Sex differences in TB treatment outcomes: Retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-ND-4.0
AI-generated summary
In a retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis, males with drug-susceptible pulmonary TB showed higher mortality and sputum positivity rates compared to females.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Rationale Although the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) is higher in males compared to females, the relationship of sex with TB treatment outcomes has not been adequately studied. Objectives and Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study and a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies during the last 10 years to assess the sex differences in clinical and microbiological outcomes in tuberculosis. Measurements and Main Results In our cohort of 2,894 patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary TB (1,975 males and 919 females), males had higher adjusted hazards of mortality due to all causes (HR 1·43,95%CI 1.03-1.98) and infections (HR 1.70, 95%CI 1.09-2.64) at 9 months and higher adjusted odds ratio for sputum culture (OR 1.56,95%CI 1.05-2.33) and similar odds ratio for smear positivity (OR 1.27, 0.71-2.27) at 2 months compared to females. Among 7896 articles retrieved, 398 articles were included in our systematic review with a total of 3,957,216 patients. The odds of all-cause mortality was higher in males compared to females in the pooled unadjusted (OR 1.26, 95%CI 1.19-1.34) and adjusted (OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.18-1.45) analyses. Relative to females, males had higher pooled odds of sputum culture (OR 1.44,95% CI 1.14-1.81) and sputum smear (OR 1.58,95%CI 1.41-1.77) positivity at the end of the intensive phase, and upon completion of treatment. Conclusions During TB treatment, males have higher all-cause-, infection- and TB-related mortality, as well as higher rates of sputum smear and culture positivity, both after the intensive phase and at the completion of TB treatment, after adjusting for confounding factors.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0