Combined Hysteroscopy and Laparoscopy in the Evaluation of Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
article
OA: diamond
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Abstract
Introduction: To determine the relative frequency of gynecological pathologies in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss using combined hysteroscopy and laparoscopy, and to evaluate the potential of this combined strategy in the diagnosis of coexisting pathologies. Methods: Over 6 years, in a large referral infertility clinic and research centre in Tehran, 80 women with the diagnosis of recurrent pregnancy loss underwent hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. Results: Forty nine (61.3%) women had 3 episodes of miscarriage, 9 (11.3%) had 4 occurrence of pregnancy loss and 14 (17.5%) patients had experienced 5 abortions. Also, there were 4 (5%), 2 (2.5%) and 2 (2.5%) participants with 6, 7 and 8 miscarriages, respectively. Thirteen women (16.2%) had normal hysteroscopy, and in 52 (65%) participant's laparoscopy did not reveal abnormal findings. Septate uterus and submucous myomas together, comprised 62 (77.5%) of the recognized pathologies in hysteroscopy. Of the 28 abnormalities found in laparoscopy, 12 (43%) was endometriosis (15% overall) and the others were, pelvic and abdominal adhesions. Conclusion: Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy yields more satisfactory diagnostic results compared with hysteroscopy alone. Septate uterus, submucous myomas and endometriosis were common findings in patients with recurrent miscarriage. Especially, patients with recurrent pregnancy loss should be examined for the coexistence of endometriosis
Full text
2,833 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Combined Hysteroscopy and Laparoscopy in the Evaluation of Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v12i1.1999Keywords:
Recurrent pregnancy loss; recurrent miscarriage; hysteroscopy; laparoscopy; structural uterine defectsAbstract
Introduction: To determine the relative frequency of gynecological pathologies in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss using combined hysteroscopy and laparoscopy, and to evaluate the potential of this combined strategy in the diagnosis of coexisting pathologies. Methods: Over 6 years, in a large referral infertility clinic and research centre in Tehran, 80 women with the diagnosis of recurrent pregnancy loss underwent hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. Results: Forty nine (61.3%) women had 3 episodes of miscarriage, 9 (11.3%) had 4 occurrence of pregnancy loss and 14 (17.5%) patients had experienced 5 abortions. Also, there were 4 (5%), 2 (2.5%) and 2 (2.5%) participants with 6, 7 and 8 miscarriages, respectively. Thirteen women (16.2%) had normal hysteroscopy, and in 52 (65%) participant's laparoscopy did not reveal abnormal findings. Septate uterus and submucous myomas together, comprised 62 (77.5%) of the recognized pathologies in hysteroscopy. Of the 28 abnormalities found in laparoscopy, 12 (43%) was endometriosis (15% overall) and the others were, pelvic and abdominal adhesions. Conclusion: Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy yields more satisfactory diagnostic results compared with hysteroscopy alone. Septate uterus, submucous myomas and endometriosis were common findings in patients with recurrent miscarriage. Especially, patients with recurrent pregnancy loss should be examined for the coexistence of endometriosis
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All material submitted for publication is assumed to be submitted exclusively to the IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia (IMJM) unless the contrary is stated. Manuscript decisions are based on a double-blinded peer review process. The Editor retains the right to determine the style and if necessary, edit and shorten any material accepted for publication.
IMJM retain copyright to all the articles published in the journal. All final ‘proof’ submissions must be accompanied by a completed Copyright Assignment Form, duly signed by all authors. The author(s) or copyright owner(s) irrevocably grant(s) to any third party, in advance and in perpetuity, the right to use, reproduce or disseminate the research article in its entirety or in part, in any format or medium, provided that no substantive errors are introduced in the process, proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given, and that the bibliographic details are not changed. If the article is reproduced or disseminated in part, this must be clearly and unequivocally indicated.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
References (20)
- W1969495490 via openalex
- W1971958830 via openalex
- W1976422208 via openalex
- W1983196285 via openalex
- W2000363161 via openalex
- W2030049287 via openalex
- W2030267747 via openalex
- W2049068012 via openalex
- W2077867999 via openalex
- W2129283979 via openalex
- W2132093414 via openalex
- W2135231302 via openalex
- W2136152362 via openalex
- W2145643106 via openalex
- W2151983841 via openalex
- W2153113454 via openalex
- W2169266667 via openalex
- W2322561651 via openalex
- W6679238341 via openalex
- W6700533340 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK