Untangling the impact of live baitfish restrictions on recreational fishing participation in the United States

2024 · doi:10.32942/x2961v
preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

In recent decades, many jurisdictions have established regulations governing the use of live baitfish in recreational fishing. These regulations are usually motivated by environmental concerns, such as the role that live baitfish play in the spread of invasive species and aquatic diseases. One question that might be posed by policymakers is whether limiting the use of live baitfish could impact the general public's interest in fishing. In this study, we conduct a before-after control-intervention (BACI) analysis to test whether live baitfish regulations in the United States are followed by changes in recreational fishing. Using data from the 1960s to the present day, we analyze four states that have implemented live baitfish restrictions: Maine, New York, Vermont and Colorado. We find that live baitfish restrictions do not cause a decline in the public's participation in fishing. Our results can empower policymakers to craft evidence-based regulations on the use of live baitfish while remaining confident that such policies are not likely to cause any unintended consequences on the recreational fishing community.
Full text 1,718 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

In recent decades, many jurisdictions have established regulations governing the use of live baitfish in recreational fishing. These regulations are usually motivated by environmental concerns, such as the role that live baitfish play in the spread of invasive species and aquatic diseases. One question that might be posed by policymakers is whether limiting the use of live baitfish could impact the general public's interest in fishing. In this study, we conduct a before-after control-intervention (BACI) analysis to test whether live baitfish regulations in the United States are followed by changes in recreational fishing. Using data from the 1960s to the present day, we analyze four states that have implemented live baitfish restrictions: Maine, New York, Vermont and Colorado. We find that live baitfish restrictions do not cause a decline in the public's participation in fishing. Our results can empower policymakers to craft evidence-based regulations on the use of live baitfish while remaining confident that such policies are not likely to cause any unintended consequences on the recreational fishing community. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2961V Subjects Environmental Studies, Social and Behavioral Sciences

Keywords

Recreational Fishing, Live Baitfish, Fishing Participation, Environmental Regulations, invasive species, invasive species management, Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Policy Analysis, United States, Fishing License Data Dates Published: 2024-08-29 16:58 License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Data and Code Availability Statement: Open data/code are not available. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0