Correcting Loop Detector Positional Bias When Estimating Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

This study evaluates machine learning models (ordinary least squares regression, random forest, and XGBoost) to convert localized loop detector (LD) speeds into spatial link speeds for estimating network macroscopic fundamental diagrams, using floating car device (FCD) average speed as ground truth. The random forest model performed best, improving accuracy by 37.44% versus original LD-derived speeds and achieving an RMSE of 9.54 km/hr. The authors also examined how LD position and demand affect performance by separating loading and unloading periods, with the random forest yielding an improved accuracy of 44.9%, and they report that NMFD analysis supported robustness of corrected LD inputs. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract This study explores the use of machine learning models (ML) to transform localized loop detector (LD) speeds into spatial link speeds for accurate estimation of network macroscopic fundamental diagrams ( NMFDs). We compare the performance of Ordinary Least Squares Regression (OLSR), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost models, using a comprehensive dataset to evaluate their effectiveness in aligning LD speeds with floating car device (FCD) as ground truth average speed. The RF model showed the highest accuracy, with a 37.44% improvement over original LDD speeds and a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 9.54 km/hr. Additionally, we investigated the impact of LD positions and demand by separating loading and unloading periods. The RF model's adjustments were especially effective under these conditions, resulting in an improved accuracy of 44.9%. Our analysis of NMFDs further validated the RF model's robustness and accurate estimation of NMFDs using corrected LDD.
Full text 11,819 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Correcting Loop Detector Positional Bias When Estimating Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Correcting Loop Detector Positional Bias When Estimating Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams Nandan Maiti, Ludovic Leclercq This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5684680/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 21 Mar, 2025 Read the published version in Data Science for Transportation → Version 1 posted 9 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study explores the use of machine learning models (ML) to transform localized loop detector (LD) speeds into spatial link speeds for accurate estimation of network macroscopic fundamental diagrams ( NMFDs). We compare the performance of Ordinary Least Squares Regression (OLSR), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost models, using a comprehensive dataset to evaluate their effectiveness in aligning LD speeds with floating car device (FCD) as ground truth average speed. The RF model showed the highest accuracy, with a 37.44% improvement over original LDD speeds and a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 9.54 km/hr. Additionally, we investigated the impact of LD positions and demand by separating loading and unloading periods. The RF model's adjustments were especially effective under these conditions, resulting in an improved accuracy of 44.9%. Our analysis of NMFDs further validated the RF model's robustness and accurate estimation of NMFDs using corrected LDD. Loop detectors Floating cars Spatial imputation Macroscopic fundamental diagrams Machine learning models Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 21 Mar, 2025 Read the published version in Data Science for Transportation → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 06 Feb, 2025 Reviews received at journal 05 Feb, 2025 Reviews received at journal 14 Jan, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 24 Dec, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 24 Dec, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 24 Dec, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 23 Dec, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 23 Dec, 2024 First submitted to journal 20 Dec, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5684680","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":394705174,"identity":"85650d1b-5901-44fc-9b0a-faecc63c17a8","order_by":0,"name":"Nandan Maiti","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Université Gustave Eiffel","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nandan","middleName":"","lastName":"Maiti","suffix":""},{"id":394705175,"identity":"902d338e-3aa2-45ff-89c8-7183248f0d28","order_by":1,"name":"Ludovic Leclercq","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Université Gustave Eiffel","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ludovic","middleName":"","lastName":"Leclercq","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-12-20 14:08:21","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5684680/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5684680/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42421-025-00120-w","type":"published","date":"2025-03-21T15:57:55+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":79120696,"identity":"22b82aa0-e68c-4a77-978f-276c07c7090b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-24 16:11:04","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":8191152,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"LDDspeedcorrectionsJournalSub.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5684680/v1_covered_550e21e4-ae4d-4fcd-9434-a1f96b1c89a6.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Correcting Loop Detector Positional Bias When Estimating Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"data-science-for-transportation","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"Learn more about [Data Science for Transportation](https://www.springer.com/journal/42421)","snPcode":"42421","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/42421/3","title":"Data Science for Transportation","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"snapp","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Loop detectors, Floating cars, Spatial imputation, Macroscopic fundamental diagrams, Machine learning models","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5684680/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5684680/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"This study explores the use of machine learning models (ML) to transform localized loop detector (LD) speeds into spatial link speeds for accurate estimation of network macroscopic fundamental diagrams ( NMFDs). We compare the performance of Ordinary Least Squares Regression (OLSR), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost models, using a comprehensive dataset to evaluate their effectiveness in aligning LD speeds with floating car device (FCD) as ground truth average speed. The RF model showed the highest accuracy, with a 37.44% improvement over original LDD speeds and a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 9.54 km/hr. Additionally, we investigated the impact of LD positions and demand by separating loading and unloading periods. The RF model's adjustments were especially effective under these conditions, resulting in an improved accuracy of 44.9%. Our analysis of NMFDs further validated the RF model's robustness and accurate estimation of NMFDs using corrected LDD.","manuscriptTitle":"Correcting Loop Detector Positional Bias When Estimating Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-01-06 11:22:55","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5684680/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-02-06T18:36:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-02-06T04:38:18+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-01-15T01:38:37+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"231579788743035968920060484811786071256","date":"2024-12-25T03:58:01+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"44251521968228899441528592531523390107","date":"2024-12-24T20:57:53+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-12-24T17:00:11+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-12-23T07:05:27+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-12-23T07:02:59+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Data Science for Transportation","date":"2024-12-20T13:56:53+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"data-science-for-transportation","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"Learn more about [Data Science for Transportation](https://www.springer.com/journal/42421)","snPcode":"42421","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/42421/3","title":"Data Science for Transportation","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"snapp","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"360ccbf1-03c4-4e73-b709-f051a396f9d2","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 6th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-03-24T16:06:25+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-5684680","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42421-025-00120-w","journal":{"identity":"data-science-for-transportation","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Data Science for Transportation"},"publishedOn":"2025-03-21 15:57:55","publishedOnDateReadable":"March 21st, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-01-06 11:22:55","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s42421-025-00120-w","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42421-025-00120-w","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5684680","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5684680","identity":"rs-5684680","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0