Rare Case of Appendiceal Signet-ring Cell Carcinoma Mimicking Advanced Ovarian Cancer

In: Journal of Cancer Research and Practice · 2022 · vol. 9(3) , pp. 104–107 · doi:10.4103/jcrp.jcrp_5_22 · W4294023536
article OA: diamond CC0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-10 ⓘ

A case of primary appendiceal signet-ring cell carcinoma initially mimicking advanced ovarian cancer highlights the diagnostic challenges and need for appropriate surgical management in rare gastrointestinal malignancies.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-24 · read from full text ⓘ

This case report describes a 68-year-old woman initially diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent suboptimal debulking surgery due to extensive peritoneal metastasis. Final pathology revealed that the malignancy was actually primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the appendix, which had spread to the bilateral adnexa, uterus, and omentum. The authors highlight that preoperative imaging and tumor markers were nonspecific, leading to a misdiagnosis that complicated surgical planning and treatment outcomes. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the appendix is extremely rare, and because the symptoms are vague and nonspecific, obtaining a preoperative diagnosis is difficult. It cannot be detected using imaging modalities because its radiologic features are undefined, and its appearance on both computed tomography and ultrasound images is similar to that of nontumorous appendicitis. Usually, a diagnosis is made after surgery for other diseases involving the removal of the appendix. The right hemicolectomy is suggested for invasive adenocarcinoma; however, diagnosing primary signet-ring cell carcinoma before surgery and managing tumors with adequate surgical resection remain challenging. We present a case of a large ovarian tumor with peritoneal carcinomatosis diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer but subsequently revealed through pathology to be primary appendiceal signet-ring carcinoma. Detecting appendiceal signet-ring carcinoma warrants additional surgical management, and treating it involves chemotherapy. This rare disease should be kept in mind when encountering abdominal right lower quadrant pain and tumors to allow for a full treatment plan.
Full text 7,328 characters · extracted from oa-html · 3 sections · click to expand

Introduction

The incidence of primary carcinoma of the appendix is extremely low, affecting approximately 1–2/100,000 people each year in the United States.[] The signet-ring cell subtype is particularly rare, comprising 4% of all appendiceal carcinomas.[] Symptoms of appendiceal cancer are often nonspecific and most commonly present as right lower quadrant abdominal pain; it can mimic several diseases originating from the pelvic cavity, such as acute appendicitis, ovarian cancer, or other diseases related to the adnexa. Hence, primary cancers of the appendix are frequently diagnosed after surgery for appendicitis, presumed ovarian malignancies, or other reasons.[] In this article, we present a patient with an initial diagnosis of advanced right ovarian cancer. She underwent suboptimal debulking surgery because of extensive disseminated peritoneal metastasis. The final pathology revealed primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the appendix. CASE REPORT A 68-year-old multiparous woman with no known medical or surgical history complained of abdominal distension for 1 month. She denied a loss of body weight, easy satiety, vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation, bloody stool, pencil stool, or irregular vaginal bleeding. On pelvic examination, a mass greater than the size of a fetal head was palpated over the right lower quadrant of her abdomen. Ultrasound displayed a cystic mass arising from the right pelvic cavity with a solid component measuring 15.8 cm × 10 cm [Figure 1]. Due to the impression of ovarian cancer, computed tomography (CT) was performed, and blood was drawn for tumor markers. The CT scan showed peritoneal seeding and a right ovarian tumor densely adhered to the uterus, bowel, and omentum [Figures 2 and 3]. No gastrointestinal tract tumor was suspected and no lymphadenopathy was detected. Elevated tumor markers, namely carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; 750.3 ng/mL), cancer antigen 125 (CA125; 841.6 U/mL), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9; 7328.3 U/mL), were noted. Since no gastrointestinal tract lesion was identified by CT scan, panendoscopy and colonoscopy were omitted. She underwent cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. During surgery, the adhesion between the appendix and ovarian tumor was inseparable, and an appendectomy was performed. The contralateral ovary was also involved. A frozen section of the ovarian tumor [Figure 4] was identified as a signet-ring cell tumor. Malignancy originating from the gastrointestinal tract was impressed. Because of extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis, suboptimal debulking surgery was conducted. Subsequent panendoscopy and colonoscopy both resulted in negative findings. The final pathology report revealed appendiceal adenocarcinoma of a signet-ring type [Figure 5] with bilateral adnexa, uterus, and omentum metastasis. The appendiceal tumor was immunopositive for CK7 [Figure 6] and CDX-2 [Figure 7]. After surgery, she received six courses of chemotherapy with irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate, folinic acid, and fluorouracil. When her CEA level had decreased to 17.8 ng/mL, she rejected further treatment. Eight months after the last course of chemotherapy, she presented to the emergency room (ER) with dyspnea, abdominal distension, and bilateral leg edema. A thorough examination revealed massive ascites with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and acute renal failure. She opted for palliative treatment and died of septic shock 10 days after her admission to the ER.

Discussion

The incidence of signet-ring cell carcinoma of the appendix is less than 5% of all appendiceal tumors, and the clinical symptoms are indistinguishable from those arising from the right lower quadrant abdominal cavity. The most common clinical complaint is abdominal pain in the lower right quadrant, which is similar to that of acute appendicitis.[] Preoperative detection can be used to design an appropriate surgical resection, but making an accurate diagnosis is not often possible before surgery.[] Radiologic techniques, such as CT of the appendix, are nonspecific for appendiceal cancer.[] Cho proposed that patients with concentric hypoechoic mucosal thickening and certain clinical presentations, such as potential ovarian or peritoneal metastasis or submucosal infiltrative tumors, including signet-ring cell carcinoma, should be examined to obtain another diagnosis.[] Appendiceal sonography may be done when large pelvic tumors arising from the right pelvic cavity are seen. If the ultrasound image of the appendix shows a concentrically thickened wall with a hypoechoic submucosal and muscle layer, then signet-ring cell carcinoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis. No specific CT findings distinguish signet-ring cell carcinoma from other histological types, except those that indicate a spread to adjacent organs (76%) at presentation.[] An accurate diagnosis and precise staging warrant a right hemicolectomy, a suitable surgical treatment.[] Because of its aggressive behavior, close follow-up is necessary after cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy. Our patient complained of abdominal fullness, which is nonspecific for appendiceal tumors. The correct diagnosis was determined only after debulking surgery, which was initially performed for ovarian malignancy. Although she received six courses of chemotherapy, the disease failed to respond. This clinical circumstance is consistent with the knowledge of signet-ring cell carcinoma, and a preoperative diagnosis remains a challenge for appropriate surgical planning. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

References

- 1. McCusker ME, Coté TR, Clegg LX, Sobin LH. Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix: A population-based study from the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results program, 1973-1998 Cancer. 2002;94:3307–12 - 2. McGory ML, Maggard MA, Kang H, O'Connell JB, Ko CY. Malignancies of the appendix: Beyond case series reports Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:2264–71 - 3. Kelly KJ. Management of appendix cancer Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2015;28:247–55 - 4. Fusari M, Sorrentino N, Bottazzi EC, Del Vecchio W, Cozzolino I, Maurea S, et al Primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the appendix mimicking acute appendicitis Acta Radiol Short Rep. 2012;1 arsr. 2012.120017 - 5. Ko YH, Jung CK, Oh SN, Kim TH, Won HS, Kang JH, et al Primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the appendix: A rare case report and our 18-year experience World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:5763–8 - 6. Cho YJ, Kim HJ, Jang SK, Yeon JW, Kim KH, Paik SY. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the appendix: A case report with an emphasis on sonographic findings Ultrasonography. 2016;35:164–7 - 7. Zhou ML, Yan FH, Xu PJ, Zhang LJ, Li QH, Ji Y. Mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix: CT findings Chin Med J (Engl). 2006;119:1300–3 - 8. Deans GT, Spence RA. Neoplastic lesions of the appendix Br J Surg. 1995;82:299–306

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (7)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK