Genetic diversity is key to a nature-positive future

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-ND-4.0

Abstract

1. Nature-positive describes the concept of halting and then reversing the loss of biodiversity in a manner that is equitable to all, particularly indigenous peoples and local communities. 2. Genetic diversity is the foundational component of biodiversity, underpinning species and ecosystem diversity. Genetic diversity is vital to resilience and ecosystem services. While genetic diversity was included in early definitions of nature-positive, it has been omitted from some more recent framings. Here we discuss why this omission may jeopardise the very ecosystems which the concept aims to protect. 3. The limitations around data and methods for assessing genetic diversity are rapidly disappearing. Thus we argue genetic diversity should be used for measuring nature-positive outcomes. With advances in genetic and genomic technologies, this approach can even be more affordable than assessing species or ecosystems. If DNA-based data are not available, indicators are available for inferring the status of genetic diversity with proxy data. 4. Policy implications: It is both possible and beneficial to incorporate genetic diversity in biodiversity assessments for nature-positive. It should be used in co-developing management plans at local and national levels. Including genetic diversity in steps to build a nature-positive future is thus essential if the concept is to achieve its aims.
Full text 1,957 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

1. Nature-positive describes the concept of halting and then reversing the loss of biodiversity in a manner that is equitable to all, particularly indigenous peoples and local communities. 2. Genetic diversity is the foundational component of biodiversity, underpinning species and ecosystem diversity. Genetic diversity is vital to resilience and ecosystem services. While genetic diversity was included in early definitions of nature-positive, it has been omitted from some more recent framings. Here we discuss why this omission may jeopardise the very ecosystems which the concept aims to protect. 3. The limitations around data and methods for assessing genetic diversity are rapidly disappearing. Thus we argue genetic diversity should be used for measuring nature-positive outcomes. With advances in genetic and genomic technologies, this approach can even be more affordable than assessing species or ecosystems. If DNA-based data are not available, indicators are available for inferring the status of genetic diversity with proxy data. 4. Policy implications: It is both possible and beneficial to incorporate genetic diversity in biodiversity assessments for nature-positive. It should be used in co-developing management plans at local and national levels. Including genetic diversity in steps to build a nature-positive future is thus essential if the concept is to achieve its aims. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2Z91S Subjects Biodiversity, Genetics and Genomics, Life Sciences

Keywords

metrics, bending the curve, biodiversity loss, resilience, just transition, science-policy, genetic diversity. Dates Published: 2025-02-21 01:21 Older Versions License CC-BY Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0