Different Phenotypes and Chondrogenic Responses of Human Menstrual Blood and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells to activin A and TGF-β3

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Background: Due to its low capacity for self-repair, articular cartilage is highly susceptible to damage and deterioration, which leads to the development of degenerative joint diseases such as osteoarthritis. Menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MenSCs) are much less characterized compared to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs). However, MenSCs seem an attractive alternative to classical BMMSCs due to ease of access and broader differentiation capacity. The aim of this study was to evaluate chondrogenic differentiation potential of MenSCs and BMMSCs stimulated with transforming growth factor β (TGF-β3) and activin A, member of the TGF-β superfamily of proteins.Methods: MenSCs (n=6) and BMMSCs (n=5) were isolated from different healthy donors. Expression of cell surface markers CD90, CD73, CD105, CD44, CD45, CD14, CD36, CD55, CD54, CD63, CD106, CD34, CD10, Notch1 was analysed by flow cytometry. Cell proliferation capacity was determined using CCK-8 proliferation kit. Adipogenic differentiation capacity was evaluated according to Oil-Red staining, osteogenic differentiation - Alizarin Red staining. Chondrogenic differentiation (Activin A and TGF-β3 stimulation) was induced in vitro and in vivo (subcutaneous scaffolds in nude BALB/c mice) and investigated by histologically and by expression of chondrogenic genes (collagen type II, aggrecan). Activin A protein production was evaluated by ELISA.Results: MenSCs exhibited a higher proliferation rate, as compared to BMMSCs, and a different expression profile of several cell surface markers. Activin A stimulated collagen type II gene expression and glycosaminoglycan synthesis in TGF-β3 treated MenSCs but not in BMMSCs, both in vitro and in vivo, although the effects of TGF-β3 alone were more pronounced in BMMSCs in vitro. Conclusion: These data suggest that activin A exerts differential effects on the induction of chondrogenic differentiation in MenSCs vs. BMMSCs, which implies that different mechanisms of chondrogenic regulation are activated in these cells. Following further optimisation of differentiation protocols and the choice of growth factors, potentially including activin A, MenSCs may turn out to be a promising population of stem cells for the development of cell-based therapies with the capacity to stimulate cartilage repair and regeneration.Trial registration: Not applicable.
Full text 165,202 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Different Phenotypes and Chondrogenic Responses of Human Menstrual Blood and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells to activin A and TGF-β3 | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Different Phenotypes and Chondrogenic Responses of Human Menstrual Blood and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells to activin A and TGF-β3 Ilona Uzieliene, Edvardas Bagdonas, Kazuto Hoshi, Tomoaki Sakamoto, and 6 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-127313/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 10 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: Due to its low capacity for self-repair, articular cartilage is highly susceptible to damage and deterioration, which leads to the development of degenerative joint diseases such as osteoarthritis. Menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MenSCs) are much less characterized compared to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs). However, MenSCs seem an attractive alternative to classical BMMSCs due to ease of access and broader differentiation capacity. The aim of this study was to evaluate chondrogenic differentiation potential of MenSCs and BMMSCs stimulated with transforming growth factor β (TGF-β3) and activin A, member of the TGF-β superfamily of proteins. Methods: MenSCs (n=6) and BMMSCs (n=5) were isolated from different healthy donors. Expression of cell surface markers CD90, CD73, CD105, CD44, CD45, CD14, CD36, CD55, CD54, CD63, CD106, CD34, CD10, Notch1 was analysed by flow cytometry. Cell proliferation capacity was determined using CCK-8 proliferation kit. Adipogenic differentiation capacity was evaluated according to Oil-Red staining, osteogenic differentiation - Alizarin Red staining. Chondrogenic differentiation (Activin A and TGF-β3 stimulation) was induced in vitro and in vivo (subcutaneous scaffolds in nude BALB/c mice) and investigated by histologically and by expression of chondrogenic genes (collagen type II, aggrecan). Activin A protein production was evaluated by ELISA. Results: MenSCs exhibited a higher proliferation rate, as compared to BMMSCs, and a different expression profile of several cell surface markers. Activin A stimulated collagen type II gene expression and glycosaminoglycan synthesis in TGF-β3 treated MenSCs but not in BMMSCs, both in vitro and in vivo , although the effects of TGF-β3 alone were more pronounced in BMMSCs in vitro . Conclusion: These data suggest that activin A exerts differential effects on the induction of chondrogenic differentiation in MenSCs vs. BMMSCs, which implies that different mechanisms of chondrogenic regulation are activated in these cells. Following further optimisation of differentiation protocols and the choice of growth factors, potentially including activin A, MenSCs may turn out to be a promising population of stem cells for the development of cell-based therapies with the capacity to stimulate cartilage repair and regeneration. Trial registration: Not applicable. Stem Cell & Developmental Cell Biology Human mesenchymal stem cells menstrual blood bone marrow chondrogenic differentiation activin A TGF-β3 Figures Figure 1 Figure 1 Figure 1 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 3 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 7 Figure 7 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 8 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 11 Introduction Human articular cartilage has a poor capacity for intrinsic repair weak ability to restore its lesions leading to the development of progressive degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA), which is one of the most common form of arthritis across the world [ 1 ]. Currently, there is no effective treatment for OA, although cell-based therapies using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) seem promising approaches for cartilage regeneration. However, thus far, there MSC-based therapies that can effectively restore damaged cartilage in OA [ 2 ][ 3 ][ 4 ]. Furthermore, due to complications associated with the collection of bone marrow samples, which is an invasive procedure, and the poor yield of MSCs, alternative sources of cells are needed in order to overcome technical issues in BMMSC isolation, for instance, adipose, amnion and umbilical cord tissue [ 2 ][ 5 ][ 6 ]. Menstrual blood is a unique body fluid, a renewable and sustainable source of multipotent stem cells (MenSCs) for regenerative medicine, which may originate from different subpopulations of endometrium, as reviewed [ 7 ][ 8 ]. These cells are of great interest due to their ease of access, as their collection does not require any complicated procedures and the permissions of ethics authorities, as well as invasive surgical procedures [ 9 ][ 10 ]. Moreover, MenSCs were demonstrated to differentiate towards a wider range of tissues, including neurogenic, cardiomyogenic and even hepatogenic cell lineages, as compared to BMMSCs [ 11 ][ 12 ][ 13 ][ 14 ]. Chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs has been reported in several studies, suggesting that MenSCs could be a suitable candidate for cartilage tissue engineering as they have been reported to produce and accumulate extracellular matrix (ECM) [ 14 ][ 15 ]. However, the expression of collagen 2A1 mRNA was exclusively detectable in differentiated BMMSCs, whereas it was not observed in differentiated MenSCs [ 14 ], suggesting that molecular mechanisms regulating chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs may differ in these two cells and the classical protocol applied for BMMSCs might not be suitable for MSCs of other origins [ 16 ][ 17 ]. Classical chondrogenesis stimulating factors, such as TGF-β and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), may not stimulate differentiation in MenSCs [ 18 ][ 19 ][ 20 ] and application of different stimulating factors may be needed. Several studies suggest that a member of the TGF-β superfamily activin A could play a role in the early stages of MSC chondrogenesis [ 21 ][ 22 ]. Activin A induces the expression of octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4), Nanog, Nodal, proto-oncogene protein Wnt3, fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF-8) and is necessary for the maintenance of self-renewal and pluripotency of MSCs [ 21 ]. Furthermore, enhanced production of activin A was demonstrated in OA cartilage, as compared to the healthy one, while it suppressed aggrecanase-mediated cleavage of aggrecan [ 23 ]. This suggests activin A to be a protective factor for OA development, and a potential candidate for future cartilage repair strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the chondrogenic differentiation potential of MenSCs and BMMSCs stimulated with TGF-β3 and activin A by histochemical staining with safranin-O and determining collagen II and aggrecan gene expression in cell pellets. We also stimulated chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs on atelocollagen/Polylactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds and subcutaneously inserted them into nude BALB/c mice for 9 weeks. The isolated constructs with cells were analyzed histologically by glycosaminoglycan (GAG) protein expression. In addition, we evaluated activin A secretion in proliferating BMMSCs and MenSCs and during chondrogenic differentiation in pellets. The key focus of this study was to compare chondrogenic differentiation of both cell types, however, we also compared stem cell properties of MenSCs and BMMSCs by characterizing the expression of cell surface markers (CD90, CD73, CD105, CD44, CD45, CD14, CD36, CD55, CD54, CD63, CD106, CD34, CD10, Notch1), their proliferation capacity and potential to differentiate into two other MSC lineages – adipogenic and osteogenic. Materials And Methods Cell isolation and culture Menstrual blood samples were collected from six healthy women aged between 20–40. About 5–10 mL of menstrual blood was collected by donors using sterile silicone cups (iCare) inserted into vagina during second day of menstrual cycle. In laboratory facilities mononuclear cells were separated using Ficoll-Paque PLUS (Stem Cell Technologies) density gradient centrifugation (30 min, room temperature, 400 g ) and washed out two times in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Sigma Aldrich), centrifuged 10 min, 600 g . Collected MenSCs were seeded into tissue culture flasks (Gibco, Life Technologies) with low glucose (1 g/L) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Merck Millipore) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Merck Millipore), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Life Technologies), 1 ng/mL FGF2 (Applied Biological Materials) (later referred as “complete medium”), and cultured in 37 ºC incubator with 5% CO 2 , saturated humidity. Medium was changed twice a week and after cells reached their confluence (~ 80%) they were detached using trypsin-EDTA 0.25% solution (Gibco, Life Technologies), calculated (CASY, Omni Life Science) and sub-cultured. Human BMMSCs were isolated from bone marrow tissues, remaining after surgical procedures according to the established protocols as previously described [ 24 ]. There were five bone-marrow donors aged between 50–60. BMMSCs were cultured under the same conditions as MenSCs. All procedures using human tissues in this study were approved by the local bioethics committee, permission No. 158200-14-741. The experiments were performed using MenSCs and BMMSCs at early passages (P) P2 to P3. Proliferation assay MenSCs and BMMSCs were seeded into 12-well plates (SPL, Life Sciences) at density 5000 cells/well in a complete medium. Cell proliferation was determined at days 1, 5, 8 and 12 by measuring it with cell counting kit – 8 (CCK-8) (Dojindo) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The medium was collected to 96 well plate (Orange Scientific) and absorbance of reduced formazan dye was quantified using spectrophotometric quantification (SpectroMaxi3, Molecular Devices) (absorbance, 450 nm). Scratch assay Scratch assay was performed to evaluate cell migration capacity. MenSCs and BMMSCs were seeded into T25 flasks (Gibco, Life Technologies) and grown to full confluence. Later a straight scratch of the cell monolayer was performed with a 1 mL pipet tip. The cell scratch was photographed under a phase-contrast microscope at 0, 8, 24 and 48 hours, and cell migration abilities were evaluated by the size of area of migrated cells inside the scratch. Immunophenotypic characterization of cells Surface marker analysis was performed by harvesting the cells, washing them with cytometer buffer (PBS + 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Biological Industries)) 5 min at 600 g , and incubating with the specific labelled antibodies in cytometer buffer for 20 min at 4 °C. Antibodies used for the experiment were against human cell surface cluster of differentiation CD antigens CD90, CD73, CD105, CD44, CD45, CD14, CD36, CD55, CD54, CD63, CD106, CD34, CD10, Notch1 purchased from BD Pharmingen (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA) and Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA). In all experiments, matching isotype antibodies were used as negative controls. Data (10.000 events) were collected using a flow cytometer FACS Aria II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed on FacsDiva analysis software (BD Biosciences). Adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation For adipogenic differentiation, MenSCs and BMMSCs were seeded into a 12 well plate, at a density of 60 000 cells/well. Differentiation was induced in sub-confluent cells using adipogenic medium, consisting of low glucose (1 g/L) DMEM medium, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 20% FBS, 1 µmol/L dexamethasone (Sigma Aldrich), 60 µmol/L indomethacin (Sigma Aldrich) and 50 µmol/L 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) (Biosource) for 21 day. After that, lipid droplets in cells were stained with Oil Red-O (Carl Roth) and visualized in an inverted light microscope. Quantitative analysis was performed by dissolving lipid droplets in 70% isopropanol solution (Eurochemicals), after which the released oil-red dye was collected into 96 well plate and measured absorbance using spectrophotometer (absorbance, 520 nm). For osteogenic differentiation MenSCs and BMMSCs were also seeded into a 12 well plate, at a density 40 000 cells/well. Osteogenic differentiation medium was added after the cells reached their sub-confluence, consisting of high glucose (4.5 g/L) DMEM medium (Gibco, Life Technologies), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 10% FBS, 0.1 µmol/L dexamethasone, 50 µg/mL ascorbic acid and 10 mmol/L β – glycerophosphate (Santa Cruz) for 21 day. Osteogenesis was evaluated by light microscopy, staining the cells with Alizarin Red S (Carl Roth). Quantitative analysis was evaluated by dissolving the calcium hydroxyapatite crystals, stained with Alizarin, in 10% cetyl-pyridinium chloride (Sigma Aldrich). The dissolved solution was then collected into 96 well plate and absorbance measured using spectrophotometer (absorbance, 562 nm). Chondrogenic differentiation using activin A and TGF-β3 in vitro Chondrogenesis was induced using a protocol used by State Research Institute Centre for Innovative medicine. Chondrogenic medium was composed of high glucose (4.5 g/L) DMEM medium, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium (Gibco Life Technologies), 350 µM L-proline (Carl Roth), 0.1% dexamethasone, 170 µM ascorbic acid-phosphate (Sigma Aldrich) and 10 ng/mL TGF-β3 (Gibco, Life Technologies), or 50 ng/mL activin A (Merck, Millipore). Briefly, 250 k of MenSCs or BMMSCs were added in 15 mL tubes (Gibco, Life Technologies), centrifuged 5 min at 600 g and cultivated in chondrogenic medium. The tubes with cells were divided into 4 groups: 1 – Control (chondrogenic medium without growth factors); 2 – activin A; 3 – TGF-β3; 4 – TGF-β3 + activin A. Double growth factor group was activin A-stimulated only once at the start of differentiation, while during second medium change on day 2 – only TGF-β3 was added. This protocol was chosen based on previous studies suggesting the efficacy of activin A at the early stages of chondrogenic differentiation [ 21 ]. Each treatment was applied in technical triplicates. The production of ECM in cell pellets was evaluated macroscopically and histologically (Safranin O staining). Chondrogenic differentiation using activin A and TGF-β3 in vivo Chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs was also stimulated in atelocollagen/PLLA constructs, which were inserted into six nude mice (BALB/c). For this purpose, 100 000 cells were mixed with 100 µL of atelocollagen gel (Koken) for 10 min according to manufacturer’s recommendations, transferred to PLLA (R&D) and incubated for 2 h in 37 ºC incubator with 5% CO 2 . After that cell constructs were transferred into 20 mL tubes and chondrogenic differentiation medium was added. The constructs with cells of each donor were divided into three groups: 1 – Control; 2 – activin A and 3 – TGF-β3, where control – cells incubated in chondrogenic medium without growth factors, activin A – cells incubated in chondrogenic medium with activin A (50 ng/mL), which was added only once, at the beginning of the differentiation (at day 2 it was replaced with TGF-β3), TGF-β3 – cells incubated in chondrogenic medium with TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL). Chondrogenesis was induced for 21 days. The medium was changed three times a week. After the end of differentiation, the cell constructs were subcutaneously implanted into BALB/c nude mice (n = 6), under general anesthesia with isoflurane (Sigma Aldrich). Each donor’s cell constructs were inserted into the same mouse. The constructs with cells remained in mice for 9 weeks. After that period, the mice were sacrificed using diethyl ether (Sigma Aldrich) and the constructs were carefully removed. Every construct was divided into equal two parts, where one part was used for histological analysis and the other for GAG protein analysis (Biocolor). GAG analysis in cell atelocollagen/PLLA constructs Half of the collected cell atelocollagen/PLLA constructs were transferred into acetic acid solution (50 nM) (Sigma Aldrich) and homogenized using stainless steel beads in homogenizer (300 sec, 3200 rpm). After homogenization, all procedures were performed on ice. The homogenized solution was transferred to Eppendorf and pepsin (10 ng/mL) (Wako) was added for 48 h, 4 o C in a rotor spin. After 48 h, the solution was neutralized using Tris-buffered saline (TBS) buffer, consisting of 1 M Tris, 2 M sodium chloride and 50 mM calcium chloride solution. Elastase (1 mg/mL) (Wako) was added overnight, 4 o C in a rotor spin. The following morning, the samples were centrifuged at 910 g , 5 min, 4 o C. The protein levels were standardized using Lowry method. The GAG levels were measured spectrophotometrically using blyscan™-sulphated GAG assay (Biocolor), according to manufacturer’s recommendations, as previously described [ 25 ]. Histology of chondrogenic differentiation cell pellets For histochemical and immunohistochemical analysis, chondrogenic differentiation pellets were fixed in 10% neutral formalin and embedded into paraffin. 3-micrometer sections were deparaffinized and processed for standard staining with safranin-O (Sigma Aldrich). RNA extraction from cell pellets At the end of chondrogenic differentiation period, the cell pellets were collected, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70 °C. Frozen samples were homogenized by ultrasonication (Bandelin Sonopuls) in lysis buffer (Qiagen, 74104) and RNA was extracted according manufacturer’s protocol. RNA concentration and purity were measured with the SpectraMax i3 (Molecular Devices, USA). RT-qPCR RNA was reverse-transcribed with Maxima cDNA Synthesis kit including dsDNase treatment (Thermo Scientific). RT-qPCR reaction mixes were prepared with Maxima Probe qPCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific) and TaqMan Gene expression Assays ( RPS9 - Hs02339424_g1, B2M - Hs00984230_m1, COL2A1 - Hs01060345_m1, ACAN - Hs00153936_m1 (Thermo Scientific)) and ran on the Agilent Aria MX instrument (Agilent Technologies) in technical triplicates starting with denaturation step for 10 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C denaturation and 60 s for annealing and extension. Relative levels of gene transcripts were calculated by subtracting the threshold cycle (Ct) of the normalizer (the geometric mean of the two housekeeping genes – RPS9 and B2M) from the Ct of the gene of interest, giving the dCt values which were subsequently transformed to 2 -dCt values and multiplied by 1000 to scale-up for better graphical representation. Quantification of activin A from chondrogenic pellet supernatants and monolayer by ELISA Activin A protein production was evaluated during chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs and during cell cultivation in monolayer. Supernatants were collected from the pellets incubated with TGF-β3 and control during chondrogenic differentiation, and from monolayer cultures during 8th and 12th days. Activin A protein levels were detected using activin A duo set ELISA (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Activin A levels secreted during monolayer culture were normalized according to upgrowing number of cells by precise value of proliferation. It was implemented by calculating the ratio of a secreted activin A to proliferation value. Statistical analysis of studies The Student’s t-test was used to calculate statistical difference among MenSCs and BMMSCs data in proliferation, immunophenotypic, GAG analysis, gene analysis and ELISA assays. A P ≤ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results MenSCs and BMMSCs proliferation and migration capacity The proliferation capacity of MenSCs was significantly higher than BMMSCs (Fig. 1 -A). During the first 3 days of culture, there were no significant differences in cell proliferation, however, from the 5th day, MenSCs proliferation started to increase and on day 12 the difference reached statistical significance compared to BMMSCs (MenSCs 0.828 (+/- 0.201), BMMSCs 0.286 (+/- 0.085)) (P value 0.022). In scratch assays, after 48 hours complete wound closure was observed in MenSCs, but not in BMMSCs (Fig. 1 -B). These results suggest that proliferation and migration of MenSCs are higher than BMMSCs. Surface marker expression in MenSCs and BMMSCs In order to determine and compare immunophenotypical profiles of MenSCs and BMMSCs, the cells were stained with antibodies against MSC surface markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105), hematopoietic (CD14, CD34, CD36, CD45) and pluripotential stem cell markers (CD10, CD54, CD55, CD63, CD106, Notch1) and analysed by flow cytometer (Fig. 2 ). MenSCs and BMMSCs were both positive for classical MSC markers – CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, where more than 95% of total cell population was positive, and negative for hematopoietic stem cell markers – CD14, CD34, CD36, CD45 (less than 10% of total cell population was positive). Expression of CD55, CD54, CD10 and Notch1 was statisticaly significantly higher in MenSCs, as compared to BMMSCs, whereas CD63in BMMSCs. MenSCs and BMMSCs ability to differentiate into osteoblasts and adipocytes To evaluate mesodermal lineage potential, MenSCs and BMMSCs were induced to differentiate towards adipogenic and osteogenic direction (Fig. 3 ). The results demonstrate that MenSCs and BMMSCs are able to differentiate into adipogenic and osteogenic lineage cells. However, adipogenic differentiation capacity was significantly stronger in BMMSCs (3.22 ± 1.39), than in MenSCs (2.41 ± 0.13), as they formed more lipid droplets. However, osteogenic differentiation, was significantly higher in MenSCs (38.86 ± 10.71) than in BMMSCs (19.74 ± 7.32). Secretion of activin A during proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs During 12 days of cell culture in monolayer (Fig. 4 -A), the level of activin A was increasing in supernatants, and during 8 and 12 days it was significantly higher in MenSCs (757 ± 79 pg/mL, and 2064 ± 312 pg/mL, respectively), as compared to BMMSCs (396 ± 187.51 pg/mL and 586 ± 359.2 pg/mL, respectively). P values: 8th day – 0.018; 12th day – 0.028. We next wanted to determine, whether the higher levels of activin A are associated with more intensive its secretion in MenSCs or rather with the higher numbers of those cells due to the more intensive proliferation. To investigate that, activin A secretion was normalized according to the upgrowing cell activity, measured by CCK-8, which essentially represents cell numbers (Fig. 4 -B). After normalisation, secretion of activin A still remained significantly higher in MenSCs as compared to BMMSCs on days 8th and 12th in monolayer:(8th day - MenSCs 2622.8; BMMSCs 2066.7, P = 0.027; 12th day: -MenSCs 2493.1; BMMSCs 2046.7, P = 0.031). Stimulation of chondrogenic differentiation in MenSCs and BMMSCs with activin A and/or TGF-β3 After analysis of activin A secretion in monolayer, both cell types were stimulated to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage using TGF-β3 and cell supernatants were collected for activin A secretion analysis. During the 3rd day of chondrogenic differentiation in pellet system, the levels of activin A are presented in Fig. 5 . It was significantly higher in control cells and cells, stimulated with TGF-β3 on 3rd day of chondrogenic induction in MenSCs (control – 82.32 ± 2.94 pg/mL; TGF-β3–63.21 ± 1.47 pg/mL), as compared to BMMSCs (control 5.88 ± 2.94 pg/mL and TGF-β3 102.9 ± 1.47 pg/mL), where P ≤ 0.001 for controls and P ≤ 0.05 for TGF-β3. BMMSCs maintained production of activin A on 3rd day of differentiation only in combination with TGF-β3 (102.9 ± 1.47 pg/mL), as compared to control (5.88 ± 2.94 pg/mL) (P ≤ 0.05). Noteworthy, MenSCs control cells, which were incubated without any growth factors, produced higher quantities of activin A than cells stimulated with TGF-β3, where in contrast, BMMSCs maintained activin A secretion only under stimulation with TGF-β3. These differences might be associated with activin A-dependent mechanisms specific for MenSCs. During the later 19 days of chondrogenic induction of both, MenSCs and BMMSCs, the secretion of activin A was very low and practically non-detectable (data not shown). According to histological staining of pellet sections with safranin-O, different responses to TGF-β3 and activin A were observed in MenSCs and BMMSCs (Fig. 6 ). Combination of activin A and TGF-β3 stimulated proteoglycan synthesis in MenSCs, while stimulation with either activin A or TGF-β3 alone had no clear effect on chondrogenic response in those cells. In BMMSCs, accumulation of proteoglycans was observed in both, activin A or TGF-β3-stimulated groups of BMMSCs, however, the effects of TGF-β3 were more pronounced. At gene expression level, a weaker ability to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage was observed in MenSCs, as compared to BMMSCs (Fig. 7 and Fig. 8 ). Collagen type II ( COL2A1) , which is one the major collagen type in articular cartilage, gene expression was significantly lower in TGF-β3 and TGF-β3 with activin A groups of MenSCs, as compared to these two groups of BMMSCs (P ≤ 0.001). However, application of TGF-β3 alone or in combination with activin A significantly upregulated COL2A1 expression in MenSCs and the combination of activin A and TGF-β3 was significantly stronger than the effect of TGF-β3 alone (Fig. 7 ). Activin A had no substantial effect on COL2A1 gene expression in MenSCs. Low levels of aggrecan ( ACAN) gene expression was detected in all 4 conditions of MenSCs (Fig. 8 ), as compared to substantialy higher levels of its expression in BMMSCs. ACAN expression statistically significantly increased only in BMMSCs and only after stimulation with TGF-β3 or a combination of activin A with TGF-β3. BMMSCs possessed a strong ability to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage with TGF-β3, according to COL2A1 and ACAN gene expression (Fig. 7 and Fig. 8 ). In opposite to MenSCs, combination of activin A with TGF-β3 in BMMSCs had no additional effect on the expression of the genes tested. Chondrogenesis of MenSCs and BMMSCs in vivo According to safranin-O staining, higher accumulation of ECM proteins was observed in samples of combined activin A and TGF-β3 treatment, as compared to control in both cells (Fig. 9 , B). GAG synthesis was also observed in higher content in samples treated with combination of TGF-β3 and activin A as well as single factors, in both MenSCs and BMMSCs (Fig. 10 ). However, statistically significant differences were observed only in MenSCs, where GAG production was higher in TGF-β3 stimulated group and additionally more pronounced if the combination of TGF-β3 + activin A was used. Although there were no significant differences between MenSCs and BMMSCs groups, MenSCs stimulated with TGF-β3 + activin A samples produced more GAGs, as compared to samples of BMMSCs under the same stimulation. Discussion MSCs have been a focus in regenerative medicine due to their high potential to differentiate towards several lineages including osteoblasts, chondrocytes and adipocytes. Firstly, MSCs were discovered in bone marrow, while later they were isolated form almost all human tissues, including bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood, placenta [ 26 ][ 27 ][ 28 ][ 6 ][ 29 ] and human menstrual blood [ 8 ][ 30 ][ 31 ]. The collection of menstrual blood samples does not require invasive procedures, which highlights a key advantage of MenSCs in regenerative medicine over BMMSCs [ 10 ]. MenSCs are increasingly investigated in different studies, and are known to be similar to BMMSCs [ 8 ][ 32 ][ 33 ]. Furthermore, due to a high potential to differentiate into several different lineages, MenSCs have been proposed for treatment of critical limb ischemia, stroke, type I diabetes mellitus, Parkinson’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders in experimental disease models [ 14 ][ 9 ]. Despite those advantages of MenSCs as compared to MSCs derived from other tissues, their characteristics have not been extensively studied so far. For instance, potential application of MenSCs for cartilage regeneration still requires additional studies on chondrogenic differentiation capacity. One of the usually used growth factors in chondrogenic differentiation of BMMSCs is TGF-β, however, other types of MSCs, for instance isolated from adipose tissue, may respond better to other growth factors, for instance BMP-2, -4 or -7 [ 34 ][ 35 ]. The growth factor activin A is important in numerous cell processes, as well as the early stages of chondrogenesis [ 21 ]. Mechanisms of action of activin A and TGF-βs appear similar, they both induce phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 during chondrogenesis [ 36 ]. However, the role of activin A in chondrogenic differentiation is controversial, as some studies propose that it antagonises chondrogenesis and supresses the expression of chondrogenic genes [ 37 ][ 38 ]. Furthermore, activin A is very important in regulating the female menstrual cycle and has various functions in reproduction [ 39 ][ 40 ][ 41 ][ 42 ], suggesting that it may modulate other functional characteristics of MenSCs, including differentiation. In this study, MenSCs and BMMSCs were isolated and characterized and compared by MSC surface marker expression (flow cytometry), proliferation abilities (CCK-8, spectrophotometry) and MSC trilineage differentiation capacity (osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic). We observed higher proliferation and migration in MenSCs compared to BMMSCs, which is similar to the results obtained in other studies, where MenSCs and BMMSCs proliferation was investigated [ 32 ][ 43 ]. Expression of typical MSCs surface markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105), hematopoietic stem cell markers (CD14 CD34, CD36, CD45), and pluripotent stem cell markers (CD10, CD54, CD55, CD63, Notch1) were analysed for characterisation of MenSCs phenotype [ 44 ][ 45 ][ 46 ][ 47 ][ 48 ]. Expression of CD55, CD54, CD10 and Notch1 surface markers in MenSCs was significantly higher, as compared to BMMSCs, whereas expression of CD63 was higher in BMMSCs (Fig. 2 ). CD10 is a membrane metallo-endopeptidase, also referred as neprilysin, which is involved in different cell signalling pathways influencing cell migration, angiogenesis, tumorigenesis and immunomodulation [ 44 ]. Moreover, CD10 has also been a marker of highly proliferating cells, as well as calcifying cells [ 49 ], which was also observed for MenSCs in the present study. CD55 is a complement decay-accelerating factor, also a MSC marker used to identify endoderm in early embryonic development [ 50 ]. CD54 is an intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), which was shown to be involved in the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs [ 51 ]. Notch1 is a member of the Notch family of receptors and plays a significant role in mediating BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation in MSC [ 52 ]. Notch is also known to be associated with enhanced MSC proliferation [ 53 ], which might be associated with high regenerative abilities of endometrium and could represent an advantage in regenerative medicine when large amounts of cells are needed. Even though the main focus of this study was chondrogenic differentiation in both MenSCs and BMMSCs we also compared their potential to differentiate into adipogenic and osteogenic lineages. MenSCs showed weak adipogenic differentiation capacity, which is in agreement to the data obtained in other studies [ 32 ][ 43 ]. Moreover, the weak adipogenic differentiation capacity was also observed in amniotic fluid, placenta, umbilical cord and umbilical cord blood MSCs [ 54 ][ 55 ], which are of similar origin with MenSCs. This is in contrast to classical trilineage differentiation of BMMSCs. However, as described above, potential of MenSC to differentiate into neurogenic, cardiomyogenic and even hepatogenic cell lineages [ 11 ][ 12 ][ 13 ] confirm their advanced differentiation potential, while the weaker adipogenesis probably indicate different differentiation profile rather than lack of stem cell properties. Furthermore, osteogenic differentiation capacity of MenSCs was significantly stronger as compared to BMMSCs (Fig. 3 ), which to the best of our knowledge, has not been demonstrated previously. Stronger osteogenic differentiation capacity than in BMMSCs has been already reported for MSCs derived from placental and amniotic fluid [ 56 ][ 57 ][ 58 ], which are the ones of the closest origin to MenSCs, therefore, might share some functional similarities. The levels of secreted activin A were measured during cell proliferation in monolayer and their chondrogenic differentiation. Higher levels of activin A were secreted by MenSCs in monolayer (Fig. 4 ), as compared to BMMSCs, and the elevated levels remained until 3rd day of chondrogenic differentiation in both – non-stimulated control and TGF-β3 group of MenSC (Fig. 5 ). No significant chondrogenic response to activin A has been previously reported in BMMSCs [ 37 ][ 38 ], which is in agreement with results obtained in this study. However, this is the first report of MenSCs stimulated to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage using activin A. Noteworthy, the expression of chondrogenic genes indicates weaker ability MenSCs to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage, in comparison to the levels in BMMSCs. The response to activin A during chondrogenic differentiation was also different in MenSCs and BMMSCs. In MenSCs, the effects of activin A alone were negligible and only in combination with TGF-β3 resulted in a substantial increase of COL2A1 expression. Even though COL2A1 and ACAN gene expression was stronger in BMMSCs after stimulation with TGF-β3, activin A had no significant effect on the expression of these genes neither alone, nor in combination with TGF-β3. Positive safranin-O staining was observed in histological samples of activin A-treated BMMSCs pellets, suggesting stimulatory effects of this factor on chondrogenic differentiation. In BMMSCs stimulated with a combination of activin A with TGF-β3, the expression of COL2A1 gene (Fig. 7 ) as well as the ECM protein content observed in histology samples (Fig. 6 ) were not significantly different, as compared to a single TGF-β3 stimulation. The in vitro chondrogenesis studies using activin A were followed by an in vivo study. The technology of Atelocollagen/PLLA construct application was chosen due to its biocompatibility and efficacy for stimulation of BMMSCs chondrogenic differentiation in vivo [ 59 ][ 60 ]. Chondrogenesis of MenSCs and BMMSCs in constructs was induced for 3 weeks in vitro , followed by their subcutaneous insertion into nude BALB/C mice. Histological evaluation of the samples (Fig. 9 ), as well as GAG analysis (Fig. 10 ) indicated that the additional stimulation with activin A, prior to switching to TGF-β3, upregulated the production of ECM proteins in MenSCs, as compared to the controls or TGF-β3 stimulated samples. Somewhat similar tendencies, although less expressed were observed in BMMSCs. These data are in contrast to the results obtained during in vitro cultures, where potential of MenSCs to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage was lower, as compared to BMMSCs. It is likely that longer stimulation is needed for MenSCs to effectively induce chondrogenic responses, as compared to BMMSCs, as in vivo study lasted an additional 63 days. Furthermore, paracrine effects in both cell types might also play a role in stimulating host cell response and their migration, which induces differentiation of MSCs [ 61 ]. MenSCs produce some unique factors, as demonstrated by others and in the present study, and seem less responsive to cytokine activation and express less immunosuppressive molecules, as compared to BMMSCs [ 10 ]. The differences in secretion of various paracrine factors might result in the disparities of host cell responses to MenSCs and BMMSCs in vivo , which in turn led to more expressed chondrogenic induction. It should also be considered that application of the scaffolds may play a role in stimulation of ECM production in MSCs, as previously demonstrated [ 15 ][ 62 ]. Although it might appear that collagen-based scaffolds are essential for stimulating chondrogenesis in MenSCs, further studies are needed to support their use. Moreover, there are many soluble factors in mouse body fluids that may differently foster chondrogenic differentiation of implanted cells. Taken together, combined in vitro and in vivo data suggest that MenSCs differently respond to external stimuli and show distinct functional activity from BMMSCs. Nevertheless, it is likely that they are capable of switching to chondrogenesis, but this process takes longer time and the choice of suitable combinations of the factors to guide these cells and orchestrate the differentiation process are needed. Conclusions The results presented in this original investigation demonstrate that MenSCs share many similar phenotypic properties with BMMSCs, but they exhibit several differences as well. The proliferation rate and osteogenic differentiation capacity of MenSCs is higher than of BMMSCs, while adipogenic differentiation capacity is lower. Expression of surface markers CD55, CD54, CD10 and Notch1 were significantly higher in MenSCs, while of CD63 was lower, as compared to BMMSCs. Secreted levels of activin A were significantly higher in MenSCs as compared to BMMSCs on days 8 and 12 of cultivation in monolayer. The potential of BMMSCs to differentiate into the chondrogenic lineage was more pronounced under stimulation with TGF-β3 in vitro . In contrast, the efficacy of activin A was higher in chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs, as compared to BMMSCs, both in vivo and, particularly, in vitro . These data suggest that activin A is differently involved in the induction of chondrogenic differentiation in MenSCs vs. BMMSCs, which implies distinct pathways of chondrogenesis regulation in these cells. Following further optimisation of the differentiation protocol and growth factor choice, potentially including activin A and extending the duration of growth factor stimulation, MenSCs may indeed turn out to be a promising population of stem cells for the further development as a key component of cell-based therapies for stimulating cartilage repair and regeneration. Abbreviations Aggrecan ACAN; Bone marrow MSCs BMMSCs; Bone morphogenetic protein-2 BMP-2; Cell counting kit 8 CCK-8; Collagen Type II Alpha 1 Chain gene COL2A1; Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium DMEM; Extracellular matrix ECM; Fibroblast growth factor 8 FGF-8; Glycosaminoglycan GAG; Menstrual blood-derived MSCs MenSCs; Mesenchymal stem cells MSCs; Osteoarthritis OA; Polylactic acid PLLA; Transforming growth factorβ TGF-β; Declarations All procedures using human tissues in this study were approved by “Vilnius Regional Committee for Biomedical Research Ethics”, permission No. 158200-14-741-257. All procedures using mice in this study were carried out at Tokyo university hospital, and were approved by "Animal Experimentation Committee, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo" (approval number: P15-019). Consent for publication: Not applicable Availability of Data and Materials: The data supporting these findings can be found at State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Department of Regenerative medicine. Author Contributions: Writing-Original Draft Preparation and study design – I. Uzieliene and E. Bernotiene; donor patient selection and enrollment G.Kvederas; cell isolation, chondrogenesis, proliferation, ELISA studies, as well as scratch assay, osteogenic/adipogenic differentiation – Z. Tachtamisevaite, G. Rakauskiene and I. Uzieliene, Surface marker analysis – I. Uzieliene; Gene expression study – E. Bagdonas; conceptualization of the manuscript – E. Bernotiene; critical revision - E. Bernotiene, A.Mobasheri; In vivo study design, conceptualization – A. Hikita, K. Hoshi, I. Uzieliene; In vivo study, chondrogenesis on Atelocollagen/PLLA scaffolds, GAG analysis – T. Sakamoto and I. Uzieliene; editing – all authors. Funding: This work was funded by Lithuanian Research Council (LMTLT) ”Development of injectable biomimetic hydrogels for engineering of cartilage tissue”, P‐LLT‐18‐21, agreement No S-LLT-18-4. Scientific trip to Tokyo university hospital was funded by European structural funds Nr. 09.3.3.-LMT-K-712-14-0144. Acknowledgments: We would like to thank professor Zygmunt Mackiewicz for histological evaluation of pellet cultures. Conflicts of Interest: The authors do not declare any conflicts of interest. References Neogi, T. The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2013 , 21 , 1145–1153. Lindenmair, A.; Hatlapatka, T.; Kollwig, G.; Hennerbichler, S.; Gabriel, C.; Wolbank, S.; Redl, H.; Kasper, C. Mesenchymal stem or stromal cells from amnion and umbilical cord tissue and their potential for clinical applications. Cells 2012 , 1 , 1061–88. Somoza, R.A.; Welter, J.F.; Correa, D.; Caplan, A.I. Chondrogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Challenges and Unfulfilled Expectations. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2014 , 20 , 596–608. Shariatzadeh, M.; Song, J.; Wilson, S.L. The efficacy of different sources of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Cell Tissue Res. 2019 , 399–410. Ullah, I.; Subbarao, R.B.; Rho, G.J. Human mesenchymal stem cells - current trends and future prospective. Biosci. Rep. 2015 , 35 , 1–18. Kozlowska, U.; Krawczenko, A.; Futoma, K.; Jurek, T.; Rorat, M.; Patrzalek, D.; Klimczak, A. Similarities and differences between mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells derived from various human tissues. World J. Stem Cells 2019 , 11 , 347–374. Lv, H.; Hu, Y.; Cui, Z.; Jia, H. Human menstrual blood: A renewable and sustainable source of stem cells for regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018 , 9 , 1–11. Meng, X.; Ichim, T.E.; Zhong, J.; Rogers, A.; Yin, Z.; Jackson, J.; Wang, H.; Ge, W.; Bogin, V.; Chan, K.W.; et al. Endometrial regenerative cells: a novel stem cell population. J. Transl. Med. 2007 , 5 , 57. Chen, L.; Qu, J.; Cheng, T.; Chen, X.; Xiang, C. Menstrual blood-derived stem cells: Toward therapeutic mechanisms, novel strategies, and future perspectives in the treatment of diseases. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019 , 10 , 1–12. Uzieliene, I.; Urbonaite, G.; Tachtamisevaite, Z.; Mobasheri, A.; Bernotiene, E. The potential of menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair and regeneration: Novel aspects. Stem Cells Int. 2018, 1 , 1–10. Hida, N.; Nishiyama, N.; Miyoshi, S.; Kira, S.; Segawa, K.; Uyama, T.; Mori, T.; Miyado, K.; Ikegami, Y.; Cui, C.; et al. Novel Cardiac Precursor-Like Cells from Human Menstrual Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Cells. Stem Cells 2008 , 26 , 1695–1704. Ikegami, Y.; Miyoshi, S.; Nishiyama, N.; Hida, N.; Okamoto, K.; Miyado, K.; Segawa, K.; Ogawa, S.; Umezawa, A. Serum-independent cardiomyogenic transdifferentiation in human endometrium-derived mesenchymal cells. Artif. Organs 2010 , 34 , 280–288. Azedi, F.; Kazemnejad, S.; Zarnani, A.H.; Soleimani, M.; Shojaei, A.; Arasteh, S. Comparative capability of menstrual blood versus bone marrow derived stem cells in neural differentiation. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2017 , 44 , 169–182. Mou, X.; Lin, J.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, X.; Xiang, B.; Li, C.; Ma, J.; Xiang, C. Menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into functional hepatocyte-like cells. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2013 , 14 , 961–72. Kazemnejad, S.; Zarnani, A.H.; Khanmohammadi, M.; Mobini, S. Characterization and chondrogenic differentiation of menstrual blood-derived stem cells on nanofibrous scaffolds. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013 , 1058 , 149–169. Zhou, Q.; Li, B.; Zhao, J.; Pan, W.; Xu, J.; Chen, S. IGF-I induces adipose derived mesenchymal cell chondrogenic differentiation in vitro and enhances chondrogenesis in vivo. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. - Anim. 2016 , 52 , 356–364. Nirmal, R.S.; Nair, P.D. Significance of soluble growth factors in the chondrogenic response of human umbilical cord matrix stem cells in a porous three dimensional scaffold. Eur. Cells Mater. 2013 , 26 , 234–251. Khanmohammadi, M.; Khanjani, S.; Bakhtyari, M.S.; Zarnani, A.H.; Edalatkhah, H.; Akhondi, M.M.; Mirzadegan, E.; Kamali, K.; Alimoghadam, K.; Kazemnejad, S. Proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation potential of menstrual blood- and bone marrow-derived stem cells in two-dimensional culture. Int. J. Hematol. 2012 , 95 , 484–493. Wolff, E.F.; Wolff, A.B.; Hongling Du; Taylor, H.S. Demonstration of Multipotent Stem Cells in the Adult Human Endometrium by In Vitro Chondrogenesis. Reprod. Sci. 2007 , 14 , 524–533. Patel, A.N.; Park, E.; Kuzman, M.; Benetti, F.; Silva, F.J.; Allickson, J.G. Multipotent menstrual blood stromal stem cells: Isolation, characterization, and differentiation. Cell Transplant. 2008 , 17 , 303–311. Djouad, F.; Jackson, W.M.; Bobick, B.E.; Janjanin, S.; Song, Y.; Huang, G.T.; Tuan, R.S. Activin A expression regulates multipotency of mesenchymal progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2010 , 1 , 11. Peran, M.; Ruiz, S.; Kwiatkowski, W.; Marchal, J.A.; Yang, S.L.; Aranega, A.; Choe, S.; Izpisua Belmonte, J.C. Activin/BMP2 chimeric ligands direct adipose-derived stem cells to chondrogenic differentiation. Stem Cell Res. 2013 , 10 , 464–476. Alexander, S.; Watt, F.; Sawaji, Y.; Hermansson, M.; Saklatvala, J. Activin a is an anticatabolic autocrine cytokine in articular cartilage whose production is controlled by fibroblast growth factor 2 and NF-κB. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 , 56 , 3715–3725. Uzieliene, I.; Bernotiene, E.; Rakauskiene, G.; Denkovskij, J.; Bagdonas, E.; Mackiewicz, Z.; Porvaneckas, N.; Kvederas, G.; Mobasheri, A. The Antihypertensive Drug Nifedipine Modulates the Metabolism of Chondrocytes and Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 2019 , 10 , 1–11. Fujihara, Y.; Abe, T.; Asawa, Y.; Nishizawa, S.; Saijo, H.; Hikita, A.; Hoshi, K. Influence of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns from Chondrocytes in Tissue-Engineered Cartilage. Tissue Eng. Part A 2020 , 1–27. Ullah, I.; Subbarao, R.B.; Rho, G.J. Human mesenchymal stem cells - Current trends and future prospective. Biosci. Rep. 2015, 35 , 1–18. Araña, M.; Mazo, M.; Aranda, P.; Pelacho, B.; Prosper, F. Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Isolation, Expansion, and Characterization. 2013 , 1036 , 81–88. Elahi, K.C.; Klein, G.; Avci-Adali, M.; Sievert, K.D.; Macneil, S.; Aicher, W.K. Human mesenchymal stromal cells from different sources diverge in their expression of cell surface proteins and display distinct differentiation patterns. Stem Cells Int. 2016 , 1–9. Secunda, R.; Vennila, R.; Mohanashankar, A.M.; Rajasundari, M.; Jeswanth, S.; Surendran, R. Isolation, expansion and characterisation of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood and matrix: a comparative study. Cytotechnology 2015 , 67 , 793–807. Musina, R.A.; Belyavski, A. V.; Tarusova, O. V.; Solovyova, E. V.; Sukhikh, G.T. Endometrial mesenchymal stem cells isolated from the menstrual blood. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2008 , 145 , 539–543. Dalirfardouei, R.; Jamialahmadi, K.; Mahdipour, E. A feasible method for the isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from menstrual blood and their exosomes. Tissue Cell 2018 , 55 , 53–62. Alcayaga-Miranda, F.; Cuenca, J.; Luz-Crawford, P.; Aguila-Díaz, C.; Fernandez, A.; Figueroa, F.E.; Khoury, M. Characterization of menstrual stem cells: angiogenic effect, migration and hematopoietic stem cell support in comparison with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015 , 6 , 32. Liu, Y.; Niu, R.; Yang, F.; Yan, Y.; Liang, S.; Sun, Y.; Shen, P.; Lin, J. Biological characteristics of human menstrual blood-derived endometrial stem cells. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018 , 22 , 1627–1639. Yu, D.A.; Han, J.; Kim, B.S. Stimulation of chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Stem Cells 2012, 5 , 16–22. Im, G.-I.; Ko, J.-Y.; Lee, J.H. Chondrogenesis of adipose stem cells in a porous polymer scaffold: influence of the pore size. Cell Transplant. 2012, 21 , 2397–405. Grafe, I.; Alexander, S.; Peterson, J.R.; Snider, T.N.; Levi, B.; Lee, B.; Mishina, Y. TGF-b Family Signaling in Mesenchymal Differentiation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2018 , 10 , 1–49. Mitsugi, S.; Ariyoshi, W.; Okinaga, T.; Kaneuji, T.; Kataoka, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Nishihara, T. Mechanisms involved in inhibition of chondrogenesis by activin-A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012 , 420 , 380–384. Kroon, L.M.G. d.; Davidson, E.N.B.; Narcisi, R.; Farrell, E.; Kraan, P.M. v. d.; van Osch, G.J.V.M. Activin and Nodal Are Not Suitable Alternatives to TGF for Chondrogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Cartilage 2017 , 8 , 432–438. Wijayarathna, R.; de Kretser, D.M. Activins in reproductive biology and beyond. Hum. Reprod. Update 2016 , 22 , 342–357. Welt, C.K. Regulation and function of inhibins in the normal menstrual cycle. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2004 , 22 , 187–193. Perakakis, N.; Upadhyay, J.; Ghaly, W.; Chen, J.; Chrysafi, P.; Anastasilakis, A.D.; Mantzoros, C.S. Regulation of the activins-follistatins-inhibins axis by energy status: Impact on reproductive function. Metabolism. 2018 , 85 , 240–249. Wijayarathna, R.; de Kretser, D.M. Activins in reproductive biology and beyond. Hum. Reprod. Update 2016 , 22 , 342–357. Faramarzi, H.; Mehrabani, D.; Fard, M.; Akhavan, M.; Zare, S.; Bakhshalizadeh, S.; Manafi, A.; Kazemnejad, S.; Shirazi, R. The Potential of Menstrual Blood-Derived Stem Cells in Differentiation to Epidermal Lineage: A Preliminary Report. World J. Plast. Surg. 2016 , 5 , 26–31. Rasini, V.; Dominici, M.; Kluba, T.; Siegel, G.; Lusenti, G.; Northoff, H.; Horwitz, E.M.; Schäfer, R. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells markers in the human bone marrow. Cytotherapy 2013 , 15 , 292–306. Maleki, M.; Ghanbarvand, F.; Behvarz, M.R.; Ejtemaei, M.; Ghadirkhomi, E. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cell markers in multiple human adult stem cells. Int. J. Stem Cells 2014 , 7 , 118–126. Lv, F.J.; Tuan, R.S.; Cheung, K.M.C.; Leung, V.Y.L. Concise review: The surface markers and identity of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2014 , 32 , 1408–1419. Szade, K.; Zuba-Surma, E.; Rutkowski, A.J.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J. CD45-CD14+CD34+ murine bone marrow low-adherent mesenchymal primitive cells preserve multilineage differentiation potential in long-term in vitro culture. Mol. Cells 2011 , 31 , 497–507. Lin, C.S.; Xin, Z.C.; Dai, J.; Lue, T.F. Commonly used mesenchymal stem cell markers and tracking labels: Limitations and challenges. Histol. Histopathol. 2013 , 28 , 1109–1116. Ding, L.; Vezzani, B.; Khan, N.; Su, J.; Xu, L.; Yan, G.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Gaur, A.; Diao, Z.; et al. CD10 expression identifies a subset of human perivascular progenitor cells with high proliferation and calcification potentials. Stem Cells 2020 , 38 , 261–275. Weng, L.; Hu, X.; Kumar, B.; Garcia, M.; Todorov, I.; Jung, X.; Marcucci, G.; Forman, S.J.; Chen, C.C. Identification of a CD133-CD55-population functions as a fetal common skeletal progenitor. Sci. Rep. 2016 , 6 , 1–13. Zhao, L.; Abdollah, P.; Do, S.; Nye, C.; Hantash, B.M. Novel Negative Selection Marker CD54 Enhances Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. J. Clin. Cell. Immunol. 2013 , S9 . Cao, J.; Wei, Y.; Lian, J.; Yang, L.; Zhang, X.; Xie, J.; Liu, Q.; Luo, J.; He, B.; Tang, M. Notch signaling pathway promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by enhancing BMP9/Smad signaling. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017 , 40 , 378–388. Azizidoost, S.; Shanaki Bavarsad, M.; Shanaki Bavarsad, M.; Shahrabi, S.; Jaseb, K.; Rahim, F.; Shahjahani, M.; Saba, F.; Ghorbani, M.; Saki, N. The role of notch signaling in bone marrow niche. Hematology 2015 , 20 , 93–103. Wu, C.; Chen, L.; Huang, Y. zhou; Huang, Y.; Parolini, O.; Zhong, Q.; Tian, X.; Deng, L. Comparison of the proliferation and differentiation potential of human urine-, placenta decidua basalis-, and bone marrow-derived stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2018 , 2018 . Ragni, E.; Viganò, M.; Parazzi, V.; Montemurro, T.; Montelatici, E.; Lavazza, C.; Budelli, S.; Vecchini, A.; Rebulla, P.; Giordano, R.; et al. Adipogenic potential in human mesenchymal stem cells strictly depends on adult or foetal tissue harvest. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013 , 45 , 2456–2466. Maher, S.; Kolieb, E.; Sabik, N.A.; Abd-Elhalim, D.; El-Serafi, A.T.; El-Wazir, Y. Comparison of the osteogenic differentiation potential of mesenchymal cells isolated from human bone marrow, umbilical cord blood and placenta derived stem cells. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2015 , 4 , 80–85. Kmiecik, G.; Spoldi, V.; Silini, A.; Parolini, O. Current view on osteogenic differentiation potential of mesenchymal stromal cells derived from placental tissues. Stem Cell Rev. Reports 2015 , 11 , 570–585. Mohammed, E.E.A.; El-Zawahry, M.; Farrag, A.R.H.; Aziz, N.N.A.; Sharaf-Eldin, W.; Abu-Shahba, N.; Mahmoud, M.; Gaber, K.; Ismail, T.; Mossaad, M.M.; et al. Osteogenic differentiation potential of human bone marrow and amniotic fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro & in vivo. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2019 , 7 , 507–515. Okubo, R.; Asawa, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Nagata, S.; Nio, M.; Takato, T.; Hikita, A.; Hoshi, K. Proliferation medium in three-dimensional culture of auricular chondrocytes promotes effective cartilage regeneration in vivo. Regen. Ther. 2019 , 11 , 306–315. Inaki, R.; Fujihara, Y.; Kudo, A.; Misawa, M.; Hikita, A.; Takato, T.; Hoshi, K. Periostin contributes to the maturation and shape retention of tissue-engineered cartilage. Sci. Rep. 2018 , 8 , 1–13. Umeyama, R.; Yamawaki, T.; Liu, D.; Kanazawa, S.; Takato, T.; Hoshi, K.; Hikita, A. Optimization of culture duration of bone marrow cells before transplantation with a β-tricalcium phosphate/recombinant collagen peptide hybrid scaffold. Regen. Ther. 2020 , 14 , 284–295. Meng, F.G.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Huang, G.X.; Chen, W.S.; Zhang, Z.J.; He, A.S.; Liao, W.M. Chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells in a novel hyaluronate-collagen-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for knee repair. Eur. Cells Mater. 2016 , 31 , 79–94. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Review # 1 received at journal 17 Dec, 2020 Editorial decision: Major Revision 17 Dec, 2020 Review # 2 received at journal 16 Dec, 2020 Reviewer # 2 agreed at journal 12 Dec, 2020 Reviewer # 1 agreed at journal 10 Dec, 2020 Editor assigned by journal 09 Dec, 2020 Reviewers invited by journal 09 Dec, 2020 Submission checks completed at journal 09 Dec, 2020 Editor invited by journal 09 Dec, 2020 First submitted to journal 07 Dec, 2020 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-127313","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":6344079,"identity":"d73f6039-53ce-462b-8cd4-24d83803100b","order_by":0,"name":"Ilona Uzieliene","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-9163","institution":"State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ilona","middleName":"","lastName":"Uzieliene","suffix":""},{"id":6344080,"identity":"188b1599-b81a-44ff-89cc-97925388e8cb","order_by":1,"name":"Edvardas Bagdonas","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Edvardas","middleName":"","lastName":"Bagdonas","suffix":""},{"id":6344081,"identity":"2658fd1e-a7b1-46db-9595-4263eaa8c5a2","order_by":2,"name":"Kazuto Hoshi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tokyo","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kazuto","middleName":"","lastName":"Hoshi","suffix":""},{"id":6344082,"identity":"e336d018-b401-4b4c-a87c-17d05497a737","order_by":3,"name":"Tomoaki Sakamoto","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tokyo","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tomoaki","middleName":"","lastName":"Sakamoto","suffix":""},{"id":6344083,"identity":"83000b88-6792-47c8-9b2b-2abba2792107","order_by":4,"name":"Atsuhiko Hikita","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tokyo","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Atsuhiko","middleName":"","lastName":"Hikita","suffix":""},{"id":6344084,"identity":"e954dd8f-33cd-4415-9805-374088ae8ecb","order_by":5,"name":"Zivile Tachtamisevaite","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zivile","middleName":"","lastName":"Tachtamisevaite","suffix":""},{"id":6344085,"identity":"1f558b27-4bb0-4fc0-bb3f-7af8d76ec290","order_by":6,"name":"Greta Rakauskiene","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Greta","middleName":"","lastName":"Rakauskiene","suffix":""},{"id":6344086,"identity":"6d79d2b7-ce54-4197-b385-9fb1cfb4fba9","order_by":7,"name":"Giedrius Kvederas","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Vilnius University: Vilniaus Universitetas","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Giedrius","middleName":"","lastName":"Kvederas","suffix":""},{"id":6344087,"identity":"ac36e991-2027-49a2-a41f-d37cc69c73cd","order_by":8,"name":"Ali Mobasheri","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ali","middleName":"","lastName":"Mobasheri","suffix":""},{"id":6344088,"identity":"b255ae08-0a1b-447e-a5ec-ae9b638ba6a1","order_by":9,"name":"Eiva Bernotiene","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1529-5513","institution":"State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Eiva","middleName":"","lastName":"Bernotiene","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2020-12-12 14:46:13","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-127313/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-127313/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":4318295,"identity":"b3b471a5-2ff7-49cd-9eba-7bbbc458f5da","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:25:10","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":596281,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A – Proliferation of MenSCs and BMMSCs in monolayer, during 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 days of culture. Measured using CCK-8 viability and cytotoxicity assay. The absorbance of reduced formazan dye, produced by living cells, is presented. Absorbance measured at 450 nm. *P ≤ 0.05. B – Scratch assay. MenSCs and BMMSCs migration after mechanically disrupted monolayer with a sterile 1 ml pipet tip, obtained at different time points (0, 8, 24 and 48 h). Scale bar 500 µm.","description":"","filename":"fig1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/f3bc0fcc6e36a5663ca3aaaa.png"},{"id":4318237,"identity":"63016a50-abda-44bc-b6e2-65c29f8583bf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:34","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":596281,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A – Proliferation of MenSCs and BMMSCs in monolayer, during 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 days of culture. Measured using CCK-8 viability and cytotoxicity assay. The absorbance of reduced formazan dye, produced by living cells, is presented. Absorbance measured at 450 nm. *P ≤ 0.05. B – Scratch assay. MenSCs and BMMSCs migration after mechanically disrupted monolayer with a sterile 1 ml pipet tip, obtained at different time points (0, 8, 24 and 48 h). Scale bar 500 µm.","description":"","filename":"fig1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/dcdd5b233f9078ff162b1696.png"},{"id":4318234,"identity":"c32574b1-86b1-493a-b59a-39f7c57092b5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:09","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":596281,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A – Proliferation of MenSCs and BMMSCs in monolayer, during 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 days of culture. Measured using CCK-8 viability and cytotoxicity assay. The absorbance of reduced formazan dye, produced by living cells, is presented. Absorbance measured at 450 nm. *P ≤ 0.05. B – Scratch assay. MenSCs and BMMSCs migration after mechanically disrupted monolayer with a sterile 1 ml pipet tip, obtained at different time points (0, 8, 24 and 48 h). Scale bar 500 µm.","description":"","filename":"fig1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/6d7704dbe218b9ad5a16c21b.png"},{"id":4318228,"identity":"0aacad8b-d0d2-432a-9787-4aec5e84a12a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:03","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":596281,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A – Proliferation of MenSCs and BMMSCs in monolayer, during 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 days of culture. Measured using CCK-8 viability and cytotoxicity assay. The absorbance of reduced formazan dye, produced by living cells, is presented. Absorbance measured at 450 nm. *P ≤ 0.05. B – Scratch assay. MenSCs and BMMSCs migration after mechanically disrupted monolayer with a sterile 1 ml pipet tip, obtained at different time points (0, 8, 24 and 48 h). Scale bar 500 µm.","description":"","filename":"fig1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/b7af2a558abf575eeb6e081e.png"},{"id":4318236,"identity":"dae3be6c-3755-4d26-896d-43672c61b461","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:34","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":9608,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Expression of surface markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD14, CD34, CD36, CD45, CD10, CD54, CD55, CD63, Notch1) in MenSCs and BMMSCs. Flow cytometry analysis. % - percentage of cell population positive for indicated marker. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05","description":"","filename":"fig2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/f0120a605ee97998cd7c27dd.png"},{"id":4318294,"identity":"803b0e8f-170d-419a-81d1-657c39e55798","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:25:10","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":9608,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Expression of surface markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD14, CD34, CD36, CD45, CD10, CD54, CD55, CD63, Notch1) in MenSCs and BMMSCs. Flow cytometry analysis. % - percentage of cell population positive for indicated marker. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05","description":"","filename":"fig2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/51b236b0799b10ddc04c97e7.png"},{"id":4318232,"identity":"ae4b43aa-ba13-4701-8390-98b7ba1ffbb3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:09","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":9608,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Expression of surface markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD14, CD34, CD36, CD45, CD10, CD54, CD55, CD63, Notch1) in MenSCs and BMMSCs. Flow cytometry analysis. % - percentage of cell population positive for indicated marker. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05","description":"","filename":"fig2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/6ffeaa772fd0500631e72122.png"},{"id":4318221,"identity":"c7ce5b89-d7d4-48fd-90db-602a7bddf10e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:03","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":9608,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Expression of surface markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD14, CD34, CD36, CD45, CD10, CD54, CD55, CD63, Notch1) in MenSCs and BMMSCs. Flow cytometry analysis. % - percentage of cell population positive for indicated marker. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05","description":"","filename":"fig2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/cee50b155af9945cd8554869.png"},{"id":4318297,"identity":"a354813a-fe02-47bf-9ddc-7bb6a841cc38","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:25:10","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":543610,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A – Adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation analysis of MenSCs and BMMSCs, staining the cells with oil red, and alizarin, respectively. Control cells were incubated using standart complete DMEM medium and stained with the same dyes after differentiation ended. The cells were cultivated in adipogenic/osteogenic medium for 21 day. Scale bar 100 µm. B – Quantitative adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation analysis of MenSCs and BMMSCs (21 day), dissolving lipid droplets (stained with oil-red) in isopropanol and calcium hydroxyapatite crystals (stained with alizarin) in cetyl-pyridinium chloride solutions. Absorbance measured at 520 nm and 562 nm, respectively. Graphs presented as ratio to control. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05\n\n","description":"","filename":"fig3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/7afd4bce61e810293c4f6776.png"},{"id":4318222,"identity":"af594184-241a-4dbc-8ebc-f25bd2051e97","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:03","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":543610,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A – Adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation analysis of MenSCs and BMMSCs, staining the cells with oil red, and alizarin, respectively. Control cells were incubated using standart complete DMEM medium and stained with the same dyes after differentiation ended. The cells were cultivated in adipogenic/osteogenic medium for 21 day. Scale bar 100 µm. B – Quantitative adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation analysis of MenSCs and BMMSCs (21 day), dissolving lipid droplets (stained with oil-red) in isopropanol and calcium hydroxyapatite crystals (stained with alizarin) in cetyl-pyridinium chloride solutions. Absorbance measured at 520 nm and 562 nm, respectively. Graphs presented as ratio to control. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05\n\n","description":"","filename":"fig3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/17905e0da781d3f81e11a3ca.png"},{"id":4318227,"identity":"fcc39dfe-5d46-43a9-8176-7e7ed32d9252","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:03","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":20985,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Levels of secreted activin A after 3 days of chondrogenic differentiation in MenSCs and BMMSCs in incomplete chondrogenic medium (control) or incomplete chondrogenic medium + TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL). Pellet cultures, ELISA assay. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05\n \n","description":"","filename":"fig5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/146288b0d7bdd8dc77388622.png"},{"id":4318224,"identity":"90edd88d-db9f-4010-9b29-47ad6c91959b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:03","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":39043,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A – Levels of activin A in supernatants of MenSCs and BMMSCs monolayer cultures on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 of cell proliferation in complete DMEM medium. ELISA assay. * P ≤ 0.05. B – Secreted levels of activin A, normalised according to CCK-8 absorbance of MenSCs and BMMSCs on days 8 and 12. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05","description":"","filename":"fig4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/8ef526c2bbb6b35da9329891.png"},{"id":4318292,"identity":"b8f055ea-5b19-45c8-b5f2-57da0037604b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:25:10","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":20985,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Levels of secreted activin A after 3 days of chondrogenic differentiation in MenSCs and BMMSCs in incomplete chondrogenic medium (control) or incomplete chondrogenic medium + TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL). Pellet cultures, ELISA assay. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05\n \n","description":"","filename":"fig5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/9a17b24d0cb08fdc9b90ec14.png"},{"id":4318299,"identity":"dd8f0ceb-b136-4639-90e7-b7579134c687","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:25:10","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":216920,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs stimulated with activin A (50 ng/mL) and TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL). Histological analysis of cell pellets (Safranin-O staining after 21 days of chondrogenic induction). Control cells were cultivated in chondrogenic medium without growth factors. Scale bars 100 µm and 500 µm.\n \n","description":"","filename":"fig6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/268ffce7671b354919b872fd.png"},{"id":4318238,"identity":"8f5da06e-bd5d-4c6f-939a-f6daeba9ddc4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:34","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":216920,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs stimulated with activin A (50 ng/mL) and TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL). Histological analysis of cell pellets (Safranin-O staining after 21 days of chondrogenic induction). Control cells were cultivated in chondrogenic medium without growth factors. Scale bars 100 µm and 500 µm.\n \n","description":"","filename":"fig6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/e5cf6d5db7270b31f34f1779.png"},{"id":4318233,"identity":"49fb7197-ac4d-4934-9054-2722b94ce433","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:09","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":216920,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs stimulated with activin A (50 ng/mL) and TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL). Histological analysis of cell pellets (Safranin-O staining after 21 days of chondrogenic induction). Control cells were cultivated in chondrogenic medium without growth factors. Scale bars 100 µm and 500 µm.\n \n","description":"","filename":"fig6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/7248278ff5e3b44073630b86.png"},{"id":4318230,"identity":"e6ab44d9-3b95-41aa-b939-7bc13cf48a85","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:03","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":216920,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs stimulated with activin A (50 ng/mL) and TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL). Histological analysis of cell pellets (Safranin-O staining after 21 days of chondrogenic induction). Control cells were cultivated in chondrogenic medium without growth factors. Scale bars 100 µm and 500 µm.\n \n","description":"","filename":"fig6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/1b3ad7981198122050024340.png"},{"id":4318296,"identity":"33a276c8-8221-4d50-bbc0-9916b11ce025","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:25:10","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":16870,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Collagen type 2 (COL2A1) gene expression in MenSCs and BMMSCs after stimulating chondrogenic differentiation for 21 days with activin A (50 ng/mL), TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL) and both TGF-β3 and activin A. Control cells were cultivated in the same chondrogenic medium without growth factors. Relative transcript level after normalization to geometric mean of B2M and RPS9 housekeeping genes. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05","description":"","filename":"fig7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/b756ff1362d6d2b9dfa5b18e.png"},{"id":4318225,"identity":"1fb5feb8-2fb1-4cfb-a4e9-2e2b1809b151","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:03","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":18245,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Aggrecan (ACAN) gene expression in MenSCs and BMMSCs after stimulating chondrogenic differentiation for 21 days with activin A (50 ng/mL), TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL) and both TGF-β3 and activin A. Control cells were cultivated in the same chondrogenic medium without growth factors. Relative transcript level after normalization to geometric mean of B2M and RPS9 housekeeping genes. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05","description":"","filename":"fig8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/470ec3ef732a9828944f9905.png"},{"id":4318226,"identity":"8b18be88-6f5e-4a4d-b49b-26cef0d45474","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:03","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":16870,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Collagen type 2 (COL2A1) gene expression in MenSCs and BMMSCs after stimulating chondrogenic differentiation for 21 days with activin A (50 ng/mL), TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL) and both TGF-β3 and activin A. Control cells were cultivated in the same chondrogenic medium without growth factors. Relative transcript level after normalization to geometric mean of B2M and RPS9 housekeeping genes. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05","description":"","filename":"fig7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/b9ee22c54fcd6d9417165ba4.png"},{"id":4318298,"identity":"7ebe5e95-646d-40f3-96dc-71086dd5b61d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:25:10","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"Figure 9","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":18245,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Aggrecan (ACAN) gene expression in MenSCs and BMMSCs after stimulating chondrogenic differentiation for 21 days with activin A (50 ng/mL), TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL) and both TGF-β3 and activin A. Control cells were cultivated in the same chondrogenic medium without growth factors. Relative transcript level after normalization to geometric mean of B2M and RPS9 housekeeping genes. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05","description":"","filename":"fig8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/eef6073004e5eef9c0fdbcc3.png"},{"id":4318229,"identity":"2f0202db-6c7e-4d91-9350-f5d2fd0f5d3a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:03","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"Figure 9","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":757508,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Atelocollagen/PLLA constructs with MenSCs and BMMSCs, stimulated for 2 days with activin A (50 ng/mL), followed by for 21 day with TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL) and subcutaneous insertion into mice for 9 weeks. A – experimental mice and construct loaded with cells, B – Histological analysis of constructs after 9 weeks in vivo. Control constructs were differentiated under the same conditions, excluding growth factors. Safranin-O staining. 100x and 400x magnification.","description":"","filename":"fig9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/a6d82220125a383b2f799262.png"},{"id":4318300,"identity":"2c379d93-7213-4984-9000-62f28b605971","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:25:10","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"Figure 10","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":757508,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Atelocollagen/PLLA constructs with MenSCs and BMMSCs, stimulated for 2 days with activin A (50 ng/mL), followed by for 21 day with TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL) and subcutaneous insertion into mice for 9 weeks. A – experimental mice and construct loaded with cells, B – Histological analysis of constructs after 9 weeks in vivo. Control constructs were differentiated under the same conditions, excluding growth factors. Safranin-O staining. 100x and 400x magnification.","description":"","filename":"fig9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/ac8d85621015fab09307392e.png"},{"id":4318293,"identity":"22926761-7aff-4363-b04a-36a7bd3a6a4a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:25:10","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"Figure 11","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":10214,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Production of GAGs in atelocollagen/PLLA constructs by MenSCs and BMMSCs, treated for 2 days with activin A (50 ng/mL), followed by 21 day with TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL) and subcutaneous insertion into mice for 9 weeks, spectrophotometrically measured by GAG assay. Control constructs were differentiated under the same conditions, but without growth factors. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05","description":"","filename":"fig10.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/b45383c11a203adb604287c2.png"},{"id":4318223,"identity":"b9d3d93b-d136-4249-bc60-11643df221cb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-16 23:23:03","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"Figure 11","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":10214,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Production of GAGs in atelocollagen/PLLA constructs by MenSCs and BMMSCs, treated for 2 days with activin A (50 ng/mL), followed by 21 day with TGF-β3 (10 ng/mL) and subcutaneous insertion into mice for 9 weeks, spectrophotometrically measured by GAG assay. Control constructs were differentiated under the same conditions, but without growth factors. Horizontal bars represent P ≤ 0.05","description":"","filename":"fig10.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/8bf80599a3fab166b29a9737.png"},{"id":13634336,"identity":"e90a4cd7-6c26-44e1-96ba-41f0ad0580fc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-17 08:31:41","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":11665973,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-127313/v1/7a080827-5c48-4adc-a2df-2d920b6b1c0d.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eDifferent Phenotypes and Chondrogenic Responses of Human Menstrual Blood and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells to activin A and TGF-β3\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":" \u003cp\u003eHuman articular cartilage has a poor capacity for intrinsic repair weak ability to restore its lesions leading to the development of progressive degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA), which is one of the most common form of arthritis across the world [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. Currently, there is no effective treatment for OA, although cell-based therapies using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) seem promising approaches for cartilage regeneration. However, thus far, there MSC-based therapies that can effectively restore damaged cartilage in OA [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e]. Furthermore, due to complications associated with the collection of bone marrow samples, which is an invasive procedure, and the poor yield of MSCs, alternative sources of cells are needed in order to overcome technical issues in BMMSC isolation, for instance, adipose, amnion and umbilical cord tissue [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. Menstrual blood is a unique body fluid, a renewable and sustainable source of multipotent stem cells (MenSCs) for regenerative medicine, which may originate from different subpopulations of endometrium, as reviewed [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. These cells are of great interest due to their ease of access, as their collection does not require any complicated procedures and the permissions of ethics authorities, as well as invasive surgical procedures [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. Moreover, MenSCs were demonstrated to differentiate towards a wider range of tissues, including neurogenic, cardiomyogenic and even hepatogenic cell lineages, as compared to BMMSCs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. Chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs has been reported in several studies, suggesting that MenSCs could be a suitable candidate for cartilage tissue engineering as they have been reported to produce and accumulate extracellular matrix (ECM) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. However, the expression of collagen 2A1 mRNA was exclusively detectable in differentiated BMMSCs, whereas it was not observed in differentiated MenSCs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e], suggesting that molecular mechanisms regulating chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs may differ in these two cells and the classical protocol applied for BMMSCs might not be suitable for MSCs of other origins [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. Classical chondrogenesis stimulating factors, such as TGF-β and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), may not stimulate differentiation in MenSCs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e] and application of different stimulating factors may be needed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeveral studies suggest that a member of the TGF-β superfamily activin A could play a role in the early stages of MSC chondrogenesis [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. Activin A induces the expression of octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4), Nanog, Nodal, proto-oncogene protein Wnt3, fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF-8) and is necessary for the maintenance of self-renewal and pluripotency of MSCs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Furthermore, enhanced production of activin A was demonstrated in OA cartilage, as compared to the healthy one, while it suppressed aggrecanase-mediated cleavage of aggrecan [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. This suggests activin A to be a protective factor for OA development, and a potential candidate for future cartilage repair strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe aim of this study was to evaluate the chondrogenic differentiation potential of MenSCs and BMMSCs stimulated with TGF-β3 and activin A by histochemical staining with safranin-O and determining collagen II and aggrecan gene expression in cell pellets. We also stimulated chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs on atelocollagen/Polylactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds and subcutaneously inserted them into nude BALB/c mice for 9 weeks. The isolated constructs with cells were analyzed histologically by glycosaminoglycan (GAG) protein expression. In addition, we evaluated activin A secretion in proliferating BMMSCs and MenSCs and during chondrogenic differentiation in pellets.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe key focus of this study was to compare chondrogenic differentiation of both cell types, however, we also compared stem cell properties of MenSCs and BMMSCs by characterizing the expression of cell surface markers (CD90, CD73, CD105, CD44, CD45, CD14, CD36, CD55, CD54, CD63, CD106, CD34, CD10, Notch1), their proliferation capacity and potential to differentiate into two other MSC lineages \u0026ndash; adipogenic and osteogenic.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Materials And Methods","content":" \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCell isolation and culture\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMenstrual blood samples were collected from six healthy women aged between 20\u0026ndash;40. About 5\u0026ndash;10\u0026nbsp;mL of menstrual blood was collected by donors using sterile silicone cups (iCare) inserted into vagina during second day of menstrual cycle. In laboratory facilities mononuclear cells were separated using Ficoll-Paque PLUS (Stem Cell Technologies) density gradient centrifugation (30\u0026nbsp;min, room temperature, 400\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eg\u003c/em\u003e) and washed out two times in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Sigma Aldrich), centrifuged 10\u0026nbsp;min, 600\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eg\u003c/em\u003e. Collected MenSCs were seeded into tissue culture flasks (Gibco, Life Technologies) with low glucose (1\u0026nbsp;g/L) Dulbecco\u0026rsquo;s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Merck Millipore) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Merck Millipore), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Life Technologies), 1\u0026nbsp;ng/mL FGF2 (Applied Biological Materials) (later referred as \u0026ldquo;complete medium\u0026rdquo;), and cultured in 37 \u0026ordm;C incubator with 5% CO\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e, saturated humidity. Medium was changed twice a week and after cells reached their confluence (~\u0026thinsp;80%) they were detached using trypsin-EDTA 0.25% solution (Gibco, Life Technologies), calculated (CASY, Omni Life Science) and sub-cultured. Human BMMSCs were isolated from bone marrow tissues, remaining after surgical procedures according to the established protocols as previously described [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. There were five bone-marrow donors aged between 50\u0026ndash;60. BMMSCs were cultured under the same conditions as MenSCs. All procedures using human tissues in this study were approved by the local bioethics committee, permission No. 158200-14-741.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe experiments were performed using MenSCs and BMMSCs at early passages (P) P2 to P3.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eProliferation assay\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMenSCs and BMMSCs were seeded into 12-well plates (SPL, Life Sciences) at density 5000 cells/well in a complete medium. Cell proliferation was determined at days 1, 5, 8 and 12 by measuring it with cell counting kit \u0026ndash; 8 (CCK-8) (Dojindo) according to manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instructions. The medium was collected to 96 well plate (Orange Scientific) and absorbance of reduced formazan dye was quantified using spectrophotometric quantification (SpectroMaxi3, Molecular Devices) (absorbance, 450\u0026nbsp;nm).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eScratch assay\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eScratch assay was performed to evaluate cell migration capacity. MenSCs and BMMSCs were seeded into T25 flasks (Gibco, Life Technologies) and grown to full confluence. Later a straight scratch of the cell monolayer was performed with a 1\u0026nbsp;mL pipet tip. The cell scratch was photographed under a phase-contrast microscope at 0, 8, 24 and 48 hours, and cell migration abilities were evaluated by the size of area of migrated cells inside the scratch.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eImmunophenotypic characterization of cells\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSurface marker analysis was performed by harvesting the cells, washing them with cytometer buffer (PBS\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Biological Industries)) 5\u0026nbsp;min at 600\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eg\u003c/em\u003e, and incubating with the specific labelled antibodies in cytometer buffer for 20\u0026nbsp;min at 4\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C. Antibodies used for the experiment were against human cell surface cluster of differentiation CD antigens CD90, CD73, CD105, CD44, CD45, CD14, CD36, CD55, CD54, CD63, CD106, CD34, CD10, Notch1 purchased from BD Pharmingen (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), R\u0026amp;D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA) and Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA). In all experiments, matching isotype antibodies were used as negative controls. Data (10.000 events) were collected using a flow cytometer FACS Aria II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed on FacsDiva analysis software (BD Biosciences).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAdipogenic and osteogenic differentiation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor adipogenic differentiation, MenSCs and BMMSCs were seeded into a 12 well plate, at a density of 60 000 cells/well. Differentiation was induced in sub-confluent cells using adipogenic medium, consisting of low glucose (1\u0026nbsp;g/L) DMEM medium, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 20% FBS, 1\u0026nbsp;\u0026micro;mol/L dexamethasone (Sigma Aldrich), 60\u0026nbsp;\u0026micro;mol/L indomethacin (Sigma Aldrich) and 50\u0026nbsp;\u0026micro;mol/L 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) (Biosource) for 21\u0026nbsp;day. After that, lipid droplets in cells were stained with Oil Red-O (Carl Roth) and visualized in an inverted light microscope. Quantitative analysis was performed by dissolving lipid droplets in 70% isopropanol solution (Eurochemicals), after which the released oil-red dye was collected into 96 well plate and measured absorbance using spectrophotometer (absorbance, 520\u0026nbsp;nm).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor osteogenic differentiation MenSCs and BMMSCs were also seeded into a 12 well plate, at a density 40 000 cells/well. Osteogenic differentiation medium was added after the cells reached their sub-confluence, consisting of high glucose (4.5\u0026nbsp;g/L) DMEM medium (Gibco, Life Technologies), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 10% FBS, 0.1\u0026nbsp;\u0026micro;mol/L dexamethasone, 50\u0026nbsp;\u0026micro;g/mL ascorbic acid and 10\u0026nbsp;mmol/L β \u0026ndash; glycerophosphate (Santa Cruz) for 21\u0026nbsp;day. Osteogenesis was evaluated by light microscopy, staining the cells with Alizarin Red S (Carl Roth). Quantitative analysis was evaluated by dissolving the calcium hydroxyapatite crystals, stained with Alizarin, in 10% cetyl-pyridinium chloride (Sigma Aldrich). The dissolved solution was then collected into 96 well plate and absorbance measured using spectrophotometer (absorbance, 562\u0026nbsp;nm).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eChondrogenic differentiation using activin A and TGF-β3 in vitro\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eChondrogenesis was induced using a protocol used by State Research Institute Centre for Innovative medicine. Chondrogenic medium was composed of high glucose (4.5\u0026nbsp;g/L) DMEM medium, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium (Gibco Life Technologies), 350\u0026nbsp;\u0026micro;M L-proline (Carl Roth), 0.1% dexamethasone, 170\u0026nbsp;\u0026micro;M ascorbic acid-phosphate (Sigma Aldrich) and 10\u0026nbsp;ng/mL TGF-β3 (Gibco, Life Technologies), or 50\u0026nbsp;ng/mL activin A (Merck, Millipore). Briefly, 250\u0026nbsp;k of MenSCs or BMMSCs were added in 15\u0026nbsp;mL tubes (Gibco, Life Technologies), centrifuged 5\u0026nbsp;min at 600\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eg\u003c/em\u003e and cultivated in chondrogenic medium. The tubes with cells were divided into 4 groups: 1 \u0026ndash; Control (chondrogenic medium without growth factors); 2 \u0026ndash; activin A; 3 \u0026ndash; TGF-β3; 4 \u0026ndash; TGF-β3\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;activin A. Double growth factor group was activin A-stimulated only once at the start of differentiation, while during second medium change on day 2 \u0026ndash; only TGF-β3 was added. This protocol was chosen based on previous studies suggesting the efficacy of activin A at the early stages of chondrogenic differentiation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Each treatment was applied in technical triplicates. The production of ECM in cell pellets was evaluated macroscopically and histologically (Safranin O staining).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eChondrogenic differentiation using activin A and TGF-β3 in vivo\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eChondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs was also stimulated in atelocollagen/PLLA constructs, which were inserted into six nude mice (BALB/c). For this purpose, 100 000 cells were mixed with 100\u0026nbsp;\u0026micro;L of atelocollagen gel (Koken) for 10\u0026nbsp;min according to manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s recommendations, transferred to PLLA (R\u0026amp;D) and incubated for 2\u0026nbsp;h in 37 \u0026ordm;C incubator with 5% CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e. After that cell constructs were transferred into 20\u0026nbsp;mL tubes and chondrogenic differentiation medium was added. The constructs with cells of each donor were divided into three groups: 1 \u0026ndash; Control; 2 \u0026ndash; activin A and 3 \u0026ndash; TGF-β3, where control \u0026ndash; cells incubated in chondrogenic medium without growth factors, activin A \u0026ndash; cells incubated in chondrogenic medium with activin A (50\u0026nbsp;ng/mL), which was added only once, at the beginning of the differentiation (at day 2 it was replaced with TGF-β3), TGF-β3 \u0026ndash; cells incubated in chondrogenic medium with TGF-β3 (10\u0026nbsp;ng/mL). Chondrogenesis was induced for 21 days. The medium was changed three times a week. After the end of differentiation, the cell constructs were subcutaneously implanted into BALB/c nude mice (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;6), under general anesthesia with isoflurane (Sigma Aldrich). Each donor\u0026rsquo;s cell constructs were inserted into the same mouse. The constructs with cells remained in mice for 9 weeks. After that period, the mice were sacrificed using diethyl ether (Sigma Aldrich) and the constructs were carefully removed. Every construct was divided into equal two parts, where one part was used for histological analysis and the other for GAG protein analysis (Biocolor).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eGAG analysis in cell atelocollagen/PLLA constructs\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eHalf of the collected cell atelocollagen/PLLA constructs were transferred into acetic acid solution (50\u0026nbsp;nM) (Sigma Aldrich) and homogenized using stainless steel beads in homogenizer (300 sec, 3200\u0026nbsp;rpm). After homogenization, all procedures were performed on ice. The homogenized solution was transferred to Eppendorf and pepsin (10\u0026nbsp;ng/mL) (Wako) was added for 48\u0026nbsp;h, 4 \u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003eC in a rotor spin. After 48\u0026nbsp;h, the solution was neutralized using Tris-buffered saline (TBS) buffer, consisting of 1\u0026nbsp;M Tris, 2\u0026nbsp;M sodium chloride and 50\u0026nbsp;mM calcium chloride solution. Elastase (1\u0026nbsp;mg/mL) (Wako) was added overnight, 4\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003eC in a rotor spin. The following morning, the samples were centrifuged at 910\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eg\u003c/em\u003e, 5\u0026nbsp;min, 4\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003eC. The protein levels were standardized using Lowry method. The GAG levels were measured spectrophotometrically using blyscan\u0026trade;-sulphated GAG assay (Biocolor), according to manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s recommendations, as previously described [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eHistology of chondrogenic differentiation cell pellets\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor histochemical and immunohistochemical analysis, chondrogenic differentiation pellets were fixed in 10% neutral formalin and embedded into paraffin. 3-micrometer sections were deparaffinized and processed for standard staining with safranin-O (Sigma Aldrich).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eRNA extraction from cell pellets\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt the end of chondrogenic differentiation period, the cell pellets were collected, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C. Frozen samples were homogenized by ultrasonication (Bandelin Sonopuls) in lysis buffer (Qiagen, 74104) and RNA was extracted according manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s protocol. RNA concentration and purity were measured with the SpectraMax i3 (Molecular Devices, USA).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eRT-qPCR\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eRNA was reverse-transcribed with Maxima cDNA Synthesis kit including dsDNase treatment (Thermo Scientific). RT-qPCR reaction mixes were prepared with Maxima Probe qPCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific) and TaqMan Gene expression Assays (\u003cem\u003eRPS9\u003c/em\u003e - Hs02339424_g1, \u003cem\u003eB2M\u003c/em\u003e - Hs00984230_m1, \u003cem\u003eCOL2A1\u003c/em\u003e - Hs01060345_m1, \u003cem\u003eACAN\u003c/em\u003e - Hs00153936_m1 (Thermo Scientific)) and ran on the Agilent Aria MX instrument (Agilent Technologies) in technical triplicates starting with denaturation step for 10\u0026nbsp;min at 95\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C followed by 40 cycles of 15\u0026nbsp;s at 95\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C denaturation and 60\u0026nbsp;s for annealing and extension. Relative levels of gene transcripts were calculated by subtracting the threshold cycle (Ct) of the normalizer (the geometric mean of the two housekeeping genes \u0026ndash; RPS9 and B2M) from the Ct of the gene of interest, giving the dCt values which were subsequently transformed to 2\u003csup\u003e-dCt\u003c/sup\u003e values and multiplied by 1000 to scale-up for better graphical representation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eQuantification of activin A from chondrogenic pellet supernatants and monolayer by ELISA\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eActivin A protein production was evaluated during chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs and during cell cultivation in monolayer. Supernatants were collected from the pellets incubated with TGF-β3 and control during chondrogenic differentiation, and from monolayer cultures during 8th and 12th days. Activin A protein levels were detected using activin A duo set ELISA (R\u0026amp;D Systems) according to the manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s protocol. Activin A levels secreted during monolayer culture were normalized according to upgrowing number of cells by precise value of proliferation. It was implemented by calculating the ratio of a secreted activin A to proliferation value.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis of studies\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Student\u0026rsquo;s t-test was used to calculate statistical difference among MenSCs and BMMSCs data in proliferation, immunophenotypic, GAG analysis, gene analysis and ELISA assays. A P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05 was considered as statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e "},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eMenSCs and BMMSCs proliferation and migration capacity\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe proliferation capacity of MenSCs was significantly higher than BMMSCs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e-A). During the first 3 days of culture, there were no significant differences in cell proliferation, however, from the 5th day, MenSCs proliferation started to increase and on day 12 the difference reached statistical significance compared to BMMSCs (MenSCs 0.828 (+/- 0.201), BMMSCs 0.286 (+/- 0.085)) (P value 0.022).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn scratch assays, after 48 hours complete wound closure was observed in MenSCs, but not in BMMSCs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e-B).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThese results suggest that proliferation and migration of MenSCs are higher than BMMSCs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eSurface marker expression in MenSCs and BMMSCs\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn order to determine and compare immunophenotypical profiles of MenSCs and BMMSCs, the cells were stained with antibodies against MSC surface markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105), hematopoietic (CD14, CD34, CD36, CD45) and pluripotential stem cell markers (CD10, CD54, CD55, CD63, CD106, Notch1) and analysed by flow cytometer (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMenSCs and BMMSCs were both positive for classical MSC markers \u0026ndash; CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, where more than 95% of total cell population was positive, and negative for hematopoietic stem cell markers \u0026ndash; CD14, CD34, CD36, CD45 (less than 10% of total cell population was positive). Expression of CD55, CD54, CD10 and Notch1 was statisticaly significantly higher in MenSCs, as compared to BMMSCs, whereas CD63in BMMSCs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eMenSCs and BMMSCs ability to differentiate into osteoblasts and adipocytes\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo evaluate mesodermal lineage potential, MenSCs and BMMSCs were induced to differentiate towards adipogenic and osteogenic direction (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). The results demonstrate that MenSCs and BMMSCs are able to differentiate into adipogenic and osteogenic lineage cells. However, adipogenic differentiation capacity was significantly stronger in BMMSCs (3.22\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.39), than in MenSCs (2.41\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.13), as they formed more lipid droplets. However, osteogenic differentiation, was significantly higher in MenSCs (38.86\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.71) than in BMMSCs (19.74\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.32).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eSecretion of activin A during proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs and BMMSCs\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuring 12 days of cell culture in monolayer (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e-A), the level of activin A was increasing in supernatants, and during 8 and 12 days it was significantly higher in MenSCs (757\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;79\u0026nbsp;pg/mL, and 2064\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;312\u0026nbsp;pg/mL, respectively), as compared to BMMSCs (396\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;187.51\u0026nbsp;pg/mL and 586\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;359.2\u0026nbsp;pg/mL, respectively). P values: 8th day \u0026ndash; 0.018; 12th day \u0026ndash; 0.028. We next wanted to determine, whether the higher levels of activin A are associated with more intensive its secretion in MenSCs or rather with the higher numbers of those cells due to the more intensive proliferation. To investigate that, activin A secretion was normalized according to the upgrowing cell activity, measured by CCK-8, which essentially represents cell numbers (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e-B). After normalisation, secretion of activin A still remained significantly higher in MenSCs as compared to BMMSCs on days 8th and 12th in monolayer:(8th day - MenSCs 2622.8; BMMSCs 2066.7, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.027; 12th day: -MenSCs 2493.1; BMMSCs 2046.7, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.031).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eStimulation of chondrogenic differentiation in MenSCs and BMMSCs with activin A and/or TGF-\u0026beta;3\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter analysis of activin A secretion in monolayer, both cell types were stimulated to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage using TGF-\u0026beta;3 and cell supernatants were collected for activin A secretion analysis. During the 3rd day of chondrogenic differentiation in pellet system, the levels of activin A are presented in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e. It was significantly higher in control cells and cells, stimulated with TGF-\u0026beta;3 on 3rd day of chondrogenic induction in MenSCs (control \u0026ndash; 82.32\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.94\u0026nbsp;pg/mL; TGF-\u0026beta;3\u0026ndash;63.21\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.47\u0026nbsp;pg/mL), as compared to BMMSCs (control 5.88\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.94\u0026nbsp;pg/mL and TGF-\u0026beta;3 102.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.47\u0026nbsp;pg/mL), where P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.001 for controls and P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05 for TGF-\u0026beta;3. BMMSCs maintained production of activin A on 3rd day of differentiation only in combination with TGF-\u0026beta;3 (102.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.47\u0026nbsp;pg/mL), as compared to control (5.88\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.94\u0026nbsp;pg/mL) (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Noteworthy, MenSCs control cells, which were incubated without any growth factors, produced higher quantities of activin A than cells stimulated with TGF-\u0026beta;3, where in contrast, BMMSCs maintained activin A secretion only under stimulation with TGF-\u0026beta;3. These differences might be associated with activin A-dependent mechanisms specific for MenSCs. During the later 19 days of chondrogenic induction of both, MenSCs and BMMSCs, the secretion of activin A was very low and practically non-detectable (data not shown).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAccording to histological staining of pellet sections with safranin-O, different responses to TGF-\u0026beta;3 and activin A were observed in MenSCs and BMMSCs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e). Combination of activin A and TGF-\u0026beta;3 stimulated proteoglycan synthesis in MenSCs, while stimulation with either activin A or TGF-\u0026beta;3 alone had no clear effect on chondrogenic response in those cells. In BMMSCs, accumulation of proteoglycans was observed in both, activin A or TGF-\u0026beta;3-stimulated groups of BMMSCs, however, the effects of TGF-\u0026beta;3 were more pronounced.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAt gene expression level, a weaker ability to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage was observed in MenSCs, as compared to BMMSCs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e and Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). Collagen type II (\u003cem\u003eCOL2A1)\u003c/em\u003e, which is one the major collagen type in articular cartilage, gene expression was significantly lower in TGF-\u0026beta;3 and TGF-\u0026beta;3 with activin A groups of MenSCs, as compared to these two groups of BMMSCs (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.001). However, application of TGF-\u0026beta;3 alone or in combination with activin A significantly upregulated \u003cem\u003eCOL2A1\u003c/em\u003e expression in MenSCs and the combination of activin A and TGF-\u0026beta;3 was significantly stronger than the effect of TGF-\u0026beta;3 alone (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). Activin A had no substantial effect on \u003cem\u003eCOL2A1\u003c/em\u003e gene expression in MenSCs.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLow levels of aggrecan (\u003cem\u003eACAN)\u003c/em\u003e gene expression was detected in all 4 conditions of MenSCs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e), as compared to substantialy higher levels of its expression in BMMSCs. \u003cem\u003eACAN\u003c/em\u003e expression statistically significantly increased only in BMMSCs and only after stimulation with TGF-\u0026beta;3 or a combination of activin A with TGF-\u0026beta;3.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBMMSCs possessed a strong ability to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage with TGF-\u0026beta;3, according to \u003cem\u003eCOL2A1\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eACAN\u003c/em\u003e gene expression (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e and Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). In opposite to MenSCs, combination of activin A with TGF-\u0026beta;3 in BMMSCs had no additional effect on the expression of the genes tested.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eChondrogenesis of MenSCs and BMMSCs in vivo\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAccording to safranin-O staining, higher accumulation of ECM proteins was observed in samples of combined activin A and TGF-\u0026beta;3 treatment, as compared to control in both cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e, B).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGAG synthesis was also observed in higher content in samples treated with combination of TGF-\u0026beta;3 and activin A as well as single factors, in both MenSCs and BMMSCs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e). However, statistically significant differences were observed only in MenSCs, where GAG production was higher in TGF-\u0026beta;3 stimulated group and additionally more pronounced if the combination of TGF-\u0026beta;3\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;activin A was used. Although there were no significant differences between MenSCs and BMMSCs groups, MenSCs stimulated with TGF-\u0026beta;3\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;activin A samples produced more GAGs, as compared to samples of BMMSCs under the same stimulation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":" \u003cp\u003eMSCs have been a focus in regenerative medicine due to their high potential to differentiate towards several lineages including osteoblasts, chondrocytes and adipocytes. Firstly, MSCs were discovered in bone marrow, while later they were isolated form almost all human tissues, including bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood, placenta [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e] and human menstrual blood [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. The collection of menstrual blood samples does not require invasive procedures, which highlights a key advantage of MenSCs in regenerative medicine over BMMSCs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. MenSCs are increasingly investigated in different studies, and are known to be similar to BMMSCs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. Furthermore, due to a high potential to differentiate into several different lineages, MenSCs have been proposed for treatment of critical limb ischemia, stroke, type I diabetes mellitus, Parkinson\u0026rsquo;s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders in experimental disease models [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. Despite those advantages of MenSCs as compared to MSCs derived from other tissues, their characteristics have not been extensively studied so far. For instance, potential application of MenSCs for cartilage regeneration still requires additional studies on chondrogenic differentiation capacity. One of the usually used growth factors in chondrogenic differentiation of BMMSCs is TGF-β, however, other types of MSCs, for instance isolated from adipose tissue, may respond better to other growth factors, for instance BMP-2, -4 or -7 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e]. The growth factor activin A is important in numerous cell processes, as well as the early stages of chondrogenesis [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Mechanisms of action of activin A and TGF-βs appear similar, they both induce phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 during chondrogenesis [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e]. However, the role of activin A in chondrogenic differentiation is controversial, as some studies propose that it antagonises chondrogenesis and supresses the expression of chondrogenic genes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, activin A is very important in regulating the female menstrual cycle and has various functions in reproduction [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e], suggesting that it may modulate other functional characteristics of MenSCs, including differentiation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this study, MenSCs and BMMSCs were isolated and characterized and compared by MSC surface marker expression (flow cytometry), proliferation abilities (CCK-8, spectrophotometry) and MSC trilineage differentiation capacity (osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic). We observed higher proliferation and migration in MenSCs compared to BMMSCs, which is similar to the results obtained in other studies, where MenSCs and BMMSCs proliferation was investigated [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eExpression of typical MSCs surface markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105), hematopoietic stem cell markers (CD14 CD34, CD36, CD45), and pluripotent stem cell markers (CD10, CD54, CD55, CD63, Notch1) were analysed for characterisation of MenSCs phenotype [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eExpression of CD55, CD54, CD10 and Notch1 surface markers in MenSCs was significantly higher, as compared to BMMSCs, whereas expression of CD63 was higher in BMMSCs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). CD10 is a membrane metallo-endopeptidase, also referred as neprilysin, which is involved in different cell signalling pathways influencing cell migration, angiogenesis, tumorigenesis and immunomodulation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. Moreover, CD10 has also been a marker of highly proliferating cells, as well as calcifying cells [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e], which was also observed for MenSCs in the present study. CD55 is a complement decay-accelerating factor, also a MSC marker used to identify endoderm in early embryonic development [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e]. CD54 is an intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), which was shown to be involved in the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e]. Notch1 is a member of the Notch family of receptors and plays a significant role in mediating BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation in MSC [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e]. Notch is also known to be associated with enhanced MSC proliferation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e], which might be associated with high regenerative abilities of endometrium and could represent an advantage in regenerative medicine when large amounts of cells are needed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEven though the main focus of this study was chondrogenic differentiation in both MenSCs and BMMSCs we also compared their potential to differentiate into adipogenic and osteogenic lineages. MenSCs showed weak adipogenic differentiation capacity, which is in agreement to the data obtained in other studies [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e]. Moreover, the weak adipogenic differentiation capacity was also observed in amniotic fluid, placenta, umbilical cord and umbilical cord blood MSCs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e], which are of similar origin with MenSCs. This is in contrast to classical trilineage differentiation of BMMSCs. However, as described above, potential of MenSC to differentiate into neurogenic, cardiomyogenic and even hepatogenic cell lineages [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e] confirm their advanced differentiation potential, while the weaker adipogenesis probably indicate different differentiation profile rather than lack of stem cell properties. Furthermore, osteogenic differentiation capacity of MenSCs was significantly stronger as compared to BMMSCs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e), which to the best of our knowledge, has not been demonstrated previously. Stronger osteogenic differentiation capacity than in BMMSCs has been already reported for MSCs derived from placental and amniotic fluid [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e], which are the ones of the closest origin to MenSCs, therefore, might share some functional similarities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe levels of secreted activin A were measured during cell proliferation in monolayer and their chondrogenic differentiation. Higher levels of activin A were secreted by MenSCs in monolayer (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e), as compared to BMMSCs, and the elevated levels remained until 3rd day of chondrogenic differentiation in both \u0026ndash; non-stimulated control and TGF-β3 group of MenSC (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). No significant chondrogenic response to activin A has been previously reported in BMMSCs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e], which is in agreement with results obtained in this study. However, this is the first report of MenSCs stimulated to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage using activin A. Noteworthy, the expression of chondrogenic genes indicates weaker ability MenSCs to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage, in comparison to the levels in BMMSCs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe response to activin A during chondrogenic differentiation was also different in MenSCs and BMMSCs. In MenSCs, the effects of activin A alone were negligible and only in combination with TGF-β3 resulted in a substantial increase of \u003cem\u003eCOL2A1\u003c/em\u003e expression. Even though \u003cem\u003eCOL2A1\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eACAN\u003c/em\u003e gene expression was stronger in BMMSCs after stimulation with TGF-β3, activin A had no significant effect on the expression of these genes neither alone, nor in combination with TGF-β3. Positive safranin-O staining was observed in histological samples of activin A-treated BMMSCs pellets, suggesting stimulatory effects of this factor on chondrogenic differentiation. In BMMSCs stimulated with a combination of activin A with TGF-β3, the expression of COL2A1 gene (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e) as well as the ECM protein content observed in histology samples (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e) were not significantly different, as compared to a single TGF-β3 stimulation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e chondrogenesis studies using activin A were followed by an \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e study. The technology of Atelocollagen/PLLA construct application was chosen due to its biocompatibility and efficacy for stimulation of BMMSCs chondrogenic differentiation \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e]. Chondrogenesis of MenSCs and BMMSCs in constructs was induced for 3 weeks \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e, followed by their subcutaneous insertion into nude BALB/C mice. Histological evaluation of the samples (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e), as well as GAG analysis (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e) indicated that the additional stimulation with activin A, prior to switching to TGF-β3, upregulated the production of ECM proteins in MenSCs, as compared to the controls or TGF-β3 stimulated samples. Somewhat similar tendencies, although less expressed were observed in BMMSCs. These data are in contrast to the results obtained during \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e cultures, where potential of MenSCs to differentiate into chondrogenic lineage was lower, as compared to BMMSCs. It is likely that longer stimulation is needed for MenSCs to effectively induce chondrogenic responses, as compared to BMMSCs, as in vivo study lasted an additional 63 days. Furthermore, paracrine effects in both cell types might also play a role in stimulating host cell response and their migration, which induces differentiation of MSCs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e]. MenSCs produce some unique factors, as demonstrated by others and in the present study, and seem less responsive to cytokine activation and express less immunosuppressive molecules, as compared to BMMSCs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. The differences in secretion of various paracrine factors might result in the disparities of host cell responses to MenSCs and BMMSCs \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e, which in turn led to more expressed chondrogenic induction. It should also be considered that application of the scaffolds may play a role in stimulation of ECM production in MSCs, as previously demonstrated [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e][\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e]. Although it might appear that collagen-based scaffolds are essential for stimulating chondrogenesis in MenSCs, further studies are needed to support their use. Moreover, there are many soluble factors in mouse body fluids that may differently foster chondrogenic differentiation of implanted cells. Taken together, combined \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e data suggest that MenSCs differently respond to external stimuli and show distinct functional activity from BMMSCs. Nevertheless, it is likely that they are capable of switching to chondrogenesis, but this process takes longer time and the choice of suitable combinations of the factors to guide these cells and orchestrate the differentiation process are needed.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Conclusions","content":" \u003cp\u003eThe results presented in this original investigation demonstrate that MenSCs share many similar phenotypic properties with BMMSCs, but they exhibit several differences as well. The proliferation rate and osteogenic differentiation capacity of MenSCs is higher than of BMMSCs, while adipogenic differentiation capacity is lower. Expression of surface markers CD55, CD54, CD10 and Notch1 were significantly higher in MenSCs, while of CD63 was lower, as compared to BMMSCs. Secreted levels of activin A were significantly higher in MenSCs as compared to BMMSCs on days 8 and 12 of cultivation in monolayer. The potential of BMMSCs to differentiate into the chondrogenic lineage was more pronounced under stimulation with TGF-β3 \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e. In contrast, the efficacy of activin A was higher in chondrogenic differentiation of MenSCs, as compared to BMMSCs, both \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e and, particularly, \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e. These data suggest that activin A is differently involved in the induction of chondrogenic differentiation in MenSCs vs. BMMSCs, which implies distinct pathways of chondrogenesis regulation in these cells. Following further optimisation of the differentiation protocol and growth factor choice, potentially including activin A and extending the duration of growth factor stimulation, MenSCs may indeed turn out to be a promising population of stem cells for the further development as a key component of cell-based therapies for stimulating cartilage repair and regeneration.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":" \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionList\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eAggrecan\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eACAN;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eBone marrow MSCs\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBMMSCs;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eBone morphogenetic protein-2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBMP-2;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eCell counting kit 8\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCCK-8;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eCollagen Type II Alpha 1 Chain gene\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCOL2A1;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eDulbecco\u0026rsquo;s modified Eagle medium\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDMEM;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eExtracellular matrix\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eECM;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eFibroblast growth factor 8\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFGF-8;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eGlycosaminoglycan\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGAG;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eMenstrual blood-derived MSCs\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMenSCs;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eMesenchymal stem cells\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSCs;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eOsteoarthritis\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOA;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003ePolylactic acid\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePLLA;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eTransforming growth factorβ\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTGF-β;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e "},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003eAll procedures using human tissues in this study were approved by \u0026ldquo;Vilnius Regional Committee for Biomedical Research Ethics\u0026rdquo;, permission No. 158200-14-741-257.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll procedures using mice in this study were carried out at Tokyo university hospital, and were approved by \"Animal Experimentation Committee, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo\" (approval number: P15-019).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eConsent for publication:\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eAvailability of Data and Materials:\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe data supporting these findings can be found at State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Department of Regenerative medicine.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contributions:\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWriting-Original Draft Preparation and study design \u0026ndash; I. Uzieliene and E. Bernotiene; donor patient selection and enrollment G.Kvederas; cell isolation, chondrogenesis, proliferation, ELISA studies, as well as scratch assay, osteogenic/adipogenic differentiation \u0026ndash; Z. Tachtamisevaite, G. Rakauskiene and I. Uzieliene, Surface marker analysis \u0026ndash; I. Uzieliene; Gene expression study \u0026ndash; E. Bagdonas; conceptualization of the manuscript \u0026ndash; E. Bernotiene; critical revision - E. Bernotiene, A.Mobasheri; In vivo study design, conceptualization \u0026ndash; A. Hikita, K. Hoshi, I. Uzieliene; In vivo study, chondrogenesis on Atelocollagen/PLLA scaffolds, GAG analysis \u0026ndash; T. Sakamoto and I. Uzieliene; editing \u0026ndash; all authors.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eFunding:\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work was funded by Lithuanian Research Council (LMTLT) \u0026rdquo;Development of injectable biomimetic hydrogels for engineering of cartilage tissue\u0026rdquo;, P‐LLT‐18‐21, agreement No S-LLT-18-4. Scientific trip to Tokyo university hospital was funded by European structural funds Nr. 09.3.3.-LMT-K-712-14-0144.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgments:\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe would like to thank professor Zygmunt Mackiewicz for histological evaluation of pellet cultures.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eConflicts of Interest:\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors do not declare any conflicts of interest.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNeogi, T. The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. \u003cem\u003eOsteoarthr. Cartil.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e21\u003c/em\u003e, 1145\u0026ndash;1153.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLindenmair, A.; Hatlapatka, T.; Kollwig, G.; Hennerbichler, S.; Gabriel, C.; Wolbank, S.; Redl, H.; Kasper, C. Mesenchymal stem or stromal cells from amnion and umbilical cord tissue and their potential for clinical applications. \u003cem\u003eCells\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2012\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e1\u003c/em\u003e, 1061\u0026ndash;88.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSomoza, R.A.; Welter, J.F.; Correa, D.; Caplan, A.I. Chondrogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Challenges and Unfulfilled Expectations. \u003cem\u003eTissue Eng. Part B Rev.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2014\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e20\u003c/em\u003e, 596\u0026ndash;608.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShariatzadeh, M.; Song, J.; Wilson, S.L. The efficacy of different sources of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. \u003cem\u003eCell Tissue Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2019\u003c/strong\u003e, 399\u0026ndash;410.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUllah, I.; Subbarao, R.B.; Rho, G.J. Human mesenchymal stem cells - current trends and future prospective. \u003cem\u003eBiosci. Rep.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2015\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e35\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;18.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKozlowska, U.; Krawczenko, A.; Futoma, K.; Jurek, T.; Rorat, M.; Patrzalek, D.; Klimczak, A. Similarities and differences between mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells derived from various human tissues. \u003cem\u003eWorld J. Stem Cells\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2019\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e11\u003c/em\u003e, 347\u0026ndash;374.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLv, H.; Hu, Y.; Cui, Z.; Jia, H. Human menstrual blood: A renewable and sustainable source of stem cells for regenerative medicine. \u003cem\u003eStem Cell Res. Ther.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2018\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e9\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;11.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMeng, X.; Ichim, T.E.; Zhong, J.; Rogers, A.; Yin, Z.; Jackson, J.; Wang, H.; Ge, W.; Bogin, V.; Chan, K.W.; et al. Endometrial regenerative cells: a novel stem cell population. \u003cem\u003eJ. Transl. Med.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2007\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e5\u003c/em\u003e, 57.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen, L.; Qu, J.; Cheng, T.; Chen, X.; Xiang, C. Menstrual blood-derived stem cells: Toward therapeutic mechanisms, novel strategies, and future perspectives in the treatment of diseases. \u003cem\u003eStem Cell Res. Ther.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2019\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e10\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;12.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUzieliene, I.; Urbonaite, G.; Tachtamisevaite, Z.; Mobasheri, A.; Bernotiene, E. The potential of menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair and regeneration: Novel aspects. \u003cem\u003eStem Cells Int.\u003c/em\u003e 2018, \u003cem\u003e1\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;10.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHida, N.; Nishiyama, N.; Miyoshi, S.; Kira, S.; Segawa, K.; Uyama, T.; Mori, T.; Miyado, K.; Ikegami, Y.; Cui, C.; et al. Novel Cardiac Precursor-Like Cells from Human Menstrual Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Cells. \u003cem\u003eStem Cells\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2008\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e26\u003c/em\u003e, 1695\u0026ndash;1704.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIkegami, Y.; Miyoshi, S.; Nishiyama, N.; Hida, N.; Okamoto, K.; Miyado, K.; Segawa, K.; Ogawa, S.; Umezawa, A. Serum-independent cardiomyogenic transdifferentiation in human endometrium-derived mesenchymal cells. \u003cem\u003eArtif. Organs\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2010\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e34\u003c/em\u003e, 280\u0026ndash;288.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAzedi, F.; Kazemnejad, S.; Zarnani, A.H.; Soleimani, M.; Shojaei, A.; Arasteh, S. Comparative capability of menstrual blood versus bone marrow derived stem cells in neural differentiation. \u003cem\u003eMol. Biol. Rep.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2017\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e44\u003c/em\u003e, 169\u0026ndash;182.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMou, X.; Lin, J.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, X.; Xiang, B.; Li, C.; Ma, J.; Xiang, C. Menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into functional hepatocyte-like cells. \u003cem\u003eJ. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e14\u003c/em\u003e, 961\u0026ndash;72.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKazemnejad, S.; Zarnani, A.H.; Khanmohammadi, M.; Mobini, S. Characterization and chondrogenic differentiation of menstrual blood-derived stem cells on nanofibrous scaffolds. \u003cem\u003eMethods Mol. Biol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e1058\u003c/em\u003e, 149\u0026ndash;169.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhou, Q.; Li, B.; Zhao, J.; Pan, W.; Xu, J.; Chen, S. IGF-I induces adipose derived mesenchymal cell chondrogenic differentiation in vitro and enhances chondrogenesis in vivo. \u003cem\u003eVitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. - Anim.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2016\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e52\u003c/em\u003e, 356\u0026ndash;364.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNirmal, R.S.; Nair, P.D. Significance of soluble growth factors in the chondrogenic response of human umbilical cord matrix stem cells in a porous three dimensional scaffold. \u003cem\u003eEur. Cells Mater.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e26\u003c/em\u003e, 234\u0026ndash;251.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKhanmohammadi, M.; Khanjani, S.; Bakhtyari, M.S.; Zarnani, A.H.; Edalatkhah, H.; Akhondi, M.M.; Mirzadegan, E.; Kamali, K.; Alimoghadam, K.; Kazemnejad, S. Proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation potential of menstrual blood- and bone marrow-derived stem cells in two-dimensional culture. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Hematol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2012\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e95\u003c/em\u003e, 484\u0026ndash;493.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWolff, E.F.; Wolff, A.B.; Hongling Du; Taylor, H.S. Demonstration of Multipotent Stem Cells in the Adult Human Endometrium by In Vitro Chondrogenesis. \u003cem\u003eReprod. Sci.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2007\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e14\u003c/em\u003e, 524\u0026ndash;533.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePatel, A.N.; Park, E.; Kuzman, M.; Benetti, F.; Silva, F.J.; Allickson, J.G. Multipotent menstrual blood stromal stem cells: Isolation, characterization, and differentiation. \u003cem\u003eCell Transplant.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2008\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e17\u003c/em\u003e, 303\u0026ndash;311.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDjouad, F.; Jackson, W.M.; Bobick, B.E.; Janjanin, S.; Song, Y.; Huang, G.T.; Tuan, R.S. Activin A expression regulates multipotency of mesenchymal progenitor cells. \u003cem\u003eStem Cell Res. Ther.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2010\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e1\u003c/em\u003e, 11.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeran, M.; Ruiz, S.; Kwiatkowski, W.; Marchal, J.A.; Yang, S.L.; Aranega, A.; Choe, S.; Izpisua Belmonte, J.C. Activin/BMP2 chimeric ligands direct adipose-derived stem cells to chondrogenic differentiation. \u003cem\u003eStem Cell Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e10\u003c/em\u003e, 464\u0026ndash;476.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlexander, S.; Watt, F.; Sawaji, Y.; Hermansson, M.; Saklatvala, J. Activin a is an anticatabolic autocrine cytokine in articular cartilage whose production is controlled by fibroblast growth factor 2 and NF-\u0026kappa;B. \u003cem\u003eArthritis Rheum.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2007\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e56\u003c/em\u003e, 3715\u0026ndash;3725.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUzieliene, I.; Bernotiene, E.; Rakauskiene, G.; Denkovskij, J.; Bagdonas, E.; Mackiewicz, Z.; Porvaneckas, N.; Kvederas, G.; Mobasheri, A. The Antihypertensive Drug Nifedipine Modulates the Metabolism of Chondrocytes and Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. \u003cem\u003eFront. Endocrinol. (Lausanne).\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2019\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e10\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;11.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFujihara, Y.; Abe, T.; Asawa, Y.; Nishizawa, S.; Saijo, H.; Hikita, A.; Hoshi, K. Influence of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns from Chondrocytes in Tissue-Engineered Cartilage. \u003cem\u003eTissue Eng. Part A\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2020\u003c/strong\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;27.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUllah, I.; Subbarao, R.B.; Rho, G.J. Human mesenchymal stem cells - Current trends and future prospective. \u003cem\u003eBiosci. Rep.\u003c/em\u003e 2015, \u003cem\u003e35\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;18.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAra\u0026ntilde;a, M.; Mazo, M.; Aranda, P.; Pelacho, B.; Prosper, F. Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Isolation, Expansion, and Characterization. \u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e1036\u003c/em\u003e, 81\u0026ndash;88.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElahi, K.C.; Klein, G.; Avci-Adali, M.; Sievert, K.D.; Macneil, S.; Aicher, W.K. Human mesenchymal stromal cells from different sources diverge in their expression of cell surface proteins and display distinct differentiation patterns. \u003cem\u003eStem Cells Int.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2016\u003c/strong\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSecunda, R.; Vennila, R.; Mohanashankar, A.M.; Rajasundari, M.; Jeswanth, S.; Surendran, R. Isolation, expansion and characterisation of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood and matrix: a comparative study. \u003cem\u003eCytotechnology\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2015\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e67\u003c/em\u003e, 793\u0026ndash;807.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMusina, R.A.; Belyavski, A. V.; Tarusova, O. V.; Solovyova, E. V.; Sukhikh, G.T. Endometrial mesenchymal stem cells isolated from the menstrual blood. \u003cem\u003eBull. Exp. Biol. Med.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2008\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e145\u003c/em\u003e, 539\u0026ndash;543.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDalirfardouei, R.; Jamialahmadi, K.; Mahdipour, E. A feasible method for the isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from menstrual blood and their exosomes. \u003cem\u003eTissue Cell\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2018\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e55\u003c/em\u003e, 53\u0026ndash;62.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlcayaga-Miranda, F.; Cuenca, J.; Luz-Crawford, P.; Aguila-D\u0026iacute;az, C.; Fernandez, A.; Figueroa, F.E.; Khoury, M. Characterization of menstrual stem cells: angiogenic effect, migration and hematopoietic stem cell support in comparison with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. \u003cem\u003eStem Cell Res. Ther.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2015\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e6\u003c/em\u003e, 32.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu, Y.; Niu, R.; Yang, F.; Yan, Y.; Liang, S.; Sun, Y.; Shen, P.; Lin, J. Biological characteristics of human menstrual blood-derived endometrial stem cells. \u003cem\u003eJ. Cell. Mol. Med.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2018\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e22\u003c/em\u003e, 1627\u0026ndash;1639.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYu, D.A.; Han, J.; Kim, B.S. Stimulation of chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Stem Cells\u003c/em\u003e 2012, \u003cem\u003e5\u003c/em\u003e, 16\u0026ndash;22.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIm, G.-I.; Ko, J.-Y.; Lee, J.H. Chondrogenesis of adipose stem cells in a porous polymer scaffold: influence of the pore size. \u003cem\u003eCell Transplant.\u003c/em\u003e 2012, \u003cem\u003e21\u003c/em\u003e, 2397\u0026ndash;405.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrafe, I.; Alexander, S.; Peterson, J.R.; Snider, T.N.; Levi, B.; Lee, B.; Mishina, Y. TGF-b Family Signaling in Mesenchymal Differentiation. \u003cem\u003eCold Spring Harb Perspect Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2018\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e10\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;49.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMitsugi, S.; Ariyoshi, W.; Okinaga, T.; Kaneuji, T.; Kataoka, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Nishihara, T. Mechanisms involved in inhibition of chondrogenesis by activin-A. \u003cem\u003eBiochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2012\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e420\u003c/em\u003e, 380\u0026ndash;384.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKroon, L.M.G. d.; Davidson, E.N.B.; Narcisi, R.; Farrell, E.; Kraan, P.M. v. d.; van Osch, G.J.V.M. Activin and Nodal Are Not Suitable Alternatives to TGF for Chondrogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. \u003cem\u003eCartilage\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2017\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e8\u003c/em\u003e, 432\u0026ndash;438.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWijayarathna, R.; de Kretser, D.M. Activins in reproductive biology and beyond. \u003cem\u003eHum. Reprod. Update\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2016\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e22\u003c/em\u003e, 342\u0026ndash;357.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWelt, C.K. Regulation and function of inhibins in the normal menstrual cycle. \u003cem\u003eSemin. Reprod. Med.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2004\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e22\u003c/em\u003e, 187\u0026ndash;193.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePerakakis, N.; Upadhyay, J.; Ghaly, W.; Chen, J.; Chrysafi, P.; Anastasilakis, A.D.; Mantzoros, C.S. Regulation of the activins-follistatins-inhibins axis by energy status: Impact on reproductive function. \u003cem\u003eMetabolism.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2018\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e85\u003c/em\u003e, 240\u0026ndash;249.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWijayarathna, R.; de Kretser, D.M. Activins in reproductive biology and beyond. \u003cem\u003eHum. Reprod. Update\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2016\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e22\u003c/em\u003e, 342\u0026ndash;357.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFaramarzi, H.; Mehrabani, D.; Fard, M.; Akhavan, M.; Zare, S.; Bakhshalizadeh, S.; Manafi, A.; Kazemnejad, S.; Shirazi, R. The Potential of Menstrual Blood-Derived Stem Cells in Differentiation to Epidermal Lineage: A Preliminary Report. \u003cem\u003eWorld J. Plast. Surg.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2016\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e5\u003c/em\u003e, 26\u0026ndash;31.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRasini, V.; Dominici, M.; Kluba, T.; Siegel, G.; Lusenti, G.; Northoff, H.; Horwitz, E.M.; Sch\u0026auml;fer, R. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells markers in the human bone marrow. \u003cem\u003eCytotherapy\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e15\u003c/em\u003e, 292\u0026ndash;306.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMaleki, M.; Ghanbarvand, F.; Behvarz, M.R.; Ejtemaei, M.; Ghadirkhomi, E. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cell markers in multiple human adult stem cells. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Stem Cells\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2014\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e7\u003c/em\u003e, 118\u0026ndash;126.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLv, F.J.; Tuan, R.S.; Cheung, K.M.C.; Leung, V.Y.L. Concise review: The surface markers and identity of human mesenchymal stem cells. \u003cem\u003eStem Cells\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2014\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e32\u003c/em\u003e, 1408\u0026ndash;1419.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSzade, K.; Zuba-Surma, E.; Rutkowski, A.J.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J. CD45-CD14+CD34+ murine bone marrow low-adherent mesenchymal primitive cells preserve multilineage differentiation potential in long-term in vitro culture. \u003cem\u003eMol. Cells\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e31\u003c/em\u003e, 497\u0026ndash;507.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLin, C.S.; Xin, Z.C.; Dai, J.; Lue, T.F. Commonly used mesenchymal stem cell markers and tracking labels: Limitations and challenges. \u003cem\u003eHistol. Histopathol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e28\u003c/em\u003e, 1109\u0026ndash;1116.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDing, L.; Vezzani, B.; Khan, N.; Su, J.; Xu, L.; Yan, G.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Gaur, A.; Diao, Z.; et al. CD10 expression identifies a subset of human perivascular progenitor cells with high proliferation and calcification potentials. \u003cem\u003eStem Cells\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2020\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e38\u003c/em\u003e, 261\u0026ndash;275.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWeng, L.; Hu, X.; Kumar, B.; Garcia, M.; Todorov, I.; Jung, X.; Marcucci, G.; Forman, S.J.; Chen, C.C. Identification of a CD133-CD55-population functions as a fetal common skeletal progenitor. \u003cem\u003eSci. Rep.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2016\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e6\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;13.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhao, L.; Abdollah, P.; Do, S.; Nye, C.; Hantash, B.M. Novel Negative Selection Marker CD54 Enhances Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. \u003cem\u003eJ. Clin. Cell. Immunol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003eS9\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCao, J.; Wei, Y.; Lian, J.; Yang, L.; Zhang, X.; Xie, J.; Liu, Q.; Luo, J.; He, B.; Tang, M. Notch signaling pathway promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by enhancing BMP9/Smad signaling. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Mol. Med.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2017\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e40\u003c/em\u003e, 378\u0026ndash;388.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAzizidoost, S.; Shanaki Bavarsad, M.; Shanaki Bavarsad, M.; Shahrabi, S.; Jaseb, K.; Rahim, F.; Shahjahani, M.; Saba, F.; Ghorbani, M.; Saki, N. The role of notch signaling in bone marrow niche. \u003cem\u003eHematology\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2015\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e20\u003c/em\u003e, 93\u0026ndash;103.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWu, C.; Chen, L.; Huang, Y. zhou; Huang, Y.; Parolini, O.; Zhong, Q.; Tian, X.; Deng, L. Comparison of the proliferation and differentiation potential of human urine-, placenta decidua basalis-, and bone marrow-derived stem cells. \u003cem\u003eStem Cells Int.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2018\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e2018\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRagni, E.; Vigan\u0026ograve;, M.; Parazzi, V.; Montemurro, T.; Montelatici, E.; Lavazza, C.; Budelli, S.; Vecchini, A.; Rebulla, P.; Giordano, R.; et al. Adipogenic potential in human mesenchymal stem cells strictly depends on adult or foetal tissue harvest. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e45\u003c/em\u003e, 2456\u0026ndash;2466.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMaher, S.; Kolieb, E.; Sabik, N.A.; Abd-Elhalim, D.; El-Serafi, A.T.; El-Wazir, Y. Comparison of the osteogenic differentiation potential of mesenchymal cells isolated from human bone marrow, umbilical cord blood and placenta derived stem cells. \u003cem\u003eBeni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2015\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e4\u003c/em\u003e, 80\u0026ndash;85.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKmiecik, G.; Spoldi, V.; Silini, A.; Parolini, O. Current view on osteogenic differentiation potential of mesenchymal stromal cells derived from placental tissues. \u003cem\u003eStem Cell Rev. Reports\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2015\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e11\u003c/em\u003e, 570\u0026ndash;585.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMohammed, E.E.A.; El-Zawahry, M.; Farrag, A.R.H.; Aziz, N.N.A.; Sharaf-Eldin, W.; Abu-Shahba, N.; Mahmoud, M.; Gaber, K.; Ismail, T.; Mossaad, M.M.; et al. Osteogenic differentiation potential of human bone marrow and amniotic fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro \u0026amp; in vivo. \u003cem\u003eOpen Access Maced. J. Med. Sci.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2019\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e7\u003c/em\u003e, 507\u0026ndash;515.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOkubo, R.; Asawa, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Nagata, S.; Nio, M.; Takato, T.; Hikita, A.; Hoshi, K. Proliferation medium in three-dimensional culture of auricular chondrocytes promotes effective cartilage regeneration in vivo. \u003cem\u003eRegen. Ther.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2019\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e11\u003c/em\u003e, 306\u0026ndash;315.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInaki, R.; Fujihara, Y.; Kudo, A.; Misawa, M.; Hikita, A.; Takato, T.; Hoshi, K. Periostin contributes to the maturation and shape retention of tissue-engineered cartilage. \u003cem\u003eSci. Rep.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2018\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e8\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;13.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUmeyama, R.; Yamawaki, T.; Liu, D.; Kanazawa, S.; Takato, T.; Hoshi, K.; Hikita, A. Optimization of culture duration of bone marrow cells before transplantation with a \u0026beta;-tricalcium phosphate/recombinant collagen peptide hybrid scaffold. \u003cem\u003eRegen. Ther.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2020\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e14\u003c/em\u003e, 284\u0026ndash;295.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMeng, F.G.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Huang, G.X.; Chen, W.S.; Zhang, Z.J.; He, A.S.; Liao, W.M. Chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells in a novel hyaluronate-collagen-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for knee repair. \u003cem\u003eEur. Cells Mater.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2016\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e31\u003c/em\u003e, 79\u0026ndash;94.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"stem-cell-research-and-therapy","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scrt","sideBox":"Learn more about [Stem Cell Research \u0026 Therapy](http://stemcellres.biomedcentral.com)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/scrt/default.aspx","title":"Stem Cell Research \u0026 Therapy","twitterHandle":"@BioMedCentral","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Human mesenchymal stem cells, menstrual blood, bone marrow, chondrogenic differentiation, activin A, TGF-β3","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-127313/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-127313/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground:\u003c/strong\u003e Due to its low capacity for self-repair, articular cartilage is highly susceptible to damage and deterioration, which leads to the development of degenerative joint diseases such as osteoarthritis. Menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MenSCs) are much less characterized compared to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs). However, MenSCs seem an attractive alternative to classical BMMSCs due to ease of access and broader differentiation capacity. The aim of this study was to evaluate chondrogenic differentiation potential of MenSCs and BMMSCs stimulated with transforming growth factor β (TGF-β3) and activin A, member of the TGF-β superfamily of proteins.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods:\u003c/strong\u003e MenSCs (n=6) and BMMSCs (n=5) were isolated from different healthy donors. Expression of cell surface markers CD90, CD73, CD105, CD44, CD45, CD14, CD36, CD55, CD54, CD63, CD106, CD34, CD10, Notch1 was analysed by flow cytometry. Cell proliferation capacity was determined using CCK-8 proliferation kit. Adipogenic differentiation capacity was evaluated according to Oil-Red staining, osteogenic differentiation - Alizarin Red staining. Chondrogenic differentiation (Activin A and TGF-β3 stimulation) was induced \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e (subcutaneous scaffolds in nude BALB/c mice) and investigated by histologically and by expression of chondrogenic genes (collagen type II, aggrecan). Activin A protein production was evaluated by ELISA.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults:\u003c/strong\u003e MenSCs exhibited a higher proliferation rate, as compared to BMMSCs, and a different expression profile of several cell surface markers. Activin A stimulated collagen type II gene expression and glycosaminoglycan synthesis in TGF-β3 treated MenSCs but not in BMMSCs, both \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e, although the effects of TGF-β3 alone were more pronounced in BMMSCs \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion:\u003c/strong\u003e These data suggest that activin A exerts differential effects on the induction of chondrogenic differentiation in MenSCs vs. BMMSCs, which implies that different mechanisms of chondrogenic regulation are activated in these cells. Following further optimisation of differentiation protocols and the choice of growth factors, potentially including activin A, MenSCs may turn out to be a promising population of stem cells for the development of cell-based therapies with the capacity to stimulate cartilage repair and regeneration.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTrial registration:\u003c/strong\u003e Not applicable.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Different Phenotypes and Chondrogenic Responses of Human Menstrual Blood and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells to activin A and TGF-β3","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2020-12-16 23:23:01","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-127313/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2020-12-18T00:00:00+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Reviewer's comments unavailable due to the journal's policy.\n"},{"type":"decision","content":"Major Revision","date":"2020-12-18T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2020-12-17T00:00:00+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Reviewer's comments unavailable due to the journal's policy.\n"},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2020-12-13T00:00:00+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2020-12-11T00:00:00+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2020-12-10T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2020-12-10T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2020-12-09T23:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2020-12-09T23:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"","date":"2020-12-08T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"stem-cell-research-and-therapy","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scrt","sideBox":"Learn more about [Stem Cell Research \u0026 Therapy](http://stemcellres.biomedcentral.com)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/scrt/default.aspx","title":"Stem Cell Research \u0026 Therapy","twitterHandle":"@BioMedCentral","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"114a55ad-1680-48ae-99cd-fb3ab4a5dc49","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 16th, 2020","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":1502023,"name":"Stem Cell \u0026 Developmental Cell Biology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-05-29T11:54:21+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2020-12-16 23:23:01","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-127313","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-127313","identity":"rs-127313","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"7rjqhiLT3MXkJMwkYKINL","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0