Psychological well-being, marital adjustment and quality of life after hysterectomy: a comparative study

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2018 · vol. 7(12) , pp. 4960 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184948 · W2903026071
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-23

This study found no significant differences in psychological well-being, marital adjustment, or quality of life between Indian women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions like endometriosis and those having other gynecological surgeries.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-24 · read from full text

This cross-sectional study evaluated psychological well-being, marital adjustment, and quality of life in 100 Indian women who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions at least six months prior. Researchers compared these participants against a control group of 50 women who had other gynecological surgeries, utilizing standardized scales to assess anxiety, depression, and general well-being. The results indicated no significant differences between the groups, with both cohorts demonstrating good marital adjustment and low levels of psychiatric morbidity or decline in quality of life. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for hysterectomy (affecting 1% of the cohort), though the paper's main focus is the broader psychosocial outcomes of hysterectomy for various benign gynecological conditions rather than endometriosis specifically.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Hysterectomy is the most common major gynecological surgery often performed for benign lesions. Many studies have reported adverse psychosocial outcomes post-hysterectomy. There is a paucity of studies from India addressing psychiatric morbidity after hysterectomy. To evaluate psychological wellbeing, marital adjustment and quality of life in patients undergoing hysterectomy for non-malignant conditions, in comparison with patients undergoing surgery other than hysterectomy.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 consecutive out-patients who underwent hysterectomy for non-malignant indications at least 6 months ago. The comparison group comprised of 50 consecutive out-patients who underwent gynecological surgery other than hysterectomy at least 6 months ago formed the comparison group. The study participants were evaluated on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Psychological General Well-being Index (PGWBI), Marital Adjustment Test (MAT) and Women’s Quality of Life Questionnaire (WOMQOL).Results: The indications for hysterectomy were: uterine leiomyoma (69%), uterovaginal prolapse (18%), dysfunctional uterine bleeding (12%), and endometriosis (1%). Abdominal hysterectomy was performed in 92 patients while 8 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy. There were no significant differences in the study groups on scores of HADS, PGWBI, MAT and WOMQOL (p>0.05). Both the study groups had good marital adjustment and majority reported no depression and anxiety.Conclusions: There is no major psychiatric morbidity, decline in marital adjustment and quality of life after hysterectomy for benign conditions among Indian women. Future research on the ethno-cultural implications and effect of hysterectomy on mental health will be a significant addition to the available evidence in India.
Full text 8,535 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

Hysterectomy is the most common major gynecological surgery often performed for benign lesions. Many studies have reported adverse psychosocial outcomes post-hysterectomy. There is a paucity of studies from India addressing psychiatric morbidity after hysterectomy. To evaluate psychological wellbeing, marital adjustment and quality of life in patients undergoing hysterectomy for non-malignant conditions, in comparison with patients undergoing surgery other than hysterectomy.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 consecutive out-patients who underwent hysterectomy for non-malignant indications at least 6 months ago. The comparison group comprised of 50 consecutive out-patients who underwent gynecological surgery other than hysterectomy at least 6 months ago formed the comparison group. The study participants were evaluated on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Psychological General Well-being Index (PGWBI), Marital Adjustment Test (MAT) and Women’s Quality of Life Questionnaire (WOMQOL).

Results

The indications for hysterectomy were: uterine leiomyoma (69%), uterovaginal prolapse (18%), dysfunctional uterine bleeding (12%), and endometriosis (1%). Abdominal hysterectomy was performed in 92 patients while 8 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy. There were no significant differences in the study groups on scores of HADS, PGWBI, MAT and WOMQOL (p>0.05). Both the study groups had good marital adjustment and majority reported no depression and anxiety.

Conclusions

There is no major psychiatric morbidity, decline in marital adjustment and quality of life after hysterectomy for benign conditions among Indian women. Future research on the ethno-cultural implications and effect of hysterectomy on mental health will be a significant addition to the available evidence in India. Metrics

References

Nathorst-Boos J, Fuchs T, von Schoultz B. Consumer’s attitude to hysterectomy. The experience of 678 women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992;71(3):230-4. Polivy J. Psychological reactions to hysterectomy: a critical review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974;118(3):417-26. Bachmann GA. Psychosexual aspects of hysterectomy. Womens Health Issues 1990;1(1):41- 9. Rhodes JC, Kjerulff KH, Langenberg PW, Guzinski GM. Hysterectomy and sexual functioning. JAMA 1999;282(20):1934-41. Roovers JP, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, Heintz AP. Hysterectomy and sexual wellbeing: prospective observational study of vaginal hysterectomy, subtotal abdominal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy. BMJ 2003;327(7418):774-8. Williamson ML. Sexual adjustment after hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1992;21(1):42-7. Vomvolaki E, Kalmantis K, Kioses E, Antsaklis A. The effect of hysterectomy on sexuality and psychological changes. The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care. 2006;11(1):23-7. Farquhar CM, Sadler L, Harvey S, McDougall J, Yazdi G, Meuli KA. Prospective study of the short-term outcomes of hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 2002;42(2):197-204. Carlson KJ, Miller BA, Fowler FJ. The Maine Women’s Health Study: II. Outcomes of nonsurgical management of leiomyomas Abnormal bleeding, and chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(4):566-72. Rannestad T, Eikeland OJ, Helland H, Qvarnström U. Quality of life, pain, and psychological well-being in women suffering from gynecological disorders. J Women's Health Gender Med. 2000;9(8):897-903. Richards DH. A post-hysterectomy syndrome. The Lancet. 1974;304(7887):983-5. Drellich MC, Bieber I. The psychological importance of the uterus and its functions. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1958;126(4):322-36. Zervos SK, Papaloucas AL. Psychosomatic disturbances following hysterectomy performed at a premenopausal age. Int Surg. 1972;57(10):802-4. Lambden MP, Bellamy G, Ogburn‐Russell L, Preece CK, Moore S, Pepin T, et al. Women’s sense of well‐being before and after hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1997;26(5):540-8. Ryan MM. Hysterectomy: social and psychosexual aspects. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;11(1):23-36. Vyas JN, Rathore RS, Sharma P, Singhal AK. A study of psychiatric aspects of hysterectomy. Indian J Psychia. 1989;31(1):83-9. Subramaniam D, Subramaniam SK, Charles SX, Verghese A. Psychiatric aspects of hysterectomy. Indian J Psychia. 1982;24(1):75. Bhatia MS, Kaur N, Goyal U. Psychiatric reactions in hysterectomy. Indian J Psychia. 1990;32(1):52-6. Col SC, Col TB. Psychiatric effects of hysterectomy. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 1995 Jan 1;51(1):27-30. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67(6): 361-70. Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1(1):29. Smith AB, Selby PJ, Velikova G, Stark D, Wright EP, Gould A, et al. Factor analysis of the hospital anxiety and depression scale from a large cancer population. Psychol Psychother 2002;75(2):165-76. Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Ebrahimi M, Jarvandi S. The hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1: 14. Chaturvedi SK, Chandra PS, Channabasavanna SM, Beena MB, Pandian RD, Chandra PS. Detection of anxiety and depression in cancer patients. NIMHANS J. 1994;12:141-4. Locke HJ, Wallace KM. Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living. 1959;21(3):251-5. Gehlert S, Chang CH, Bock RD, Hartlage SA. The WOMQOL instrument measured quality of life in women of reproductive age with no known pathology. J clinic epidemiol. 2006;59(5):525-33. Dupuy H. The Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) Index. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furber CD, Elinson J, eds. Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: LeJacq Publishing Inc, 1984:170-83. Kluivers KB, Johnson NP, Chien P, Vierhout ME, Bongers M, Mol BW. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life: a systematic review. Europe J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2008;136(1):3-8. Leung PL, Tsang SW, Yuen PM. An audit on hysterectomy for benign diseases in public hospitals in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13(3):187- 93. El-Toukhy TA, Hefni M, Davies A, Mahadevan S. The effect of different types of hysterectomy on urinary and sexual functions: A prospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;24(4):420-5. Helmy YA, Hassanin IMA, Elraheem TA, Bedaiwy AA, Peterson RS, Bedaiwy, MA. Psychiatric morbidity following hysterectomy in Egypt. Int J Gynecol Obstet.2008;102(1):60-4. Okunlola MA, Umuerri C, Omigbodun OO, Morhason-Bello IO, Okonkwo SN, Ojengbede OA. Pattern of mental ill health morbidities following hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disorders among Nigerian women. Int J Mental Health Syst. 2009;3(1):18. Ackner B. Emotional aspects of hysterectomy. A follow-up study of fifty patients under the age of 40. In: European Conference on Psychosomatic Research 1960 (Vol. 1, pp. 248-252). Karger Publishers. Gath D, Cooper P, Day A. Hysterectomy and psychiatric disorder, I: levels of psychiatric disorder before and after hysterectomy. Br J Psychiatry 1982;140(4):335-42. Thakar R, Ayers S, Georgakapolou A, Clarkson P, Stanton S, Manyonda I. Hysterectomy improves quality of life and decreases psychiatric symptoms: a prospective and randomised comparison of total versus subtotal hysterectomy. BJOG 2004;111(10):1115-20. Sung MH, Lim YM. Factors affecting sexual satisfaction in Korean women who have undergone a hysterectomy. Austra J Advance Nurs, The. 2009;27(2):46. Jawor M, Dimter A, Marek K, Dudek D, Wojtys A, Szproch A. Anxiety-depressive disorder in women after hysterectomy. Own study. [In Polish]. Psychiatr Pol 2001;35(5):771-80. Flory N, Bissonnette F, Binik YM. Psychosocial effects of hysterectomy: literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2005;59(3):117-29. Persson P, Wijma K, Hammar M, Kjolhede P. Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy-a randomised controlled multicentre study. BJOG 2006;113(9):1023-30. Weber AM, Walters MD, Schover LR, Church JM, Piedmonte MR. Functional outcomes and satisfaction after abdominal hysterectomy. Prim Care Update Obstet Gynecols. 1998;5(4):203.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (34)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK