Results
and Discussion
Xenopus laevis egg cytoplasmic extracts (hereafter “extracts”) were prepared following standard
protocols (Fig. 1a and Methods) (17). Dye-labeled proteins ( Methods and Table S1) were added to the
extract at <1 nM , optimal for SMdM single-molecule detection and diffusion quantification while
minimizing possible interactions between the added molecules (16). For SMdM (Methods) ( 8, 30), the
sample was illuminated with an excitation laser at a depth of ~3 µm for the wide-field recording of single-
molecule images with an EM -CCD camera. The laser was repeatedly modulated as paired stroboscopic
pulses across tandem camera frames at a fixed center-to-center separation of Δt = 1 ms (Fig. 1b), so that
transient displacements in the Δt time window were detected for molecules that diffused into the field of
view ( Fig. 1c ). The execution of ~10 4 frame pairs over ~3 min thus recorded ~105 transient single -
molecule displacements. The accumulated displacements were either spatially binned for local statistics
(8, 31) to generate a diffusivity map (Fig. S1), or pooled for global fitting to yield a diffusion coefficient
D with an ~±1% bracket at 95% confidence (Fig. 1d,e) (30).
Figure 1 d compares SMdM results of Cy3B-tagged hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL) in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) versus in extract. With a net charge of ~+7 at physiological pH, the ~15
kDa protein serves as a model to examine charge interactions (16). In PBS, the SMdM-recorded single-
molecule displacements fit well to our single-mode diffusion model to yield a diffusion coefficient D =
102 µm 2/s ( Fig. 1d ), consistent with previous results ( 16, 30) . In contrast, markedly suppressed
displacements were observed in the extract, which conformed less well to the single-mode model to yield
a substantially lower apparent D value of 14 µm2/s (Fig. 1d). Spatial mapping of D showed no noticeable
features (Fig. S1a), expected for the homogenized extract, and suggests the above-observed deviation
from the single-mode diffusion model was due not to spatial variations but likely to heterogeneous
transient interactions with extract components. Fitting the SMdM displacements to two modes (Fig. S2)
yielded slow and fast components as 3.4 and 21.3 µm2/s, respectively, although a continuous distribution
of different transient states is likely. To understand if the positive net charge of HEWL drove the above
behavior, we succinylated HEWL to shift its net charge from ~+7 to ~−4 (Methods and Table S1) (16, 32).
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
4
SMdM yielded a notably higher D of 48 µm2/s for succinylated HEWL (sHEWL) in the extract with a
good fit to the single-mode diffusion model (Fig. 1e).
We next quantified and compared the diffusivity of 15 soluble proteins of diverse sizes and net
charges (Table S1), many of which have been employed as protein size standards, in PBS versus extract.
As we plotted all D values in PBS (hollow symbols in Fig. 1f) against the protein molecular weight, we
noted a monotonic decrease in agreement with the Young-Carroad-Bell (YCB) model (solid curve in Fig.
1f) (33). This result is expected: The YCB model is based on fitting experimental diffusivity values, and
common proteins have exhibit ed D values within 10% of the YCB prediction ( 33, 34). O ur previous
SMdM results also well followed the YCB trend (30, 35).
For diffusion in the extract, the SMdM-determined D values of the 8 negatively charged soluble
proteins (filled red squares in Fig. 1f) showed a size dependence that roughly followed (or were slightly
lower than) 50% of the YCB values in PBS (dashed curve in Fig. 1f ). An early NMR study reports a
uniform 45% scaling of the apparent diffusion coefficients of small molecules in Xenopus oocytes versus
in water (36). Using a Cannon-Fenske viscometer, we measured the bulk viscosity of the extract as 2.30
cP, ~2.22x of that measured for PBS (1.03 cP). Thus, the diffusion of negatively charged proteins is only
passively impeded by the higher cytoplasm viscosity over water. In comparison, the 7 positively charged
soluble proteins (filled blue and light-blue circles in Fig. 1f) exhibited further suppressions in diffusivity
well below the ~50% PBS values.
Plotting the SMdM-determined D values in the extract relative to those in PBS as a function of the
protein net charge (Fig. 2a) showed that whereas the negatively charged proteins all diffused at 40 -50%
of their diffusivities in PBS, proteins carrying >+5 net charges diffused at 10- 20% of their PBS
diffusivities, while the weakly positively charged proteins exhibited intermediate values.
To verify electrostatic interaction as the driving force of this behavior, we added increasing
concentrations of salt to the extract and re -measured D. To directly compare positively and negatively
charged proteins in the same extract samples, we separately labeled HEWL and bovine carbonic anhydrase
(BCA) with Cy3B and CF647, respectively, and performed SMdM for both proteins in two color channels.
We found that for samples with increasing amounts of NaCl added, the positively charged HEWL (blue
circles in Fig. 2b) progressively increased its diffusivity from 16% to 37% of the PBS value. In contrast,
the negatively charged BCA (red squares in Fig. 2b ) stayed at 50-53% of its PBS value . Assuming the
remaining minor variations in the BCA readouts reflected non- charge effects, e.g., m echanical
disturbances from NaCl addition, the r atio between the PBS -normalized D values of HEWL and BCA
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
5
(black diamonds in Fig. 2b) progressively increased with NaCl addition from 10 mM to 300 mM before
plateauing at ~70%. Thus, ionic screening efficiently reduced the likely dynamic interactions between the
positively charged HEWL and the negatively charged species in the extract, yet the interactions were still
not fully eliminated at 500 mM ionic strength, reminiscent of our recent observations of HEWL-BSA
interactions in buffer (16).
Together, our SMdM experiments in the extract unveiled charge-driven suppression of diffusion
for positively charged proteins. These results may be explained if the macromolecular environment in the
extract is dominated by negatively charged species, akin to our recent observations in mammalian cells
and in solution ( 8, 10, 16). In agreement with this prediction, a n analysis of the expected net charges of
major proteins in the Xenopus egg cytoplasm ic extract, as ranked by the mass spectrometry -detected
abundances (37), indicated most as negative or neutral ( Table S2). C ytoplasmic extracts also contain
abundant ribosomes. Although many ribosomal proteins are highly positively charged (Table S3), their
assembly with ribosomal RNA (rRNA) results in highly negatively charged ribosomes, which in bacteria
have been identified as the source of diffusion suppression for positively charged proteins (11).
To probe the contribution of RNA, ~90% of which is ribosomal in the extract ( 38), to protein
diffusion properties, we treated extracts with ribonuclease (RNase) (29, 39, 40). Interestingly, we observed
that while treating extracts with RNase A did not immediately alter the diffusion behavior of the positively
charged HEWL (Fig. 3a-b, versus Fig. S1a-b), micrometer-scale low-diffusivity domains emerged after
3 h (magenta in Fig. 3c ). Rendering the single-molecule localizations from the SM dM data into SMLM
(single-molecule localization microscopy) (41) super-resolution images showed an increased presence of
HEWL in the low-diffusivity domains and resolved structures consistent with amorphous aggregates with
micrometer-scale clouds and nanoscale foci ( Fig. S 3). Meanwhile, the negatively charged BCA also
exhibited locally reduced diffusivity in the RNase A-induced aggregates but was moderately excluded
(Fig. S4). Concomitantly, we noted that the RNase A-treated extracts became visibly cloudy ( Fig. 3e),
consistent with past studies showing that RNase treatment s of mammalian and bacterial lysates cause
widespread protein aggregation ( 42, 43). Given the high abundance of ribosomal proteins and rRNA in
egg extract (38, 44), we estimated that RNA degradation may release up to 5 mg/mL ribosomal proteins,
many of which are highly positively charged ( Table S3 ), into the negatively charged cytoplasmic
background. This extensive mixing of oppositely charged proteins likely induces aggregation (45-47).
To examine this hypothesis, we added positively charged proteins to untreated extracts. Notably,
addition of 1 mg/mL of either polylysine or HEWL induced immediate clouding of the extract (Fig. 3e)
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
6
and micrometer-sized low-diffusivity domains in the SM dM diffusivity map (Fig. 3f). In comparison,
adding negatively charged polyglutamic acid (Fig. 3e) or BSA (Fig. S1b) to the extract did not induce
aggregation. To further substantiate our model, we examined high- speed extract s (HSEs) in which
ribosomes (together with vesicles and large protein complexes ) were removed by ultracentrifugation at
200,000g for 2.5 h at 4 ⸰C (17). RNase treatment of the ribosome-depleted HSE did not induce clouding,
while polylysine addition still generated immediate clouding (Fig. S5), consistent with our model that the
release of ribosomal proteins drove aggregation in the RNase A-treated cytoplasmic extracts.
A recent study show ed that introducing cationic “killer peptides” into cell lysates induced
aggregation (48), echoing earlier findings in bacteria ( 49). Our results suggest that in the cytoplasmic
environment, substantial addition or liberation of positively charged proteins, regardless of specific forms,
both prompt aggregation. The former scenario is fast due to immediate charge interactions whereas the
latter is slow, as positively charged proteins are gradually released . Earlier work showed that RNase
treatments of Xenopus egg extracts abolish mitotic spindle assembly and nuclear envelope formation (39,
40). While these observations, together with the above-noted RNase-induced lysate aggregation (42, 43),
were interpreted as unrecognized translation-independent RNA functions, our data suggests that a critical
RNA function is to invert the positive net charges of their binding proteins to negative, which is essential
to maintain a functional cytoplasmic milieu.
In addition to the difference in aggregation speed, the RNase- treated extract also showed a mild
increase in D of HEWL from ~14 to ~18 µm2/s for regions outside the low-diffusivity aggregates (compare
Fig. 3d to Fig. 3b,g). This reduced suppression of diffusion may be attributed to diminished impediments
from ribosomes and RNA. Yet, the recovery is far from complete, given the above D = 48 µm2/s of sHEWL
in the extract, suggesting that the predominately negatively charged protein environment still suppressed
the diffusion of the positively charged HEWL (16).
A remaining puzzle was the above-noted relatively invariant 40-50% scaling of D in the extract
versus in PBS for negatively charged proteins of different sizes (Fig. 2a). While this observation simplified
our comparison with positively charged diffusers, it conflicts with the notion that intracellular diffusion is
generally more hindered for larger molecules (6, 50-52). To reconcile this issue, we noted that in the
standard extract preparation protocol, cytochalasin is added to inhibit actin polymerization (17). It has
been shown that the s ize-dependent suppression of DNA mobility in mammalian cells depends on the
actin cytoskeleton, and that in solution, the addition of 8 mg/mL polymerized actin recapitulated a size-
dependent diffusion slowdown, whereas adding soluble crowding agents, including cytosol extracts, did
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
7
not ( 50). Our recent SM dM results with expandable hydrogels also show ed that obstruction due to
immobile meshworks is vital for the size-dependent suppression of molecular diffusivity (53). Meanwhile,
a recent study reported that BSA diffuses slightly slower in actin-intact extracts (27).
To probe the likely role of the actin cytoskeleton in size -dependent diffusion suppression, we
prepared actin -intact Xenopus egg extracts in which c ytochalasin was omitted, as well as actin -
supplemented samples to which extra actin was added at 5 mg/mL (~0.5 wt%), a concentration at which
size-dependent diffusion suppression emerge s in solution-hydrogel systems ( 50, 53). Chemically fixing
the samples for phalloidin labeling ( 54) and three-dimensional stochastic optical reconstruction
microscopy (3D-STORM) (55, 56) super- resolution imaging revealed dense actin networks with sub-
micrometer grid sizes (Fig. 4a) analogous to those seen in animal cells (54), with the actin-supplemented
samples roughly doubling the density of actin filaments over the actin-intact samples. In comparison, no
phalloidin staining was observed in the standard actin-inhibited samples (Fig. S6).
SMdM showed that whereas the 660 kDa thyroglobulin exhibited similar scaling of its D value in
actin-inhibited extract relative to PBS when compared to the 30 kDa BCA (47% vs. 50%), it experienced
progressively stronger diffusivity suppression in actin- intact and actin -supplemented extracts, reaching
39% and 32% of the PBS value, respectively (Fig. 4b). In comparison, the 30 kDa BCA displayed notably
smaller decreases in D to reach 46% and 43% of the PBS value in the actin-intact and actin-supplemented
extracts, respectively ( Fig. 4b ). Increased variations in the measured D values were also noted in the
presence of actin (Fig. 4b), likely related to the observed spatial inhomogeneity in local actin density (Fig.
4a). These results underscore the key role of actin cytoskeleton in the s ize-dependent suppression of
diffusion in the cytoplasm. We also compared the positively charged HEWL, and noted that whereas its
D value in the actin-inhibited extract already started low at 14% of the PBS value, a further suppression
to 9% of the PBS value was observed in the actin-intact extract (Fig. S6).
Materials and methods
Xenopus egg cytoplasm extracts. Xenopus egg cytoplasm extracts were prepared following standard protocols
(17). Briefly, eggs from Xenopus laevis were dejellied, packed at low speed to remove excess buffer, and then
crushed by centrifugation at 18,000 g for 15 min. The cytoplasm was retrieved using a syringe and supplemented
with 10 μg/mL LPC protease inhibitors, 20 μg/mL cytochalasin B, and 1x energy mix (4 mM creatine phosphate,
0.5 mM ATP , 0.05 mM EGTA, and 0.5 mM MgCl 2). Actin-intact extracts were similarly prepared but excluded
cytochalasin B. Actin -supplemented extracts were prepared by adding actin from rabbit skeletal muscle
(Cytoskeleton, Inc. AKL95-B) to the actin-intact extract to 5 mg/mL. For RNase treatment, Ribonuclease A from
bovine pancreas (Sigma R5500) was added to the extract to 1 mg/mL. For the addition of different proteins,
poly(D,L-lysine hydrobromide)250 (Alamanda Polymers 000-RKB250), HEWL (Sigma L4919), poly(D,L-glutamic
acid sodium salt)300 (Alamanda Polymers 000-RE300), or BSA (Sigma A3059) were separately added to the extract
to 1 mg/mL. High-speed extracts (HSEs) were prepared by ultracentrifuging the standard extracts above at 200,000g
for 2.5 h at 4 ⸰C. After centrifugation, the clear supernatant was retrieved using a syringe, leaving the pellet behind.
Dye-labeling of proteins. Sources of proteins used are shown in Table S1. We chose proteins of well-defined sizes,
many of which have been employed as protein size standards in size-exclusion chromatography (e.g., Sigma
MWGF1000). The protein sizes were further validated with a different set of size standards ( Bio-Rad 1511901)
(Fig. S7). The proteins were labeled with Cy3B NHS (N -hydroxysuccimidyl) ester (Cytiva PA63101) or CF647
NHS ester (Biotium 92135) in 0.1 M NaHCO 3 at an ~1:1 initial dye:protein ratio for 1 h. Unconjugated dye was
removed by filtering through Amicon centrifugal filters six times , so that no remaining dyes were detected in the
final flowthrough. Absorbances at 280 and 560 nm, as measured by a NanoDrop 2000c spectrometer
(ThermoFisher), indicated that the final product had ~0.5 dyes per protein on average. Thus, the fluorescently
detected molecules in SMdM typically had only one dye on the protein, while the unlabeled fraction of the protein
was undetected. Succinylation of Cy3B -labeled HEWL was done by adding excessive solid succinic anhydride
(Fisher Scientific AC158760050) into the sample (57) and then cleaning up with Amicon centrifugal filters.
Imaging devices. #1.5 Glass coverslips were acid-treated and passivated with 10 mg/mL methoxy-PEG silane (MW
5000, PG1-SL-5k, Nanocs) in 95% ethanol/water for 30 min, and then rinsed and sonicated for 5 min in Milli -Q
water (30). The coverslips were then each mounted with a plastic tube (cut from a 0.65 mL microcentrifuge tube)
to form an imaging chamber (58). For SMdM, ~100 µL of extract or PBS, with dye-labeled proteins added at 0.2-
1.0 nM, were added into the imaging chamber. We separately compared imaging chambers with Bioinert surfaces
(ibidi 80800), which have been used in recent studies (27), and obtained indistinguishable results.
SMdM. SMdM was performed on a Nikon Ti-E inverted fluorescence microscope, as described previously (8, 30).
Briefly, a 561 nm and a 642 nm laser were focused at the edge of the back focal plane of an oil-immersion objective
lens to illuminate a few micrometers into the sample. The focal plane was maintained at ~3 µm into the sample, and
single-molecule images were recorded in the wide field with an EM -CCD camera (iXon Ultra 897, Andor) that
operated continuously at 110 frames per second. The laser was repeatedly modulated as paired stroboscopic pulses
across tandem camera frames at a fixed center -to-center separation of Δ t = 1 ms ( Fig. 1b). The recorded images
across the pair frames thus captured the transient single- molecule displacements in the Δt = 1 ms time window.
Typical runs executed 1.0×104 frame pairs over ~3 min, accumulating 0.5- 5×105 single-molecule displacements.
These displacements were pooled for global fitting or spatially binned with a grid size of 500 nm for local fitting to
the probability model:
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
10
22( ) exp( )rrP r braa= −+ (Eqn. 1)
Here a = 4DΔt with D being the diffusion coefficient, and b accounts for a uniform background due to extraneous
molecules that randomly diffuse into the search radius during Δt (8). For spatially binned data, the fitted D value in
each spatial bin was assigned a color on the continuous D scale for rendering into a color-coded D map.
3D-STORM imaging of actin filaments. For 3D-STORM imaging of actin filaments (54) in the actin-intact and
actin-added extracts, 100 µL of the extract was added into an 8- well glass coverslip chamber (ibidi 80807) and
incubated for 45 min at room temperature. The sample was fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in the cytoskeleton buffer
(10 mM MES, pH = 6.1, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM glucose, and 5 mM MgCl 2) for 30 min, and then
reduced using freshly made 0.1% (w/v) NaBH4 in PBS. Actin filaments were stained by 400 nM phalloidin Alexa
Fluor 647 (Cell Signaling Technology 8940S) overnight at 4 C. The sample was washed with PBS and mounted in
a STORM imaging buffer containing 100 mM Tris -HCl, pH = 7.5, 100 mM cysteamine, 5% (w/v) glucose, 0.8
mg/mL glucose oxidase (Sigma-Aldrich, G2133), and 40 µg/mL catalase (Sigma-Aldrich, C30). 3D-STORM was
performed as described previously (55, 56, 59).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes
of Health ( KX: R35GM149349, RH: R35GM118183), the Packard Fellowships for Science and
Engineering (KX), the Heising-Simons Faculty Fellows Award (KX), the Flora Lamson Hewlett Chair in
Biochemistry (RH), and a Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund Fellowship (CZ).
References
1. G. Rivas, A. P. Minton, Macromolecular crowding in vitro, in vivo, and in between. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41,
970-981 (2016).
2. D. Guin, M. Gruebele, Weak Chemical Interactions That Drive Protein Evolution: Crowding, Sticking, and
Quinary Structure in Folding and Function. Chem. Rev. 119, 10691-10717 (2019).
3. S. S. Stadmiller, G. J. Pielak, Protein- complex stability in cells and in vitro under crowded conditions. Curr.
Opin. Struct. Biol. 66, 183-192 (2021).
4. M. Bonucci, T. Shu, L. J. Holt, How it feels in a cell. Trends Cell Biol. 33, 924-938 (2023).
5. J. Lippincott-Schwartz, E. Snapp, A. Kenworthy, Studying protein dynamics in living cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell
Biol. 2, 444-456 (2001).
6. A. S. Verkman, Solute and macromolecule diffusion in cellular aqueous compartments. Trends Biochem. Sci.
27, 27-33 (2002).
7. R. Machan, T. Wohland, Recent applications of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy in live systems. FEBS
Lett. 588, 3571-3584 (2014).
8. L. Xiang, K. Chen, R. Yan, W. Li, K. Xu, Single -molecule displacement mapping unveils nanoscale
heterogeneities in intracellular diffusivity. Nat. Methods 17, 524-530 (2020).
9. M. A. Steves, C. He, K. Xu, Single -molecule spectroscopy and super-resolution mapping of physicochemical
parameters in living cells. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 75, 163-183 (2024).
10. L. Xiang, R. Yan, K. Chen, W. Li, K. Xu, Single -molecule displacement mapping unveils sign -asymmetric
protein charge effects on intraorganellar diffusion. Nano Lett. 23, 1711-1716 (2023).
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
11
11. P. E. Schavemaker, W. M. Smigiel, B. Poolman, Ribosome surface properties may impose limits on the nature
of the cytoplasmic proteome. eLife 6, e30084 (2017).
12. Y . Ye, Q. Wu, W. Zheng, B. Jiang, G. J. Pielak, M. Liu, C. Li, Positively charged tags impede protein mobility
in cells as quantified by 19F NMR. J. Phys. Chem. B 123, 4527-4533 (2019).
13. S. Leeb, T. Sörensen, F. Yang, X. Mu, M. Oliveberg, J. Danielsson, Diffusive protein interactions in human
versus bacterial cells. Curr. Res. Struct. Biol. 2, 68-78 (2020).
14. S. Leeb, F. Yang, M. Oliveberg, J. Danielsson, Connecting longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates in live-
cell NMR. J. Phys. Chem. B 124, 10698-10707 (2020).
15. E. Vallina Estrada, N. Zhang, H. Wennerström, J. Danielsson, M. Oliveberg, Diffusive intracellular interactions:
On the role of protein net charge and functional adaptation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 81, 102625 (2023).
16. A. A. Choi, K. Xu, Single -molecule diffusivity quantification unveils ubiquitous net charge -driven protein–
protein interaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 10973-10978 (2024).
17. T. J. Maresca, R. Heald, Methods for studying spindle assembly and chromosome condensation in Xenopus egg
extracts. Methods Mol Biol 322, 459-474 (2006).
18. C. M. Field, J. F. Pelletier, T. J. Mitchison, Xenopus extract approaches to studying microtubule organization
and signaling in cytokinesis. Methods Cell Biol 137, 395-435 (2017).
19. R. Gibeaux, R. Heald, The use of cell -free Xenopus extracts to investigate cytoplasmic events. Cold Spring
Harb. Protoc., doi:10.1101/pdb.top097048 (2019).
20. D. D. Newmeyer, D. M. Farschon, J. C. Reed, Cell-free apoptosis in Xenopus egg extracts: Inhibition by Bcl-2
and requirement for an organelle fraction enriched in mitochondria. Cell 79, 353-364 (1994).
21. R. Heald, R. Tournebize, T. Blank, R. Sandaltzopoulos, P. Becker, A. Hyman, E. Karsenti, Self-organization of
microtubules into bipolar spindles around artificial chromosomes in Xenopus egg extracts. Nature 382, 420-
425 (1996).
22. J. B. Chang, J. E. Ferrell Jr, Mitotic trigger waves and the spatial coordination of the Xenopus cell cycle. Nature
500, 603-607 (2013).
23. M. C. Good, M. D. Vahey, A. Skandarajah, D. A. Fletcher, R. Heald, Cytoplasmic volume modulates spindle
size during embryogenesis. Science 342, 856-860 (2013).
24. Y . Guan, Z. Li, S. Wang, P. M. Barnes, X. Liu, H. Xu, M. Jin, A. P. Liu, Q. Yang, A robust and tunable mitotic
oscillator in artificial cells. eLife 7, e33549 (2018).
25. X. R. Cheng, J. E. Ferrell, Spontaneous emergence of cell -like organization in Xenopus egg extracts. Science
366, 631-637 (2019).
26. C. Y . Zhou, B. Dekker, Z. Liu, H. Cabrera, J. Ryan, J. Dekker, R. Heald, Mitotic chromosomes scale to nuclear-
cytoplasmic ratio and cell size in Xenopus. eLife 12, e84360 (2023).
27. W. Y . C. Huang, X. R. Cheng, J. E. Ferrell, Cytoplasmic organization promotes protein diffusion in Xenopus
extracts. Nat. Commun. 13, 5599 (2022).
28. Y . Chen, J.-H. Huang, C. Phong, J. E. Ferrell, Viscosity-dependent control of protein synthesis and degradation.
Nat. Commun. 15, 2149 (2024).
29. F. C. Keber, T. Nguyen, A. Mariossi, C. P. Brangwynne, M. Wuhr, Evidence for widespread cytoplasmic
structuring into mesoscale condensates. Nat. Cell Biol. 26, 346-352 (2024).
30. A. A. Choi, H. H. Park, K. Chen, R. Yan, W. Li, K. Xu, Displacement statistics of unhindered single molecules
show no enhanced diffusion in enzymatic reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 4839-4844 (2022).
31. L. Xiang, K. Chen, K. Xu, Single molecules are your quanta: A bottom-up approach toward multidimensional
super-resolution microscopy. ACS Nano 15, 12483-12496 (2021).
32. I. Gitlin, J. D. Carbeck, G. M. Whitesides, Why are proteins charged? Networks of charge-charge interactions
in proteins measured by charge ladders and capillary electrophoresis. Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit. 45, 3022-3060
(2006).
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
12
33. M. E. Young, P. A. Carroad, R. L. Bell, Estimation of diffusion coefficients of proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 22,
947-955 (1980).
34. M. T. Tyn, T. W. Gusek, Prediction of diffusion coefficients of proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 35, 327-338 (1990).
35. A. A. Choi, L. Xiang, W. Li, K. Xu, Single-molecule displacement mapping indicates unhindered intracellular
diffusion of small (≲1 kDa) solutes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 8510-8516 (2023).
36. J. V . Sehy, J. J. Ackerman, J. J. Neil, Apparent diffusion of water, ions, and small molecules in the Xenopus
oocyte is consistent with Brownian displacement. Magn. Reson. Med. 48, 42-51 (2002).
37. M. Wühr, R. M. Freeman, M. Presler, M. E. Horb, L. Peshkin, S. P. Gygi, M. W. Kirschner, Deep proteomics
of the Xenopus laevis egg using an mRNA-derived reference database. Curr. Biol. 24, 1467-1475 (2014).
38. K. Okuyama, N. Sagata, K. Shiokawa, K. Yamana, Localization of poly(A) sequences that are lost during oocyte
maturation of Xenopus laevis. Cell Struct. Funct. 6, 279-282 (1981).
39. M. D. Blower, M. Nachury, R. Heald, K. Weis, A Rae1-containing ribonucleoprotein complex is required for
mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 121, 223-234 (2005).
40. A. Aze, M. Fragkos, S. Bocquet, J. Cau, M. Méchali, RNAs coordinate nuclear envelope assembly and DNA
replication through ELYS recruitment to chromatin. Nat. Commun. 8, 2130 (2017).
41. M. Lelek, M. T. Gyparaki, G. Beliu, F. Schueder, J. Griffié, S. Manley, R. Jungmann, M. Sauer, M. Lakadamyali,
C. Zimmer, Single-molecule localization microscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1, 39 (2021).
42. J. Aarum, C. P . Cabrera, T. A. Jones, S. Rajendran, R. Adiutori, G. Giovannoni, M. R. Barnes, A. Malaspina, D.
Sheer, Enzymatic degradation of RNA causes widespread protein aggregation in cell and tissue lysates. EMBO
Rep. 21, e49585 (2020).
43. C. Park, B. Han, Y . Choi, Y . Jin, K. P. Kim, S. I. Choi, B. L. Seong, RNA -dependent proteome solubility
maintenance in Escherichia coli lysates analysed by quantitative mass spectrometry: Proteomic characterization
in terms of isoelectric point, struct ural disorder, functional hub, and chaperone network. RNA Biol. 21, 1-18
(2024).
44. A. A. Tokmakov, T. Hashimoto, Y . Hasegawa, S. Iguchi, T. Iwasaki, Y . Fukami, Monitoring gene expression in
a single Xenopus oocyte using multiple cytoplasmic collections and quantitative RT-PCR. FEBS J. 281, 104-
114 (2014).
45. T. Croguennec, G. M. Tavares, S. Bouhallab, Heteroprotein complex coacervation: A generic process. Adv.
Colloid Interface Sci. 239, 115-126 (2017).
46. J. Zheng, C. -h. Tang, W. Sun, Heteroprotein complex coacervation: Focus on experimental strategies to
investigate structure formation as a function of intrinsic and external physicochemical parameters for food
applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 284, 102268 (2020).
47. R. A. Kapelner, V . Yeong, A. C. Obermeyer, Molecular determinants of protein-based coacervates. Curr. Opin.
Colloid Interface Sci. 52, 101407 (2021).
48. S. Boeynaems, X. R. Ma, V . Yeong, G. M. Ginell, J.-H. Chen, J. A. Blum, L. Nakayama, A. Sanyal, A. Briner,
D. V . Haver, J. Pauwels, A. Ekman, H. B. Schmidt, K. Sundararajan, L. Porta, K. Lasker, C. Larabell, M. A. F.
Hayashi, A. Kundaje, F. Impens, A. Obermeyer, A. S. Holehouse, A. D. Gitler, Aberrant phase separation is a
common killing strategy of positively charged peptides in biology and human disease. bioRxiv, DOI:
10.1101/2023.03.09.531820 (2023).
49. Y . Zhu, S. Mohapatra, J. C. Weisshaar, Rigidification of the Escherichia coli cytoplasm by the human
antimicrobial peptide LL-37 revealed by superresolution fluorescence microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.
A. 116, 1017-1026 (2019).
50. E. Dauty, A. S. Verkman, Actin cytoskeleton as the principal determinant of size-dependent DNA mobility in
cytoplasm. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 7823-7828 (2005).
51. R. Milo, R. Phillips, Cell Biology by the Numbers (Garland Science, New York, NY , 2016).
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
13
52. K. Kwapiszewska, K. Szczepanski, T. Kalwarczyk, B. Michalska, P. Patalas- Krawczyk, J. Szymanski, T.
Andryszewski, M. Iwan, J. Duszynski, R. Holyst, Nanoscale viscosity of cytoplasm is conserved in human cell
lines. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 6914-6920 (2020).
53. H. H. Park, A. A. Choi, K. Xu, Size-dependent suppression of molecular diffusivity in expandable hydrogels:
A single-molecule study. J. Phys. Chem. B 127, 3333-3339 (2023).
54. K. Xu, H. P. Babcock, X. Zhuang, Dual-objective STORM reveals three-dimensional filament organization in
the actin cytoskeleton. Nat. Methods 9, 185-188 (2012).
55. M. J. Rust, M. Bates, X. Zhuang, Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy
(STORM). Nat. Methods 3, 793-795 (2006).
56. B. Huang, W. Wang, M. Bates, X. Zhuang, Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical
reconstruction microscopy. Science 319, 810-813 (2008).
57. K. F. Geoghegan, Modification of amino groups. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 86, 15.2.1-15.2.20 (2016).
58. S. Moon, W. Li, M. Hauser, K. Xu, Graphene-enabled, spatially controlled electroporation of adherent cells for
live-cell super-resolution microscopy. ACS Nano 14, 5609-5617 (2020).
59. M. Wojcik, M. Hauser, W. Li, S. Moon, K. Xu, Graphene -enabled electron microscopy and correlated super -
resolution microscopy of wet cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7384 (2015).
Figure captions
Figure 1. Single-molecule displacement/diffusivity mapping (SM dM)-based protein diffusivity quantification in
Xenopus egg extract versus in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). (a) Schematic: Cytoplasmic extracts from Xenopus
eggs. (b) Schematic: In SM dM, paired excitation pulses are repeatedly applied across tandem camera frames, so
that transient single -molecule displacements are captured in the wide field for the time window defined by the
separation between the paired pulses, Δ t. (c) Example single -molecule images o f Cy3B-labeled bovine carbonic
anhydrase diffusing in the extract, shown as a magenta-green overlaid image for a tandem pair of frames at Δt = 1
ms. (d) Example distributions of SMdM-recorded 1-ms single-molecule displacements for ~200 pM Cy3B-labeled
hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL) diffusing in PBS (top) versus in extract (bottom). Blue curves: fits to our single-
mode diffusion model, with resultant apparent diffusion coefficients D and 95% confidence intervals marked in
each plot. (e) Similar to (d), but for succinylated HEWL (sHEWL). (f) SMdM-determined D values for 15 proteins
of varied sizes and charges (Table S1 ), in PBS (hollow symbols) and extract (filled symbols). Red squares:
Negatively charged proteins. Blue circles: Positively charged proteins with >+5 net charges. Light -blue circles:
Weakly positively charged proteins with ~+2 net charges. Each data point is an average of at least three SMdM
measurements from two or more extract samples. Solid curve: Expected D in PBS at room temperature according
to the Young−Carroad−Bell (YCB) model. Dashed curve: The PBS YCB values divided by 2.
Figure 2. Net-charge effects on protein diffusion in Xenopus egg extract. ( a) SM dM-determined diffusion
coefficients D in the extract relative to those in PBS for different proteins, as a function of their net charges in the
range of -25 to +25. (b) Blue and red symbols: Relative in -extract D values normalized to in-PBS values, plotted
as a function of added NaCl, for the positively charged HEWL-Cy3B (blue) and the negatively charged BCA-CF647
(red). Values were obtained through sequential SMdM in two color channels. Error bars: Sample standard deviations
between results from two or three SMd M measurements at each data point. Black diamonds (y-axis on the right):
Ratio between the PBS-normalized D values of the two proteins.
Figure 3. SMdM diffusivity mapping of HEWL in RNase-treated egg extracts further underscores the charge-sign
asymmetry of the cytoplasmic environment. (a) Color-coded SMdM diffusivity map of Cy3B-labeled HEWL in an
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
14
extract sample 20 min after RNase A treatment at room temperature. ( b) Distributions of single -molecule
displacements for the data in (a). Blue line: fit to the SMdM diffusion model, with resultant apparent diffusion
coefficient D and 95% confidence intervals noted. ( c) SMdM diffusivity map of the same sample after 3 h. ( d)
Distributions of single-molecule displacements for regions outside the low-diffusivity domains in (c). (e) Photos of
extract samples taken immediately (left) and after 3 h (right), after RNase A treatment or the addition of 1 mg/mL
polylysine, HEWL, or polyglutamic acid. ( f) Color-coded SMdM D map of Cy3B -labeled HEWL in an extract
sample supplemented with 1 mg/mL polylysine. ( g) Distribution of single -molecule displacements for regions
outside the low-diffusivity domains in (f).
Figure 4. Importance of the actin cytoskeletal network in molecular size-dependent diffusion suppression. (a) 3D-
STORM super -resolution images of phalloidin- labeled actin filaments in actin -preserved (top) and actin-
supplemented (bottom) Xenopus egg extracts. Color presents axial (depth) information. ( b) SMdM-determined D
values in the extract relative to in PBS, for the ~30 kDa BCA (black) and the ~660 kDa thyroglobulin (red), in actin-
inhibited, actin-intact, and actin -supplemented samples. Each data poin t corresponds to one independent SM dM
measurement for a different sample region, from ~3 samples under each condition.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
sHEWL
STI
BCA
BSA ADHBMY1
ApoferritinTHYGHEWL H1.0
PolyK Avidin Cas9-NLS
RNase A
CTRA
10 100 1000
0
20
40
60
80
100
(–), PBS
(–), extract
(+), PBS
(+), extract
(++), PBS
(++), extract
D (μm2/s)
Molecular weight (kDa)
YCB
YCB/2
Excitation
Frame 1 Frame 2
Δt
0
Time
x104
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0
1
2
3
4Count (103)
d in 1 ms (µm)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0
5
10Count (103)
d in 1 ms (µm)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0
2
4
6Count (103)
d in 1 ms (µm)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0
1
2
3
4Count (103)
d in 1 ms (µm)
HEWL in PBS
D (µm2/s):
102 ± 1
D (µm2/s):
14.3 ± 0.2
sHEWL in PBS
D (µm2/s):
96.1 ± 0.9
D (µm2/s):
47.6 ± 0.4
d e f
Frame 1 + Frame 2
a
HEWL in extract sHEWL in extract
b
c
5 µm
cytoplasm
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
−20 −10 0 10 20
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
sHEWL
STI BCA
BSA ADH
RNase A
CTRA
HEWL Avidin
Cas9-NLS
Net charge
D(Extract) / D(PBS)
0 100 200 300 400 500
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
BCA-CF647
HEWL-Cy3B
Ratio
D(Extract) / D(PBS)
Added NaCl (mM)
HEWL:BCA
a
b
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
0 500 1000
0
2
4
6Count (103)
d in 1 ms (nm)
0 500 1000
0
2
4
6
8Count (103)
d in 1 ms (nm)
0 500 1000
0
10
20
30
40
50Count (103)
d in 1 ms (nm)
+RNase, 20 min +RNase, 3 h +polyKa
b
f
5 µm
g
0 h 3 h
+polyK+HEWL +RNase Extract
e
c
d
5 µm 5 µm
30
0
10
D
(µm2/s)
20
D (µm2/s):
14.4 ± 0.1
D (µm2/s):
18.2 ± 0.2
D (µm2/s):
14.4 ± 0.2
+polyE
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50D(Extract) / D( PBS)
BCA (~30 kDa)
Thyroglobulin (~660 kDa)
Actin inhibited A ctin intact Actin added
Actin intactActin added
a b
2 µm
2 µm
z (nm)-400 400
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 26, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.24.609541doi: bioRxiv preprint