Abstract
Background: Uterine leiomyoma is the most common benign tumor in women of reproductive age, and
it can cause infertility. The growth of uterine leiomyoma is mediated by various steroids and growth
factors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the expression of various growth factors in uterine
leiomyoma. Additionally, comparing the effects of existing medication and specific growth factor
inhibitors on leiomyoma and the normal myometrium, we aimed to see the potential of transforming
growth factor -beta (TGF -β) inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors as
therapeutic drugs for uterine leiomyoma.
Methods
This in vitro study included uterine leiomyoma samples from 12 patients who underwent
hysterectomy by laparoscopy or laparotomy at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital between May 2016 and March
2018. Normal myometrium and uteri ne leiomyoma tissue were obtained from each patient and the
expression of growth factors was compared using immunohistochemical staining. After the primary
culture of normal myometrial and leiomyoma cells, cell viability was evaluated following treatment with
100 nM ulipristal acetate (UPA) and mifepristone for 48 h. Western blot analysis was performed to
determine the protein expression of each growth factor. Cell viability was determined following
treatment with a 10 -µM TGF-β inhibitor (LY364947) and a 5-µ M VEGF inhibitor (axitinib) for 24 h in
cultured normal myometrium and leiomyoma cells.
Results
Immunohistochemical staining revealed the significantly higher intensity of TGF-β and VEGF in
the leiomyoma tissue than in the normal myometrium (P < 0.05). M ifepristone treatment decreased
VEGF expression by 62% in the leiomyoma cells (P < 0.05). According to the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8)
assay, cell viability was decreased after UPA, mifepristone, TGF-β1 inhibitor, and VEGF inhibitor
treatments in the norma l myometrium and leiomyoma tissue. The effects of the TGF -β1 inhibitor
significantly differed between normal myometrium and leiomyoma tissue, with a greater decrease in cell
survival in the leiomyoma tissue (P < 0.05). Post-hoc analysis showed that the TGF -β1 and VEGF
inhibitors had a greater inhibitory effect on leiomyoma tissue compared with that of UPA.
Conclusion
TGF-β and VEGF inhibitors significantly decreased the viability of uterine leiomyoma cells,
showing stronger effects than the conventional dr ug, UPA. TGF-β1 inhibitors affect both leiomyoma
tissue and the normal uterus; thus, targeted local treatment rather than systemic treatment should be
considered.
Key words: leiomyoma; axitinib; infertility; ulipristal acetate; mifepristone
Introduction
Uterine leiomyomas are the most common
benign tumors in women of childbearing age, causing
excessive menstruation and pressure symptoms [1].
This condition can cause infertility, miscarriage, and
complications during pregnancy [2, 3]. The
prevalence of lei omyomas in infertile women is
Ivyspring
International Publisher
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2022, Vol. 19
https://www.medsci.org
1780
5%-10% [4, 5]. A meta- analysis published in 2009
based on data from 18 studies showed that regardless
of localization, the presence of leiomyoma results in a
significant decrease in fertility rates and an increase in
miscarriage rates [6]. Uterine leiomyomas and
infertility are closely related to age [7]; the prevalence
of leiomyoma increases with age, which is important
because the age at which women bear children has
gradually increased [7]. Despite the importance of
fertility and the quality of life of women, treatments
for leiomyoma are limited and have not been widely
examined. In addition to surgical treatment, only a
few me dical treatments are available [1]. Such
medications exert therapeutic effects by regulating
ovarian steroid signaling but show limitations, such
as long -term side effects, resulting in hypo -
estrogenemia [8]. Thus, new targeted therapies are
needed. Recently, studies on the early disease stages
suggested that leiomyoma development is a
multi-step proces s involving various cytokines and
various growth factors, although the molecular
mechanisms are not completely understood. The
process is considered to involve insulin- like growth
factor-1 (IGF -1), platelet -derived growth factor,
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal
growth factor (EGF), and basic fibroblast growth
factor [9, 10]. The purpose of this study was to
compare the expression of the representative growth
factors in patients with uterine leiomyoma and to
compare the effect of the cur rently used medications
with growth factor inhibitors on myoma tissue and
the normal myometrium.
Materials and methods
Subjects and tissue collection
Twelve uterine leiomyoma tissues were obtained
from women who underwent hysterectomy by
laparoscopy or lap arotomy at Seoul St. Mary’s
Hospital from May 2016 to March 2018. The patients
were aged between 38 and 52 years, with a mean age
of 44.5 years. All patients had a menstrual cycle with
symptomatic leiomyoma , such as abnormal uterine
bleeding, dysmenorrhea, and pressure symptoms.
Uterine leiomyoma is diagnosed preoperatively by
ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging
and histologically confirmed after surgery. Eight
patients had multiple leiomyomas and four had single
leiomyoma. For all patients, norm al uterine
myometrium and leiomyoma tissues were collected
from the uterus parts removed after hysterectomy.
Two of the 12 tissue samples obtained from the
patients were discarded because they did not reach
sufficient saturation. Informed consent was obtai ned
from each patient before surgery for the use of uterine
tissues. All tissues were collected in accordance with
the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki , and
approval for the use of uterine leiomyoma was
granted by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul St.
Mary’s Hospital (No. KC 12TNSI0822).
Cell culture
Uterine leiomyoma tissues were dissected from
the uterus and washed with PBS. The tissues were
minced into small piece s and digested in 30 mg/mL
collagenase IV and 4 mg DNase I at 37 °C for 3 h. The
leiomyoma cells were collected by centrifugation at
1,000g for 3 min and washed three times with
phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Isolated leiomyoma
cells were cultured in 100-mm
2 culture dishes at 37 °C
and 5% CO 2 in a humidified atmosphere in phenol
red-free Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/F12
(Gibco Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100
U/mL penicillin (Gibco Life Techn ologies, Grand
Island, NY, USA). The morphological characteristics
were observed daily under an inverted microscope
with the medium changed every 2 days. When the
cells reached saturation, they were isolated using
trypsin-EDTA (Gibco Life Technologies, Gra nd
Island, NY, USA).
Drug treatment
Ulipristal acetate (UPA) (100 nM; HRA Pharma,
Paris, France), mifepristone (RU486; Sigma- Aldrich,
St. Louis, MO, USA), LY364947 (inhibitor of TGF -β;
Cat. #2718, Tocris Co., Ellisville, MO, USA), and
axitinib (inhibitor o f VEGF; Cat. #4350, Tocris Co.)
were used to treat the cells for 48 h.
Immunohistochemistry staining
For pathological examination of resected
specimens, the tissues were fixed with 10% formalin
for 24 h at 25 °C and embedded in paraffin.
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens
were cut into 5 -µm-thick sections. The tissues were
rehydrated using xylene three times for 10 min and a
series of graded ethanol (absolute ethanol twice, 90%
ethanol, 80% ethanol, and 70% ethanol each for 5 min)
at 25 °C. Afte r washing with water for 5 min, the
sections were permeabilized using 3% H
2O2 in
methanol for 10 min at 25 °C and washed again with
water for 5 min. For antigen retrieval, the sections
were immersed in citrate buffer (pH 9.0; DAKO S2367,
Glostrup, Denmark), boiled for 10 min, cooled to 25
°C for 20 min on ice, washed with water, and blocked
with protein block serum -free (DAKO X0909) for 30
min at 25 °C. The tissues were incubated with
anti-EGF (ab9695, Abcam), TGF-β (ab92486, Abcam),
VEGF-A (ab1316, Abcam), and IGF-1 (ab9572, Abcam,
Cambridge, UK) antibodies (1:500) overnight at 4 °C.
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2022, Vol. 19
https://www.medsci.org
1781
The sections were washed with wash buffer (DAKO
S3006) prior to incubation with DAKO REAL TM
ENVISION/HRP, rabbit/mouse (DAKO K5007) for
30 min at 25 °C.
Western blot immunoassay
Proteins were extracted from the cultured
uterine leiomyoma cells. After drug treatment, the
cells were lysed at 4 °C for 30 min in lysis buffer. The
lysates were centrifuged at 1,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C,
and the supernatants were collected. The protein
content in the supernatants was determined using the
BCA assay (cat 23227). Each 50- µg aliquot of protein
extracted from cultured cells was separated using a
NuPAGE Novex 4%–12% Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen Life
Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) under reducing
conditions at 200 V for 50 min. The proteins were
electrophoretically transferred from the gels onto
polyvinylidene fluoride transfer membranes
(Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The blots were
exposed overnight at 4 °C to primary antibodies: a
mouse monoclonal antibody to VEGF (ab1316,
Abcam) and a rabbit polyclonal antibody to EGF
(ab9695, Abcam), IGF -1 (ab9572, Abcam ), or TGF -β
(ab92486, Abcam) at a dilution of 1:200. The blots were
washed three times with Tris -buffered saline
containing 1X Tween 20. The membranes were
incubated for 1 h with anti -mouse or anti -rabbit
secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Dallas, TX, USA) diluted to 1:1000 with blocking
buffer. Characteristic protein bands were detected
using the ECL western blotting system (Amersham).
Protein levels on the blots were standardized to the
levels of β -actin 1:1000 (sc47778, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology). The membranes were visualized by
exposure to an X -OMAT film (Eastman Kodak Co.,
Rochester, NY, USA).
Cell viability assay
The leiomyoma and normal myometrial cells
were seeded into a 96 -well plate, incubated for 24 h,
and then treated with 100 nM UPA and mifepristone
for 48 h at 37 °C and 5% CO
2. The cells were treated
with 10 µM LY364947 (inhibitor of TGF-β; Cat. #2718,
Tocris Co., Ellisville, MO, USA) and 5 µM axitinib
(inhibitor of VEGF; Cat. #4350, Tocris Co.) for 24 h.
Cell counting kit -8 (CCK- 8, Dojindo Molecular
Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan) assay was used
to determine cell viabili ty according to the
manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
Statistical software ( SPSS 23.0, SPSS, Inc.,
Chicago, IL, USA) w as used for data analysis. For
statistical analysis, the chi -square test and one -way
analysis of variance were performed. Measured data
were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and
t-tests were used to analyze data between the two
groups. One -way analysis of variance and Scheffe’s
post-hoc test were used to compare multiple
treatment options. Statistical significance was set at P
< 0.05.
Results
Histological expression of growth factor and
quantification
Immunohistochemical staining was performed
using leiomyoma cells from 12 patients. Figure 1
shows the immunohistochemical staining results of
EGF, IGF-1, TGF-β, and VEGF in normal myometrial
cells (Fig. 1A, upper panel) and leiomyoma cells (Fig.
1B, middle panel). The expression of growth factors
was investigated by calculating the relative mask area
(%) in the normal myometrium layer and leiomyoma
tissue (Fig. 1C, lowe r panel). Among the various
growth factors, TGF -β and VEGF showed
significantly higher staining intensity in leiomyoma
tissue than in normal myometrium (P < 0.05). The
intensity of TGF -β was 3.1-fold higher in leiomyoma
cells than in normal myometrium cells; VEGF showed
14.4-fold higher intensity, whereas EGF and IGF -1
showed no significant difference in normal
myometrium and leiomyoma cells.
Evaluation of growth factor expression on
leiomyoma tissue after conventional drug
treatment with ulipristal acetate and
mifepristone
Figure 2 shows the results of western blotting,
which was performed to evaluate the protein
expression of growth factors in uterine leiomyoma
tissue in the presence or absence of drug treatment for
48 h. The most commonly used medications for
leiomyoma treatment, namely UPA and mifepristone,
were used to treat uterine leiomyoma tissues. The
protein expression of growth factors such as EGF,
IGF-1, TGF -β, and VEGF was quantified (Fig. 2A).
After mifepristone treatment, VEGF expression was
significantly decreased by 62% in uterine leiomyoma
cells (P < 0.05). The expression levels of EGF, IGF,
TGF-β, and VEGF increased when UPA was used for
leiomyoma tissue, but this increase was not
statistically significant. In the case of mifepristone, the
expression levels of EGF and TGF -β increased and
those of IGF and VEGF decreased; however, only the
62% decrease in the expression level of VEGF was
statistically significant (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2B).
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2022, Vol. 19
https://www.medsci.org
1782
Figure 1. Immunocytochemical staining of IGF-1, 217EGF, TGF-β, and VEGF in the normal myometrium (A) and leiomyoma tissue (B). Leiomyoma cells are cultured for 24 h
at 25 °C and the tissues are incubated overnight with antibodies diluted by 1:500. Bar = 500 µm. The expression (C) of each growth factor is calculated using the relative mask
area [rMA = (MA/FA) × 100]. FA, overall field area (mm2); MA, overall mask area (mm2), which is the summed area for each detected object in each layer. *P < 0.05 is considered
as significant. Abbreviations: EGF, epidermal growth factor; IGF -1, insulin-like growth factor -1; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-beta; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth
factor.
Effect on cell viability after TGF-β1 inhibitor,
VEGF inhibitor, UPA, and mifepristone on
leiomyoma and normal myometrium
To examine the survival of cells in the
leiomyoma tissue and normal myometrium after each
drug treatment, a CCK-8 assay was performed.
Because TGF-β and VEGF were signifi cantly
increased in the leiomyoma tissue, we used inhibitors
of VEGF and TGF-β1. The cells were also treated with
UPA and mifepristone for comparison. Drugs were
administered to both the normal myometrium and
leiomyoma tissues.
As illustrated in Fig. 3, co mpared with the
untreated group, each drug significantly decreased
cell viability in both the normal myometrium tissue
and leiomyoma tissue. The viability of uterine
leiomyoma cells decreased to 67%, 59%, 27%, and 29%
after treatment with UPA, mifepristone , TGF -β1
inhibitor, and VEGF inhibitor, respectively, compared
to the untreated control. In the normal myometrium,
cell viability decreased to 69%, 57%, 49%, and 35%
compared to the control group. Only the TGF -β1
inhibitor resulted in significantly differe nt effects on
cell viability in the normal myometrium and
leiomyoma tissue, causing a greater decrease in the
survival rate of leiomyoma cells. There was no
significant difference between the two groups after
treatment with the other drugs . Post -hoc analys is
revealed that the change in cell viability in leiomyoma
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2022, Vol. 19
https://www.medsci.org
1783
was greater following treatment with the VEGF and
TGF-β1 inhibitors than following treatment with
UPA. In the normal myometrium, cell viability was
decreased more by the VEGF inhibitor than by UPA
(Table 1).
Figure 2. Expression of growth factors EGF, IGF-1, TGF-β, and VEGF in myoma tissue after treatment with UPA and mifepristone. (A) Western blotting of growth factors after
UPA and 100 nM mifepristone (10−7 M) treatment for 48 h in myoma tissue. (B) Densitometric analysis of each growth factor expression. All data are presented as the mean ±
standard deviation and were analyzed by using a one -way analysis of variance. *P < 0.05 was considered as significant. Abbreviations: EGF: epidermal growth factor; IGF -1:
insulin-like growth factor-1; TGF-β: transforming growth factor-beta; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; UPA: ulipristal acetate.
Figure 3. Effect of UPA, mifepristone, TGF-β1 inhibitor, and VEGF inhibitor treatment in normal uterine myometrium and leiomyoma tissue. The normal myometrial tissue and
leiomyoma tissue are treated with 100 nM of UPA and mifepristone for 48 h and 10 µM TGF -β inhibitor and 5 µM VEGF inhibitor for 24 h. CCK-8 assays are performed to
evaluate cell survival. Cell viability after UPA, mifepristone, TGF-β1 inhibitor, and VEGF inhibitor treatment are analyzed as a percentage compared to non-drug tissue. All data
are presented as the mean ± standard deviation and are analyzed u sing a one-way analysis of variance and Scheffe’s post-hoc test. * P < 0.05 was considered as significant.
Abbreviations: EGF: epidermal growth factor; TGF-β: transforming growth factor-beta; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; UPA: ulipristal acetate.
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2022, Vol. 19
https://www.medsci.org
1784
Table 1. Changes in cell viability of myometrium and leiomyoma
tissue after UPA, mifepristone, TGF -β1 inhibitor, and VEGF
inhibitor treatment and post- hoc analysis of differences between
treatments
Treatment Mean SD P Post-hoc test
Normal
myometrium
UPA (U) 69.10 17.83 0.03 U>A (Scheffe)
Mifepristone (M) 57.20 15.24
TGF-β1 inhibitor (L) 49.09 10.83
VEGF inhibitor (A) 34.74 10.14
Myoma UPA (U) 67.81 17.53 0.02 U>L,A
(Scheffe) Mifepristone (M) 58.59 21.31
TGF-β1 inhibitor (L) 26.76 1.30
VEGF inhibitor (A) 29.24 7.74
All data are presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD) and were analyzed
by using one-way analysis of variance and Scheffe’s post hoc test.
Abbreviations: EGF: as epidermal growth factor; TGF-β: transforming growth
factor-beta; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; UPA: ulipristal acetate.
Discussion
Uterine leiomyoma is the most common benign
tumor i n women of childbearing age and causes
symptoms such as bleeding or pel vic pain infertility
[1]. A total survey using data from cohorts of one
million patients collected from Korean health
insurance data from 2002 to 2013 showed that the
prevalence of leiomyoma is increasing in women of all
childbearing ages, quadrupling to 2.48% from 2002 to
2013 [11]. In 2018, the average age of women who
gave birth in Korea was 32 years, and the proportion
of elderly mothers had increased to 31.8% [12]. The
prevalence of uterine leiomyoma is expected to
gradually increase with the developme nt of imaging
equipment for diagnosis, leading to socioeconomic
loss as the marriage and childbirth age increases.
Hysterectomy is considered the absolute treatment for
uterine leiomyoma, but alternative treatments are
widely used to preserve fertility and avoid invasive
surgery [13].
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists,
which are currently widely used for treatment, can
reduce the size by 40% and improve symptoms after 3
months of treatment, but the effect is temporary (3–6
months) and used only in lim ited cases because of
their various side effects [14, 15]. Treatment with
gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs leads to a
rebound in fibroid growth and the loss of bone
mineral density when the administration is stopped
[16]. As another option, a selecti ve progesterone
receptor modulator with a tissue-specific effect on the
progesterone receptor can be used [17]. Mifepristone
is the first progesterone receptor antagonist and has
been used clinically for more than 25 years [18, 19].
Cochrane's review of ra ndomized controlled studies
showed a decrease in bleeding and increased quality
of life in patients administered mifepristone;
however, there was no significant decrease in the
leiomyoma volume [20]. UPA is widely used as a
selective progesterone receptor modulator and was
approved by the US FDA in 2010 for treating
symptomatic leiomyoma in females of childbearing
age. However, side effects such as nausea, vomiting,
breast tenderness, headache, and malaise can occur ;
therefore, this drug can only be used before surgery or
for a limited time [21 -23]. Liver injury necessitating
liver transplantation has recently been reported in
women treated with UPA [22,23]. This has led to the
suspension of UPA as a medical therapy for treating
uterine fibroids while the Eur opean Medicines
Agency conducts a review of this liver injury risk [16].
The European Medicine Agency safety committee
advised that women should stop taking 5 mg UPA
and that no new patients should commence treatment
until the ongoing review is completed.
The effect of long -term use of current
medications is currently being evaluated for PERL 4
and VENUS 2, which are not available to women who
are planning to become pregnant because of ovulation
inhibition [23, 24]. The fertility outcome has not been
fully discussed. Growth factor control may prevent
the effects of steroid changes to effectively treat
long-lasting leiomyomas. Unlike previous studies of
the effects of individual growth factors, we compared
several growth factors simultaneously. We also
compared the effects on cell viability in both
leiomyoma tissue and normal myometrium. Our
Results
show that currently used medications decrease
cell viability not only in leiomyoma tissue, but also in
normal tissues. However, among the growth factor
inhibitors used in this study, the TGF -β1 inhibitor
showed more specific action towards uterine
leiomyoma, demonstrating its potential as a
therapeutic agent. Several studies showed that TGF -β
not only stimulates smooth muscle cells, but also
contributes to the growth of uterine leiomyoma [9,
25], and studies of selected cell lines revealed that this
growth factor significantly affects the accumulation of
extracellular matrix in uterine leiomyoma [26, 27].
Cellular responses to TGF -β are diver se, and several
studies have demonstrated its pre-tumorigenic role in
various stages of cancer; accordingly, many strategies
to suppress TGF-β are being evaluated [28]. However,
systemic therapy, such as targeting TGF -β signaling,
shows some limitations such as cardiovascular toxic
side effects and benign tumor formation (Colak and
Ten Dijke, 2017). We found that the TGF -β inhibitor
affected not only myoma tissue, but also the normal
myometrium; therefore, targeted local treatment
rather than systemic treat ment should be considered.
As we only evaluated one concentration of each drug,
differences in culture conditions and concentrations
should be examined to determine the safety margin
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2022, Vol. 19
https://www.medsci.org
1785
for the normal myometrium while treating the
leiomyoma tissue.
VEGF is an important growth factor that
stimulates the proliferation of vascular endothelial
cells. VEGF promotes cell migration and proliferation
by binding to associated receptors, thereby increasing
angiogenesis. Although uterine fibroids are benign
tumors, angiogenesis is critical for the occurrence and
development of these fibroids [29]. The effect of VEGF
on the prognosis of leiomyoma gained attention
following a study demonstrating a difference in the
expression of VEGF and IGF -1 after uterine artery
embolization treatment.
Inhibitors of the growth factors TGF -β1 and
VEGF showed greater inhibitory effects on
leiomyoma cell viability than conventional drugs,
indicating their potential as therapeutic agents for
uterine leiomyoma. In addition, as previous studies
revealed risks associated with the systemic action of
growth factor inhibitors, their use as local treatments
could be considered.
Conclusion
The expression of various growth factors (EGF,
IGF-1, TGF -β, and VEGF) was evaluated in uterine
leiomyoma tissues. The expression levels of TGF -β
and VEGF were 3.1- and 14-fold higher in leiomyoma
than in the normal myometrium. Among the
leiomyoma treatments used in the clinic, UPA did not
significantly alter growth factor expression in
leiomyoma tissue, whereas mifep ristone significantly
decreased the expression of VEGF in leiomyoma
tissue.
The TGF-β1 inhibitor caused a more significant
change in cell viability in leiomyoma tissue than in the
normal myometrium. In the post -hoc test, TGF -β1
inhibitor and VEGF inhibitor s tended to have greater
inhibitory effects than the conventional drug, UPA.
Through this study, the potential of growth-inhibitors
as a treatment for leiomyoma was examined, and the
possibility as a local treatment could also be
considered. It is expected that a safer therapeutic
concentration can be found through additional
experiments with various concentrations in the future.
Abbreviations
EGF: epidermal growth factor; TGF -β:
transforming growth factor -beta; VEGF: vascular
endothelial growth factor; UPA: ulipristal acetate.
Acknowledgements
Funding
This research was supported by the Basic Science
Research Program through the National Research
Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of
Education (2020R1F1A1063199), Basic Science
Research Program through the NRF funded by the
Ministry of Education (2017R1D1A1B03028045), and
Korea Research Foundation for Gynecologic Cancer
(2021-1).
Ethics Committee Approval
This study was granted exemption by the
Institutional Review Board of The Catholic University
of Korea, Seoul, St, Mary’s Hospital (IRB No. KC
12TNSI0822).
ORCID
Jung Yoon Park Http://orcid.org/0000 -0003-
0756-2439; Mee-Ran Kim Http://orcid.org/0000 -
0003-4492-0768.
Author Contributions
JYP and MRK and BC designed the study. JYP
and BC performed the experiments. JYP and MRK
and BC analyzed the data. JYP and BC drafted the
manuscript. All authors contributed to the
interpretation and discussion of the results.
Data Availability
Data are available at International Journal of
Medical Sciences online.
Competing Interests
The authors have declared that no competing
interest exists.
References
1. Sohn GS, Cho S, Kim YM, et al. Current medical treatment of uterine fibroids.
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018; 61: 192-201.
2. Parazzini F, Tozzi L, Bianchi S. Pregnan cy outcome and uterine fibroids. Best
Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016; 34: 74-84.
3. Klatsky PC, Tran ND, Caughey AB, et al. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes:
a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2008; 198: 357-66.
4. Guo XC, Segars JH. The impact and management of fibroids for fertility: an
evidence-based approach. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012; 39: 521-33.
5. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in
collaboration with Socie ty of Reproductive Surgeons. Myomas and
reproductive function. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: S125-S30.
6. Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated
systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91: 1215-23.
7. Van Heertum K, Barmat L. Uterine fibroids associated with infertility.
Womens Health (Lond). 2014; 10: 645-53.
8. Moravek MB, Bulun SE. Endocrinology of uterine fibroids: steroid hormones,
stem cells, and genetic contribution. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 27:
276-83.
9. Ciarmela P, Islam MS, Reis FM, et al. Growth factors and myometrium:
biological effects in uterine fibroid and possible clinical implications. Hum
Reprod Update. 2011; 17: 772-90.
10. Tal R, Segars JH. The role of angiogenic factors in fibroid pathogen esis:
potential implications for future therapy. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20:
194-216.
11. Namkung J, Kim M, Hwang H. Epidemiology and recent treatment of
leiomyomas in korean women. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110: e140.
12. [Internet] Statistics Korea, Korean S tatistical Information Service. Birth
statistics. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/1/1/index.board
13. Lumsden MA, Hamoodi I, Gupta J, et al. Fibroids: diagnosis and management.
BMJ. 2015; 351: h4887.
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2022, Vol. 19
https://www.medsci.org
1786
14. Lethaby A, Vollenhoven B, Sowter M. Pre -operative GnRH analogue therapy
before hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2001: Cd000547.
15. Friedman AJ, Hoffman DI, Comite F, et al. Treatment of leiomyomata uteri
with leuprolide acetate depot: a double -blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter
study. The Leuprolide Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77: 720-5.
16. Ekanem E, Talaulikar V. Medical therapy for fibroids: what next for ulipristal
acetate? Adv Ther. 2021; 38: 137-48.
17. Chabbert-Buffet N, Esber N, Bouchard P. Fibroid growth and medical options
for treatment. Fertil Steril. 2014; 102: 630-9.
18. Feng C, Meldrum S, Fiscella K. Improved quality of life is partly explained by
fewer symptoms after treatment of fibroids with mifepristone. Int J Gynaecol
Obstet. 2010; 109: 121-4.
19. Shen Q, Hua Y, Jiang W, et al. Effects of mifepristone on uterine leiomyoma in
premenopausal women: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: 1722-6.e1-10.
20. Tristan M, Orozco LJ, Steed A, et al. Mifepristone for uterine fibroids.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012: Cd007687.
21. Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vazquez F, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide
acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 421-32.
22. Donnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus placebo for
fibroid treatment before surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 409-20.
23. Donnez J, Vazquez F, Tomaszewski J, et al. Long -term treatment of uterine
fibroids with ulipristal acetate. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101: 1565-73.e1-18.
24. Liu J, Soper D, Lukes AS, et al. VENUS II: the second us -based phase 3 study
of ulipristal acetate (UPA) for treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (UF).
Fertil Steril. 2017; 108: e27-e8.
25. Arici A, Sozen I. Transforming growth factor -beta3 is expressed at high levels
in leiomyoma where it stimulates fibronectin expression and cell proliferation.
Fertil Steril. 2000; 73: 1006-11.
26. Lee BS, Nowak RA. Human leiomyoma smooth muscle cells show increased
expression of transforming growth factor -beta 3 (TGF be ta 3) and altered
responses to the antiproliferative effects of TGF beta. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2001; 86: 913-20.
27. Joseph DS, Malik M, Nurudeen S, et al. Myometrial cells undergo fibrotic
transformation under the influence of transforming growth factor beta-3. Fertil
Steril. 2010; 93: 1500-8.
28. Teixeira AF, Ten Dijke P, Zhu H -J. On -target anti -TGF-β therapies are not
succeeding in clinical cancer treatments: what are remaining challenges? Front
Cell Dev Biol. 2020; 8: 605.
29. Mu Y, He J, Yan R, et al. IGF‑1 and VEGF can be used as prognostic indicators
for patients with uterine fibroids treated with uterine artery embolization. Exp
Ther Med. 2016; 11: 645-9.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.