 · pp. 1473–1476 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_121 · W2754983142
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-11

This chapter reviews trachelectomy indications, access routes, and complications following supracervical hysterectomy, an alternative to total hysterectomy with potential risks of cervical retention.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 · read from full text

This chapter reviews cervical stump extirpation (trachelectomy), the removal of the cervix after supracervical hysterectomy, including indications, surgical access routes, and complications. It frames supracervical hysterectomy as having benefits such as reduced complications, shorter hospital stays, faster return to activity, and lower mesh-related problems when combined with abdominal sacrocolopexy, while emphasizing counseling about cervical retention risks such as ongoing cervical screening and the possible need for future surgery. A stated limitation is that the chapter is a narrative review/clinical overview rather than new comparative trial evidence, and it relies on prior studies to discuss outcomes. Relevance to endometriosis: the chapter cites laparoscopic trachelectomy performed for persistent pelvic pain and endometriosis after supracervical hysterectomy, though the chapter’s main focus is trachelectomy after supracervical hysterectomy.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 7,077 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Cervical stump extirpation (trachelectomy) is the removal of the cervix following supracervical hysterectomy. Subtotal or supracervical hysterectomy is an alternative to total hysterectomy (removal of uterine fundus and cervix) in women undergoing hysterectomy for many benign indications. There are several benefits to supracervical hysterectomy including reduced complications, shorter hospital stay, and faster resumption of activity; in addition, mesh complications are reduced when hysterectomy is done in conjunction with an abdominal sacrocolopexy. However, women considering supracervical hysterectomy should be counseled regarding risks of cervical retention, including need for cervical screening according to current guidelines, as well as the potential need for future surgery to remove the cervical stump. With increases in minimally invasive surgical techniques, many women will elect to undergo supracervical hysterectomy: therefore, it is likely that most gynecologists will encounter patients that require trachelectomy. In this chapter, we will review the indications for trachelectomy, advantages and disadvantages of different routes of access for trachelectomy, as well as complications associated with removing the cervix following subtotal hysterectomy. Disclosures The authors report no conflicts of interest; There was no financial support for this research. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES. Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):205–12. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1265-3. Bensinger G, Lind L, Lesser M, Guess M, Winkler HA. Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(6):2094–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.066. Thom CH, Dunne TJ, Livornese G. Vaginal cervicectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1967;30(4):473–80. Jones DE, Shackelford DP, Brame RG. Supracervical hysterectomy: back to the future? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(3 Pt 1):513–5. Munro MG. Supracervical hysterectomy: a time for reappraisal. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(1):133–9. Brown JS, Sawaya G, Thom DH, Grady D. Hysterectomy and urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Lancet. 2000;356(9229):535–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02577-0. Kilkku P, Gronroos M, Hirvonen T, Rauramo L. Supravaginal uterine amputation vs. hysterectomy. Effects on libido and orgasm. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983;62(2):147–52. Learman LA, RL Jr S, Varner RE, McNeeley SG, Goodman-Gruen D, Richter HE, Lin F, Showstack J, Ireland CC, Vittinghoff E, Hulley SB, Washington AE. Total or Supracervical Hysterectomy Research G. A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(3):453–62. Greer WJ, Richter HE, Wheeler TL, Varner RE, Szychowski JM, Kuppermann M, Learman LA. Long-term outcomes of the total or supracervical hysterectomy (TOSH) trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(1):49–57. doi:10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181cec343. Learman LA, RL Jr S, Varner RE, Richter HE, Lin F, Ireland CC, Kuppermann M, Vittinghoff E, Showstack J, Washington AE, Hulley SB. Medicine or Surgery Research G. Hysterectomy versus expanded medical treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding: clinical outcomes in the medicine or surgery trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5 Pt 1):824–33. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000124272.22072.6f. Kuppermann M, Summitt Jr RL, Varner RE, McNeeley SG, Goodman-Gruen D, Learman LA, Ireland CC, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, Richter HE, Showstack J, Hulley SB, Washington AE. Total or Supracervical Hysterectomy Research G. Sexual functioning after total compared with supracervical hysterectomy: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(6):1309–18. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000160428.81371.be. Thakar R, Ayers S, Clarkson P, Stanton S, Manyonda I. Outcomes after total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(17):1318–25. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa013336. Pratt JH, Jefferies JA. The retained cervical stump. A 25-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1976;48(6):711–5. Decker DG, Hunt AB, Fricke RE, Nelson GA. Carcinoma of the cervical stump. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1957;73(5):974–81. discussion, 981–74 Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Gluud C, Tabor A. Randomised controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results. BJOG: Inter J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110(12):1088–98. Boosz A, Lermann J, Mehlhorn G, Loehberg C, Renner SP, Thiel FC, Schrauder M, Beckmann MW, Mueller A. Comparison of re-operation rates and complication rates after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopy-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011a;158(2):269–73. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.021. Welch JS, Counseller VS, Malkasian Jr GD. The vaginal removal of the cervical stump. Surg Clin North Am. 1959;39(4):1073–84. Boosz A, Lermann J, Mehlhorn G, Renner SP, Thiel FC, Hartmann A, Beckmann MW, Mueller A. Is laparoscopic extirpation of the cervical stump after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy justified in women with incidentally found atypical endometrial hyperplasia? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011b;21(8):705–9. doi:10.1089/lap.2010.0497. Mayo CH, Mayo C. Carcinoma of the cervical stump following subtotal hysterectomy. Ann Surg. 1931;93(6):1215–9. Hilger WS, Pizarro AR, Magrina JF. Removal of the retained cervical stump. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(6):2117–21. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.015. Pasley WW. Trachelectomy: a review of fifty-five cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159(3):728–32. Okaro EO, Jones KD, Sutton C. Long term outcome following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. BJOG: Inter J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;108(10):1017–20. Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Roemisch M, Seidman DS, Nezhat C. Laparoscopic trachelectomy for persistent pelvic pain and endometriosis after supracervical hysterectomy. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(6):925–8. Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ. A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(6):1365–73. discussion 1373-64 doi:10.1067/mob.2000.110910. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2018 Springer International Publishing Switzerland About this chapter Cite this chapter Mueller, M.G., Kenton, K. (2018). Trachelectomy: Removal of Cervical Stump Following Supracervical Hysterectomy. In: Alkatout, I., Mettler, L. (eds) Hysterectomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_121 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_121 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22496-1 Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22497-8 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

References (24)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK