The role of (99m)technetium-labelled hepato imino diacetic acid (HIDA) scan in the management of biliary pain.
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This study evaluated laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes for patients with typical biliary pain and normal ultrasound who had abnormal HIDA scans, finding that the procedure effectively resolved symptoms in the majority of cases.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveTo assess the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the basis of an abnormal provocative (99m)technetium-labelled hepato imino diacetic acid (HIDA) scan for patients with typical biliary pain and normal trans-abdominal ultrasound (TUS) scan.Patients and methodsProspective data were collected for 1201 consecutive patients with typical biliary symptoms. Patients who were found to have a normal TUS and upper GI endoscopy subsequently underwent cholescintigraphy (HIDA scan). Patients with an abnormal HIDA scan, i.e.<40% ejection fraction with Sincalide (cholecystokinin octapeptide)--were offered cholecystectomy. Symptoms and histology were reviewed postoperatively.ResultsIn all, 48/1201 (4%) patients with typical biliary symptoms had a normal ultrasound and endoscopy; 35/48 patients had an abnormal provocative HIDA scan and all underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Histology in all cases revealed chronic cholecystitis and 18 patients had sludge or microlithiasis within the gallbladder. At 6-week follow-up, 31 of the 35 patients were completely asymptomatic or improved. Furthermore, 79% of patients remained symptom-free or improved at a median follow-up of 28.5 months (range 4-70).ConclusionsHIDA scan is a useful clinical tool as an adjunct to the diagnosis and management of patients who present with typical biliary pain and a normal TUS scan.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-30T09:23:35.175841+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-01T06:29:04.589233+00:00