Genetic characteristics and prognosis of m6A RNAmethylation regulator in acute myeloid leukemia

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07+body, 2026-07-05

This study analyzed m6A RNA methylation regulators in AML, finding two subgroups with differential expression, with one subgroup exhibiting longer survival and enriched Notch pathway activity.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

This preprint analyzes acute myeloid leukemia (AML) RNA-seq and survival data from TCGA and ICGC to characterize genetic expression patterns of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators (writers, readers, and erasers) and assess whether they can stratify prognosis and clinicopathological features. Using consensus clustering (k=2) on 151 AML samples, the authors define two m6A regulator subgroups (RM1 and RM2), finding higher regulator expression in RM1 and longer survival in RM2; they also report pathway enrichment in RM1 involving endothelial-hematopoietic transformation through the Notch pathway, and Kaplan–Meier results where low FTO, ALKBH5, or ZC3H13 expression is associated with higher survival. Cox regression-derived risk scores using regulator expression predict survival and relate to morphological categories, with additional ROC evaluation and cross-validation. A major limitation explicitly noted is that the work is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Background: To identify the genetic characteristics of m6A RNA methylation regulators in AML and explore their potential value as prognostic markers.Methods: RNA-seq transcriptome data and clinical survival data of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were downloaded from ICGC and TCGA, gene annotation files were downloaded from GENECODE (1). 13 widely reported m6A RNA alphas were obtained from the literature. The expression of m6A RNA methylation regulators were collected and analized using gene annotation files. The samples were subjected to consistent clustering to obtain two subgroups RM1 and RM2, and the pathological characteristics and survival between the two subgroups were analyzed. Comparative analysis and functional analysis of m6A RNA methylation regulators between subgroups were completed. The STRING database analyzed the interactions between m6A RNA methylation regulators, and Spearman analyzed the correlation of expression of m6A RNA methylation regulators. COX regression analysis and risk scores were used to predict prognosis and pathological characteristics, and risk scores calculated using features were used to predict the prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of tumor patients.Results: According to the morphological characteristics of AML, the samples were divided into 8 categories (M0 Undifferentiated, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7), and among them, the expression profile and expression heat map of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were constructed. Using m6A RNA methylation regulator as a feature vector, consistent clustering of 151 samples yielded two subgroups RM1 and RM2. Among them, the expression of the regulator in RM1 was higher than RM2,and RM2 patients had a longer survival time than RM1. Gene set enrichment analysis found that functional processes such as endothelial-hematopoietic transformation through the Notch pathway were significantly enriched in RM1. The analysis of the KM curve indicates that when the expression of FTO or ALKBH5 or of ZC3H13 was low, the survival time of patients was significantly higher than that with high expression.Conclusion: m6A RNA methylase regulator is not only an independent prognostic marker of AML, but also can predict its clinicopathological characteristics, which has potential value for stratifying prognosis and improving treatment strategies.
Full text 98,246 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Genetic characteristics and prognosis of m6A RNAmethylation regulator in acute myeloid leukemia | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research article Genetic characteristics and prognosis of m6A RNAmethylation regulator in acute myeloid leukemia Jiasheng Xu, Kaili Liao, Zhonghua Fu, Zhenfang Xiong This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-37234/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background : To identify the genetic characteristics of m6A RNA methylation regulators in AML and explore their potential value as prognostic markers. Methods : RNA-seq transcriptome data and clinical survival data of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were downloaded from ICGC and TCGA, gene annotation files were downloaded from GENECODE (1). 13 widely reported m6A RNA alphas were obtained from the literature. The expression of m6A RNA methylation regulators were collected and analized using gene annotation files. The samples were subjected to consistent clustering to obtain two subgroups RM1 and RM2, and the pathological characteristics and survival between the two subgroups were analyzed. Comparative analysis and functional analysis of m6A RNA methylation regulators between subgroups were completed. The STRING database analyzed the interactions between m6A RNA methylation regulators, and Spearman analyzed the correlation of expression of m6A RNA methylation regulators. COX regression analysis and risk scores were used to predict prognosis and pathological characteristics, and risk scores calculated using features were used to predict the prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of tumor patients. Results : According to the morphological characteristics of AML, the samples were divided into 8 categories (M0 Undifferentiated, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7), and among them, the expression profile and expression heat map of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were constructed. Using m6A RNA methylation regulator as a feature vector, consistent clustering of 151 samples yielded two subgroups RM1 and RM2. Among them, the expression of the regulator in RM1 was higher than RM2, and RM2 patients had a longer survival time than RM1. Gene set enrichment analysis found that functional processes such as endothelial-hematopoietic transformation through the Notch pathway were significantly enriched in RM1. The analysis of the KM curve indicates that when the expression of FTO or ALKBH5 or of ZC3H13 was low, the survival time of patients was significantly higher than that with high expression. Conclusion : m6A RNA methylase regulator is not only an independent prognostic marker of AML, but also can predict its clinicopathological characteristics, which has potential value for stratifying prognosis and improving treatment strategies. Cancer Biology m6A methylation regulators clinical prognostic impact AML Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant disease of myeloid hematopoietic stem / progenitor cells. It is characterized by the abnormal proliferation of primary and immature myeloid cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. The clinical manifestations are anemia, bleeding, infection, and fever, organ infiltration, metabolic abnormalities, etc. [1]. Most cases of this disease are critically ill and have a dangerous prognosis, which can be life-threatening if not treated in time. This disease accounts for 30% of pediatric leukemia, and it is affected by molecular biology and chemotherapy. Children's AML is similar to adults (<50 years); infants and young children are more likely to develop AML than adults [2-3]. According to current knowledge, the exact etiology of leukemia is unknown, but it is related to regional environmental factors, ionizing radiation, chemical exposure, alcoholism and smoking are related to the body's special response to certain viral infections [4-5]. In addition, in recent years, it has been found through genetic mutation frequency and some biomarker studies that it may be a combination of genetics and environmental factors results [6-7]. M6A is a universal form of mRNA modification, but little is known about its role in AML. This work aims to identify the genetic characteristics and prognostic value of m6A regulators in AML. The AML samples were collected in TCGA, the Log-rank test and Cox regression model were used for survival analysis. Chi-square test was used to calculate the relationship between m6A regulator changes and clinicopathology. Genetic changes of m6A regulators in AML were identified and their changes were found to be poor significant relationships between clinical characteristics. These findings help to understand the epigenetic modification of RNA in AML. Methods 2.1 Data acquisition and preprocessing Download acute myeloid leukemia (AML) RNA-seq transcriptome data (rpkm data), acute myeloid leukemia clinical survival data (including disease) from ICGC and TCGA (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) (Physical characteristics and survival time, etc.), download gene annotation files from GENECODE (https://www.gencodegenes.org/). Select samples that have both pathological characteristics and RNA-seq expression data, and a total of 151 acute myeloids cell-like leukemia samples were obtained. Since there is no stage data for AML, leukemia morphology: M0 Undifferentiated, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7 were used as a pathological feature. From the literature [8-10], 13 widely reported m6A RNA methylation regulators (m6A RNA methylation regulators for different participating roles in the methylation process: writers (methyltransferase) -METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, KIAA1429, RBM15, ZC3H13; readers (binding proteins)-YTHDC1, YTHDC2, YTHDF1, YTHDF2, HNRNPC; erasers (demethylase)-FTO, ALKBH5). The selection process for m6A RNA methylation regulators is: We first collated a list of sixteen m6A RNA methylation regulators from published literature, [1-3] and then we restricted the list to genes with available RNA expression data in the TCGA datasets. This yielded a total of thirteen m6A RNA methylation regulators. Then, we systematically compared the expression of these m6A RNA methylation regulators with different clinical pathological features. Select 151 acute myeloid leukemia samples with existing pathological characteristics (morphological characteristics: M0 Undifferentiated, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7) and RNA-seq expression data; use gene annotation file to construct the expression profile (rpkm data) of m6A RNA methylation regulators ( Supplementary Table 1 ), classify acute myeloid leukemia samples based on the morphological characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia, and use m6A RNA methylation regulators, finally construct an expression heat map. 2.2 Sample consistent clustering and subgroup analysis The AML m6A RNA methylation regulator was used as a feature vector, and ConsensusClusterPlus consensus clustering (k = 2) was performed on the samples. Two subgroups RM1 and RM2 were obtained. The t-test was used to compare and analyze the age difference between rm1 and rm2, the chi-square test was used to analyze the difference between the who subclasses of the two subgroups, and the cox regression was used to analyze the difference in survival between the two subgroups. 2.3 Analysis of the interaction between m6A RNA methylation regulators and functional analysis between subgroups The STRING database was used to analyze the interactions between m6A RNA methylation regulators, and Spearman analyzed the expression correlation of m6A RNA methylation regulators. Construct the expression profiles of m6A RNA methylation regulators in RM1 and RM2 subgroups, use PCA to analyze the differences in m6A RNA methylation regulator expression between the two subgroups, and use R package: clusterprofier to annotate and Enrichment analysis. The enrichment content includes GO biological processes (BP) and KEGG Pathways. 2.4. Cox regression analysis and the use of risk scores to predict prognosis and pathological characteristics A risk score is given for each acute myeloid leukemia sample, with the formula: Risk score = , Among them, Coefi is the regression coefficient (COefficient) of COX regression, and xi is the expression value of the prognosis methylation regulator of each acute myeloid leukemia. This formula was used to calculate the risk score of each acute myeloid leukemia sample. According to this risk score, the sample was divided into high-risk group and low-risk group. Find the difference between overall survival (OS) between the two categories. 2.5. Prediction of prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of tumor patients using risk scores calculated by features Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to estimate classification performance.The higher the area under the curve (AUC) value, the higher the classification performance. Using 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators as risk characteristics, the TCGA acute myeloid leukemia sample was divided into 5 parts, 5 times cross-validation was applied, the model was trained with four fifths of the sample and tested on the test set (the remaining one fifths of the samples). In this way, each part will be tested once. Then the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is used to estimate the classification performance. The higher the area under the curve (AUC) value , The higher the classification performance. Comparative analysis of whether the risk score model can perfectly predict the three-year survival rate, RM1 / 2 subgroup, prognosis results, morphological characteristics and other characteristics of tumor patients. Results 3.1 Differential gene screening According to the morphological characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia samples were divided into 8 categories (M0 Undifferentiated, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7). See Table 1 for clinical information. For information on 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators, see Table 2. Among 8 types of samples (M0 Undifferentiated, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7), the expression profiles of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were constructed, and the corresponding heat maps were constructed using the expression profiles (Figure 1A). Samples were sorted from M0 Undifferentiated to M7 according to morphological characteristics, and genes are divided according to different functions: writers (methyltransferase: METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, KIAA1429, RBM15, ZC3H13); readers (binding protein: YTHDC1 , YTHDC2, YTHDF1, YTHDF2, HNRNPC); erasers (demethylase: FTO, ALKBH5), sorted from top to bottom. Red represents high gene expression, purple represents low gene expression. 3.2 Sample consistent clustering Using the selected 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators as feature vectors, ConsensusClusterPlus clustering was performed on 151 samples, and two subgroups RM1 and RM2 were obtained. See the ConsensusClusterPlus clustering map of two subgroups RM1 and RM2 in Figure 1B. Under ideal conditions, the samples in the Consensus Cluster Plus cluster should be scattered, and the samples in the group should be clustered together, as shown in the Figure 1B: where the purple dots represent RM1 and the green dots represent RM2. RM1 and RM2 contain 91 and 60 samples, respectively (Supplementary Table 2). The heatmap of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators of acute myeloid leukemia between the two subgroups is shown in Figure 1C. One row represents one gene and one column represents a sample. The samples were ordered from left to right, and the red group on the left is RM1, and the right blue group is RM2. The genes are based on different functions: writers (methyltransferase: METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, KIAA1429, RBM15, ZC3H13); readers (binding proteins: YTHDC1, YTHDC2, YTHDF1, YTHDF2, HNRNPC ); erasers (demethylase: FTO, ALKBH5), sorted from top to bottom. Red represents high gene expression and purple represents low gene expression. Among them, the expression level of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators in RM1 was generally higher than RM2. 3.3 Comparative analysis of pathological characteristics (age + morphological characteristics) and survival between the two subgroups Extract the samples containing the age data in the two subgroups, and perform a T test on the age of the samples in the two subgroups. Compare the differences between the ages of the two subgroups (RM1, RM2). From the box plot, you can see that there is a difference between the ages of the two subgroups. (p = 0.08), but the difference is not significant (Figure 2A). The samples containing the morphological characteristics data in the two subgroups were extracted and the chi-square test was used to analyze the morphological characteristics of the two subgroups. The results showed that: The morphological characteristics of the two subgroups were significantly different (p = 0.00337). For a pie chart of the morphological characteristics of the two subgroups, see Figure 2B. Extract the samples with survival data from the two subgroups, use Cox regression to analyze the survival of the two subgroups, and draw the KM survival curve, see Figure 2C. The results showed that the two subgroups (RM1, RM2) had different survival periods. Among them, 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators had higher expression values in RM1 than RM2, and RM2 (blue) patients had a longer survival time than RM1 (red). The results indicate that 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were in RM1. It is possible that it inhibits the expression of key functional genes in the AML patients, resulting in a significant reduction in survival time. 3.4 Analysis of the interaction between m6A RNA methylation regulators and functional analysis among subgroups Using STRING to draw a protein interaction network diagram (PPI) of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators, and get the interaction relationship between 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators, see Figure 2D. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to evaluate the difference in expression between the two subgroup samples (RM1, RM2), and the results were shown in Figure 3a. The blue dots represent RM1 and the yellow triangles represent RM2. Then, using R Contains clusterProfiler for enrichment analysis of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators (GO-BP, KEGG Pathway) See Figure 3b. The 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were mainly involved in Notch signaling pathway, cytokine-mediated signaling pathway, endothelial pathways and biological processes such as hematopoietic transition have been shown to be related to acute myeloid leukemia. 3.5 Cox regression analysis and use of risk scores to predict prognosis Each sample was scored by the m6A RNA methylation regulator, and the samples were divided into high and low risk groups based on the risk score of each sample. Survival analysis was performed on the two groups of samples. The KM survival curve is shown in Figure 4a. It can be seen that the risk score can well separate the high and low risk groups of the sample (p = 0.042). In order to further study the previous relationship of the 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators, we constructed their co-expression relationship, and different points in the co-expression relationship diagram represented different methylation regulators and described their functional correlation. Using the R package Corrplot further visualized the above relationship.The expression correlation diagram of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators is shown in Figure 4b. 3.6 Prediction of prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of tumor patients using feature-calculated risk scores Take 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators as combined features, map them to TCGA-AML. Use Support Vector Machine (SVM) to assess the risk score of combined features, predict the outcome of three-year survival results, training set See Figure 5A, test set shown in Figure 5B. Risk scores for subgroup outcome prediction, training set shown in Figure 5C, test set shown in Figure 5D. Risk scores were used to evaluate combination features to predict outcome outcome, training set see Figure 5E, the test set was shown in Figure 5F, the risk score of the combined feature was used to predict the morphological characteristics of the outcome, the training set was shown in Figure 5G, and the test set was shown in Figure 5H. The ROC curve shows that the risk score can perfectly predict the three-year survival rate of AML patients. In the RM1 / 2 subgroup, the morphological feature status and prognostic outcome status, and the prediction efficiency was better than the morphological feature status. These results showed that the risk score calculated by the feature can accurately predict the prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of AML patients. 3.7 Analysis of prognostic correlation of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators Thirteen m6A RNA methylation regulators were individually analyzed for prognosis and the survival curve was drawn (Figure 6). The results showed that: the eraser (demethylase): FTO, ALKBH5, and writers: ZC3H13, were significantly correlated with overall survival (P <0.05, Figure 6K-M). Discussion Acute myelogenous leukemia is a hematopoietic stem cell malignant disease. It is characterized by the abnormal proliferation of the myeloid lineage of embryonic cell clones, which can lead to the accumulation of immature progenitor cells and impair hematopoietic function. [11-12]. The condition of AML develops very quickly. If not treated in time, it may be fatal within weeks or months. Acute myeloid leukemia is the most common acute leukemia in adults [12-13], although AML can occur in all ages, it mainly happens in the elderly and the average age at diagnosis is approximately 70 years [14-15]. Currently, most patients diagnosed with AML are unable to determine their etiology and susceptibility, but are exposed to DNA-destroying agents (such as benzene, cigarettes, ionizing radiation (usually due to radiation therapy), and cytotoxic chemotherapy) which increase the risk of amAMLl [16-17]. AML is similar to other cancers in that it exhibits abnormal proliferation, survival and differentiation of related cells. This kind of cellular characteristics is caused by genetic changes in the cells, but the coding sequence mutations in AML cells are much less than those in most solid epithelial tumor cells. Previous studies have shown an identification in 200 adult AML patient's tumor samples with nearly 2,000 different mutated genes, but only 23 of them were frequently mutated, and an average of 13 mutations were identified per genome; 5 of these mutations were in repeatedly mutated genes [18-19], the large overlap of these mutations provides a potential direction for the prognosis and treatment of AML [20-21]. M6A RNA methylation modification is the most common way to modify mRNA, and it exists in many species of animals and plants, yeasts, bacteria, and mycoplasma. Studies have found that it can modify more than 7,000 mammalian genes, of which Contains about 12,000 m6A sites [22]. These sites are concentrated in PRACH (R is G or A, H is A, C or U), they are usually found in the terminator and 3'UTR. M6A through m6A methyltransferase ("writer") is modified and subsequently recognized by the m6A binding protein ("reader"), and this modification is also eliminated by demethylase ("eraser"). M6A modification is very common, and its dynamic regulation has been shown to be strongly related to gene expression [23]. In recent years, the clinical application value of m6A in tumors has become increasingly apparent. It mainly affects the occurrence and development of cancer by regulating the life activities of cells. M6A as a promising biomarker and is increasingly being used to detect and prevent cancer [24]. In addition, more and more studies show that m6A has potential clinical application value as a therapeutic target for cancer patients [25]. Researchers have reported that METTL3 is a proto-oncogene, which can be suppressed by m6A modification. Prepare cell differentiation in test tubes while promoting cell growth. Conversely, in vivo, this can induce cell differentiation and apoptosis, thereby inhibiting leukemia [26]. METTL14, which is also a proto-oncogene, can be modified by m6A. Inhibit the differentiation of hepatocytes in leukemia and promote the regeneration of stem cells [27]. FTO is also a proto-oncogene, and m6A modification can promote the transformation of leukocytes in leukemia and inhibit their differentiation [28]. In our study, we obtained and screened RNA-seq transcriptome data and clinical survival data for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) from ICGC and TCGA, and constructed 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators using gene annotation files Expression profile of factors. Through consistent clustering of samples, two subgroups RM1 and RM2 were obtained, and the functional analysis of m6A RNA methylation regulators between subgroups was performed. For m6A RNA methylation regulators, we used the STRING database for protein protein interaction network (PPI network) analysis. The STRING database is a database that searches for known and predicted protein-protein interactions. This database can be applied to 2031 species, including the interaction between 9.6 million proteins and 13.8 million proteins. Using STRING, the interactions between 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were obtained and the corresponding network diagrams were drawn; circles in the network represent proteins (i.e., 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators), straight lines represent interactions between proteins. Different colored lines represent different evidence; the stronger the two proteins interact, the thicker the lines; the different colored and shaped lines represent different interactions, including data results mined from PubMed summary text, database data results, and results predicted using bioinformatics methods. Principal Component Analysis (Principal Component Analysis, PCA) is a multivariate analysis technique. The core idea of PCA is to reduce the dimensionality of the data while preserving the differences of the data as much as possible, that is, abstracting out less unrelated variables to describe the data. It is a group of points in multi-dimensional space. While maintaining the relative spatial position of this group of points, it is rotated to a new coordinate system (the coordinate axis is each PC), so that the coordinates of each point on the new coordinate axis (projection) has the largest variance, and the axis with the largest projection variance is PC1, followed by PC2. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used to evaluate the difference in expression of samples (RM1, RM2) between two subgroups, and PCA uses linear algebra calculation method, dimensionality reduction and principal component extraction of tens of thousands of genetic variables. Ideally, in the PCA graph, samples between groups should be scattered, and samples within the group should be gathered together. In this study, we use PCA was used to compare the expression profiles between the two subgroups of RM1 and RM2, and the results showed that there was a significant difference between them. We performed a survival analysis of the grouped cases based on the mean of FTO and ALKBH5, and the analysis of the KM curve indicated that the expression was low in FTO (blue), the patient's survival time is significantly higher than high expression (red); in the case of ALKBH5 low expression (blue), the patient's survival time is significantly higher than high expression (red). Similarly, based on The survival analysis of grouped cases by the mean of ZC3H13 also showed that compared with high expression (red), ZC3H13 low expression (blue), the survival time of patients was significantly improved. The results indicate that FTO, ALKBH5 and ZC3H13 may be involved in the regulation as key genes。 The occurrence and development of AML has led to a significant reduction in survival time. In the future, m6A RNA methylation modification can become a potential therapeutic target. New drugs can control the cancer process through the regulation of m6A RNA methylation modification. It can also become a biomarker for cancer occurrence and development to provide rapid and sensitive warnings [29-31]. We also need more experiments to discover the mechanism of m6A RNA methylation modification in AML regulation, so as to open up the development of new drugs and biomarker research door. Conclusion In conclusion, 13 major m6A RNA methylation regulators can be divided into 2 subgroups (RM1 / 2) by consistent clustering analysis in different clinicopathological characteristics samples. Compared with RM2, RM1 has worse prognosis and more morphological features. Moreover, gene enrichment analysis found that functional processes such as endothelial-hematopoietic transformation transmitting signals through the Notch pathway were significantly enriched in RM1. The above findings indicate that 13 m6A RNA methylation enzyme regulators can be used as a risk profile for AML, which is not only an independent prognostic marker, but also predicts the clinicopathological features of AML. Tables Table 1 Clinical factors Clinical factors leukemia_morphology M0 Undifferentiated 15 M1 35 M2 38 M3 15 M4 29 M5 15 M6 2 M7 1 Not Classified 1 Vital_status alive 54 dead 97 Age <30 13 30-40 18 41-50 23 51-60 30 61-70 38 71-80 26 81-90 3 Table 2 Information of m6A RNA regulators m 6 A RNA regulators Chr Start End Strand Type ALKBH5 17 18183078 18209954 + erasers FTO 16 53701692 54158512 + erasers KIAA1429 8 94487693 94553529 - writers METTL14 4 118685368 118715433 + writers METTL3 14 21498133 21511375 - writers RBM15 1 110338506 110346681 + writers WTAP 6 159725585 159756319 + writers ZC3H13 13 45954465 46052759 - writers HNRNPC 14 21209136 21269494 - readers YTHDC1 4 68310387 68350089 - readers YTHDC2 5 113513683 113595285 + readers YTHDF1 20 63195429 63216234 - readers YTHDF2 1 28736621 28769775 + readers Abbreviations AML: Acute myeloid leukemia BP: biological processes KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes ICGC: International Cancer Genome Consortium TCGA: The Cancer Genome Atlas OS:overall survival ROC: Receiver operating characteristic AUC: area under the curve PPI network: protein protein interaction network PCA: Principal component analysis Declarations Acknowledgements: ZHENFANG XIONG and ZHONGHUA FU are the co-Corresponding authors of this article; Xiong Zhenfang is the 1st of the corresponding authors and Fu Zhonghua is the 2nd of the corresponding authors. Availability of data and materials: All datas are available. Please contact us to access if it is needed. Ethical approval and consent to participate : This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of theFirst Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Funding: The study did not accept any funding. Authors’ Contributions: JS: research design and drafting the manuscript KL: literature search ZH: help modify articles and collate references ZF: review and revision of the manuscript and writing guidance All authors have read and approved the manuscript. Consent for publication: Not Applicable Disclosure statement Competing interests: There are no conflicts of interest in this study. References [1] Narayanan D, Weinberg OK. How I investigate acute myeloid leukemia. Int J Lab Hematol. 2020;42(1):3–15. doi:10.1111/ijlh.13135; [2] Fisher BT, Zaoutis T, Dvorak CC, et al. Effect of Caspofungin vs Fluconazole Prophylaxis on Invasive Fungal Disease Among Children and Young Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;322(17):1673–1681. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.15702. [3] Truong TH, Pole JD, Barber R, et al. Enrollment on clinical trials does not improve survival for children with acute myeloid leukemia: A population-based study. Cancer. 2018;124(20):4098–4106. doi:10.1002/cncr.31728 [4] Vargas-Carretero CJ, Fernandez-Vargas OE, Ron-Magaña AL, Padilla-Ortega JA, Ron-Guerrero CS, Barrera-Chairez E. Etiology and clinico-hematological profile of pancytopenia: experience of a Mexican Tertiary Care Center and review of the literature. Hematology. 2019;24(1):399–404. doi:10.1080/16078454.2019.1590961 [5] Frederiksen LE, Erdmann F, Wesseling C, Winther JF, Mora AM. Parental tobacco smoking and risk of childhood leukemia in Costa Rica: A population-based case-control study. Environ Res. 2020;180:108827. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.108827 [6] Freeman SD, Hourigan CS. MRD evaluation of AML in clinical practice: are we there yet?. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2019;2019(1):557–569. doi:10.1182/hematology.2019000060 [7] Ferri GM, Guastadisegno CM, Intranuovo G, et al. Maternal Exposure to Pesticides, Paternal Occupation in the Army/Police Force, and CYP2D6*4 Polymorphism in the Etiology of Childhood Acute Leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018;40(4):e207–e214. doi:10.1097/MPH.0000000000001105 [8] Chen JN, Chen Y, Wei YY, et al. Regulation of m^(6)A RNA Methylation and Its Effect on Myogenic Differentiation in Murine Myoblasts. Hematology.. 2019;53(3):436–445. doi:10.1134/S0026898419030042 [9] Kwok CT, Marshall AD, Rasko JE, Wong JJ. Genetic alterations of m6A regulators predict poorer survival in acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2017; 10:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0410-6 [10] Meyer KD, Saletore Y, Zumbo P, Elemento O, Mason CE, Jaffrey SR. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell. 2012;149(7):1635–46. [11] Spiekermann K, Shen AS. Akute myeloische Leukämie bei Erwachsenen [AML in Adults - An Update on Diagnosis, Risk Classification and Therapy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2018;143(18):1297–1303. doi:10.1055/s-0043-121022 [12] Gupta R, Yadav S, Parashar Y, et al. Morphological characteristics, cytogenetic profile, and outcome of RUNX1-RUNX1T1-positive acute myeloid leukemia: Experience of an Indian tertiary care center. Int J Lab Hematol. 2020;42(1):37–45. doi:10.1111/ijlh.13121 [13] Auletta JJ. AML: exposed and exploited?. Blood. 2018;131(1):8–10. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-11-813899 [14] Ofran Y, Leiba R, Ganzel C, et al. Prospective comparison of early bone marrow evaluation on day 5 versus day 14 of the "3 + 7" induction regimen for acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2015;90(12):1159–1164. doi:10.1002/ajh.24207 [15] Peters JM, Ansari MQ. Multiparameter flow cytometry in the diagnosis and management of acute leukemia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135(1):44–54. doi:10.1043/2010-0387-RAR.1 [16] Barghout SH, Schimmer AD. The ubiquitin-activating enzyme, UBA1, as a novel therapeutic target for AML. Oncotarget. 2018;9(76):34198–34199. Published 2018 Sep 28. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.26153 [17] Joseph R, McRee AJ, Mathews S, Zeidner JF. Inversion 16 (inv(16)) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following treatment with radiation, capecitabine, and temozolomide in a patient with metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Leuk Lymphoma. 2019;60(11):2793–2797. doi:10.1080/10428194.2019.1612060 [18] Vetro C, Haferlach T, Meggendorfer M, et al. Cytogenetic and molecular genetic characterization of KMT2A-PTD positive acute myeloid leukemia in comparison to KMT2A-Rearranged acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Genet. 2020;240:15–22. doi:10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.10.006 [19] Mitrovic M, Kostic T, Virijevic M, et al. The influence of Wilms' tumor 1 gene expression level on prognosis and risk stratification of acute promyelocytic leukemia patients. Int J Lab Hematol. 2020;42(1):82–87. doi:10.1111/ijlh.13144. [20] LeBlanc TW, Erba HP. Shifting paradigms in the treatment of older adults with AML. Semin Hematol. 2019;56(2):110–117. doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2019.02.002 [21] Wu M, Hamaker M, Li L, Small D, Duffield AS. DOCK2 interacts with FLT3 and modulates the survival of FLT3-expressing leukemia cells. Leukemia. 2017;31(3):688–696. doi:10.1038/leu.2016.284 [22] Chen M, Nie ZY, Wen XH, Gao YH, Cao H, Zhang SF. m6A RNA methylation regulators can contribute to malignant progression and impact the prognosis of bladder cancer. Biosci Rep. 2019;39(12):BSR20192892. doi:10.1042/BSR20192892 [23] Huang W, Qi CB, Lv SW, Xie M, Feng YQ, Huang WH, Yuan BF. Determination of DNA and RNA methylation in circulating tumor cells by mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2016;88(2):1378–84. [24] Kwok CT, Marshall AD, Rasko JE, Wong JJ. Genetic alterations of m6A regulators predict poorer survival in acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2017; 10:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0410-6 [25] Lin S, Choe J, Du P, Triboulet R, Gregory RI. The m(6)A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes translation in human cancer cells. Mol Cell. 2016;62(3):335–45. [26] Barbieri I, Tzelepis K, Pandolfini L, et al. Promoter-bound METTL3 maintains myeloid leukaemia by m6A-dependent translation control. Nature. 2017;552(7683):126–131. doi:10.1038/nature24678 [27] Weng H, Huang H, Wu H, et al. METTL14 Inhibits Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Differentiation and Promotes Leukemogenesis via mRNA m6A Modification. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(2):191–205.e9. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2017.11.016 [28] Al-Serri A, Alroughani R, Al-Temaimi RA. The FTO gene polymorphism rs9939609 is associated with obesity and disability in multiple sclerosis patients. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19071. Published 2019 Dec 13. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55742-2 [29]Wang S, Sun C, Li J, Zhang E, Ma Z, Xu W, Li H, Qiu M, Xu Y, Xia W, Xu L, Yin R. Roles of RNA methylation by means of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in human cancers. Cancer Lett. 2017; 408:112–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2017.08.030 [30] Visvanathan A, Patil V, Arora A, Hegde AS, Arivazhagan A, Santosh V, Somasundaram K. Essential role of METTL3-mediated m(6)A modification in glioma stem-like cells maintenance and radioresistance. Oncogene. 2018; 37(4):522–33. [31] Yang Y, Hsu PJ, Chen YS, Yang YG. Dynamic transcriptomic m6A decoration: writers, erasers, readers and functions in RNA metabolism. Cell Res. 2018; 28:616–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-018-0040-8. Supplementary Files SupplementaryTable2.xlsx SupplementaryTable1.xlsx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-37234","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":737654,"identity":"390ef134-c20a-4ea0-bce7-09a056218f57","order_by":0,"name":"Jiasheng Xu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Nanchang University First Affiliated Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jiasheng","middleName":"","lastName":"Xu","suffix":""},{"id":737655,"identity":"3af4a1a9-f4df-4d50-98a3-fd811ca7ce4d","order_by":1,"name":"Kaili Liao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Nanchang University Second Affiliated Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kaili","middleName":"","lastName":"Liao","suffix":""},{"id":737656,"identity":"ee48d887-8e2f-4c04-a049-db15953545a3","order_by":2,"name":"Zhonghua Fu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhonghua","middleName":"","lastName":"Fu","suffix":""},{"id":737657,"identity":"dc71c943-53ed-445b-9c60-da8e3c4ae3db","order_by":3,"name":"Zhenfang Xiong","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2062-9204","institution":"the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhenfang","middleName":"","lastName":"Xiong","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2020-06-20 21:12:51","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-37234/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-37234/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":1467056,"identity":"af9f057d-4295-4a05-b3eb-b62cc0bebb85","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-07-01 13:54:24","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":391418,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"a. Heat map of m6A RNA methylation regulator among eight morphological features; b. Consistent clustering of acute myeloid leukemia samples; c. Heat map of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators in two subgroups of acute myeloid leukemia ","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-37234/v1/1.png"},{"id":1467057,"identity":"6810f7c9-e868-46c7-8488-73926e7580bf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-07-01 13:54:25","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":579636,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"a. Age box between two subgroups of acute myeloid leukemia; 2b. Pie chart of morphological characteristics between two subgroups of acute myeloid leukemia; 2c. Survival curve between two subgroups of acute myeloid leukemia; 2d. Protein interaction network (PPI) of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators ","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-37234/v1/2.png"},{"id":1467058,"identity":"c8f9cb83-3f36-40c9-8511-2b45c01a7106","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-07-01 13:54:25","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":131629,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"a. Principal component analysis of two subgroups (RM1, RM2); 3b. Enrichment map of m6A RNA methylation regulators in two subgroups (RM1, RM2) ","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-37234/v1/3.png"},{"id":1467059,"identity":"82fdd6a1-f3bd-42bf-bdbe-1e68a90ad5c6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-07-01 13:54:25","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":174398,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"a. Sample survival curve for high and low risk groups; 4b. Correlation diagram of methylation regulator expression in acute myeloid leukemia (The beginning of each line represents 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators, and each small circle represents the Spearman correlation coefficient of two methylation regulators. Red indicates that the Spearman correlation coefficient is close to -1, and blue indicates The Spearman correlation coefficient is closer to 1. The closer the absolute value of the Spearman correlation coefficient is to 1, the more speculated that the two methylation regulators play a similar role in RM1 or RM2 of AML).","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-37234/v1/4.png"},{"id":1467060,"identity":"28bb4794-8970-46d7-bbe4-bbfd7991a17f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-07-01 13:54:25","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":259881,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A Prediction effect of risk scores of combined features on three-year survival results (training set); B. Prediction effect of risk scores of combined features on three-year survival results (test set); C: Risk score pairs of combined features Prediction effect of subgroups (training set); D: Prediction effect of risk score of combined features on subgroups (test set); E: Prediction effect of risk score of combined features on prognosis results (training set); F: Combination The predictive effect of the risk score of the feature on the prognostic results (test set); G: the predictive effect of the risk score of the combined feature on the morphological feature (training set); H: the predictive effect of the risk score of the combined feature on the morphological feature (test) set) ","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-37234/v1/5.png"},{"id":1467061,"identity":"d3dd5846-d73c-44e1-a85d-a66db1845843","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-07-01 13:54:25","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":717079,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Prognostic analysis of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators","description":"","filename":"6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-37234/v1/6.png"},{"id":13548622,"identity":"da462a52-1724-48ee-9d99-a2554367a46d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-17 02:18:12","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2444023,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-37234/v1/9f7a5bb3-7978-4f8d-8418-09335c0ce47b.pdf"},{"id":1467063,"identity":"be5405ba-1c85-4060-a32f-3151eb852dd8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-07-01 13:54:26","extension":"xlsx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":11178,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryTable2.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-37234/v1/SupplementaryTable2.xlsx"},{"id":1467064,"identity":"27ab3f73-416b-452a-83a1-12e1f146b871","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-07-01 13:54:26","extension":"xlsx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":36219,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryTable1.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-37234/v1/SupplementaryTable1.xlsx"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Genetic characteristics and prognosis of m6A RNAmethylation regulator in acute myeloid leukemia","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant disease of myeloid hematopoietic stem / progenitor cells. It is characterized by the abnormal proliferation of primary and immature myeloid cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. The clinical manifestations are anemia, bleeding, infection, and fever, organ infiltration, metabolic abnormalities, etc. [1]. Most cases of this disease are critically ill and have a dangerous prognosis, which can be life-threatening if not treated in time. This disease accounts for 30% of pediatric leukemia, and it is affected by molecular biology and chemotherapy. Children's AML is similar to adults (\u0026lt;50 years); infants and young children are more likely to develop AML than adults [2-3]. According to current knowledge, the exact etiology of leukemia is unknown, but it is related to regional environmental factors, ionizing radiation, chemical exposure, alcoholism and smoking are related to the body's special response to certain viral infections [4-5]. In addition, in recent years, it has been found through genetic mutation frequency and some biomarker studies that it may be a combination of genetics and environmental factors results [6-7].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eM6A is a universal form of mRNA modification, but little is known about its role in AML. This work aims to identify the genetic characteristics and prognostic value of m6A regulators in AML. The AML samples were collected in TCGA, the Log-rank test and Cox regression model were used for survival analysis. Chi-square test was used to calculate the relationship between m6A regulator changes and clinicopathology. Genetic changes of m6A regulators in AML were identified and their changes were found to be poor significant relationships between clinical characteristics. These findings help to understand the epigenetic modification of RNA in AML.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.1 Data acquisition and preprocessing\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDownload acute myeloid leukemia (AML) RNA-seq transcriptome data (rpkm data), acute myeloid leukemia clinical survival data (including disease) from ICGC and TCGA (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) (Physical characteristics and survival time, etc.), download gene annotation files from GENECODE (https://www.gencodegenes.org/). Select samples that have both pathological characteristics and RNA-seq expression data, and a total of 151 acute myeloids cell-like leukemia samples were obtained. Since there is no stage data for AML, leukemia morphology: M0 Undifferentiated, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7 were used as a pathological feature. From the literature [8-10], 13 widely reported m6A RNA methylation regulators (m6A RNA methylation regulators for different participating roles in the methylation process: writers (methyltransferase) -METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, KIAA1429, RBM15, ZC3H13; readers (binding proteins)-YTHDC1, YTHDC2, YTHDF1, YTHDF2, HNRNPC; erasers (demethylase)-FTO, ALKBH5). The selection process for m6A RNA methylation regulators is: We first collated a list of sixteen m6A RNA methylation regulators from published literature, [1-3] and then we restricted the list to genes with available RNA expression data in the TCGA datasets. This yielded a total of thirteen m6A RNA methylation regulators. Then, we systematically compared the expression of these m6A RNA methylation regulators with different clinical pathological features.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSelect 151 acute myeloid leukemia samples with existing pathological characteristics (morphological characteristics: M0 Undifferentiated, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7) and RNA-seq expression data; use gene annotation file to construct the expression profile (rpkm data) of m6A RNA methylation regulators (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 1\u003c/strong\u003e), classify acute myeloid leukemia samples based on the morphological characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia, and use m6A RNA methylation regulators, finally construct an expression heat map.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.2 Sample consistent clustering and subgroup analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe AML m6A RNA methylation regulator was used as a feature vector, and ConsensusClusterPlus consensus clustering (k = 2) was performed on the samples. Two subgroups RM1 and RM2 were obtained. The t-test was used to compare and analyze the age difference between rm1 and rm2, the chi-square test was used to analyze the difference between the who subclasses of the two subgroups, and the cox regression was used to analyze the difference in survival between the two subgroups.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.3 Analysis of the interaction between m6A RNA methylation regulators and functional analysis between subgroups\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe STRING database was used to analyze the interactions between m6A RNA methylation regulators, and Spearman analyzed the expression correlation of m6A RNA methylation regulators. Construct the expression profiles of m6A RNA methylation regulators in RM1 and RM2 subgroups, use PCA to analyze the differences in m6A RNA methylation regulator expression between the two subgroups, and use R package: clusterprofier to annotate and Enrichment analysis. The enrichment content includes GO biological processes (BP) and KEGG Pathways.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.4. Cox regression analysis and the use of risk scores to predict prognosis and pathological characteristics\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA risk score is given for each acute myeloid leukemia sample, with the formula:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRisk score = , Among them, Coefi is the regression coefficient (COefficient) of COX regression, and xi is the expression value of the prognosis methylation regulator of each acute myeloid leukemia. This formula was used to calculate the risk score of each acute myeloid leukemia sample. According to this risk score, the sample was divided into high-risk group and low-risk group. Find the difference between overall survival (OS) between the two categories.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.5. Prediction of prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of tumor patients using risk scores calculated by features\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to estimate classification performance.The higher the area under the curve (AUC) value, the higher the classification performance. Using 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators as risk characteristics, the TCGA acute myeloid leukemia sample was divided into 5 parts, 5 times cross-validation was applied, the model was trained with four fifths of the sample and tested on the test set (the remaining one fifths of the samples). In this way, each part will be tested once. Then the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is used to estimate the classification performance. The higher the area under the curve (AUC) value , The higher the classification performance. Comparative analysis of whether the risk score model can perfectly predict the three-year survival rate, RM1 / 2 subgroup, prognosis results, morphological characteristics and other characteristics of tumor patients.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.1 Differential gene screening\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAccording to the morphological characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia samples were divided into 8 categories (M0 Undifferentiated, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7). See Table 1 for clinical information. For information on 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators, see Table 2. Among 8 types of samples (M0 Undifferentiated, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7), the expression profiles of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were constructed, and the corresponding heat maps were constructed using the expression profiles (Figure 1A). Samples were sorted from M0 Undifferentiated to M7 according to morphological characteristics, and genes are divided according to different functions: writers (methyltransferase: METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, KIAA1429, RBM15, ZC3H13); readers (binding protein: YTHDC1 , YTHDC2, YTHDF1, YTHDF2, HNRNPC); erasers (demethylase: FTO, ALKBH5), sorted from top to bottom. Red represents high gene expression, purple represents low gene expression.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.2 Sample consistent clustering\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUsing the selected 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators as feature vectors, ConsensusClusterPlus clustering was performed on 151 samples, and two subgroups RM1 and RM2 were obtained. See the ConsensusClusterPlus clustering map of two subgroups RM1 and RM2 in Figure 1B. Under ideal conditions, the samples in the Consensus Cluster Plus cluster should be scattered, and the samples in the group should be clustered together, as shown in the Figure 1B: where the purple dots represent RM1 and the green dots represent RM2. RM1 and RM2 contain 91 and 60 samples, respectively (Supplementary Table 2). The heatmap of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators of acute myeloid leukemia between the two subgroups is shown in Figure 1C. One row represents one gene and one column represents a sample. The samples were ordered from left to right, and the red group on the left is RM1, and the right blue group is RM2. The genes are based on different functions: writers (methyltransferase: METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, KIAA1429, RBM15, ZC3H13); readers (binding proteins: YTHDC1, YTHDC2, YTHDF1, YTHDF2, HNRNPC ); erasers (demethylase: FTO, ALKBH5), sorted from top to bottom. Red represents high gene expression and purple represents low gene expression. Among them, the expression level of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators in RM1 was generally higher than RM2.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.3 Comparative analysis of pathological characteristics (age + morphological characteristics) and survival between the two subgroups\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eExtract the samples containing the age data in the two subgroups, and perform a T test on the age of the samples in the two subgroups. Compare the differences between the ages of the two subgroups (RM1, RM2). From the box plot, you can see that there is a difference between the ages of the two subgroups. (p = 0.08), but the difference is not significant (Figure 2A). The samples containing the morphological characteristics data in the two subgroups were extracted and the chi-square test was used to analyze the morphological characteristics of the two subgroups. The results showed that: The morphological characteristics of the two subgroups were significantly different (p = 0.00337). For a pie chart of the morphological characteristics of the two subgroups, see Figure 2B. Extract the samples with survival data from the two subgroups, use Cox regression to analyze the survival of the two subgroups, and draw the KM survival curve, see Figure 2C. The results showed that the two subgroups (RM1, RM2) had different survival periods. Among them, 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators had higher expression values in RM1 than RM2, and RM2 (blue) patients had a longer survival time than RM1 (red). The results indicate that 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were in RM1. It is possible that it inhibits the expression of key functional genes in the AML patients, resulting in a significant reduction in survival time.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.4 Analysis of the interaction between m6A RNA methylation regulators and functional analysis among subgroups\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUsing STRING to draw a protein interaction network diagram (PPI) of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators, and get the interaction relationship between 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators, see Figure 2D. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to evaluate the difference in expression between the two subgroup samples (RM1, RM2), and the results were shown in Figure 3a. The blue dots represent RM1 and the yellow triangles represent RM2. Then, using R Contains clusterProfiler for enrichment analysis of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators (GO-BP, KEGG Pathway) See Figure 3b. The 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were mainly involved in Notch signaling pathway, cytokine-mediated signaling pathway, endothelial pathways and biological processes such as hematopoietic transition have been shown to be related to acute myeloid leukemia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.5 Cox regression analysis and use of risk scores to predict prognosis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEach sample was scored by the m6A RNA methylation regulator, and the samples were divided into high and low risk groups based on the risk score of each sample. Survival analysis was performed on the two groups of samples. The KM survival curve is shown in Figure 4a. It can be seen that the risk score can well separate the high and low risk groups of the sample (p = 0.042). In order to further study the previous relationship of the 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators, we constructed their co-expression relationship, and different points in the co-expression relationship diagram represented different methylation regulators and described their functional correlation. Using the R package Corrplot further visualized the above relationship.The expression correlation diagram of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators is shown in Figure 4b.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.6 Prediction of prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of tumor patients using feature-calculated risk scores\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTake 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators as combined features, map them to TCGA-AML. Use Support Vector Machine (SVM) to assess the risk score of combined features, predict the outcome of three-year survival results, training set See Figure 5A, test set shown in Figure 5B. Risk scores for subgroup outcome prediction, training set shown in Figure 5C, test set shown in Figure 5D. Risk scores were used to evaluate combination features to predict outcome outcome, training set see Figure 5E, the test set was shown in Figure 5F, the risk score of the combined feature was used to predict the morphological characteristics of the outcome, the training set was shown in Figure 5G, and the test set was shown in Figure 5H. The ROC curve shows that the risk score can perfectly predict the three-year survival rate of AML patients. In the RM1 / 2 subgroup, the morphological feature status and prognostic outcome status, and the prediction efficiency was better than the morphological feature status. These results showed that the risk score calculated by the feature can accurately predict the prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of AML patients.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3.7 Analysis of prognostic correlation of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThirteen m6A RNA methylation regulators were individually analyzed for prognosis and the survival curve was drawn (Figure 6). The results showed that: the eraser (demethylase): FTO, ALKBH5, and writers: ZC3H13, were significantly correlated with overall survival (P \u0026lt;0.05, Figure 6K-M).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eAcute myelogenous leukemia is a hematopoietic stem cell malignant disease. It is characterized by the abnormal proliferation of the myeloid lineage of embryonic cell clones, which can lead to the accumulation of immature progenitor cells and impair hematopoietic function. [11-12]. The condition of AML develops very quickly. If not treated in time, it may be fatal within weeks or months. Acute myeloid leukemia is the most common acute leukemia in adults [12-13], although AML can occur in all ages, it mainly happens in the elderly and the average age at diagnosis is approximately 70 years [14-15]. Currently, most patients diagnosed with AML are unable to determine their etiology and susceptibility, but are exposed to DNA-destroying agents (such as benzene, cigarettes, ionizing radiation (usually due to radiation therapy), and cytotoxic chemotherapy) which increase the risk of amAMLl [16-17]. AML is similar to other cancers in that it exhibits abnormal proliferation, survival and differentiation of related cells. This kind of cellular characteristics is caused by genetic changes in the cells, but the coding sequence mutations in AML cells are much less than those in most solid epithelial tumor cells. Previous studies have shown an identification in 200 adult AML patient's tumor samples with nearly 2,000 different mutated genes, but only 23 of them were frequently mutated, and an average of 13 mutations were identified per genome; 5 of these mutations were in repeatedly mutated genes [18-19], the large overlap of these mutations provides a potential direction for the prognosis and treatment of AML [20-21].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eM6A RNA methylation modification is the most common way to modify mRNA, and it exists in many species of animals and plants, yeasts, bacteria, and mycoplasma. Studies have found that it can modify more than 7,000 mammalian genes, of which Contains about 12,000 m6A sites [22]. These sites are concentrated in PRACH (R is G or A, H is A, C or U), they are usually found in the terminator and 3'UTR. M6A through m6A methyltransferase (\"writer\") is modified and subsequently recognized by the m6A binding protein (\"reader\"), and this modification is also eliminated by demethylase (\"eraser\"). M6A modification is very common, and its dynamic regulation has been shown to be strongly related to gene expression [23]. In recent years, the clinical application value of m6A in tumors has become increasingly apparent. It mainly affects the occurrence and development of cancer by regulating the life activities of cells. M6A as a promising biomarker and is increasingly being used to detect and prevent cancer [24]. In addition, more and more studies show that m6A has potential clinical application value as a therapeutic target for cancer patients [25].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eResearchers have reported that METTL3 is a proto-oncogene, which can be suppressed by m6A modification. Prepare cell differentiation in test tubes while promoting cell growth. Conversely, in vivo, this can induce cell differentiation and apoptosis, thereby inhibiting leukemia [26]. METTL14, which is also a proto-oncogene, can be modified by m6A. Inhibit the differentiation of hepatocytes in leukemia and promote the regeneration of stem cells [27]. FTO is also a proto-oncogene, and m6A modification can promote the transformation of leukocytes in leukemia and inhibit their differentiation [28]. In our study, we obtained and screened RNA-seq transcriptome data and clinical survival data for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) from ICGC and TCGA, and constructed 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators using gene annotation files Expression profile of factors. Through consistent clustering of samples, two subgroups RM1 and RM2 were obtained, and the functional analysis of m6A RNA methylation regulators between subgroups was performed. For m6A RNA methylation regulators, we used the STRING database for protein protein interaction network (PPI network) analysis. The STRING database is a database that searches for known and predicted protein-protein interactions. This database can be applied to 2031 species, including the interaction between 9.6 million proteins and 13.8 million proteins. Using STRING, the interactions between 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were obtained and the corresponding network diagrams were drawn; circles in the network represent proteins (i.e., 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators), straight lines represent interactions between proteins. Different colored lines represent different evidence; the stronger the two proteins interact, the thicker the lines; the different colored and shaped lines represent different interactions, including data results mined from PubMed summary text, database data results, and results predicted using bioinformatics methods. Principal Component Analysis (Principal Component Analysis, PCA) is a multivariate analysis technique. The core idea of PCA is to reduce the dimensionality of the data while preserving the differences of the data as much as possible, that is, abstracting out less unrelated variables to describe the data. It is a group of points in multi-dimensional space. While maintaining the relative spatial position of this group of points, it is rotated to a new coordinate system (the coordinate axis is each PC), so that the coordinates of each point on the new coordinate axis (projection) has the largest variance, and the axis with the largest projection variance is PC1, followed by PC2. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used to evaluate the difference in expression of samples (RM1, RM2) between two subgroups, and PCA uses linear algebra calculation method, dimensionality reduction and principal component extraction of tens of thousands of genetic variables. Ideally, in the PCA graph, samples between groups should be scattered, and samples within the group should be gathered together. In this study, we use PCA was used to compare the expression profiles between the two subgroups of RM1 and RM2, and the results showed that there was a significant difference between them. We performed a survival analysis of the grouped cases based on the mean of FTO and ALKBH5, and the analysis of the KM curve indicated that the expression was low in FTO (blue), the patient's survival time is significantly higher than high expression (red); in the case of ALKBH5 low expression (blue), the patient's survival time is significantly higher than high expression (red). Similarly, based on The survival analysis of grouped cases by the mean of ZC3H13 also showed that compared with high expression (red), ZC3H13 low expression (blue), the survival time of patients was significantly improved. The results indicate that FTO, ALKBH5 and ZC3H13 may be involved in the regulation as key genes。 The occurrence and development of AML has led to a significant reduction in survival time.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the future, m6A RNA methylation modification can become a potential therapeutic target. New drugs can control the cancer process through the regulation of m6A RNA methylation modification. It can also become a biomarker for cancer occurrence and development to provide rapid and sensitive warnings [29-31]. We also need more experiments to discover the mechanism of m6A RNA methylation modification in AML regulation, so as to open up the development of new drugs and biomarker research door.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, 13 major m6A RNA methylation regulators can be divided into 2 subgroups (RM1 / 2) by consistent clustering analysis in different clinicopathological characteristics samples. Compared with RM2, RM1 has worse prognosis and more morphological features. Moreover, gene enrichment analysis found that functional processes such as endothelial-hematopoietic transformation transmitting signals through the Notch pathway were significantly enriched in RM1. The above findings indicate that 13 m6A RNA methylation enzyme regulators can be used as a risk profile for AML, which is not only an independent prognostic marker, but also predicts the clinicopathological features of AML.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 1 Clinical factors\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClinical factors\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eleukemia_morphology\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eM0 Undifferentiated\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eM1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e35\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eM2\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e38\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eM3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eM4\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e29\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eM5\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eM6\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eM7\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot Classified\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVital_status\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ealive\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e54\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003edead\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e97\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"154\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;30\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e30-40\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e41-50\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e23\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e51-60\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e30\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e61-70\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e38\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e71-80\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e26\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"212\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"158\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e81-90\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"83\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 2 Information of m6A RNA regulators\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003em\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003eA RNA regulators\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChr\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStart\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEnd\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStrand\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eType\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eALKBH5\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e18183078\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e18209954\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eerasers\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFTO\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e53701692\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e54158512\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eerasers\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKIAA1429\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e94487693\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e94553529\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ewriters\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMETTL14\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e118685368\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e118715433\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ewriters\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMETTL3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e21498133\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e21511375\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ewriters\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRBM15\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e110338506\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e110346681\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ewriters\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWTAP\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e159725585\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e159756319\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ewriters\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZC3H13\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e45954465\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e46052759\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ewriters\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHNRNPC\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e21209136\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e21269494\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ereaders\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYTHDC1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e68310387\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e68350089\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ereaders\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYTHDC2\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e113513683\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e113595285\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ereaders\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYTHDF1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e63195429\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e63216234\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ereaders\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"151\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYTHDF2\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"57\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e28736621\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e28769775\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"66\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ereaders\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e"},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cp\u003eAML: Acute myeloid leukemia\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBP: biological processes\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eICGC: International Cancer Genome Consortium\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTCGA: The Cancer Genome Atlas\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOS:overall survival\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eROC: Receiver operating characteristic\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAUC: area under the curve\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePPI network: protein protein interaction network\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePCA: Principal component analysis\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZHENFANG XIONG and ZHONGHUA FU are the co-Corresponding authors of this article; Xiong Zhenfang is the 1st of the corresponding authors and Fu Zhonghua is the 2nd of the corresponding authors.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials: \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll datas are available. Please contact us to access if it is needed.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical approval and consent to participate :\u0026nbsp; \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of theFirst Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. All subjects gave\u0026nbsp;written informed consent\u0026nbsp;in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding: \u003c/strong\u003eThe study did not accept any funding.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026rsquo; Contributions: \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJS: research design and drafting the manuscript\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKL: literature search\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZH: help modify articles and collate references\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZF: review and revision of the manuscript and writing guidance\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll authors have read and approved the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot Applicable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDisclosure statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests:\u003c/strong\u003e There are no conflicts of interest in this study.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003cp\u003e[1] Narayanan D, Weinberg OK. How I investigate acute myeloid leukemia.\u0026nbsp;Int J Lab Hematol. 2020;42(1):3\u0026ndash;15. doi:10.1111/ijlh.13135;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[2] Fisher BT, Zaoutis T, Dvorak CC, et al. Effect of Caspofungin vs Fluconazole Prophylaxis on Invasive Fungal Disease Among Children and Young Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\u0026nbsp;JAMA. 2019;322(17):1673\u0026ndash;1681. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.15702.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[3] Truong TH, Pole JD, Barber R, et al. Enrollment on clinical trials does not improve survival for children with acute myeloid leukemia: A population-based study.\u0026nbsp;Cancer. 2018;124(20):4098\u0026ndash;4106. doi:10.1002/cncr.31728\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[4] Vargas-Carretero CJ, Fernandez-Vargas OE, Ron-Maga\u0026ntilde;a AL, Padilla-Ortega JA, Ron-Guerrero CS, Barrera-Chairez E. Etiology and clinico-hematological profile of pancytopenia: experience of a Mexican Tertiary Care Center and review of the literature.\u0026nbsp;Hematology. 2019;24(1):399\u0026ndash;404. doi:10.1080/16078454.2019.1590961\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[5] Frederiksen LE, Erdmann F, Wesseling C, Winther JF, Mora AM. Parental tobacco smoking and risk of childhood leukemia in Costa Rica: A population-based case-control study.\u0026nbsp;Environ Res. 2020;180:108827. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.108827\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[6] Freeman SD, Hourigan CS. MRD evaluation of AML in clinical practice: are we there yet?.\u0026nbsp;Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2019;2019(1):557\u0026ndash;569. doi:10.1182/hematology.2019000060\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[7] Ferri GM, Guastadisegno CM, Intranuovo G, et al. Maternal Exposure to Pesticides, Paternal Occupation in the Army/Police Force, and CYP2D6*4 Polymorphism in the Etiology of Childhood Acute Leukemia.\u0026nbsp;J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018;40(4):e207\u0026ndash;e214. doi:10.1097/MPH.0000000000001105\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[8] Chen JN, Chen Y, Wei YY, et al. Regulation of m^(6)A RNA Methylation and Its Effect on Myogenic Differentiation in Murine Myoblasts. Hematology.. 2019;53(3):436\u0026ndash;445. doi:10.1134/S0026898419030042\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[9] Kwok CT, Marshall AD, Rasko JE, Wong JJ. Genetic alterations of m6A regulators predict poorer survival in acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2017; 10:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0410-6\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[10] Meyer KD, Saletore Y, Zumbo P, Elemento O, Mason CE, Jaffrey SR. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3\u0026prime; UTRs and near stop codons. Cell. 2012;149(7):1635\u0026ndash;46.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[11] Spiekermann K, Shen AS. Akute myeloische Leuk\u0026auml;mie bei Erwachsenen [AML in Adults - An Update on Diagnosis, Risk Classification and Therapy].\u0026nbsp;Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2018;143(18):1297\u0026ndash;1303. doi:10.1055/s-0043-121022\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[12] Gupta R, Yadav S, Parashar Y, et al. Morphological characteristics, cytogenetic profile, and outcome of RUNX1-RUNX1T1-positive acute myeloid leukemia: Experience of an Indian tertiary care center.\u0026nbsp;Int J Lab Hematol. 2020;42(1):37\u0026ndash;45. doi:10.1111/ijlh.13121 [13] Auletta JJ. AML: exposed and exploited?.\u0026nbsp;Blood. 2018;131(1):8\u0026ndash;10. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-11-813899\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[14] Ofran Y, Leiba R, Ganzel C, et al. Prospective comparison of early bone marrow evaluation on day 5 versus day 14 of the \"3\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;7\" induction regimen for acute myeloid leukemia.\u0026nbsp;Am J Hematol. 2015;90(12):1159\u0026ndash;1164. doi:10.1002/ajh.24207\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[15] Peters JM, Ansari MQ. Multiparameter flow cytometry in the diagnosis and management of acute leukemia.\u0026nbsp;Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135(1):44\u0026ndash;54. doi:10.1043/2010-0387-RAR.1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[16] Barghout SH, Schimmer AD. The ubiquitin-activating enzyme, UBA1, as a novel therapeutic target for AML.\u0026nbsp;Oncotarget. 2018;9(76):34198\u0026ndash;34199. Published 2018 Sep 28. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.26153\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[17] Joseph R, McRee AJ, Mathews S, Zeidner JF. Inversion 16 (inv(16)) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following treatment with radiation, capecitabine, and temozolomide in a patient with metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET).\u0026nbsp;Leuk Lymphoma. 2019;60(11):2793\u0026ndash;2797. doi:10.1080/10428194.2019.1612060\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[18] Vetro C, Haferlach T, Meggendorfer M, et al. Cytogenetic and molecular genetic characterization of KMT2A-PTD positive acute myeloid leukemia in comparison to KMT2A-Rearranged acute myeloid leukemia.\u0026nbsp;Cancer Genet. 2020;240:15\u0026ndash;22. doi:10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.10.006\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[19] Mitrovic M, Kostic T, Virijevic M, et al. The influence of Wilms' tumor 1 gene expression level on prognosis and risk stratification of acute promyelocytic leukemia patients.\u0026nbsp;Int J Lab Hematol. 2020;42(1):82\u0026ndash;87. doi:10.1111/ijlh.13144.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[20] LeBlanc TW, Erba HP. Shifting paradigms in the treatment of older adults with AML.\u0026nbsp;Semin Hematol. 2019;56(2):110\u0026ndash;117. doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2019.02.002\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[21] Wu M, Hamaker M, Li L, Small D, Duffield AS. DOCK2 interacts with FLT3 and modulates the survival of FLT3-expressing leukemia cells.\u0026nbsp;Leukemia. 2017;31(3):688\u0026ndash;696. doi:10.1038/leu.2016.284\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[22] Chen M, Nie ZY, Wen XH, Gao YH, Cao H, Zhang SF. m6A RNA methylation regulators can contribute to malignant progression and impact the prognosis of bladder cancer.\u0026nbsp;Biosci Rep. 2019;39(12):BSR20192892. doi:10.1042/BSR20192892\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[23] Huang W, Qi CB, Lv SW, Xie M, Feng YQ, Huang WH, Yuan BF. Determination of DNA and RNA methylation in circulating tumor cells by mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2016;88(2):1378\u0026ndash;84.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[24] Kwok CT, Marshall AD, Rasko JE, Wong JJ. Genetic alterations of m6A regulators predict poorer survival in acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2017; 10:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0410-6\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[25] Lin S, Choe J, Du P, Triboulet R, Gregory RI. The m(6)A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes translation in human cancer cells. Mol Cell. 2016;62(3):335\u0026ndash;45.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[26] Barbieri I, Tzelepis K, Pandolfini L, et al. Promoter-bound METTL3 maintains myeloid leukaemia by m6A-dependent translation control. Nature. 2017;552(7683):126\u0026ndash;131. doi:10.1038/nature24678\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[27] Weng H, Huang H, Wu H, et al. METTL14 Inhibits Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Differentiation and Promotes Leukemogenesis via mRNA m6A Modification. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(2):191\u0026ndash;205.e9. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2017.11.016\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[28] Al-Serri A, Alroughani R, Al-Temaimi RA. The FTO gene polymorphism rs9939609 is associated with obesity and disability in multiple sclerosis patients. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19071. Published 2019 Dec 13. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55742-2\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[29]Wang S, Sun C, Li J, Zhang E, Ma Z, Xu W, Li H, Qiu M, Xu Y, Xia W, Xu L, Yin R. Roles of RNA methylation by means of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in human cancers. Cancer Lett. 2017; 408:112\u0026ndash;20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2017.08.030\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[30] Visvanathan A, Patil V, Arora A, Hegde AS, Arivazhagan A, Santosh V, Somasundaram K. Essential role of METTL3-mediated m(6)A modification in glioma stem-like cells maintenance and radioresistance. Oncogene. 2018; 37(4):522\u0026ndash;33.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[31] Yang Y, Hsu PJ, Chen YS, Yang YG. Dynamic transcriptomic m6A decoration: writers, erasers, readers and functions in RNA metabolism. Cell Res. 2018; 28:616\u0026ndash;24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-018-0040-8.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"m6A, methylation regulators, clinical prognostic impact, AML","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-37234/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-37234/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground\u003c/strong\u003e: To identify the genetic characteristics of m6A RNA methylation regulators in AML and explore their potential value as prognostic markers.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods\u003c/strong\u003e: RNA-seq transcriptome data and clinical survival data of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were downloaded from ICGC and TCGA, gene annotation files were downloaded from GENECODE (1). 13 widely reported m6A RNA alphas were obtained from the literature. The expression of m6A RNA methylation regulators were collected and analized using gene annotation files. The samples were subjected to consistent clustering to obtain two subgroups RM1 and RM2, and the pathological characteristics and survival between the two subgroups were analyzed. Comparative analysis and functional analysis of m6A RNA methylation regulators between subgroups were completed. The STRING database analyzed the interactions between m6A RNA methylation regulators, and Spearman analyzed the correlation of expression of m6A RNA methylation regulators. COX regression analysis and risk scores were used to predict prognosis and pathological characteristics, and risk scores calculated using features were used to predict the prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of tumor patients.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults\u003c/strong\u003e: According to the morphological characteristics of AML, the samples were divided into 8 categories (M0 Undifferentiated, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7), and among them, the expression profile and expression heat map of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were constructed. Using m6A RNA methylation regulator as a feature vector, consistent clustering of 151 samples yielded two subgroups RM1 and RM2. Among them, the expression of the regulator in RM1 was higher than RM2,\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eand RM2 patients had a longer survival time than RM1. Gene set enrichment analysis found that functional processes such as endothelial-hematopoietic transformation through the Notch pathway were significantly enriched in RM1. The analysis of the KM curve indicates that when the expression of FTO or ALKBH5 or of ZC3H13 was low, the survival time of patients was significantly higher than that with high expression.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion\u003c/strong\u003e: m6A RNA methylase regulator is not only an independent prognostic marker of AML, but also can predict its clinicopathological characteristics, which has potential value for stratifying prognosis and improving treatment strategies.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Genetic characteristics and prognosis of m6A RNAmethylation regulator in acute myeloid leukemia","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2020-07-01 13:54:24","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-37234/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"807dcafe-e1f4-4045-bff5-3e49c1e89369","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 1st, 2020","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":136870,"name":"Cancer Biology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2020-07-24T20:14:38+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2020-07-01 13:54:24","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-37234","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-37234","identity":"rs-37234","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"J0_U0BvcaRcwD8yVFaRlm","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0