Evolution of objectives can enable prosocial behaviour without social awareness

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

A bstract Division of labour is fundamental to the functioning of societies and socially living organisms. While it has been central to their study for decades, no complete picture has emerged yet. Some of the most fascinating questions arise in the context of self-organised societies, like those of social insects, that coordinate their behaviour with completely decentralised simple decision-making performed by individuals that only have local information at their disposal. Based on empirical evidence, these collectives appear to balance task engagement globally across their whole task network for the benefit of the colony overall. How can this pro-social coordination be achieved by independently acting individuals? How is a global workforce balancing possible based on only local perception with no knowledge of the global colony status or needs? Central to solving these problems is the question how can the relevant information flow through the task network so that a changed task demand in one part of the colony can lead to adjustments in distant other parts? We detail a model that presents a potential answer to this conundrum. Our model is informed by evolutionary game theory and rests on the assumption that the perception of an individual’s sensory input can evolve. We present simulation studies and a mathematical proof to show that pro-social behaviour will evolve in a collective of agents that adjust their behaviour using primitive and biologically plausible learning mechanisms if we assume an evolving perception function.
Full text 1,851 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Division of labour is fundamental to the functioning of societies and socially living organisms. While it has been central to their study for decades, no complete picture has emerged yet. Some of the most fascinating questions arise in the context of self-organised societies, like those of social insects, that coordinate their behaviour with completely decentralised simple decision-making performed by individuals that only have local information at their disposal. Based on empirical evidence, these collectives appear to balance task engagement globally across their whole task network for the benefit of the colony overall. How can this pro-social coordination be achieved by independently acting individuals? How is a global workforce balancing possible based on only local perception with no knowledge of the global colony status or needs? Central to solving these problems is the question how can the relevant information flow through the task network so that a changed task demand in one part of the colony can lead to adjustments in distant other parts? We detail a model that presents a potential answer to this conundrum. Our model is informed by evolutionary game theory and rests on the assumption that the perception of an individual’s sensory input can evolve. We present simulation studies and a mathematical proof to show that pro-social behaviour will evolve in a collective of agents that adjust their behaviour using primitive and biologically plausible learning mechanisms if we assume an evolving perception function. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes yue.yang1{at}monash.edu Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple., Dr. Seuss Significantly strengthened the discussion of network optimality by providing a convergence proof (Section 4).

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00