A Novel Slow-Progressive Knee Osteoarthritis Murine Model Induced by Non-Invasive Posterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Mice

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Recently, alternatives to animal testing, such as new approach methodologies, are being developed in the orthopedic research field; animal models still provide valuable insights into the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, commonly used models develop OA much more rapidly and severely than those observed in human patients. We aimed to develop a novel murine model that closely mimics the slow progression of human OA with posterior Cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture. Design 12-week-old C57BL/6 mice were induced to PCL-rupture (PCL-R) by manually applying an external tibial posterior translation force. We analyzed joint kinematics, histological observations, and bone structure to confirm the absence of concurrent injury on day 0. Then, joint stability and the pathophysiological progression of knee OA were analyzed at 8, 16, and 34 weeks post-PCL-R. The destabilized medial meniscus (DMM) model was also analyzed to compare the OA progression. Results Non-invasive PCL-R intervention induced the complete rupture in the central region of PCL without concurrent injury. The PCL-R group showed larger posterior tibial deviation than the INTACT ( P =0.008). Regarding the range of motion in the PCL-R group, there was no limitation in range of motion on day 0, but extension limitations occurred at weeks 16 and 34 weeks. Histologically, articular cartilage degeneration in PCL-R was milder than DMM. In the subchondral bone, micro-CT reconstruction images indicated that, compared with the INTACT group, the DMM group observed progressive subchondral bone formation from 16 weeks post-surgery. In contrast, the PCLR group maintained the subchondral bone structure even at 34 weeks. Conclusions PCL-R model induced mild abnormal mechanical stress depending on posterior instability, and cartilage degeneration occurred more slowly in this model than in DMM models.
Full text 1,976 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective Recently, alternatives to animal testing, such as new approach methodologies, are being developed in the orthopedic research field; animal models still provide valuable insights into the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, commonly used models develop OA much more rapidly and severely than those observed in human patients. We aimed to develop a novel murine model that closely mimics the slow progression of human OA with posterior Cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture. Design 12-week-old C57BL/6 mice were induced to PCL-rupture (PCL-R) by manually applying an external tibial posterior translation force. We analyzed joint kinematics, histological observations, and bone structure to confirm the absence of concurrent injury on day 0. Then, joint stability and the pathophysiological progression of knee OA were analyzed at 8, 16, and 34 weeks post-PCL-R. The destabilized medial meniscus (DMM) model was also analyzed to compare the OA progression.

Results

Non-invasive PCL-R intervention induced the complete rupture in the central region of PCL without concurrent injury. The PCL-R group showed larger posterior tibial deviation than the INTACT (P=0.008). Regarding the range of motion in the PCL-R group, there was no limitation in range of motion on day 0, but extension limitations occurred at weeks 16 and 34 weeks. Histologically, articular cartilage degeneration in PCL-R was milder than DMM. In the subchondral bone, micro-CT reconstruction images indicated that, compared with the INTACT group, the DMM group observed progressive subchondral bone formation from 16 weeks post-surgery. In contrast, the PCLR group maintained the subchondral bone structure even at 34 weeks.

Conclusions

PCL-R model induced mild abnormal mechanical stress depending on posterior instability, and cartilage degeneration occurred more slowly in this model than in DMM models. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00