Plasmodium ARK1 regulates spindle formation during atypical mitosis and forms a divergent chromosomal passenger complex

Plasmodium ARK1 regulates spindle formation during atypical mitosis and forms a divergent chromosomal passenger complex | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Plasmodium ARK1 regulates spindle formation during atypical mitosis and forms a divergent chromosomal passenger complex Rita Tewari, Annu Nagar, Ryuji Yanase, Mohammad Zeeshan, David J. P. Ferguson, and 13 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7473364/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 26 Feb, 2026 Read the published version in Nature Communications → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Mitosis in Plasmodium spp., the causative agent of malaria, is fundamentally different from model eukaryotes, proceeding via a bipartite microtubule organising centre (MTOC) and lacking canonical regulators such as Polo and Bub1 kinases. During schizogony, asynchronous nuclear replication produces a multinucleate schizont, while rapid male gametogony generates an octaploid nucleus before gamete formation. Here, we identify Aurora-related kinase 1 (ARK1) as a key component of inner MTOC and spindle formation, controlling kinetochore dynamics and driving mitotic progression. Conditional ARK1 depletion disrupts spindle biogenesis, kinetochore segregation, karyokinesis and cytokinesis in both stages, and affects parasite transmission. Interactome analysis reveals ARK1 as the catalytic core of a non-canonical chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) containing two divergent inner centromere proteins (INCENPs) but lacking Survivin and Borealin. Comparative genomics indicates this CPC architecture arose early in Apicomplexa, replacing canonical centromere-targeting modules. These findings uncover a distinct mitotic machinery in Plasmodium and identify the ARK1–INCENP interface as a potential multistage target for malaria therapeutic intervention. Biological sciences/Microbiology/Parasitology/Parasite biology Biological sciences/Microbiology/Cellular microbiology Plasmodium Aurora kinase chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) INCENP spindle karyokinesis male gametogony MTOC cytokinesis transmission Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Introduction Plasmodium spp., the causative agent of malaria, is a haploid unicellular eukaryote of the phylum Apicomplexa, which is evolutionarily distant from most model organisms and has some unusual divergent features of cell division. During its life cycle, mitosis is closed and typified by two distinct forms: schizogony within vertebrate host cells, and male gametogony within the female mosquito gut (Fig. 1a). During asexual proliferation within host red blood cells (schizogony), repeated asynchronous nuclear division, without chromosome condensation, produces a multinucleate schizont. Subsequent budding produces invasive merozoites to continue the cycle. In contrast, during male gametogony three rounds of rapid genome replication to octaploid (1N to 8N) occur in 8 minutes within the intact nucleus. Karyokinesis and cytokinesis are synchronised with axoneme dynamics by replication and separation of a bipartite microtubule-organising centre (MTOC), chromosome condensation, and complementary de novo basal body formation, leading to the budding of eight flagellated male gametes. These events occur within 12 to 15 min of gametocyte activation, which is probably the most rapid mitosis amongst eukaryotes 1 . Compared to schizogony, mitosis in male gametogony is unusual, with atypical continuous spindles and an MTOC that spans the nuclear envelope connecting the spindle microtubules with those of the axoneme. Male gametes are the only flagellated stage in the parasite’s life cycle, and therefore the only stage where centriole formation and de novo replication of the basal body occurs 1 – 4 . Aurora-related kinases (ARKs) are multi-functional mitotic kinases that regulate eukaryotic cell division. They act on spindle pole duplication, kinetochore-microtubule attachment, spindle assembly, mitotic checkpoints and cytokinesis 5 – 8 . Budding yeast and the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum 9 have a single ARK to execute all functions, suggesting these to be ancestral to all eukaryotes 7 . However, multiple different lineages (e.g. vertebrates, plants, kinetoplastids) have one or more paralogs that resulted from parallel duplications, which subdivided functions over the different paralogs 7 , 10 . One paralog (Aurora B in humans) is the catalytic centre of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), a key regulator of mitotic events at the cell equator, which initially hitchhikes on the inner centromere and finally remains at the central spindle to orchestrate cytokinesis. In addition to the single Aurora kinase, the CPC consists of inner centromere protein (INCENP), Survivin and Borealin 11 , 12 that guide its localisation to kinetochores, spindle and the central spindle. It is also critical for mitotic histone phosphorylation, fixing errors in kinetochore-spindle attachment, and correct cytokinesis (Fig. 1b). In Plasmodium , there are also three ARKs, which have divergent sequence and mostly lack canonical scaffolds 10 , 13 , 14 . ARK1, 2 and 3 are refractory to gene disruption and indispensable during asexual blood stage schizogony in both P. berghei and P. falciparum 13 – 15 . ARK1 associates with the spindle pole body during schizogony 16 , 17 , but its function is not understood during this process and its location and function in sexual stages remains unknown. Our recent studies on ARK2 revealed its association with spindle microtubules (MTs) forming a divergent protein complex with EB1, myosin K and MISFIT 10 , but little is known of ARK1 and 3 functions during male gametogony or whether they are essential for parasite transmission. ARK1 function has been studied in another apicomplexan, Toxoplasma gondii , where it interacts with INCENP1-2 and is important for asexual replication, but its function during male gametogony is difficult to study because the sexual cycle of these parasites only takes place in the gut of cats (Fig. 1b) 18 . Here, we have investigated Plasmodium ARK1, integrating studies of location, function and molecular interactions across two life-cycle stages using P. falciparum (Pf, for asexual blood-stage schizogony) and P. berghei (Pb, for male gametogony). High-resolution live-cell imaging and expansion microscopy revealed ARK1 associated with the mitotic spindle, kinetochores, and the inner MTOC. Conditional gene knockout using rapamycin-DiCre in P. falciparum 19 and gene knockdown using a promoter-trap approach in P. berghei 20 revealed that ARK1 regulates spindle biogenesis, karyokinesis and cytokinesis during both schizogony and male gametogony, suggesting that ARK1 is a critical regulator of Plasmodium mitosis. Interactome analysis also identified Plasmodium ARK1 as a component of a non-canonical Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) comprising the two divergent INCENP1 and INCENP2, but without the canonical subunits Survivin and Borealin. These data underscore the evolutionary divergence of the Plasmodium mitotic machinery from that of its host, and therefore its potential as a target for therapeutic intervention at multiple stages of the lifecycle. Results ARK1 is present in asexual stage parasites undergoing mitotic division We studied the location of PfARK1 in asexual blood stages, using a rapamycin-inducible dimerizable Cre recombinase (DiCre)-based strategy to knockout the ARK1 gene in the 1G5DC parasite line (Extended Data Fig. 1) 19 . As a first step in this strategy, we generated a HA-PfARK1-loxP parasite line, and these parasites were used to locate ARK1 during parasite division using an antibody to the HA-tag. Indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) indicated that ARK1 is expressed in trophozoite and schizont stages, but not detectable in late schizonts and all developing merozoites (Fig. 2a). ARK1 was present as a punctum proximal to the MTOC also known as a centriolar plaque, as identified by staining with an anti-centrin antibody, present only in cells with two or more associated centrin puncta, indicative of ongoing mitosis (Fig. 2a). To gain a deeper insight into ARK1 dynamics, Ultrastructure Expansion Microscopy (U-ExM) was performed using an anti-tubulin antibody to track spindle biogenesis. As reported previously 21 , parasites possessed hemispindles prior to the onset of division, but PfARK1 was not expressed in these parasites or in parasites containing interpolar spindles (Fig. 2b, c). Strikingly, PfARK1 was specifically found associated with mitotic spindles and PfARK1-positive double puncta seemed to be present at the polar ends of the mitotic spindles (Fig. 2b, c). These data strongly indicate that ARK1 is expressed transiently, and only when parasites undergo mitotic division. These observations were also validated using the rodent malaria parasite, P. berghei , a well-established model for studying gametogony and parasite development within the mosquito host. The subcellular location of PbARK1 in asexual stages was examined by generating an endogenous, C-terminal GFP-tagged PbARK1 (PbARK1-GFP) transgenic parasite line (Extended Data Fig. 2a-c and Supplementary Notes). Live cell imaging of PbARK1-GFP in asexual blood stages revealed a diffuse location in early ring stages. During trophozoite and early schizont stages, PbARK1-GFP re-localised to discrete focal points in the nucleus (Extended Data Fig. 2d). As schizogony progressed, the focal points of fluorescence divided into two closely associated puncta, which followed subsequent asynchronous nuclear divisions and eventually became diffuse during the later stages (Extended Data Fig. 2d, e). These observations are consistent with the ARK1 location in P. falciparum as described above (Fig. 2a). PbARK1 is located in the nucleoplasm, at the spindle poles and at microtubules during male gametogony In male gametocytes, PbARK1-GFP had a diffuse distribution predominantly within the nucleoplasm. Within one-min post-activation this was concentrated to a single discrete focal point adjacent to the DNA (Fig. 2d), and then the distribution rapidly extended to form an arc-like structure, which within three-min post-activation divided into two distinct puncta positioned at opposite sides of the nucleus (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Video 1). The two PbARK1-GFP foci elongated again, forming two arc-like structures along the periphery of the nucleus (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Video 2). By 6- to 8-min post-activation, a subsequent round of extension and division had produced eight discrete PbARK1-GFP foci, coincident with the completion of three successive rounds of mitosis (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Video 3). The arc-like pattern of PbARK1 observed in live cell imaging coincided with the pattern of anti-tubulin staining in IFA and U-ExM, suggesting an association with the mitotic spindle and spindle poles (Fig. 2e and Extended Data Fig. 2f). To further investigate ARK1 location, dynamics, and association with mitotic spindles and kinetochore segregation, we compared the location of PbARK1 with that of the kinetochore marker NDC80, spindle marker ARK2 and cytoplasmic axonemal protein kinesin-8B. We generated dual fluorescent parasite lines expressing PbARK1-GFP (green) and either PbNDC80-mCherry (magenta), PbARK2-mCherry (magenta) or Pbkinesin-8B-mCherry (magenta) by genetic cross as described previously 4 . Live-cell imaging showed that both PbARK1-GFP and PbNDC80-mCherry were located next to the Hoechst-stained DNA, partially overlapping at the spindle but not at the spindle poles (Fig. 2f left panel, Extended Data Fig. 2g, and Supplementary Video 4). 3D-structured illumination microscopy (SIM) at one-min post-activation showed a clear association of PbNDC80-mCherry with PbARK1-GFP at the spindle but not at the spindle poles (Fig. 2f right panel). In parasite lines expressing PbARK1-GFP and PbARK2-mCherry, these proteins were co-located at the spindle (Fig. 2g left panel, Extended Data Fig. 2h, and Supplementary Video 5). Further 3D-SIM at one-min post-activation showed an association of PbARK1-GFP with PbARK2-mCherry at the spindle, with PbARK1-GFP more outside at the spindle poles (Fig. 2g right panel). However, in a parasite line expressing PbARK1-GFP and Pbkinesin-8B-mCherry (a cytoplasmic marker) there was no overlap between these two proteins (Fig. 2h left panel and Extended Data Fig. 2i), an observation which was further substantiated by 3D-SIM imaging (Fig. 2h right panel). During meiotic stages of development post-fertilisation, PbARK1-GFP was diffuse in the cytoplasm, with transient nuclear foci forming in zygotes and disappearing in mature ookinetes (Extended data Fig. 3a and Supplementary Notes). A diffuse distribution was also observed throughout oocyst and sporozoite stages, including those from salivary glands (Extended Data Fig. 3b and Supplementary Notes). In liver stages (in HepG2-infected cells), the PbARK1-GFP signal remained diffuse even at 48 hours post infection (h.p.i), with slight perinuclear enrichment at 64 h.p.i (Extended Data Fig. 3c and Supplementary Notes). PfARK1 regulates spindle formation and karyokinesis The functional role of PfARK1 in asexual blood stage development was assessed by examining the effect of deleting the gene. Rapamycin (RAP) treatment of HA-PfARK1-loxP parasites efficiently excised the floxed sequence (Extended Data Fig. 1c) and caused depletion of PfARK1 protein (Extended Data Fig. 1d). Synchronized ring stage cultures of 1G5DC-SkipFlox (control) (Extended Data Fig. 4a) or HA-PfARK1-loxP parasite lines were treated with RAP or DMSO (control) and parasite growth was monitored every 24 h. In cycle 0 (RAP-treatment) there was little effect on the parasitaemia of HA-PfARK1-loxP parasites. However, a significant growth defect was observed at the beginning of the next cycle (cycle 1) as indicated by a marked reduction in parasitaemia (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 4b), whilst there was almost no effect of RAP treatment on 1G5DC-SkipFlox (Extended Data Fig. 4a). This growth defect was further accentuated in subsequent cycles. Microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained blood smears suggested normal ring to trophozoite development in cycle 1 DMSO-treated parasites (Extended Data Fig. 4c). However, following RAP treatment and PfARK1 depletion, a significant number of parasites were pyknotic (at ~ 96 hpi) and fewer rings were found in cycle 2 (Fig. 3b). Schizont development following treatment with E64 to block late schizont maturation and merozoite egress was analysed: a significant number PfARK1-depleted cycle 1 schizonts had abnormal morphology, with unsegregated nuclei (Fig. 3c and Extended Data Fig. 4d), which is consistent with the role of PfARK1 in nuclear division. This suggestion, that the decrease in parasitaemia resulting from PfARK1 depletion was due to its role in nuclear division and/or schizont maturation, was investigated further. To begin to understand how PfARK1 regulates asexual cell division, MTOC duplication and spindle formation were examined. U-ExM revealed the formation of various forms of spindles as described earlier with one or two centrin-labelled foci on the cytoplasmic side of the nuclear envelope ( Fig. 3d ) and associated with NHS-ester labelled MTOCs or associated with mitotic spindles 21 , 22 . In PfARK1-depleted parasites there were fewer spindles indicated by either absent or speckled tubulin staining (Fig. 3d and Extended Fig. 4e, grey arrow). As mentioned above, the nuclei appeared unsegregated with associated multiple centrin foci, and centrin aggregates were seen away from the nuclei and disorganized (Fig. 3d and Extended Fig. 4e, square). Collectively, these data suggested that while the MTOC duplication was unaltered, it was disorganized and spindle formation and karyokinesis were impaired in PfARK1-depleted parasites. PfARK1 depletion impairs segmentation of daughter merozoites At the end of schizogony, segmentation of the schizont by invagination of the parasite plasma membrane leads to formation of merozoites prior to their egress. IFAs were performed using antibody to MSP1, a parasite surface marker, to assess segmentation following ARK1 depletion. MSP1 fluorescence with a bunch of grape-like contours, characterized the membrane of control parasites, but in contrast, PfARK1-depleted parasites either lacked MSP1 staining, or contained large aggregations that encompassed multiple merozoites or unsegregated nuclei (Fig. 3e, cyan arrow). U-ExM of mature (segmented) schizonts with anti-GAP45 antibody-labelling revealed inner membrane complex (IMC) and tubulin labelled subpellicular MT, and rhoptries labeled with NHS-ester (Fig. 3f). However, for the PfARK1-depleted parasites, several unsegregated nuclei were present and these cells either lacked GAP45 staining, or the parasite pellicle (the plasma membrane/IMC) was disorganized (Fig. 3f, cyan arrow). NHS-ester labelled rhoptries were found with some merozoites, typically the ones with GAP45 staining. In some parasites rhoptries were either not formed properly or were absent, which may be due to arrested division of these parasites prior to rhoptry formation. In addition, subpellicular MT were either not observed in the cell or were mislocalised. These observations suggest impaired cytokinesis of daughter merozoites upon PfARK1 depletion. To study the effect of PfARK1 depletion on merozoite release and egress, time-lapse microscopy was performed 23 . For this purpose, parasites were treated with protein kinase G (PKG)-inhibitor ML-10 to allow schizont maturation but prevent egress, then its removal allowed egress, which was captured by time-lapse microscopy 24 , 25 . Egress and dispersal of merozoites for control parasites was observed (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Video 6), and while egress from the erythrocyte initially appeared almost normal in PfARK1-depleted parasites, the merozoites either remained attached to the residual body or clumped together (Fig. 3g, magenta arrows, and Supplementary Videos 7, 8) even after prolonged duration. These defects likely result from the abnormal nuclear segregation and cytokinesis in PfARK1-depleted parasites. PbARK1 knockdown reveals an essential role during male gametogony and parasite transmission Previous analysis by gene disruption had shown that PbARK1 is probably essential for asexual blood-stage development 14 . To be able to manipulate its expression in sexual stages we used a promoter trap strategy, replacing the ark1 promoter with the promoter from ama1 , resulting in P ama1 ark1 hereafter referred as ( ark1PTD ), a gene which is not transcribed in gametocytes but is highly expressed in asexual blood stages (Extended Data Fig. 5a) 26 . Correct genetic integration in the transgenic parasite line was confirmed by PCR (Extended Data Fig. 5b), and ark1 transcription was shown to be downregulated in ark1PTD gametocytes by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4a). A phenotypic analysis of these ark1PTD parasites was then performed at different stages of parasite development within the mosquito. Phenotypic analysis revealed that male gametogony (as scored by exflagellation centres) was severely affected in the ark1PTD line compared to GFP control (wild-type-GFP; WT-GFP) parasite (Fig. 4b) 27 , and therefore significantly fewer ookinetes (differentiated zygotes after fertilisation) were formed (Fig. 4c). In mosquitoes fed with ark1PTD parasites, we observed significantly fewer oocysts in the midgut at day 7 post infection, in contrast to the hundreds of oocysts in mosquitoes fed WT-GFP parasites (Fig. 4d). The number of ark1PTD oocysts was further reduced by day 14 and day 21 post infection compared to WT-GFP oocysts (Fig. 4d). The ark1PTD oocysts were also significantly smaller than the WT-GFP oocysts 7 days post infection and diminished further by day 21 post infection (Fig. 4e, f). The number of salivary glands sporozoites was significantly reduced in ark1PTD parasites on day 21 (Extended Data Fig. 5c). To further confirm the absence of sporogony, mosquitoes that had been fed with ark1PTD or WT-GFP parasites were allowed to feed on susceptible naïve mice. Mosquitoes infected with WT-GFP parasites successfully transmitted the parasite, with blood-stage infection detected in naïve mice after 4 days. In contrast, ark1PTD parasites failed to transmit in most experiments (five out of eight) (Extended Data Fig. 5d). However, on three occasions, they were able to establish infection in bite-back experiments, although the prepatent period was markedly prolonged, with blood-stage parasites first detected 14 days post-infection (Extended Data Fig. 5d). To investigate the effect of Pbark1 downregulation at the genome wide level, we performed RNA-seq analysis in triplicate, starting with total RNA extracted from purified ark1PTD and WT-GFP gametocytes at two time points: before activation (non-activated, 0 min) and at 30 min post-activation (mpa). Differences in gene expression between the correspondent samples were detected. In non-activated gametocytes, only a small number of differentially expressed genes were identified in the ark1PTD sample, with 10 genes up- and 8 genes downregulated, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 5e and Supplementary Table 1). Those genes included several fam a and b proteins known to be highly variable during life cycle progression due to their involvement in host immune response modulation 28 . They were therefore not considered as significant. At 30 mpa, 23 genes were upregulated including several conserved Plasmodium proteins with unknown function as well as PBANKA_1206900, a tubulin beta chain and putatively critical during gametocyte formation 29 . A significantly higher number of genes (229) were downregulated (Extended Data Fig. 5f and Supplementary Table 1). These genes included several protein kinases, e.g. PBANKA_1228800 and calcium-dependent protein kinase 5 (CDPK5 – PBANKA_1351500), as well as genes involved in lipid biosynthesis including PBANKA_0201300, a putative lysophospholipase, PBANKA_1127000, and a choline/ethanolaminephosphotransferase. Also, down-regulated were myosin essential light chain (ELC) and skeleton-binding protein 1 (PBANKA_1101300), as well as several enzymes known to be critical for sexual differentiation. Gene ontology (GO) analysis also revealed that several genes detected as downregulated were associated with ribosome biogenesis (Extended Data Fig. 5g). These data indicate not only a potential cell cycle arrest but also most likely stress sensing and translational inhibition as a result of PbARK1 depletion. ark1PTD parasites have defective spindle formation, MTOC separation, and axoneme formation during male gametogony To further investigate the function of PbARK1 during male gametogony, WT-GFP and ark1PTD male gametocytes were observed during gametogony using U-ExM. In WT-GFP male gametocytes at 8 mpa, individual MTOCs were distinct and separated, whereas in ark1PTD male gametocytes multiple MTOCs were clumped and aggregated together (Fig. 4g and Extended Data Fig. 6a). At 15 mpa, WT-GFP male gametocytes were observed undergoing exflagellation, whereas in ark1PTD male gametocytes the MTOCs were still clumped together and no exflagellation was observed (Fig. 4g and Extended Data Fig. 6a). We examined whether the lack of MTOC separation in the ark1PTD line led us to examine whether this was caused by a defect in spindle formation. At 8 mpa, long spindles with clearly separated MTOCs were present in WT-GFP parasites, but in ark1PTD lines, short spindles, with the two MTOCs remaining close together (Fig. 5a, b) were present. Measurement showed that ark1PTD spindles were significantly shorter (~ 0.8 µm) than WT-GFP spindles (~ 2.5 µm; Fig. 5c). These findings corroborated studies on PfARK1 during schizogony as depletion of the kinase resulted in abnormal spindle formation and accumulation of MTOCs around unsegregated nuclei (Fig. 3d). TEM observations further revealed structural defects in ark1PTD male gametocytes. At 8 mpa, in the ark1PTD line, MTOCs formed a normal bipartite structure consisting of an inner spindle MTOC and an outer basal body MTOC, similar to those in WT-GFP male gametocytes, and normal axoneme formation was observed (Fig. 5dA-D, I-L and Extended Data Fig. 6bA-D), However, we also observed MTOCs that appeared detached from the nucleus in the ark1 PTD line (Fig. 5dI, J and Extended Data Fig. 6bA, B, D). As revealed by expansion microscopy, multiple basal body MTOCs were often aggregated and clumped together (Fig. 5dL). Within the cytoplasm, we observed singlet or doublet MT that may have been axoneme precursors and likely represent failures in axoneme formation (Fig. 5dK, L). At 15 mpa, WT-GFP gametocytes had started to form gametes with flagellum and nucleus (Fig. 5dE, F, G, H), while in the ark1PTD line there was incomplete axoneme formation and exflagellation rarely occurred (Fig. 5dM-P and Extended Data Fig. 6bE-H). In addition, two basal body MTOCs remained close together without proper separation (Fig. 5dM, N, P), with short spindle MT visible between them (Fig. 5dP and Extended Data Fig. 6c). PbARK1 is part of a divergent chromosome passenger complex (CPC) with two INCENP proteins To explain the ARK1 phenotypes and confirm the logic of the observed subcellular localisations, we wanted to understand what protein scaffolds or modulator proteins might direct ARK1 activity and localisation during both asexual and sexual stages of the parasite. We therefore prepared lysates of P. berghei schizonts and male gametocytes from PbARK1-GFP and WT-GFP control parasites, immunoprecipated the protein with GFP-Trap and then identified bound proteins using mass spectrometry. At both stages we identified two divergent inner centromere proteins (INCENP1/2) as major ARK1 interactors (Fig. 6a and Extended Data Fig. 7). Although the differences were not significant (n = 2 for each sample), in the male gametocyte sample we observed co-variation of various spindle and kinetochore proteins amongst the pulldowns (Supplementary Table 2): for example, the putative ARK2-based spindle complex including MISFIT-MyoK-EB1, several kinetochore subunits e.g. Apicomplexan Kinetochore proteins (AKiTs) 1, 3, 5 and 7 and the condensin-II-specific subunits CapH2-G2-D3. Strikingly, we saw no survivin/borealin-like proteins in the interactome, confirming earlier predictions that Plasmodium spp., and more generally apicomplexans, lack other conserved components of the CPC (Fig. 6c). Since the spatiotemporal dynamics of ARK1 suggest that it may not act as the classic passenger complex on chromosomes, it is possible that the chromatin-directing function of Survivin and Borealin has become obsolete for apicomplexans and that the structural motifs for localisation and activation of ARK1 by INCENP1 and 2 might be revealed upon detailed comparative sequence analyses. T. gondii , another apicomplexan, sister to Plasmodium spp. also has two INCENP paralogs that interact with TgARK1, so we sought to reconstruct the evolutionary history of the INCENP proteins with a focus on alveolates and apicomplexans (Fig. 6b, c). The duplication that gave rise to INCENP1 and INCENP2 can be traced back to the common ancestor of all Apicomplexa (sensu stricto). We found parallel but separate duplications in other different alveolate lineages such as apicomplexpan-like Squirmida, Chrompodellida and dinoflagellate-related lineages concomitant with the loss of borealin/survivin (Fig. 6c), suggesting INCENP duplications might compensate for loss of these chromatin-directing subunits. Interestingly, INCENP2 is absent from Piroplasmida, lineages which have also lost ARK2 and ARK3, suggesting that INCENP2 might also play a role in ARK2/3-based regulatory pathways. A co-fold model of P. berghei INCENP1/2 and ARK1 using AlphaFold3, suggests that the conserved IN-box region involved in kinase interaction is flanked in all apicomplexan proteins by N- and C-terminal extensions that form a beta-sheet – folding INCENP1/2 around ARK1 (Fig. 6b and Extended Data Fig. 8). In addition, the C-terminal extension has a conserved CxC motif, possibly involved in posttranslational modification (Fig. 6b). We could only predict a coiled-coil in the N-terminus of INCENP1, and no further structural features could be discerned for INCENP2 using AlphaFold3. Such absence of any feature makes it hard to predict the binding mode of INCENP2 either as a single ARK1-INCENP2 interaction or forming an INCENP2-ARK1-INCENP1 trimeric complex. Finally, we sought whether any non-canonical ARK1/INCENP features might indicate alternative CPC functions in Plasmodium spp., such as the highly conserved autophosphorylation sites in both Aurora B and INCENP, which are crucial for the kinase activity of the CPC in vertebrates 30 . We found that both the broadly conserved autophosphorylation site in the activation loop of Aurora kinases (RxTxCGT) and the activating phosphosite on INCENP (RTSS in human) are markedly different (GxSH in ARK1) and (RTSS absent from INCENP1/2). However, some Aurora consensus sites can be found in the vicinity among INCENP1/2 paralogs (Fig. 6b – green boxes). ARK2 paralogs have a conserved Aurora activation loop, while ARK3 has a serine-rich activation loop with multiple candidate activating phosphorylation sites (Fig. 6c). The absence of clear conserved auto/trans-phosphorylation sites between ARK1 and INCENP1/2 in Plasmodium spp. indicate CPC kinase activity might be regulated in a different fashion, possibly by input of another kinase. Discussion Our cross-stage analysis identified ARK1 as a central organiser of Plasmodium mitosis using P. falciparum and P. berghei model systems. First, ARK1 localises to the spindle and inner MTOC specifically during mitosis, and its depletion in P. falciparum reduces spindle formation, prevents proper karyokinesis, disrupts segmentation and impedes egress. Second, during the rapid mitoses of male gametogony, P. berghei ARK1 dynamics follow spindle poles; knockdown shortens spindles, block MTOC separation and axoneme biogenesis, and abolishes transmission. These phenotypes position ARK1 upstream of both chromosome segregation and gamete formation. Our findings show that ARK1 is preferentially expressed and targeted during the mitotic stages marked by spindle formation. Live cell imaging and expansion microscopy revealed that ARK1 locates to the spindle apparatus and the spindle poles, corresponding to the inner core of the bipartite MTOC 4 , 21 . Expansion microscopy using centrosome (centrin) and microtubule (tubulin) markers confirmed that ARK1 associates with spindle poles within the inner MTOC in both mitotic stages. Some of these features had been observed earlier for P. falciparum ARK1 and further it had been shown that its location is limited to mitotically dividing stages 17 . Dual fluorescence microscopy analysis during male gametogony revealed that it colocalised with ARK2, another aurora kinase reported recently, and the kinetochore marker NDC80 at the plus ends of spindle microtubules, suggesting a cooperative role for ARK1 and ARK2 at equatorial spindles. It also has a role in kinetochore dynamics, as observed previously for ARK2 10 . However, live cell imaging in P. berghei clearly showed that it is part of the inner MTOC as it does not colocalise with the basal body and axoneme marker, kinesin-8B. This contrasts with T. gondii ARK1, which, when tagged at the N-terminus, exhibited a dynamic localisation to both nucleus and cytoplasm during division, but remained predominantly nuclear in non-dividing cells 18 , 31 . Its colocalisation with kinetochore NDC80 and ARK2 markers further supports a dual role in spindle organization, kinetochore segregation, and spindle pole integrity—reminiscent of Aurora B, which localises to centromeres, the central spindle, and the spindle midzone 5 , 6 , 32 , 33 . Functional genetic studies in P. falciparum and P. berghei had indicated that ARK1 is likely essential in asexual blood stages 13 , 14 . Attempts to generate conditional knockdowns using the DD/Shield system in P. falciparum were unsuccessful, as reported recently 17 . Here using the DiCre-Rapamycin system for P. falciparum 19 and promoter trap strategy for P. berghei 20 , we demonstrate that ARK1 depletion leads to defects in spindle formation and karyokinesis. In P. falciparum , ARK1 is required for proper spindle elongation, parasite growth, cytokinesis and egress. In Toxoplasma , overexpression of a kinase dead mutant of TgARK1 disrupts chromosome segregation and spindle pole body maturation, similar to some of the division defects observed here in asexual stages, although the mechanism was unexplored 18 , 31 . During male gametogony, ARK1 knockdown led to defects in the spindle apparatus and failure of MTOC separation, suggesting its associated function with the outer basal body 4 . This was accompanied by abnormal axoneme formation and very few flagellated male gametes, indicating a failure in MTOC-basal body segregation. These results suggest that while ARK1 is part of the inner MTOC, its functional association with the outer MTOC is essential for successful mitosis and gamete formation, similar to the egress and spindle elongation defects seen in P. falciparum . These features also show some resemblance to those of Aurora B in many model systems 5 , 6 , 32 , 33 . Our protein interactome analysis reveals that ARK1 is part of a non-canonical chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), comprising two divergent INCENP homologs and lacking the canonical chromatin-targeting components Borealin and Survivin. This is consistent with earlier molecular cell biological studies in Toxoplasma 18 . While studies in Toxoplasma also reported two INCENPs, they did not detect the presence or absence of other CPC components. The lack of chromatin-targeting components might suggest that INCENP1/2 can facilitate such interactions themselves or simply mean these are lost and replaced by interactions of different proteins. For instance, INCENPs in apicomplexans may form alternative CPC complexes, similar to Trypanosoma , where INCENP associates with kinesin-1A/B 34 . A potential candidate kinesin might be kinesin-8X, which shows a similar localisation pattern during different life stages as ARK1 35 . Interestingly, plants and heterokont algae also harbour divergent Survivin-like proteins, with a central conserved but highly divergent helix suggesting a possible broader evolutionary divergence of CPC components across eukaryotes 36 . Future studies will need to include a further scrutiny of INCENP1/2 localisation and interactomes to determine whether any new CPC components might be present in apicomplexans. Comparative genomics provides an evolutionary scenario for this atypical CPC. INCENP duplication into INCENP1 and INCENP2 likely arose in the apicomplexan ancestor, concomitant with the loss of Survivin and Borealin (Fig. 6). Notably, INCENP2 has been secondarily lost in piroplasmids, which also lack ARK2 and ARK3, hinting at functional coupling between Aurora paralogs and specific INCENP variants. Structural predictions using AlphaFold3 suggest that apicomplexan INCENPs contain extended IN-box regions that fold around the ARK1 kinase domain and feature a conserved CxC motif absent from other eukaryotic homologs. At the same time, ARK1 itself shows a divergent activation loop (GxSH instead of the canonical RxT), and INCENPs lack the canonical transphosphorylation site (TSS) site found in other eukaryotes. Such changes might indicate that other kinases are necessary to activate ARK1. Together, these features indicate that apicomplexans have likely rewired CPC architecture and regulation, replacing canonical chromatin-targeting logic with INCENP-centric scaffolds that localise ARK1 at the inner MTOC, spindle and nucleoplasm. While the function of the other two ARKs-ARK2 and ARK3- is unclear, at least in asexual stages, our recent studies on PbARK2 have provided insights into its role in sexual transmission stages. While ARK2 regulates spindle dynamics during male gametogony just like ARK1 in the present studies, surprisingly, its deletion did not impact exflagellation, unlike that of the ARK1 mutant (Fig. 4b). Previous studies also revealed that PbARK2 deletion caused an increase in the expression of ARK1 and ARK3 10 . Therefore, in the light of the present work, it is reasonable to suggest that ARK1 and ARK2 may have some overlap of function during male gametogony, particularly in spindle biogenesis. It was also interesting to note that the deletion of PfARK1 resulted in higher PfARK2 levels in schizonts (Extended Data Fig. 1f), although this increase was insufficient to complement the PfARK1 mutant. While there may be some overlap in ARK1 and ARK2 function, each is indispensable for parasite survival. Overall, this study suggests that Plasmodium ARK1 regulates spindle elongation during mitotic division and associates at the inner nuclear pole of the MTOC. However, its association with the outer MTOC is essential for karyokinesis and for flagellated gamete formation. ARK1 appears to represent a unique Aurora kinase paralog that, while divergent in structure, shares functional similarities with Aurora B in humans. This suggests that Plasmodium has evolved an atypical mechanism of cell division, where many of the canonical molecules are either missing or highly divergent, reflecting the parasite’s adaptation to complex life cycle transitions. Methods P. falciparum cultures Plasmodium falciparum strain 1G5DC was obtained from European Malaria Reagent Repository (EMRR) and DSM1 was obtained from BEI resources, Malaria Research and Reference Reagents Resource Centre (MR4), American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Parasites were maintained in O + human erythrocytes (5% hematocrit) in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 0.5% Albumax II and 50 µg/mL hypoxanthine 37 . Cultures were maintained at 37°C under a mixture of 5% CO 2 , 3% O 2 , and 91.8% N 2 or 5% CO 2 . Fresh erythrocytes and culture medium were used to dilute parasites to maintain 3–5% parasitaemia and 5% haematocrit. Relevant drugs were used during the culture of various transgenic lines, as described below. Parasite synchronization was carried out using 5% sorbitol as described previously 38 . Generation of transgenic parasite lines All PCR primers used in this study were synthesized by Sigma and are indicated in Supplementary Table 3. 1G5DC SkipFlox A dimerisable Cre recombinase (diCre) expressing parasite line was generated by transfecting pSkipFlox plasmid, a kind gift from Tobias Spielmann (Addgene Plasmid #85797) into the parent line 1G5DC 19 . Parasites were selected in the presence of 2.5 µg/ml of blasticidin. pSLI-HA-ARK1- loxP To generate a conditional knockout transgenic parasite, a selection-linked integration (SLI) approach was used. To generate the construct, a 592 bp homology region corresponding to the 5’-end of the PfARK1 gene was amplified using primers (P1 and P2) derived from 3D7 genomic DNA. The PCR product was cloned into NotI and PmeI sites upstream of loxP and a Myc-tag coding sequence in the pSLI-N-sandwich-loxP (K13) vector, which was a gift from Tobias Spielmann (Addgene Plasmid #85793). A recodonised sequence version of full-length PfARK1 with a N-terminal 3xHA tag and followed by a loxP site was custom synthesised as a G-block (Genscript). The G-block was cloned in the above construct downstream of yDHODH using NheI and XhoI restriction sites 19 . P. falciparum transfection The pSLI-HA-PfARK1-loxP construct was transfected in 1G5DC SkipFlox parasites at the ring stage using ~ 100µg of purified plasmid DNA. Transgenic parasites were selected by using 2nM WR99210 and integrants were then enriched using 1.5µM DSM-1. The parasites that appeared after drug selection were genotyped using PCR primers (Supplementary Table 3 and Extended Data Fig. 1a). The desired integration was confirmed by sequencing of PCR products. Conditional knockout of PfARK1 HA-PfARK1-loxP parasites were treated with 250 nM rapamycin at ring stage for 24 hours. The genomic DNA was isolated from DMSO/RAP-treated parasites and excision of the PfARK1 locus flanked by loxP sites in the transgenic parasite was confirmed by PCR using primers (P7/P8). P. falciparum growth rate assays HA-PfARK1-loxP parasites were cultured in the presence of 10 nM WR99210, 2.5 µg/ml blasticidin and 1.5µM DSM-1. Cultures were maintained at 2% hematocrit and 7–8% parasitaemia. To perform the growth rate assay, 1G5DC-SkipFlox and HA-PfARK1-LoxP parasites were synchronised at ring stage for two cycles using 5% sorbitol for 20 min at 37°C, and the rings were seeded at 0.5% parasitaemia and 2% hematocrit. To deplete ARK1, parasites were treated with either DMSO (vehicle control) or 250 nM rapamycin for 24 h. Thin Giemsa-stained blood smears were examined periodically under a microscope to quantify the parasitaemia at different parasite stages. For assessment of parasitaemia by flow cytometry, cells were fixed by incubation in a solution containing 1% paraformaldehyde and 0.0075% glutaraldehyde at ambient temperature for 15 min on an end-to-end rocker. Post-fixation, samples were either stored at 4°C or stained immediately with Hoechst 33342 dye at 37°C for 10 min. After staining, samples were washed with FACS buffer and then analysed on either BDverse (BD Biosciences) or BD FACSymphony A1 Flow Cytometers, acquiring between 10,000 and 100,000 events per sample. Data analysis was carried out using FlowJo software version 10.10.0. Ethics statement (Studies on P. berghei ) All animal procedures were approved following an ethical review process and conducted in accordance with the United Kingdom Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, under Home Office Project Licenses (PDD2D5182 and PP3589958). Female CD1 outbred mice (6 to 8 weeks old) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories and used for all experiments carried out in the UK. Purification of P. berghei schizonts and gametocytes Blood-stage parasites were obtained from infected mice on day 4 post-infection and cultured at 37°C with gentle rotation (100 rpm) for 11 or 24 hours. Schizonts were purified the following day using a 60% v/v NycoDenz gradient prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The NycoDenz stock solution consisted of 27.6% w/v NycoDenz in 5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 3 mM KCl, and 0.3 mM EDTA. Gametocyte purification was performed by first infecting phenylhydrazine-treated mice 39 , followed by sulfadiazine treatment two days post-infection to enrich for gametocytes. Blood was collected on day 4 post-infection, and gametocyte-infected cells were purified using a 48% v/v NycoDenz gradient in PBS, prepared from the same NycoDenz stock solution. Gametocytes were collected from the interface and subsequently activated for downstream assays 40 . Generation of P. berghei transgenic parasites GFP-tagging constructs were generated using the p277 plasmid vector and transfected into parasites as previously described 41 . A schematic representation of the wild-type ark1 locus, the GFP-tagging constructs, and the recombined ark1 locus is shown in Extended Data Fig. 2a. Correct integration of the gfp sequence at the ark1 locus was confirmed by diagnostic PCR using primer 1 (intArk1tg) and primer 2 (ol492), as indicated in Extended Data Fig. 2b. The expression of native ARK1-GFP was confirmed by Western blot analysis (Extended Data Fig. 2c). To investigate the function of ARK1, a promoter trap strategy was employed using double homologous recombination to generate a conditional knockdown line ( ark1PTD ). The knockdown construct was derived from the P ama1 plasmid (pSS368), in which ark1 was placed under the control of the ama1 promoter, as previously described 20 . A schematic representation of the endogenous ark1 locus, the targeting constructs, and the recombined ark1 locus is shown in Extended Data Fig. 5a. Diagnostic PCR was performed to confirm successful integration, as outlined in Extended Data Fig. 5a. Integration at the 5′ locus was verified using primers intPTD31_5 (Primer 1) and 5′-intPTD (Primer 2), while integration at the 3′ end was confirmed using primers intPTD31_3 (Primer 3) and 3′-intPTama1 (Primer 4) (Extended Data Fig. 5b). Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 3. Transfections were carried out by electroporation using P. berghei ANKA line 2.34 for GFP-tagging experiments and ANKA line 507cl1 expressing GFP for generation of the knockdown line 27 . Generation of dual tagged parasite lines ( P. berghei ) To generate dual-labelled parasites, ARK1-GFP parasites were mixed in equal proportions with either NDC80-mCherry, ARK2-mCherry, or kinesin-8B-mCherry labelled parasites and co-injected into mice. Four to five days post-infection, when gametocytaemia was high, Anopheles mosquitoes were allowed to feed on the infected mice. Mosquitoes were examined for oocyst development and sporozoite formation at days 14 and 21 post-feeding. Infected mosquitoes were then used to infect naïve mice via mosquito bite-back. Blood-stage infection was assessed 4–5 days later by Giemsa-stained blood smear microscopy. In this way, parasites expressing both ARK1-GFP and either NDC80-mCherry, ARK2-mCherry, or kinesin-8B-mCherry were obtained. Gametocytes from these mixed lines were purified, and fluorescence microscopy was performed as described below to examine protein co-localisation. P. berghei phenotype analyses Infections were initiated by intraperitoneal injection of approximately 50,000 P. berghei parasites from WT-GFP or ark1PTD lines into mice. Asexual stages and gametocyte production were monitored on Giemsa-stained thin smears. Four to five days post-infection, exflagellation and ookinete conversion were assessed using a Zeiss AxioImager M2 microscope with an AxioCam ICc1 digital camera. For mosquito transmission assays, 30–50 Anopheles stephensi (SD 500) mosquitoes were allowed to feed for 20 min on anaesthetised, infected mice with ~ 15% asexual parasitaemia and comparable gametocyte levels (as determined by Giemsa-stained smears). To evaluate midgut infection, ~ 15 mosquito guts were dissected on day 7, 14 and 21 post-feeding, and oocysts were counted using a 63× oil immersion objective on the same microscope setup. Sporozoites in oocysts were counted on day 14 and day 21 post feeding. Salivary glands were isolated on day 21 to count the sporozoites. Bite-back experiments were performed 21 days post-feeding using naïve mice, and blood smears were examined after 3–4 days. All experiments were conducted at least three times to assess the phenotype. Immunofluorescence Assay (IFAs) P. falciparum - Immunofluorescence assays (IFA) were conducted on thin blood smears following a previously described protocol 42 . In brief, air-dried smears were fixed for 2 min using ice cold 1:1 mixture of methanol and acetone. The smears were dried to remove any traces of methanol/acetone followed by blocking with 3% BSA for 45 minutes at room temperature. Samples were incubated with primary antibodies for 12 h at 4°C. After thorough washing with 1X PBS, Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies were added and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Smears were then mounted with VectaShield medium (Vector Laboratories Inc.) containing DAPI for nuclear staining. Microscopy was performed using a LSM980 AR confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss) or Zeiss Axio Observer microscope and image processing was carried out using Zeiss ZEN Blue (versions 3.1 or 3.9). Representative z-stack images were selected for figure preparation unless indicated otherwise. IFA or U-ExM (described below) with MSP1 or GAP45 antibodies was performed to assess segmentation in schizonts that had been treated with 10 µM E64 at ~ 42 h.p.i (cycle 1) for 4–5 hours to prevent egress and allow complete maturation. P. berghei - Purified gametocytes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in microtubule-stabilising buffer on poly-L-lysine–coated slides (Sigma), permeabilised with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, and blocked with 10% goat serum and 3% BSA in PBS. Primary antibodies—rabbit anti-GFP (1:250, Thermo Fisher) and mouse anti–α-tubulin (1:1000, Sigma)—were diluted in 1% BSA and 10% goat serum in PBS and incubated for 1 h. Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit and Alexa Fluor 568 anti-mouse secondary antibodies (1:1000, Invitrogen) were applied for 45 min in the dark. Slides were washed with PBS between steps, mounted with Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Labs), and sealed. Images were acquired using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope with a 63× oil immersion objective and AxioCam ICc1 camera. Fluorescence was adjusted using Axiovision (Rel. 4.8) software. Experiments were repeated at least three times, and 20–30 cells per stage were analysed. See figure legends for additional details. P. falciparum live-cell imaging Live imaging was carried out with minor modifications to previously described protocols 25 . HA-PfARK1-loxP parasites were synchronized at the ring stage and treated with either DMSO or 250 nM rapamycin for 24 hours. Schizonts (cycle 1) were subsequently purified and co-cultured with fresh erythrocytes at 2% hematocrit in RPMI1640 complete medium in the presence of 25 nM PKG inhibitor ML10 23,24 . ML10 was removed after 4–6 hours and parasites were plated onto µ-slide, 2-well ibiTreat chambers (ibidi, 80286) pre-coated with 0.5 mg/mL concanavalin A. The slides were maintained at 37°C in a humidified chamber with 5% CO₂. Imaging was performed using a Zeiss Axio Observer microscope, capturing frames every 3 seconds for a minimum duration of 30 min and the acquired time-lapse videos were processed and analyzed using Axio Vision software (version 4.8.2) or ZEN blue 3.1 or 3.9. P. berghei live cell imaging To examine PbARK1-GFP expression during erythrocytic development, parasites cultured in schizont medium were imaged at various stages, including ring, trophozoite, schizont, and merozoite. Purified gametocytes were assessed for GFP expression and localisation at multiple time points (0 and 1–15 min) following activation in ookinete medium. For nuclear staining, Hoechst dye was used during live-cell imaging. Zygote and ookinete stages were analysed over a 24-hour culture period. Images were acquired using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope equipped with a 63× oil immersion objective and an AxioCam ICc1 digital camera (Carl Zeiss) using autoexposure settings. Fluorescence signals were adjusted using Axiovision (Rel. 4.8) software to reduce background fluorescence while maintaining detection sensitivity; representative images are shown in the figures. All imaging experiments were performed in at least three independent replicates, and 30–50 cells were analysed per stage to determine PbARK1-GFP localisation. For additional details, refer to the figure legends. P. berghei structured illumination microscopy Formaldehyde-fixed (4%) gametocytes were stained with Hoechst dye, and 2 µl of the cell suspension was placed on a microscope slide and covered with a 50 × 34 mm coverslip to form a thin, immobilised cell monolayer. Imaging was performed using structured illumination microscopy (SIM) on a Zeiss Elyra PS.1 microscope with either a Zeiss Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.4 oil immersion or Zeiss C-Apochromat 63×/1.2 W Korr M27 water immersion objective, as previously described 43 . Ultrastructure expansion microscopy U-ExM was performed largely following previously published protocols 21 , 44 – 46 . In brief, to prepare U-ExM samples of P. falciparum schizonts, 12mm coverslips were placed in a 24-well plate and coated with poly-D-lysine (Gibco, A3890401, 0.1 mg/mL) for 1 h at 37°C, followed by three washes with ultrapure water. P. falciparum schizonts were seeded onto the coverslips and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Unattached cells were removed gently, and the remaining cells were fixed using 4% (v/v) formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at 37°C. After fixation, coverslips were rinsed with prewarmed PBS and incubated for 12h at 37°C in 1.4% (v/v) formaldehyde and 2% (v/v) acrylamide in PBS. A monomer solution consisting of 19% (w/w) sodium acrylate (Sigma-Aldrich, 408220), 10% (v/v) acrylamide (Sigma-Aldrich, A3553), and 2% (v/v) N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide (Sigma-Aldrich, M7279) in PBS was prepared 24 h in advance and stored at − 20°C. For polymerization, 5 µL of 10% (v/v) TEMED (Sigma-Aldrich, T9281) and 5 µL of 10% (w/v) APS (Sigma-Aldrich, A3678) were mixed with 90 µL of the thawed monomer solution. The gel mix (35 µL) was pipetted onto parafilm squares pre-cooled at − 20°C and the coverslip was placed over the drop. Gels were allowed to polymerize for 1 h at 37°C. Polymerized gels were transferred to denaturation buffer (200 mM SDS, 200 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 9) and shaken for 15 min at room temperature, then incubated at 95°C for 90 min. Denatured gels were expanded by sequential incubations in water (30 min each, repeated thrice) with gentle shaking. Expanded gels were equilibrated in PBS for 15 min and blocked in 3% BSA/PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Incubation with primary antibody (details in Supplementary Table 4) was carried out for 12h at room temperature on a shaker, followed by three 10 min washes with PBST. Gels were then incubated with secondary antibodies, 405 NHS Ester (Thermo Fisher, A30000) and SYTOX/Hoechst in PBS for 2.5 h in the dark with gentle shaking followed by three PBST washes and final equilibration in MilliQ water (30 min, repeated thrice). For imaging, µ-slide 2-well ibiTreat chambers (ibidi, 80286) were coated with poly-D-lysine (0.5 mL, 1 h at 37°C), rinsed with MilliQ water, and used to mount the gels cell side down. Imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM980 confocal microscope with a 63X oil immersion objective (NA 1.4). Z-stacks (0.5 µm intervals) were captured and processed using ZEN Blue (versions 3.1 or 3.9). Deconvolution was performed using Zen Deconvolution tool kit. U-ExM images are displayed as maximum intensity projections of full z-slices unless indicated otherwise. To prepare U-ExM samples of P. berghei male gametocytes, purified and 8 min- and 15 min-activated gametocytes were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PHEM buffer (60 mM PIPES, 25 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl 2 , pH6.9) at room temperature for 15 min. Fixed samples were attached to 10 mm round Poly-D-Lysine coated coverslips for 15 min. Coverslips were incubated overnight at 4°C in 1.4% formaldehyde (FA)/ 2% acrylamide (AA). Gelation was performed in ammonium persulfate (APS)/TEMED (10% each)/monomer solution (23% sodium acrylate; 10% AA; 0,1% BIS-AA in PBS) on ice for 5 min and at 37°C for 30 min. Gels were denatured for 15 min at 37°C and for 90 min at 95°C in denaturation buffer (200 mM SDS, 200 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 9.0, in water). After denaturation, gels were incubated in distilled water overnight for complete expansion. The following day, circular gel pieces with a diameter of ~ 13 mm were excised, and the gels were washed in PBS three times for 15 min to remove excess water. The gels were then incubated in blocking buffer (3% BSA in PBS) at room temperature for 30 min, incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-a-tubulin antibody (T9026, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:500 dilution) and/or anti-GFP antibody (A11122, Invitrogen, 1:500 dilution) in blocking buffer (1:500 dilution) at 4°C overnight and washed three times for 15 min in wash buffer (0.5% v/v TWEEN-20 in PBS). The gels were incubated with 8 µg/ml Atto 594 NHS ester (08741, Merck), 10 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 (H1399, Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11001, Invitrogen, 1:500 dilution) and Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11004, Invitrogen, 1:500 dilution) in PBS at 37°C for 3 hours followed by three washes of 15 min each in wash buffer (blocking and all antibody incubation steps were performed with gentle shaking). The gels were then washed three times for 15 min with wash buffer and expanded overnight in ultrapure water. The expanded gel was placed in a 35 mm glass bottom dish (MATTEK) with the 14 mm glass coated with Poly-D-Lysine and mounted with an 18 × 18 mm coverslip to prevent the gel from sliding and to avoid drifting while imaging. High-resolution confocal microscopy images were acquired using a Zeiss Celldiscoverer 7 with Airyscan using a Plan-Apochromat 50 ×/1.2NA Water objective, with 405, 488 and 561 nm lasers. Confocal z-stacks were acquired using line scanning and the following settings: 55 × 55 nm pixel size, 170 nm z-step, 2.91 µs/pixel dwell time, 850 gain and 3.5% (405 nm), 4.5% (488 nm) and 5.0% (561 nm) laser powers. The z-stack images were processed and analysed using Fiji (Version 1.54f) 47 . Calculation of the expansion factor for the U-ExM of male gametocytes The expansion factor for the U-ExM of male gametocytes was calculated by comparing axoneme diameters from two types of images (U-ExM and TEM). The diameters were measured using Fiji (Version 1.54f) 47 . The average diameter of the axoneme in NHS-stained U-ExM images of male gametocytes activated for 8 min was 933.83 nm (n = 12), while the average diameter in TEM images of male gametocytes activated for 8 min was 188.50 nm (n = 8). We used the calculated expansion factor of 4.954 for the analysis. Electron microscopy of male gametocytes P. berghei gametocytes activated for 8 min and 15 min were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer and processed for electron microscopy 48 . Briefly, samples were post-fixed in 1% aqueous osmium tetroxide, treated en bloc with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate, dehydrated in graded ethanol series and embedded in Spurr's epoxy resin. Thin sections were stained with lead citrate prior to examination in a Tecnai G2 12 BioTwin (FEI UK, UK) or a Jeol JEM-1400Flash (JEOL, Japan) electron microscope. Liver stage parasite imaging For P. berghei liver-stage imaging, 100,000 Hepatocelluar carcinoma cells (HepG2) were seeded onto glass coverslips in 48 well plate. Salivary glands from Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes infected with PbARK1-GFP parasites were dissected and homogenized using a pestle to release sporozoites. The sporozoites were gently pipetted onto the HepG2 cell monolayer and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO₂ in complete minimum Eagle’s medium The culture medium was replaced 2 hours post-infection and subsequently changed daily. For live-cell imaging, Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes) was added to a final concentration of 1 µg/ml to stain host and parasite nuclei. Infected cells were imaged at, 48-, and 64 -hours post-infection using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope equipped with a 63× oil immersion objective and an AxioCam ICc1 digital camera (Carl Zeiss) using autoexposure settings. and Leica Application Suite X software. Each experiment was performed in triplicate, and 20–30 infected cells were analysed per time point to assess PbARK1-GFP localisation. Immunoblotting P. falciparum - Immunoblotting was performed as described previously 49 using primary antibodies (Supplementary Table 4) and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and protein bands were visualized using either SuperSignal™ West Pico or Femto chemiluminescent substrates (Pierce, USA) using X-ray films. P. berghei - Purified gametocytes were lysed in buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 1% NP-40. After lysis, Laemmli buffer was added, and samples were boiled for 10 min at 95°C, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 5 min. The supernatants were separated on a 4–12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Biosciences). Immunoblotting was performed using the Western Breeze Chemiluminescence Anti-Rabbit Kit (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer’s protocol. An anti-GFP polyclonal antibody (Invitrogen) was used at a 1:1,250 dilution to detect PbARK1-GFP. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses P. falciparum - Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (G Biosciences) followed by purification with the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Cat. No. 74104). cDNA synthesis was performed using RevertAid H Minus Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo scientific, EP0451) and 1 µg of DNase-treated RNA as the template. Quantitative PCR was conducted using the CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). Reactions were normalized using 18S rRNA as the internal control. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2 −ΔΔCt method. Primer sequences used for the qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 3. P. berghei - Total RNA was extracted from gametocytes using the RNA Purification Kit (Stratagene), and cDNA was synthesised using the RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems). qPCR was performed with 80 ng of RNA using SYBR Green Fast Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast system. Cycling conditions were: 95°C for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 3 s and 60°C for 30 s. Primers were designed using Primer3 ( https://primer3.ut.ee/ ). Each gene was tested in three biological and technical replicates. hsp70 (PBANKA_081890) and arginyl-tRNA synthetase (PBANKA_143420) were used as reference genes. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 3. Transcriptome analysis using RNA-seq Total RNA was extracted from activated gametocytes and schizonts of P. berghei WT-GFP and ark1PTD parasites (three biological replicates each) using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen), vacuum-concentrated, and transported in RNA-stable tubes (Biomatrica). Strand-specific mRNA libraries were prepared with the TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (paired-end, 150 bp reads). Read quality was assessed with FASTQC, and trimming of low-quality reads and adapter sequences was done using Trimmomatic 50 . Reads were mapped to the P. berghei ANKA genome (PlasmoDB release 40) using HISAT2 v2.1.0 51 , and gene counts were generated with FeatureCounts 52 . Low-expression genes (CPM 2 and FDR < 0.05 were considered differentially expressed. Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry P. berghei purified schizonts and gametocytes (activated for 1.5 to 2 min) were crosslinked using formaldehyde (10-min incubation with 1% formaldehyde, followed by 5-min incubation in 0.125M glycine solution and 3 washes with PBS (pH 7.5). Immunoprecipitation was performed using crosslinked protein and a GFP-Trap_A Kit (Chromotek) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Proteins bound to the GFP-Trap_A beads were digested using trypsin and the peptides were analysed by LC-MS/MS and subsequently visualised using both Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and enrichment visualised using a volcano plot 43 , 56 . Evolutionary bioinformatics Our predicted proteome set was based on a version previously used (see Supplementary Table 5). Phyletic profiles for ARK1-3 and INCENP were partially derived from previous studies 10 , 57 . Sequence searches for missing orthologues were performed with the HHPred webserver from MPI-toolkit 58 , 59 and the hmmer package 58 , as previously described 60 . For the larger gene families like Aurora kinases, we used IQ-tree-based maximum-likelihood phylogenetics (standard setting - model finding, 1000 bootstraps 61 ) to check the validity of bidirectional-best-blast (BBH) hits amongst our genome sets on an ad hoc basis. Off note, we could not reliably generate a single phylogenetic tree harbouring all three ARKs within the Aurora kinase orthologous group (OG), suggesting that ARK2 and ARK3 are either extremely divergent or not Aurora kinases. Similarly, for the INCENP gene family, multiple alignments were generally too divergent and short to infer any consistent phylograms. All sequences used for this study can be found in Supplementary Table 5. AlphaFold3 modelling Co-folds of 3D protein structures for ARK1 and the extended IN-box of either INCENP1 or 2 were modelled using the AlphaFold3 webserver ( https://alphafoldserver.com/ ) with standard settings (seed set to 100) 62 . Data availability The RNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive with accession number: PRJNA1309997. Declarations Contributions RT, PS, and ECT conceptualised the project. AN and PS performed the P. falciparum experiments. MZ, SLP, AM, ER, and RT performed the P. berghei live-cell imaging. RY, DJF, and SV performed the TEM observation. RY and MZ performed the P. berghei U-ExM observation. MZ, AE, and DB performed the qPCR experiment. SA and KGLR performed the RNAseq analysis. RT, DB, ARB, and ECT performed the proteomics analysis. ECT performed the bioinformatics analysis. AN, RY, MZ, DJF, SLP, AM, ARB, SV, KGLR, DSG, AAH, ECT, PS, and RT performed formal analysis. AN, RY, MZ, DJF, SA, SLP, AM, ECT, and RT performed visualization. RT, PS, and ECT acquired funding. RT, PS, and ECT supervised the project. AN, RY, MZ, AAH, ECT, PS, and RT wrote the manuscript draft. All the authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. Acknowledgement RT is supported by ERC advance grant funded by UKRI Frontier Science (EP/X024776/1), MRC UK (MR/K011782/1), and BBSRC (BB/L013827/1, BB/X014681/1). MZ, DB, and AM were supported as research fellows by (EP/X024776/1). RY and DSG are supported by BBSRC (BB/X014681/1). SLP is supported by Wellcome DBT India Alliance/Team Science (IA/TSG/21/1/600261). AAH is supported by the Francis Crick Institute (FC001097), which receives core funding from the Cancer Research UK (FC001097), the UK Medical Research Council (FC001097), and the Wellcome Trust (FC001097). KGLR is supported by the NIH/NIAID (R01 AI136511) and the University of California, Riverside NIFA-Hatch-225935. ECT was supported by a personal fellowship from the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), the Netherlands (grant no. VI. Veni.202.223). Studies on P. falciparum were also supported by a Team Science grant (IA/TSG/21/1/600261) to PS, RT, and TSKP from DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance and funds from NII core. PS is a recipient of J.C. Bose Fellowship. We thank the School of Life Sciences Imaging (SLIM) for providing access to confocal and SIM microscopy and Dr Robert Markus for technical assistance. We thank the Nanoscale and Microscale Research Centre (nmRC) for providing access to instrumentation and Dr Michael W. Fey, Dr Julie Watts and Ms Nicola J. Weston for technical assistance. For Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. We thank Cleidiane Zampronio at Warwick University for mass spectrometry methods and Bio Support Unit, University of Nottingham for maintenance of mice used in this study. References Guttery, D. S., Zeeshan, M., Ferguson, D. J. P., Holder, A. A. & Tewari, R. Division and Transmission: Malaria Parasite Development in the Mosquito. Annu Rev Microbiol 76 , 113-134 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1146/annurev-micro-041320-010046 Sinden, R. E. Mitosis and meiosis in malarial parasites. Acta Leiden 60 , 19-27 (1991). Sinden, R. E., Canning, E. U., Bray, R. S. & Smalley, M. E. Gametocyte and gamete development in Plasmodium falciparum. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 201 , 375-399 (1978). Zeeshan, M. et al. Plasmodium SAS4: basal body component of male cell which is dispensable for parasite transmission. Life Sci Alliance 5 (2022). https://doi.org:10.26508/lsa.202101329 Carmena, M., Earnshaw, W. C. & Glover, D. M. The Dawn of Aurora Kinase Research: From Fly Genetics to the Clinic. Front Cell Dev Biol 3 , 73 (2015). https://doi.org:10.3389/fcell.2015.00073 Carmena, M., Ruchaud, S. & Earnshaw, W. C. Making the Auroras glow: regulation of Aurora A and B kinase function by interacting proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21 , 796-805 (2009). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.ceb.2009.09.008 Hochegger, H., Hegarat, N. & Pereira-Leal, J. B. Aurora at the pole and equator: overlapping functions of Aurora kinases in the mitotic spindle. Open Biol 3 , 120185 (2013). https://doi.org:10.1098/rsob.120185 Zhang, X. Aurora kinases. Curr Biol 18 , R146-148 (2008). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.004 Li, H. et al. Dictyostelium Aurora kinase has properties of both Aurora A and Aurora B kinases. Eukaryot Cell 7 , 894-905 (2008). https://doi.org:10.1128/EC.00422-07 Zeeshan, M. et al. Plasmodium ARK2 and EB1 drive unconventional spindle dynamics, during chromosome segregation in sexual transmission stages. Nat Commun 14 , 5652 (2023). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-023-41395-3 Vader, G., Medema, R. H. & Lens, S. M. The chromosomal passenger complex: guiding Aurora-B through mitosis. J Cell Biol 173 , 833-837 (2006). https://doi.org:10.1083/jcb.200604032 Hadders, M. A. & Lens, S. M. A. Changing places: Chromosomal Passenger Complex relocation in early anaphase. Trends Cell Biol 32 , 165-176 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.tcb.2021.09.008 Solyakov, L. et al. Global kinomic and phospho-proteomic analyses of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Commun 2 , 565 (2011). https://doi.org:10.1038/ncomms1558 Tewari, R. et al. The systematic functional analysis of Plasmodium protein kinases identifies essential regulators of mosquito transmission. Cell Host Microbe 8 , 377-387 (2010). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.chom.2010.09.006 Zhang, M. et al. Uncovering the essential genes of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum by saturation mutagenesis. Science 360 (2018). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.aap7847 Reininger, L., Wilkes, J. M., Bourgade, H., Miranda-Saavedra, D. & Doerig, C. An essential Aurora-related kinase transiently associates with spindle pole bodies during Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic schizogony. Mol Microbiol 79 , 205-221 (2011). https://doi.org:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07442.x Wyss, M. et al. The three Plasmodium falciparum Aurora-related kinases display distinct temporal and spatial associations with mitotic structures in asexual blood stage parasites and gametocytes. mSphere 9 , e0046524 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1128/msphere.00465-24 Berry, L. et al. Toxoplasma gondii chromosomal passenger complex is essential for the organization of a functional mitotic spindle: a prerequisite for productive endodyogeny. Cell Mol Life Sci 75 , 4417-4443 (2018). https://doi.org:10.1007/s00018-018-2889-6 Collins, C. R. et al. Robust inducible Cre recombinase activity in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum enables efficient gene deletion within a single asexual erythrocytic growth cycle. Mol Microbiol 88 , 687-701 (2013). https://doi.org:10.1111/mmi.12206 Sebastian, S. et al. A Plasmodium calcium-dependent protein kinase controls zygote development and transmission by translationally activating repressed mRNAs. Cell Host Microbe 12 , 9-19 (2012). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.chom.2012.05.014 Liffner, B. et al. Atlas of Plasmodium falciparum intraerythrocytic development using expansion microscopy. Elife 12 (2023). https://doi.org:10.7554/eLife.88088 Li, J. et al. Disruption of Plasmodium falciparum kinetochore proteins destabilises the nexus between the centrosome equivalent and the mitotic apparatus. Nat Commun 15 , 5794 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-024-50167-6 Ressurreicao, M. et al. Use of a highly specific kinase inhibitor for rapid, simple and precise synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium knowlesi asexual blood-stage parasites. PLoS One 15 , e0235798 (2020). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.pone.0235798 Baker, D. A. et al. A potent series targeting the malarial cGMP-dependent protein kinase clears infection and blocks transmission. Nat Commun 8 , 430 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-017-00572-x Ekka, R., Gupta, A., Bhatnagar, S., Malhotra, P. & Sharma, P. Phosphorylation of Rhoptry Protein RhopH3 Is Critical for Host Cell Invasion by the Malaria Parasite. mBio 11 (2020). https://doi.org:10.1128/mBio.00166-20 Silvie, O. et al. A role for apical membrane antigen 1 during invasion of hepatocytes by Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. J Biol Chem 279 , 9490-9496 (2004). https://doi.org:10.1074/jbc.M311331200 Janse, C. J., Ramesar, J. & Waters, A. P. High-efficiency transfection and drug selection of genetically transformed blood stages of the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei. Nat Protoc 1 , 346-356 (2006). https://doi.org:10.1038/nprot.2006.53 Nair, S. C. et al. A Plasmodium yoelii HECT-like E3 ubiquitin ligase regulates parasite growth and virulence. Nat Commun 8 , 223 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-017-00267-3 Bushell, E. et al. Functional Profiling of a Plasmodium Genome Reveals an Abundance of Essential Genes. Cell 170 , 260-272 e268 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.030 Segura-Pena, D. et al. The structural basis of the multi-step allosteric activation of Aurora B kinase. Elife 12 (2023). https://doi.org:10.7554/eLife.85328 Berry, L. et al. The conserved apicomplexan Aurora kinase TgArk3 is involved in endodyogeny, duplication rate and parasite virulence. Cell Microbiol 18 , 1106-1120 (2016). https://doi.org:10.1111/cmi.12571 Carmena, M. & Earnshaw, W. C. The cellular geography of aurora kinases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4 , 842-854 (2003). https://doi.org:10.1038/nrm1245 Carmena, M., Wheelock, M., Funabiki, H. & Earnshaw, W. C. The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): from easy rider to the godfather of mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13 , 789-803 (2012). https://doi.org:10.1038/nrm3474 Ballmer, D. & Akiyoshi, B. Dynamic localization of the chromosomal passenger complex in trypanosomes is controlled by the orphan kinesins KIN-A and KIN-B. Elife 13 (2024). https://doi.org:10.7554/eLife.93522 Zeeshan, M. et al. Plasmodium kinesin-8X associates with mitotic spindles and is essential for oocyst development during parasite proliferation and transmission. PLoS Pathog 15 , e1008048 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.ppat.1008048 Komaki, S. et al. Molecular convergence by differential domain acquisition is a hallmark of chromosomal passenger complex evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119 , e2200108119 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1073/pnas.2200108119 Trager, W. & Jensen, J. B. Cultivation of erythrocytic stages. Bull World Health Organ 55 , 363-365 (1977). Lambros, C. & Vanderberg, J. P. Synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stages in culture. J Parasitol 65 , 418-420 (1979). Beetsma, A. L., van de Wiel, T. J., Sauerwein, R. W. & Eling, W. M. Plasmodium berghei ANKA: purification of large numbers of infectious gametocytes. Exp Parasitol 88 , 69-72 (1998). https://doi.org:10.1006/expr.1998.4203 Billker, O. et al. Calcium and a calcium-dependent protein kinase regulate gamete formation and mosquito transmission in a malaria parasite. Cell 117 , 503-514 (2004). https://doi.org:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00449-0 Guttery, D. S. et al. Genome-wide functional analysis of Plasmodium protein phosphatases reveals key regulators of parasite development and differentiation. Cell Host Microbe 16 , 128-140 (2014). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.chom.2014.05.020 Tonkin, C. J. et al. Localization of organellar proteins in Plasmodium falciparum using a novel set of transfection vectors and a new immunofluorescence fixation method. Mol Biochem Parasitol 137 , 13-21 (2004). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.05.009 Zeeshan, M. et al. Plasmodium NEK1 coordinates MTOC organisation and kinetochore attachment during rapid mitosis in male gamete formation. PLoS Biol 22 , e3002802 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002802 Rashpa, R. & Brochet, M. Expansion microscopy of Plasmodium gametocytes reveals the molecular architecture of a bipartite microtubule organisation centre coordinating mitosis with axoneme assembly. PLoS Pathog 18 , e1010223 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.ppat.1010223 Bertiaux, E. et al. Expansion microscopy provides new insights into the cytoskeleton of malaria parasites including the conservation of a conoid. PLoS Biol 19 , e3001020 (2021). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001020 Yanase, R. et al. Divergent Plasmodium kinases drive MTOC, kinetochore and axoneme organisation in male gametogenesis. Life Sci Alliance 8 (2025). https://doi.org:10.26508/lsa.202403056 Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9 , 676-682 (2012). https://doi.org:10.1038/nmeth.2019 Ferguson, D. J. et al. Maternal inheritance and stage-specific variation of the apicoplast in Toxoplasma gondii during development in the intermediate and definitive host. Eukaryot Cell 4 , 814-826 (2005). https://doi.org:10.1128/EC.4.4.814-826.2005 Rawat, R. S. et al. Protein kinase PfPK2 mediated signalling is critical for host erythrocyte invasion by malaria parasite. PLoS Pathog 19 , e1011770 (2023). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011770 Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30 , 2114-2120 (2014). https://doi.org:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 12 , 357-360 (2015). https://doi.org:10.1038/nmeth.3317 Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30 , 923-930 (2014). https://doi.org:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26 , 139-140 (2010). https://doi.org:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43 , e47 (2015). https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkv007 Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15 , 550 (2014). https://doi.org:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 Zeeshan, M. et al. A novel SUN1-ALLAN complex coordinates segregation of the bipartite MTOC across the nuclear envelope during rapid closed mitosis in Plasmodium berghei. Elife 14 (2025). https://doi.org:10.7554/eLife.106537 Tromer, E. C., van Hooff, J. J. E., Kops, G. & Snel, B. Mosaic origin of the eukaryotic kinetochore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116 , 12873-12882 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1073/pnas.1821945116 Eddy, S. R. Accelerated Profile HMM Searches. PLoS Comput Biol 7 , e1002195 (2011). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 Soding, J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 21 , 951-960 (2005). https://doi.org:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti125 Zeeshan, M. et al. Real-time dynamics of Plasmodium NDC80 reveals unusual modes of chromosome segregation during parasite proliferation. J Cell Sci 134 (2020). https://doi.org:10.1242/jcs.245753 Trifinopoulos, J., Nguyen, L. T., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 44 , W232-235 (2016). https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkw256 Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630 , 493-500 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Supplementary Files SupplementaryFileslegends.docx ExtendedDataFigs.pdf Extended Data Figs 1-8 SupplementaryVideo1.mp4 Supplementary Video 1 SupplementaryVideo2.mp4 Supplementary Video 2 SupplementaryVideo3.mp4 Supplementary Video 3 SupplementaryVideo4.mp4 Supplementary Video 4 SupplementaryVideo5.mp4 Supplementary Video 5 SupplementaryVideo6.mp4 Supplementary Video 6 SupplementaryVideo7.mp4 Supplementary Video 7 SupplementaryVideo8.mp4 Supplementary Video 8 SupplementaryTable1.xlsx Supplementary Table 1 SupplementaryTable2.xlsx Supplementary Table 2 SupplementaryTable3.xlsx Supplementary Table 3 SupplementaryTable4.xlsx SupplementaryTable5.xlsx Supplementary Table 5 Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 26 Feb, 2026 Read the published version in Nature Communications → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7473364","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":510883416,"identity":"172e7424-6401-4bb8-b56e-5978363884e9","order_by":0,"name":"Rita Tewari","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3943-1847","institution":"University of Nottingham","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rita","middleName":"","lastName":"Tewari","suffix":""},{"id":510883417,"identity":"236109b8-874f-4a83-8178-e36f0f91009f","order_by":1,"name":"Annu Nagar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Institute of Immunology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Annu","middleName":"","lastName":"Nagar","suffix":""},{"id":510883418,"identity":"0af65de8-6684-4f43-8bc2-ebe7c5298af2","order_by":2,"name":"Ryuji Yanase","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-398X","institution":"University of Nottingham","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ryuji","middleName":"","lastName":"Yanase","suffix":""},{"id":510883419,"identity":"2f49484a-ff92-4ffa-8b2e-60144dfc15f0","order_by":3,"name":"Mohammad Zeeshan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Nottingham","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohammad","middleName":"","lastName":"Zeeshan","suffix":""},{"id":510883420,"identity":"a3c8dd1e-f8c0-4213-800a-bb27bc71f996","order_by":4,"name":"David J. P. Ferguson","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5045-819X","institution":"University of Oxford","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"David","middleName":"J. P.","lastName":"Ferguson","suffix":""},{"id":510883421,"identity":"36ee9ec9-165e-4531-a308-a35cde153f77","order_by":5,"name":"Steven Abel","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of California Riverside","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Steven","middleName":"","lastName":"Abel","suffix":""},{"id":510883422,"identity":"4fafad29-cbed-465a-935a-3edca5885d9e","order_by":6,"name":"Sarah Pashley","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Nottingham","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sarah","middleName":"","lastName":"Pashley","suffix":""},{"id":510883423,"identity":"5c46d00c-37d4-4750-8761-c72d2aeab9ca","order_by":7,"name":"Akancha Mishra","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Nottingham","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Akancha","middleName":"","lastName":"Mishra","suffix":""},{"id":510883424,"identity":"6fa8b8ff-0627-4f55-bca1-ad837172b5db","order_by":8,"name":"Anthonius Eze","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4821-1689","institution":"University of Glasgow","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anthonius","middleName":"","lastName":"Eze","suffix":""},{"id":510883425,"identity":"f668d7e0-e3f1-4357-a29b-0bf3c678d8de","order_by":9,"name":"Edward Rea","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Nottingham","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Edward","middleName":"","lastName":"Rea","suffix":""},{"id":510883426,"identity":"8c74ac72-c1df-4777-a774-4b9daf8d0211","order_by":10,"name":"Declan Brady","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Nottingham","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Declan","middleName":"","lastName":"Brady","suffix":""},{"id":510883427,"identity":"526f0451-700a-48da-a045-79dd05ac25af","order_by":11,"name":"Andrew Bottrill","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5182-3643","institution":"University of Warwick","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Andrew","middleName":"","lastName":"Bottrill","suffix":""},{"id":510883428,"identity":"5ee7d9de-5369-40c8-b99e-b5131cf0909d","order_by":12,"name":"Sue Vaughan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Oxford Brookes University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sue","middleName":"","lastName":"Vaughan","suffix":""},{"id":510883429,"identity":"d2b32056-f6b6-4fda-8661-3194e53c8b50","order_by":13,"name":"Karine Le Roch","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4862-9292","institution":"University of California at Riverside","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Karine","middleName":"Le","lastName":"Roch","suffix":""},{"id":510883430,"identity":"b9436b4c-a975-4a40-8a34-8d64ef86687e","order_by":14,"name":"David Guttery","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Nottingham","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"David","middleName":"","lastName":"Guttery","suffix":""},{"id":510883431,"identity":"d6e2cfc4-8de8-49d4-8098-84efc58e1c3a","order_by":15,"name":"Anthony Holder","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8490-6058","institution":"The Francis Crick Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anthony","middleName":"","lastName":"Holder","suffix":""},{"id":510883432,"identity":"ea4e90ce-0034-4025-a314-2b0eac94e77c","order_by":16,"name":"Eelco Tromer","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-7727","institution":"University of Groniingen","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Eelco","middleName":"","lastName":"Tromer","suffix":""},{"id":510883433,"identity":"406100e6-62c6-472f-9a76-00fc9c0869d7","order_by":17,"name":"Pushkar Sharma","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6861-0508","institution":"National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Pushkar","middleName":"","lastName":"Sharma","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-08-27 15:57:15","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7473364/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7473364/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69460-7","type":"published","date":"2026-02-26T05:00:00+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":92158314,"identity":"f997c849-904a-4bfb-881f-35be9dcd50de","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:37:38","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1128914,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExpansion of the Aurora kinase family among apicomplexan parasites coincides with divergent mitotic mechanisms.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ea. \u003c/strong\u003eThe schematic shows schizogony in the asexual blood stage and male gametogony in \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e, highlighting some of the subcellular structures involved (below). \u003cstrong\u003eb.\u003c/strong\u003e Left: five different cellular locations of Aurora kinases during mitosis/meiosis\u003csup\u003e10\u003c/sup\u003e, based on findings from model organisms. Right: Overview of the location and putative protein complex/interactors of three Aurora kinase paralogs ARK1-2-3 amongst the three apicomplexan parasites \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium, Toxoplasma and Cryptosporidium\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/cbf0cedfc7d17539b6df0615.png"},{"id":92159278,"identity":"95083baa-57e8-4f86-8c79-a27e773a7b94","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:45:38","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":3616225,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLocation of ARK1 during \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e asexual division and \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eP. berghei\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e sexual male gametogony.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ea. \u003c/strong\u003eSchematic of asexual division during \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum \u003c/em\u003eblood stage schizogony.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eHA-PfARK1-loxP parasites were synchronized and IFA was performed using anti-HA (green) and anti-centrin (magenta) antibody on trophozoites and schizonts. DNA was stained with DAPI. PfARK1 was observed transiently as a punctum only at nuclei with duplicated centrin foci. Scale bar = 2 mm. \u003cstrong\u003eb. \u003c/strong\u003eUltrastructure expansion microscopy (U-ExM) was performed on HA-PfARK1-loxP schizonts using anti-HA and anti-tubulin antibodies. Hemispindles (white arrow), mitotic spindles (cyan arrow) and interpolar spindles (yellow arrow) that correspond to different stages of nuclear division were observed. PfARK1-positive puncta were mainly associated with mitotic spindles with the puncta flanking the spindle. Scale bar = 2 mm. \u003cstrong\u003ec. \u003c/strong\u003eDeveloping merozoites exhibiting PfARK1 foci (panel b) in association with hemispindles, mitotic spindles or interpolar spindles were quantified across three independent biological replicates (SEM ± SE, one way ANOVA, ****\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.0001, n = 3, number of parasites = 40). \u003cstrong\u003ed.\u003c/strong\u003eSchematic of sexual male gametogony. Live cell images show the location of PbARK1-GFP (green) at different time points (1–8 min) during male gametogony. DNA (blue) was stained with Hoechst. DIC, differential interference contrast. Representative images of more than 50 cells with more than three biological replicates. Scale bar: 5mm. \u003cstrong\u003ee.\u003c/strong\u003e U-ExM images showing location of PbARK1-GFP (green) and α- tubulin (magenta) detected with anti-GFP and anti-tubulin antibodies, respectively. Hoechst was used to stain DNA (blue). Scale bar = 5 mm. Representative images of more than 10 cells from two biological replicates. \u003cstrong\u003ef.\u003c/strong\u003e Live cell imaging showing the location of PbARK1-GFP (green) in relation to kinetochore marker (NDC80-ch [mCherry; magenta]) at different time points during gametogony. DNA is stained with Hoechst dye (blue). Merge: green, magenta, and blue images merged. Representative images of more than 20 cells with three biological replicates. Scale bar= 5 mm (left panel). 3D-SIM images of fixed gametocytes at 1.5 min post activation (at the first spindle stage) showing the location of PbARK1-GFP and NDC80-mCherry. Representative image of more than 10 cells from more than two biological replicates. Scale bar = 1 mm (right panel). \u003cstrong\u003eg.\u003c/strong\u003e Left panels: live cell imaging showing the dynamics of PbARK1-GFP (green) in relation to spindle protein kinase ARK2-mCherry (magenta) at different time points during gametogony. DNA is stained with Hoechst dye (blue). Merge: green, magenta, and blue images merged. Representative images of more than 20 cells with three biological replicates. Scale bar = 5 mm (left panel). Right panels: 3D-SIM images of fixed gametocytes at 1.5 min post activation (at the first spindle stage) showing the location of PbARK1-GFP and ARK2-mCherry. Representative image of more than 10 cells from more than two biological replicates. Scale bar = 1 mm. \u003cstrong\u003eh.\u003c/strong\u003e Left panels: live cell imaging showing the dynamics of PbARK1-GFP (green) in relation to basal body/axoneme marker kinesin-8B-mCherry (magenta) at two different time points during gametogony. DNA is stained with Hoechst dye (blue). Merge: green, magenta, and blue images merged. Representative images of more than 20 cells with three biological replicates. Scale bar = 5 mm Right panels: 3D-SIM images of fixed gametocytes at 1.5 min post activation (at the first spindle stage) showing the location of PbARK1-GFP and kinesin-8B-mCherry. Representative image of more than 10 cells from more than two biological replicates. Scale bar = 1 mm.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/0f982d6ae040b39de5189fe5.png"},{"id":92159277,"identity":"ffa012d1-3842-4010-ab03-1463190960df","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:45:38","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":3522276,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePfARK1 controls karyokinesis, spindle formation and cytokinesis\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eduring asexual division.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ea.\u003c/strong\u003eGrowth rate assays were established in the presence of DMSO or RAP with synchronized HA-PfARK1-loxP ring stage parasites. After 24h, DMSO or RAP was washed away, and parasite growth was assessed after each cycle by flow cytometry. \u003cem\u003eInset\u003c/em\u003e: fold change in parasitaemia of RAP-treated parasites relative to control (DMSO) (SEM ± SE, Two-way ANOVA, n = 3, **\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.01, ***\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.001).\u003cstrong\u003e b.\u003c/strong\u003eHA-PfARK1-loxP parasites treated with either DMSO or RAP as described in panel \u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003ewere smeared, Giemsa-stained, and examined by microscopy at the indicated time point. In the DMSO-treated parasites, the intraerythrocytic developmental cycle progressed as expected, with ring, trophozoite, and subsequent ring stages typical of the 48-hour parasite cycle. However, in RAP-treated, PfARK1-depleted parasites, a significant proportion of parasites had pyknotic morphology.\u003cstrong\u003e c. \u003c/strong\u003eTo assess the impact of RAP on schizont development,\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eHA-PfARK1-loxP parasites treated with DMSO or RAP as described above were treated with E64 to block merozoite egress. Thin blood smears were made at ~40-44 h.p.i in cycle 1 and stained with DAPI. RAP treated parasites contained an unsegmented nuclear mass.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eScale bar = 2 mm. \u003cstrong\u003ed.\u003c/strong\u003e HA-PfARK1-loxP parasites were treated with DMSO or RAP. U-ExM was performed on schizonts (~40-44 h.p.i in cycle 1) during division using anti-tubulin and anti-centrin antibodies, SYTOX and NHS-ester, visualised with magenta, green, blue and inverted greyscale, respectively. In DMSO-treated control parasites, hemispindles (yellow arrow), mitotic spindles (cyan arrow) and interpolar spindles (white arrow) were observed in association with single or double centrin foci. In RAP treated parasites, either speckles of tubulin (grey arrows) or almost complete loss of tubulin staining were observed. In addition, unsegregated nuclei were observed and clusters of centrin were found associated with each nuclear mass (enclosed in squares) Scale bar = 2 mm. U-ExM images are displayed as maximum intensity projection of multiple z slices. Upper Right Panel:\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003eparasites with normal tubulin staining reflected by the presence of spindles were counted from U-ExM images (SEM ± SE, unpaired t test, **** P \u0026lt;0.0001, n = 3, number of parasites = 55).\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003eLower Right Panel\u003cem\u003e: \u003c/em\u003e% parasites with clustered and/or detached centrin foci (SEM ± SE, unpaired t test, **** P \u0026lt;0.0001, n = 3, number of parasites = 55). \u003cstrong\u003ee and f.\u003c/strong\u003e HA-PfARK1-loxP parasites were treated with DMSO or RAP as above and cycle 1 schizonts were treated then with E64 for 2 h to block merozoite egress and allow complete maturation and segmentation of the schizonts. IFA (e) or U-ExM (f) was performed on unexpanded (e) or expanded (f) parasites using anti-MSP1 (e) or anti-GAP45 and anti-tubulin (f), respectively. In DMSO treated parasites, clear segmentation was observed whereas RAP-treated parasites either lacked MSP1 and GAP45 staining or contained unsegregated nuclei which were circumscribed by a large MSP1 contour (cyan arrow). U-ExM images are displayed as maximum intensity projection of multiple z slices. Right Panel: Quantification of parasites with normal GAP45 or MSP1 staining was performed (SEM ± SE, unpaired t test, ** P \u0026lt;0.01 *** P \u0026lt;0.001, n=3, number of parasites = 75 for MSP1 and 40 for GAP45).Scale bar = 2 mm. \u003cstrong\u003eg. \u003c/strong\u003eTime lapse microscopy of HA-PfARK1-loxP parasites cultured in the presence or absence of DMSO or RAP as above and cycle 1 schizonts were anlysed. Selected still images from videos (Supplementary Videos 6-7) are used to illustrate the egress and dispersal of merozoites. DMSO treated parasites egressed from the erythrocytes and dispersed efficiently. RAP treated parasites egressed from erythrocytes but continued to clump-together even after prolonged duration (magenta arrow). Scale bar = 2 mm. Right Panel: parasites undergoing normal egress as defined above were counted (SEM ± SE, unpaired t test, **** P \u0026lt;0.0001, n=3, number of parasites= 110).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/f1d99461d423e6057b108363.png"},{"id":92158316,"identity":"821dbda9-cf67-42d9-92d8-f12ba8b7d054","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:37:38","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":4890102,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConditional knockdown of PbARK1 affects male gametogony, disrupting parasite transmission.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ea.\u003c/strong\u003eqRT-PCR showing normalised expression of PbARK1 transcripts in \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003eand WT-GFP parasites. Shown is mean ± SEM; n = 3 independent experiments. Student t test was used to examine significant difference. ***p\u0026lt;0.01. \u003cstrong\u003eb\u003c/strong\u003e. Exflagellation centres per field at 15 min post-activation. n = 3 independent experiments (\u0026gt;10 fields per experiment). Error bar ± SEM. Student t test was used to assess differences between control and experimental groups. Statistical significance is indicated as ***p\u0026lt;0.01. \u003cstrong\u003ec\u003c/strong\u003e. Percentage ookinete conversion from zygote. n = 3 independent experiments (\u0026gt;100 cells). Error bar ± SEM. Student t test was used to assess differences between control and experimental groups. Statistical significance is indicated as ***p\u0026lt;0.01. \u003cstrong\u003ed\u003c/strong\u003e. Total number of GFP-positive oocysts per infected mosquito in \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e compared to WT-GFP parasites at 7-, 14-, and 21 d post-infection. Mean ± SEM. n = 3 independent experiments. Two-way ANOVA test was employed to assess differences between control and experimental groups. Statistical significance is indicated as **P \u0026lt; 0.01, ***P \u0026lt; 0.001.\u003cstrong\u003e e.\u003c/strong\u003e Mid guts at 10 x and 63 x magnification showing oocysts of \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e and WT-GFP lines at 14-, and 21 days post-infection. Scale bar: 50 mm in 10 x and 20 mm in 63 x. \u003cstrong\u003ef.\u003c/strong\u003e The diameter of GFP-positive oocysts in \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e compared to WT-GFP parasites at 7-, 14-, and 21 d post-infection. Mean ± SEM. n=3 independent experiments. Two-way ANOVA test was employed to assess differences between control and experimental groups. Statistical significance is indicated as **P \u0026lt; 0.01, ***P \u0026lt; 0.001. \u003cstrong\u003eg.\u003c/strong\u003e Expansion microscopy images of wild-type-GFP (WT-GFP) and \u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003e gene-knockdown (\u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e) male gametocytes at 8 min or 15 min post-activation (mpa). The three images on the left show maximum intensity projections of whole-cell z-stack images labelled with NHS-ester (grey), a-tubulin (green) and Hoechst (blue). The three images on the right show magnified views of the areas enclosed by the magenta squares. BB: basal body, BBs: basal bodies (clumped), IM: inner MTOC, A: axoneme. The scale bars are scaled by an expansion factor of 4.954, calculated from a comparison of axoneme diameters measured using expansion and transmission electron microscopy images.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/3296e0bfe17338dd69875ef0.png"},{"id":92158333,"identity":"09bcbec0-38b1-496c-9b7b-2dfc72cf87c9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:37:42","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":6862226,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePbark1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003egene-knockdown disrupts spindle and axoneme formation.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ea.\u003c/strong\u003eExpansion microscopy images of \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e wild-type-GFP (WT-GFP) and \u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003egene-knockdown (\u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e) male gametocytes at 8 min post-activation (mpa). The maximum intensity projections of entire cells from a z-stack, containing spindles. Cells were labelled with NHS-ester (grey), a-tubulin (green) and Hoechst (blue). Spindles are indicated by magenta lines with a and b. \u003cstrong\u003eb.\u003c/strong\u003e Magnified views of each spindle of WT-GFP and \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003ehighlighted with magenta lines with a and b in Fig. 5a. \u003cstrong\u003ec.\u003c/strong\u003e Comparison of spindle lengths measured from expansion microscopy data of WT-GFP and \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e. Data represent mean ±SEM. (n = 7 spindles for WT-GFP and 8 spindles for \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e, respectively across 3 different cells). Student t test was used to examine significant difference. ****p\u0026lt;0.0001. The scale bars and spindle lengths are scaled by an expansion factor of 4.954, calculated from a comparison of axoneme diameters measured using expansion and transmission electron microscopy images. \u003cstrong\u003ed.\u003c/strong\u003eTransmission electron microscopy images of WT-GFP and \u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003egene-knockdown male gametocytes at 8 min or 15 min post-activation. b, f, j and n are magnified views of the areas enclosed by the magenta squares in a, e, i and m, respectively. N: nucleus, IM: inner spindle MTOC, BB: basal body, A: axoneme, K: kinetochore, Sp: spindle microtubule, F: flagellum, BBs: basal bodies (clumped), Mt: microtubule.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/cf0b155480a98af0d1931b77.png"},{"id":92160048,"identity":"54bddf0e-976a-41e1-aae6-b655fa20b3ef","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:53:38","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2275308,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePbARK1 is the divergent Aurora kinase of the alternative chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) in \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e spp.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ea. \u003c/strong\u003eVolcano plot of GFP-trap pulldown followed by LC-MS/MS analysis for ARK1-GFP from both 8-9 hr schizont and 1.5-min male gametocyte lysates. \u003cstrong\u003eb.\u003c/strong\u003e Zoom-in on the domain/motif topology of INCENP1/2 in apicomplexans (Pb = \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e; Tg = \u003cem\u003eT. gondii\u003c/em\u003e; Cmur =\u003cem\u003e C. muris)\u003c/em\u003e and model organisms (Hsap = \u003cem\u003eHomo sapiens\u003c/em\u003e; Ddis = \u003cem\u003eDictyostelium discoideum\u003c/em\u003e; Gint = \u003cem\u003eGiardia intestinalis\u003c/em\u003e), focused on the extended IN-box region (blue-yellow-red) that interacts with the kinase domain of ARK1. Arrows indicate an antiparallel beta sheet formed by the N- and C-terminal extensions of the IN-box. Green: TSS transphosphorylation site (asterisks indicate (putative) phosphorylated sites) in eukaryotic INCENP homologs, but not in INCENP1/2 in \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e (Pb) and \u003cem\u003eT. gondii\u003c/em\u003e (Tg). RET is a candidate transphosphorylation site in PbINCENP2 (Pb-2). Protein structures are predicted using AlphaFold3, for aligned error plot, see Extended Data Fig. 8. \u003cstrong\u003ec.\u003c/strong\u003ePresence/absence of ARK1/2/3, and components of the chromosomal passenger complex amongst the model eukaryotes, the SAR supergroup with a specific focus on Apicomplexa. Right: consensus sequence logos of the activation and P+1 loop of Aurora kinases in Clustal color scheme: divergent phosphorylation consensus in ARK1 (GxSH instead of RxT). \u003cstrong\u003ed.\u003c/strong\u003e Summary of findings and discussion points from this study.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/a2c9eb14c93a9a2ba0ca1a4c.png"},{"id":103570284,"identity":"910797a6-6f35-47eb-ae3c-0bbcc7b2a792","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-27 08:08:10","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":31743364,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/e65b979a-b00f-4559-bdb3-776dd0a5970e.pdf"},{"id":92158312,"identity":"1143f90a-927d-48d5-98ba-b69874c33d8a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:37:38","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":20750,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryFileslegends.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/c9f185fa74afd844dde89895.docx"},{"id":92158332,"identity":"f65ca642-c504-4a51-97df-0b9b3f464d3e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:37:40","extension":"pdf","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":4921963,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eExtended Data Figs 1-8\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"ExtendedDataFigs.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/8298e7451151c7fa73516677.pdf"},{"id":92159279,"identity":"b50d6f1c-0fda-4c81-9c31-411f9cbd4279","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:45:38","extension":"mp4","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":121624,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Video 1\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryVideo1.mp4","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/dbb7a09f3b45a4ad00116924.mp4"},{"id":92160046,"identity":"af7a0b40-33a0-4856-beb9-2b3b1a2fd33e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:53:38","extension":"mp4","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":86645,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Video 2\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryVideo2.mp4","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/891507f2245010f1999d9cba.mp4"},{"id":92158319,"identity":"b3cf9817-4673-43b4-a172-c9d74ff08ad3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:37:38","extension":"mp4","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":115591,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Video 3\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryVideo3.mp4","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/210df7b6f11c1e3e7e2fa488.mp4"},{"id":92159281,"identity":"07895078-3aac-4689-af5c-895913c0bd80","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:45:38","extension":"mp4","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":73950,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Video 4\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryVideo4.mp4","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/6b26d9bcfdf3cc76763c23b0.mp4"},{"id":92159284,"identity":"28361f3d-8012-4245-8a58-ed03e19831b8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:45:38","extension":"mp4","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":230924,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Video 5\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryVideo5.mp4","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/b7e460d6d9e6eb44fe0b4665.mp4"},{"id":92158325,"identity":"1f5665f5-6aa9-48a1-913c-f8141fd85772","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:37:38","extension":"mp4","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1897866,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Video 6\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryVideo6.mp4","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/0f1cb46a2cab1326f3f58822.mp4"},{"id":92158324,"identity":"d1816804-48bf-4d67-8255-83dfe536e174","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:37:38","extension":"mp4","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1158627,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Video 7\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryVideo7.mp4","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/742840e21509aa5ecfee663e.mp4"},{"id":92158330,"identity":"f65c0222-78bb-4e9a-a75b-bb178ef31665","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:37:38","extension":"mp4","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1079618,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Video 8\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryVideo8.mp4","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/2bab8a31cbaae8bad294e72a.mp4"},{"id":92159283,"identity":"ed63bfc5-9339-4929-afa5-7cec54a19dad","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:45:38","extension":"xlsx","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":39142,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Table 1\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryTable1.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/099f56bfe9a4112c0fa1d9ff.xlsx"},{"id":92160049,"identity":"d3474d19-a4a4-48ed-a5d0-cde5ddb8bfec","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:53:38","extension":"xlsx","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":921405,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Table 2\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryTable2.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/23b21c7b9fe8c8b6c4118b74.xlsx"},{"id":92159285,"identity":"3e69f3db-3c48-4303-97c0-e650ca14b81a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:45:38","extension":"xlsx","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":14673,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Table 3\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryTable3.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/531b48b000a2cdaf349caa4d.xlsx"},{"id":92158322,"identity":"e33d6079-020b-42fc-b235-f0d8b3211207","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:37:38","extension":"xlsx","order_by":14,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":12287,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryTable4.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/d1129e35ac84362b12122b37.xlsx"},{"id":92158327,"identity":"f5fbfba0-9827-46d9-83e3-e69a9f94ef3f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-25 09:37:38","extension":"xlsx","order_by":15,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":187293,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Table 5\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryTable5.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7473364/v1/ee8c19ffbc1a14377fcac19f.xlsx"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e Competing Interest.","formattedTitle":"Plasmodium ARK1 regulates spindle formation during atypical mitosis and forms a divergent chromosomal passenger complex","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e spp., the causative agent of malaria, is a haploid unicellular eukaryote of the phylum Apicomplexa, which is evolutionarily distant from most model organisms and has some unusual divergent features of cell division. During its life cycle, mitosis is closed and typified by two distinct forms: schizogony within vertebrate host cells, and male gametogony within the female mosquito gut (Fig.\u0026nbsp;1a). During asexual proliferation within host red blood cells (schizogony), repeated asynchronous nuclear division, without chromosome condensation, produces a multinucleate schizont. Subsequent budding produces invasive merozoites to continue the cycle. In contrast, during male gametogony three rounds of rapid genome replication to octaploid (1N to 8N) occur in 8 minutes within the intact nucleus. Karyokinesis and cytokinesis are synchronised with axoneme dynamics by replication and separation of a bipartite microtubule-organising centre (MTOC), chromosome condensation, and complementary de novo basal body formation, leading to the budding of eight flagellated male gametes. These events occur within 12 to 15 min of gametocyte activation, which is probably the most rapid mitosis amongst eukaryotes\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Compared to schizogony, mitosis in male gametogony is unusual, with atypical continuous spindles and an MTOC that spans the nuclear envelope connecting the spindle microtubules with those of the axoneme. Male gametes are the only flagellated stage in the parasite\u0026rsquo;s life cycle, and therefore the only stage where centriole formation and de novo replication of the basal body occurs\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR2 CR3\" citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAurora-related kinases (ARKs) are multi-functional mitotic kinases that regulate eukaryotic cell division. They act on spindle pole duplication, kinetochore-microtubule attachment, spindle assembly, mitotic checkpoints and cytokinesis\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR6 CR7\" citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Budding yeast and the amoeba \u003cem\u003eDictyostelium discoideum\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e have a single ARK to execute all functions, suggesting these to be ancestral to all eukaryotes\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. However, multiple different lineages (e.g. vertebrates, plants, kinetoplastids) have one or more paralogs that resulted from parallel duplications, which subdivided functions over the different paralogs\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. One paralog (Aurora B in humans) is the catalytic centre of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), a key regulator of mitotic events at the cell equator, which initially hitchhikes on the inner centromere and finally remains at the central spindle to orchestrate cytokinesis. In addition to the single Aurora kinase, the CPC consists of inner centromere protein (INCENP), Survivin and Borealin\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e that guide its localisation to kinetochores, spindle and the central spindle. It is also critical for mitotic histone phosphorylation, fixing errors in kinetochore-spindle attachment, and correct cytokinesis (Fig.\u0026nbsp;1b).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e, there are also three ARKs, which have divergent sequence and mostly lack canonical scaffolds\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. ARK1, 2 and 3 are refractory to gene disruption and indispensable during asexual blood stage schizogony in both \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR14\" citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. ARK1 associates with the spindle pole body during schizogony\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, but its function is not understood during this process and its location and function in sexual stages remains unknown. Our recent studies on ARK2 revealed its association with spindle microtubules (MTs) forming a divergent protein complex with EB1, myosin K and MISFIT\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, but little is known of ARK1 and 3 functions during male gametogony or whether they are essential for parasite transmission. ARK1 function has been studied in another apicomplexan, \u003cem\u003eToxoplasma gondii\u003c/em\u003e, where it interacts with INCENP1-2 and is important for asexual replication, but its function during male gametogony is difficult to study because the sexual cycle of these parasites only takes place in the gut of cats (Fig.\u0026nbsp;1b)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHere, we have investigated \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e ARK1, integrating studies of location, function and molecular interactions across two life-cycle stages using \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e (Pf, for asexual blood-stage schizogony) and \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e (Pb, for male gametogony). High-resolution live-cell imaging and expansion microscopy revealed ARK1 associated with the mitotic spindle, kinetochores, and the inner MTOC. Conditional gene knockout using rapamycin-DiCre in \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and gene knockdown using a promoter-trap approach in \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e revealed that ARK1 regulates spindle biogenesis, karyokinesis and cytokinesis during both schizogony and male gametogony, suggesting that ARK1 is a critical regulator of \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e mitosis. Interactome analysis also identified \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e ARK1 as a component of a non-canonical Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) comprising the two divergent INCENP1 and INCENP2, but without the canonical subunits Survivin and Borealin. These data underscore the evolutionary divergence of the \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e mitotic machinery from that of its host, and therefore its potential as a target for therapeutic intervention at multiple stages of the lifecycle.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eARK1 is present in asexual stage parasites undergoing mitotic division\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe studied the location of PfARK1 in asexual blood stages, using a rapamycin-inducible dimerizable Cre recombinase (DiCre)-based strategy to knockout the ARK1 gene in the 1G5DC parasite line (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;1)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. As a first step in this strategy, we generated a HA-PfARK1-loxP parasite line, and these parasites were used to locate ARK1 during parasite division using an antibody to the HA-tag. Indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) indicated that ARK1 is expressed in trophozoite and schizont stages, but not detectable in late schizonts and all developing merozoites (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2a). ARK1 was present as a punctum proximal to the MTOC also known as a centriolar plaque, as identified by staining with an anti-centrin antibody, present only in cells with two or more associated centrin puncta, indicative of ongoing mitosis (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2a). To gain a deeper insight into ARK1 dynamics, Ultrastructure Expansion Microscopy (U-ExM) was performed using an anti-tubulin antibody to track spindle biogenesis. As reported previously\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, parasites possessed hemispindles prior to the onset of division, but PfARK1 was not expressed in these parasites or in parasites containing interpolar spindles (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2b, c). Strikingly, PfARK1 was specifically found associated with mitotic spindles and PfARK1-positive double puncta seemed to be present at the polar ends of the mitotic spindles (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2b, c). These data strongly indicate that ARK1 is expressed transiently, and only when parasites undergo mitotic division.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese observations were also validated using the rodent malaria parasite, \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e, a well-established model for studying gametogony and parasite development within the mosquito host. The subcellular location of PbARK1 in asexual stages was examined by generating an endogenous, C-terminal GFP-tagged PbARK1 (PbARK1-GFP) transgenic parasite line (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;2a-c and Supplementary Notes). Live cell imaging of PbARK1-GFP in asexual blood stages revealed a diffuse location in early ring stages. During trophozoite and early schizont stages, PbARK1-GFP re-localised to discrete focal points in the nucleus (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;2d). As schizogony progressed, the focal points of fluorescence divided into two closely associated puncta, which followed subsequent asynchronous nuclear divisions and eventually became diffuse during the later stages (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;2d, e). These observations are consistent with the ARK1 location in \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e as described above (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2a).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePbARK1 is located in the nucleoplasm, at the spindle poles and at microtubules during male gametogony\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn male gametocytes, PbARK1-GFP had a diffuse distribution predominantly within the nucleoplasm. Within one-min post-activation this was concentrated to a single discrete focal point adjacent to the DNA (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2d), and then the distribution rapidly extended to form an arc-like structure, which within three-min post-activation divided into two distinct puncta positioned at opposite sides of the nucleus (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2d and Supplementary Video 1). The two PbARK1-GFP foci elongated again, forming two arc-like structures along the periphery of the nucleus (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2d and Supplementary Video 2). By 6- to 8-min post-activation, a subsequent round of extension and division had produced eight discrete PbARK1-GFP foci, coincident with the completion of three successive rounds of mitosis (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2d and Supplementary Video 3).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe arc-like pattern of PbARK1 observed in live cell imaging coincided with the pattern of anti-tubulin staining in IFA and U-ExM, suggesting an association with the mitotic spindle and spindle poles (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2e and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;2f). To further investigate ARK1 location, dynamics, and association with mitotic spindles and kinetochore segregation, we compared the location of PbARK1 with that of the kinetochore marker NDC80, spindle marker ARK2 and cytoplasmic axonemal protein kinesin-8B. We generated dual fluorescent parasite lines expressing PbARK1-GFP (green) and either PbNDC80-mCherry (magenta), PbARK2-mCherry (magenta) or Pbkinesin-8B-mCherry (magenta) by genetic cross as described previously\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Live-cell imaging showed that both PbARK1-GFP and PbNDC80-mCherry were located next to the Hoechst-stained DNA, partially overlapping at the spindle but not at the spindle poles (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2f left panel, Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;2g, and Supplementary Video 4). 3D-structured illumination microscopy (SIM) at one-min post-activation showed a clear association of PbNDC80-mCherry with PbARK1-GFP at the spindle but not at the spindle poles (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2f right panel). In parasite lines expressing PbARK1-GFP and PbARK2-mCherry, these proteins were co-located at the spindle (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2g left panel, Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;2h, and Supplementary Video 5). Further 3D-SIM at one-min post-activation showed an association of PbARK1-GFP with PbARK2-mCherry at the spindle, with PbARK1-GFP more outside at the spindle poles (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2g right panel). However, in a parasite line expressing PbARK1-GFP and Pbkinesin-8B-mCherry (a cytoplasmic marker) there was no overlap between these two proteins (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2h left panel and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;2i), an observation which was further substantiated by 3D-SIM imaging (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2h right panel).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDuring meiotic stages of development post-fertilisation, PbARK1-GFP was diffuse in the cytoplasm, with transient nuclear foci forming in zygotes and disappearing in mature ookinetes (Extended data Fig.\u0026nbsp;3a and Supplementary Notes). A diffuse distribution was also observed throughout oocyst and sporozoite stages, including those from salivary glands (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;3b and Supplementary Notes). In liver stages (in HepG2-infected cells), the PbARK1-GFP signal remained diffuse even at 48 hours post infection (h.p.i), with slight perinuclear enrichment at 64 h.p.i (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;3c and Supplementary Notes).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePfARK1 regulates spindle formation and karyokinesis\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe functional role of PfARK1 in asexual blood stage development was assessed by examining the effect of deleting the gene. Rapamycin (RAP) treatment of HA-PfARK1-loxP parasites efficiently excised the floxed sequence (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;1c) and caused depletion of PfARK1 protein (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;1d). Synchronized ring stage cultures of 1G5DC-SkipFlox (control) (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;4a) or HA-PfARK1-loxP parasite lines were treated with RAP or DMSO (control) and parasite growth was monitored every 24 h. In cycle 0 (RAP-treatment) there was little effect on the parasitaemia of HA-PfARK1-loxP parasites. However, a significant growth defect was observed at the beginning of the next cycle (cycle 1) as indicated by a marked reduction in parasitaemia (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3a and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;4b), whilst there was almost no effect of RAP treatment on 1G5DC-SkipFlox (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;4a). This growth defect was further accentuated in subsequent cycles. Microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained blood smears suggested normal ring to trophozoite development in cycle 1 DMSO-treated parasites (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;4c). However, following RAP treatment and PfARK1 depletion, a significant number of parasites were pyknotic (at ~\u0026thinsp;96 hpi) and fewer rings were found in cycle 2 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3b). Schizont development following treatment with E64 to block late schizont maturation and merozoite egress was analysed: a significant number PfARK1-depleted cycle 1 schizonts had abnormal morphology, with unsegregated nuclei (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3c and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;4d), which is consistent with the role of PfARK1 in nuclear division. This suggestion, that the decrease in parasitaemia resulting from PfARK1 depletion was due to its role in nuclear division and/or schizont maturation, was investigated further.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo begin to understand how PfARK1 regulates asexual cell division, MTOC duplication and spindle formation were examined. U-ExM revealed the formation of various forms of spindles as described earlier with one or two centrin-labelled foci on the cytoplasmic side of the nuclear envelope \u003cb\u003e(\u003c/b\u003eFig.\u0026nbsp;3d\u003cb\u003e)\u003c/b\u003e and associated with NHS-ester labelled MTOCs or associated with mitotic spindles\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. In PfARK1-depleted parasites there were fewer spindles indicated by either absent or speckled tubulin staining (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3d and Extended Fig.\u0026nbsp;4e, grey arrow). As mentioned above, the nuclei appeared unsegregated with associated multiple centrin foci, and centrin aggregates were seen away from the nuclei and disorganized (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3d and Extended Fig.\u0026nbsp;4e, square). Collectively, these data suggested that while the MTOC duplication was unaltered, it was disorganized and spindle formation and karyokinesis were impaired in PfARK1-depleted parasites.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePfARK1 depletion impairs segmentation of daughter merozoites\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAt the end of schizogony, segmentation of the schizont by invagination of the parasite plasma membrane leads to formation of merozoites prior to their egress. IFAs were performed using antibody to MSP1, a parasite surface marker, to assess segmentation following ARK1 depletion. MSP1 fluorescence with a bunch of grape-like contours, characterized the membrane of control parasites, but in contrast, PfARK1-depleted parasites either lacked MSP1 staining, or contained large aggregations that encompassed multiple merozoites or unsegregated nuclei (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3e, cyan arrow).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eU-ExM of mature (segmented) schizonts with anti-GAP45 antibody-labelling revealed inner membrane complex (IMC) and tubulin labelled subpellicular MT, and rhoptries labeled with NHS-ester (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3f). However, for the PfARK1-depleted parasites, several unsegregated nuclei were present and these cells either lacked GAP45 staining, or the parasite pellicle (the plasma membrane/IMC) was disorganized (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3f, cyan arrow). NHS-ester labelled rhoptries were found with some merozoites, typically the ones with GAP45 staining. In some parasites rhoptries were either not formed properly or were absent, which may be due to arrested division of these parasites prior to rhoptry formation. In addition, subpellicular MT were either not observed in the cell or were mislocalised. These observations suggest impaired cytokinesis of daughter merozoites upon PfARK1 depletion.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo study the effect of PfARK1 depletion on merozoite release and egress, time-lapse microscopy was performed\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. For this purpose, parasites were treated with protein kinase G (PKG)-inhibitor ML-10 to allow schizont maturation but prevent egress, then its removal allowed egress, which was captured by time-lapse microscopy\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Egress and dispersal of merozoites for control parasites was observed (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3g and Supplementary Video 6), and while egress from the erythrocyte initially appeared almost normal in PfARK1-depleted parasites, the merozoites either remained attached to the residual body or clumped together (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3g, magenta arrows, and Supplementary Videos 7, 8) even after prolonged duration. These defects likely result from the abnormal nuclear segregation and cytokinesis in PfARK1-depleted parasites.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePbARK1 knockdown reveals an essential role during male gametogony and parasite transmission\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrevious analysis by gene disruption had shown that PbARK1 is probably essential for asexual blood-stage development\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. To be able to manipulate its expression in sexual stages we used a promoter trap strategy, replacing the \u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003e promoter with the promoter from \u003cem\u003eama1\u003c/em\u003e, resulting in \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eama1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003e hereafter referred as (\u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e), a gene which is not transcribed in gametocytes but is highly expressed in asexual blood stages (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;5a)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Correct genetic integration in the transgenic parasite line was confirmed by PCR (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;5b), and \u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003e transcription was shown to be downregulated in \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e gametocytes by qRT-PCR (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4a). A phenotypic analysis of these \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e parasites was then performed at different stages of parasite development within the mosquito.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePhenotypic analysis revealed that male gametogony (as scored by exflagellation centres) was severely affected in the \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e line compared to GFP control (wild-type-GFP; WT-GFP) parasite (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4b) \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, and therefore significantly fewer ookinetes (differentiated zygotes after fertilisation) were formed (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4c). In mosquitoes fed with \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e parasites, we observed significantly fewer oocysts in the midgut at day 7 post infection, in contrast to the hundreds of oocysts in mosquitoes fed WT-GFP parasites (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4d). The number of \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e oocysts was further reduced by day 14 and day 21 post infection compared to WT-GFP oocysts (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4d). The \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e oocysts were also significantly smaller than the WT-GFP oocysts 7 days post infection and diminished further by day 21 post infection (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4e, f). The number of salivary glands sporozoites was significantly reduced in \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e parasites on day 21 (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;5c). To further confirm the absence of sporogony, mosquitoes that had been fed with \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e or WT-GFP parasites were allowed to feed on susceptible na\u0026iuml;ve mice. Mosquitoes infected with WT-GFP parasites successfully transmitted the parasite, with blood-stage infection detected in na\u0026iuml;ve mice after 4 days. In contrast, \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e parasites failed to transmit in most experiments (five out of eight) (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;5d). However, on three occasions, they were able to establish infection in bite-back experiments, although the prepatent period was markedly prolonged, with blood-stage parasites first detected 14 days post-infection (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;5d).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo investigate the effect of \u003cem\u003ePbark1\u003c/em\u003e downregulation at the genome wide level, we performed RNA-seq analysis in triplicate, starting with total RNA extracted from purified \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e and WT-GFP gametocytes at two time points: before activation (non-activated, 0 min) and at 30 min post-activation (mpa). Differences in gene expression between the correspondent samples were detected. In non-activated gametocytes, only a small number of differentially expressed genes were identified in the \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e sample, with 10 genes up- and 8 genes downregulated, respectively (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;5e and Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;1). Those genes included several fam a and b proteins known to be highly variable during life cycle progression due to their involvement in host immune response modulation\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. They were therefore not considered as significant. At 30 mpa, 23 genes were upregulated including several conserved \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e proteins with unknown function as well as PBANKA_1206900, a tubulin beta chain and putatively critical during gametocyte formation\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. A significantly higher number of genes (229) were downregulated (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;5f and Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;1). These genes included several protein kinases, e.g. PBANKA_1228800 and calcium-dependent protein kinase 5 (CDPK5 \u0026ndash; PBANKA_1351500), as well as genes involved in lipid biosynthesis including PBANKA_0201300, a putative lysophospholipase, PBANKA_1127000, and a choline/ethanolaminephosphotransferase. Also, down-regulated were myosin essential light chain (ELC) and skeleton-binding protein 1 (PBANKA_1101300), as well as several enzymes known to be critical for sexual differentiation. Gene ontology (GO) analysis also revealed that several genes detected as downregulated were associated with ribosome biogenesis (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;5g). These data indicate not only a potential cell cycle arrest but also most likely stress sensing and translational inhibition as a result of PbARK1 depletion.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eark1PTD\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eparasites have defective spindle formation, MTOC separation, and axoneme formation during male gametogony\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo further investigate the function of PbARK1 during male gametogony, WT-GFP and \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e male gametocytes were observed during gametogony using U-ExM. In WT-GFP male gametocytes at 8 mpa, individual MTOCs were distinct and separated, whereas in \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e male gametocytes multiple MTOCs were clumped and aggregated together (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4g and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;6a). At 15 mpa, WT-GFP male gametocytes were observed undergoing exflagellation, whereas in \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e male gametocytes the MTOCs were still clumped together and no exflagellation was observed (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4g and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;6a).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe examined whether the lack of MTOC separation in the \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e line led us to examine whether this was caused by a defect in spindle formation. At 8 mpa, long spindles with clearly separated MTOCs were present in WT-GFP parasites, but in \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e lines, short spindles, with the two MTOCs remaining close together (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5a, b) were present. Measurement showed that \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e spindles were significantly shorter (~\u0026thinsp;0.8 \u0026micro;m) than WT-GFP spindles (~\u0026thinsp;2.5 \u0026micro;m; Fig.\u0026nbsp;5c). These findings corroborated studies on PfARK1 during schizogony as depletion of the kinase resulted in abnormal spindle formation and accumulation of MTOCs around unsegregated nuclei (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3d).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTEM observations further revealed structural defects in \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e male gametocytes. At 8 mpa, in the \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e line, MTOCs formed a normal bipartite structure consisting of an inner spindle MTOC and an outer basal body MTOC, similar to those in WT-GFP male gametocytes, and normal axoneme formation was observed (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5dA-D, I-L and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;6bA-D), However, we also observed MTOCs that appeared detached from the nucleus in the \u003cem\u003eark1 PTD\u003c/em\u003e line (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5dI, J and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;6bA, B, D). As revealed by expansion microscopy, multiple basal body MTOCs were often aggregated and clumped together (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5dL). Within the cytoplasm, we observed singlet or doublet MT that may have been axoneme precursors and likely represent failures in axoneme formation (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5dK, L).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAt 15 mpa, WT-GFP gametocytes had started to form gametes with flagellum and nucleus (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5dE, F, G, H), while in the \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e line there was incomplete axoneme formation and exflagellation rarely occurred (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5dM-P and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;6bE-H). In addition, two basal body MTOCs remained close together without proper separation (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5dM, N, P), with short spindle MT visible between them (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5dP and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;6c).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePbARK1 is part of a divergent chromosome passenger complex (CPC) with two INCENP proteins\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo explain the ARK1 phenotypes and confirm the logic of the observed subcellular localisations, we wanted to understand what protein scaffolds or modulator proteins might direct ARK1 activity and localisation during both asexual and sexual stages of the parasite. We therefore prepared lysates of \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e schizonts and male gametocytes from PbARK1-GFP and WT-GFP control parasites, immunoprecipated the protein with GFP-Trap and then identified bound proteins using mass spectrometry. At both stages we identified two divergent inner centromere proteins (INCENP1/2) as major ARK1 interactors (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6a and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;7). Although the differences were not significant (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2 for each sample), in the male gametocyte sample we observed co-variation of various spindle and kinetochore proteins amongst the pulldowns (Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;2): for example, the putative ARK2-based spindle complex including MISFIT-MyoK-EB1, several kinetochore subunits e.g. Apicomplexan Kinetochore proteins (AKiTs) 1, 3, 5 and 7 and the condensin-II-specific subunits CapH2-G2-D3. Strikingly, we saw no survivin/borealin-like proteins in the interactome, confirming earlier predictions that \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e spp., and more generally apicomplexans, lack other conserved components of the CPC (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6c). Since the spatiotemporal dynamics of ARK1 suggest that it may not act as the classic passenger complex on chromosomes, it is possible that the chromatin-directing function of Survivin and Borealin has become obsolete for apicomplexans and that the structural motifs for localisation and activation of ARK1 by INCENP1 and 2 might be revealed upon detailed comparative sequence analyses.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eT. gondii\u003c/em\u003e, another apicomplexan, sister to \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e spp. also has two INCENP paralogs that interact with TgARK1, so we sought to reconstruct the evolutionary history of the INCENP proteins with a focus on alveolates and apicomplexans (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6b, c). The duplication that gave rise to INCENP1 and INCENP2 can be traced back to the common ancestor of all Apicomplexa (sensu stricto). We found parallel but separate duplications in other different alveolate lineages such as apicomplexpan-like Squirmida, Chrompodellida and dinoflagellate-related lineages concomitant with the loss of borealin/survivin (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6c), suggesting INCENP duplications might compensate for loss of these chromatin-directing subunits. Interestingly, INCENP2 is absent from Piroplasmida, lineages which have also lost ARK2 and ARK3, suggesting that INCENP2 might also play a role in ARK2/3-based regulatory pathways. A co-fold model of \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e INCENP1/2 and ARK1 using AlphaFold3, suggests that the conserved IN-box region involved in kinase interaction is flanked in all apicomplexan proteins by N- and C-terminal extensions that form a beta-sheet \u0026ndash; folding INCENP1/2 around ARK1 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6b and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;8). In addition, the C-terminal extension has a conserved CxC motif, possibly involved in posttranslational modification (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6b). We could only predict a coiled-coil in the N-terminus of INCENP1, and no further structural features could be discerned for INCENP2 using AlphaFold3. Such absence of any feature makes it hard to predict the binding mode of INCENP2 either as a single ARK1-INCENP2 interaction or forming an INCENP2-ARK1-INCENP1 trimeric complex.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFinally, we sought whether any non-canonical ARK1/INCENP features might indicate alternative CPC functions in \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e spp., such as the highly conserved autophosphorylation sites in both Aurora B and INCENP, which are crucial for the kinase activity of the CPC in vertebrates\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. We found that both the broadly conserved autophosphorylation site in the activation loop of Aurora kinases (RxTxCGT) and the activating phosphosite on INCENP (RTSS in human) are markedly different (GxSH in ARK1) and (RTSS absent from INCENP1/2). However, some Aurora consensus sites can be found in the vicinity among INCENP1/2 paralogs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6b \u0026ndash; green boxes). ARK2 paralogs have a conserved Aurora activation loop, while ARK3 has a serine-rich activation loop with multiple candidate activating phosphorylation sites (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6c). The absence of clear conserved auto/trans-phosphorylation sites between ARK1 and INCENP1/2 in \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e spp. indicate CPC kinase activity might be regulated in a different fashion, possibly by input of another kinase.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur cross-stage analysis identified ARK1 as a central organiser of \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e mitosis using \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e model systems. First, ARK1 localises to the spindle and inner MTOC specifically during mitosis, and its depletion in \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e reduces spindle formation, prevents proper karyokinesis, disrupts segmentation and impedes egress. Second, during the rapid mitoses of male gametogony, \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e ARK1 dynamics follow spindle poles; knockdown shortens spindles, block MTOC separation and axoneme biogenesis, and abolishes transmission. These phenotypes position ARK1 upstream of both chromosome segregation and gamete formation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOur findings show that ARK1 is preferentially expressed and targeted during the mitotic stages marked by spindle formation. Live cell imaging and expansion microscopy revealed that ARK1 locates to the spindle apparatus and the spindle poles, corresponding to the inner core of the bipartite MTOC\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Expansion microscopy using centrosome (centrin) and microtubule (tubulin) markers confirmed that ARK1 associates with spindle poles within the inner MTOC in both mitotic stages. Some of these features had been observed earlier for \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e ARK1 and further it had been shown that its location is limited to mitotically dividing stages\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Dual fluorescence microscopy analysis during male gametogony revealed that it colocalised with ARK2, another aurora kinase reported recently, and the kinetochore marker NDC80 at the plus ends of spindle microtubules, suggesting a cooperative role for ARK1 and ARK2 at equatorial spindles. It also has a role in kinetochore dynamics, as observed previously for ARK2\u003csup\u003e10\u003c/sup\u003e. However, live cell imaging in \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e clearly showed that it is part of the inner MTOC as it does not colocalise with the basal body and axoneme marker, kinesin-8B. This contrasts with \u003cem\u003eT. gondii\u003c/em\u003e ARK1, which, when tagged at the N-terminus, exhibited a dynamic localisation to both nucleus and cytoplasm during division, but remained predominantly nuclear in non-dividing cells\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Its colocalisation with kinetochore NDC80 and ARK2 markers further supports a dual role in spindle organization, kinetochore segregation, and spindle pole integrity\u0026mdash;reminiscent of Aurora B, which localises to centromeres, the central spindle, and the spindle midzone\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFunctional genetic studies in \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e had indicated that ARK1 is likely essential in asexual blood stages\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Attempts to generate conditional knockdowns using the DD/Shield system in \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e were unsuccessful, as reported recently\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Here using the DiCre-Rapamycin system for \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and promoter trap strategy for \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, we demonstrate that ARK1 depletion leads to defects in spindle formation and karyokinesis. In \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e, ARK1 is required for proper spindle elongation, parasite growth, cytokinesis and egress. In \u003cem\u003eToxoplasma\u003c/em\u003e, overexpression of a kinase dead mutant of TgARK1 disrupts chromosome segregation and spindle pole body maturation, similar to some of the division defects observed here in asexual stages, although the mechanism was unexplored\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDuring male gametogony, ARK1 knockdown led to defects in the spindle apparatus and failure of MTOC separation, suggesting its associated function with the outer basal body\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. This was accompanied by abnormal axoneme formation and very few flagellated male gametes, indicating a failure in MTOC-basal body segregation. These results suggest that while ARK1 is part of the inner MTOC, its functional association with the outer MTOC is essential for successful mitosis and gamete formation, similar to the egress and spindle elongation defects seen in \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e. These features also show some resemblance to those of Aurora B in many model systems\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOur protein interactome analysis reveals that ARK1 is part of a non-canonical chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), comprising two divergent INCENP homologs and lacking the canonical chromatin-targeting components Borealin and Survivin. This is consistent with earlier molecular cell biological studies in \u003cem\u003eToxoplasma\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. While studies in \u003cem\u003eToxoplasma\u003c/em\u003e also reported two INCENPs, they did not detect the presence or absence of other CPC components. The lack of chromatin-targeting components might suggest that INCENP1/2 can facilitate such interactions themselves or simply mean these are lost and replaced by interactions of different proteins. For instance, INCENPs in apicomplexans may form alternative CPC complexes, similar to \u003cem\u003eTrypanosoma\u003c/em\u003e, where INCENP associates with kinesin-1A/B\u003csup\u003e34\u003c/sup\u003e. A potential candidate kinesin might be kinesin-8X, which shows a similar localisation pattern during different life stages as ARK1\u003csup\u003e35\u003c/sup\u003e. Interestingly, plants and heterokont algae also harbour divergent Survivin-like proteins, with a central conserved but highly divergent helix suggesting a possible broader evolutionary divergence of CPC components across eukaryotes\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Future studies will need to include a further scrutiny of INCENP1/2 localisation and interactomes to determine whether any new CPC components might be present in apicomplexans.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eComparative genomics provides an evolutionary scenario for this atypical CPC. INCENP duplication into INCENP1 and INCENP2 likely arose in the apicomplexan ancestor, concomitant with the loss of Survivin and Borealin (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6). Notably, INCENP2 has been secondarily lost in piroplasmids, which also lack ARK2 and ARK3, hinting at functional coupling between Aurora paralogs and specific INCENP variants. Structural predictions using AlphaFold3 suggest that apicomplexan INCENPs contain extended IN-box regions that fold around the ARK1 kinase domain and feature a conserved CxC motif absent from other eukaryotic homologs. At the same time, ARK1 itself shows a divergent activation loop (GxSH instead of the canonical RxT), and INCENPs lack the canonical transphosphorylation site (TSS) site found in other eukaryotes. Such changes might indicate that other kinases are necessary to activate ARK1. Together, these features indicate that apicomplexans have likely rewired CPC architecture and regulation, replacing canonical chromatin-targeting logic with INCENP-centric scaffolds that localise ARK1 at the inner MTOC, spindle and nucleoplasm.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhile the function of the other two ARKs-ARK2 and ARK3- is unclear, at least in asexual stages, our recent studies on PbARK2 have provided insights into its role in sexual transmission stages. While ARK2 regulates spindle dynamics during male gametogony just like ARK1 in the present studies, surprisingly, its deletion did not impact exflagellation, unlike that of the ARK1 mutant (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4b). Previous studies also revealed that PbARK2 deletion caused an increase in the expression of ARK1 and ARK3\u003csup\u003e10\u003c/sup\u003e. Therefore, in the light of the present work, it is reasonable to suggest that ARK1 and ARK2 may have some overlap of function during male gametogony, particularly in spindle biogenesis. It was also interesting to note that the deletion of PfARK1 resulted in higher PfARK2 levels in schizonts (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;1f), although this increase was insufficient to complement the PfARK1 mutant. While there may be some overlap in ARK1 and ARK2 function, each is indispensable for parasite survival.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOverall, this study suggests that \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e ARK1 regulates spindle elongation during mitotic division and associates at the inner nuclear pole of the MTOC. However, its association with the outer MTOC is essential for karyokinesis and for flagellated gamete formation. ARK1 appears to represent a unique Aurora kinase paralog that, while divergent in structure, shares functional similarities with Aurora B in humans. This suggests that \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e has evolved an atypical mechanism of cell division, where many of the canonical molecules are either missing or highly divergent, reflecting the parasite\u0026rsquo;s adaptation to complex life cycle transitions.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003ecultures\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePlasmodium falciparum\u003c/em\u003e strain 1G5DC was obtained from European Malaria Reagent Repository (EMRR) and DSM1 was obtained from \u003cem\u003eBEI\u003c/em\u003e resources, Malaria Research and Reference Reagents Resource Centre (MR4), American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Parasites were maintained in O\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;human erythrocytes (5% hematocrit) in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 0.5% Albumax II and 50 \u0026micro;g/mL hypoxanthine\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Cultures were maintained at 37\u0026deg;C under a mixture of 5% CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, 3% O\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, and 91.8% N\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e or 5% CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e. Fresh erythrocytes and culture medium were used to dilute parasites to maintain 3\u0026ndash;5% parasitaemia and 5% haematocrit. Relevant drugs were used during the culture of various transgenic lines, as described below. Parasite synchronization was carried out using 5% sorbitol as described previously\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eGeneration of transgenic parasite lines\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll PCR primers used in this study were synthesized by Sigma and are indicated in Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;3.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e1G5DC SkipFlox\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA dimerisable Cre recombinase (diCre) expressing parasite line was generated by transfecting pSkipFlox plasmid, a kind gift from Tobias Spielmann (Addgene Plasmid #85797) into the parent line 1G5DC\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Parasites were selected in the presence of 2.5 \u0026micro;g/ml of blasticidin.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003epSLI-HA-ARK1- loxP\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo generate a conditional knockout transgenic parasite, a selection-linked integration (SLI) approach was used. To generate the construct, a 592 bp homology region corresponding to the 5\u0026rsquo;-end of the PfARK1 gene was amplified using primers (P1 and P2) derived from 3D7 genomic DNA. The PCR product was cloned into \u003cem\u003eNotI\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ePmeI\u003c/em\u003e sites upstream of loxP and a Myc-tag coding sequence in the pSLI-N-sandwich-loxP (K13) vector, which was a gift from Tobias Spielmann (Addgene Plasmid #85793). A recodonised sequence version of full-length PfARK1 with a N-terminal 3xHA tag and followed by a loxP site was custom synthesised as a G-block (Genscript). The G-block was cloned in the above construct downstream of yDHODH using \u003cem\u003eNheI\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eXhoI\u003c/em\u003e restriction sites\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003etransfection\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe pSLI-HA-PfARK1-loxP construct was transfected in 1G5DC SkipFlox parasites at the ring stage using\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;100\u0026micro;g of purified plasmid DNA. Transgenic parasites were selected by using 2nM WR99210 and integrants were then enriched using 1.5\u0026micro;M DSM-1. The parasites that appeared after drug selection were genotyped using PCR primers (Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;3 and Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;1a). The desired integration was confirmed by sequencing of PCR products.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConditional knockout of PfARK1\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eHA-PfARK1-loxP parasites were treated with 250 nM rapamycin at ring stage for 24 hours. The genomic DNA was isolated from DMSO/RAP-treated parasites and excision of the PfARK1 locus flanked by loxP sites in the transgenic parasite was confirmed by PCR using primers (P7/P8).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003egrowth rate assays\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHA-PfARK1-loxP parasites were cultured in the presence of 10 nM WR99210, 2.5 \u0026micro;g/ml blasticidin and 1.5\u0026micro;M DSM-1. Cultures were maintained at 2% hematocrit and 7\u0026ndash;8% parasitaemia. To perform the growth rate assay, 1G5DC-SkipFlox and HA-PfARK1-LoxP parasites were synchronised at ring stage for two cycles using 5% sorbitol for 20 min at 37\u0026deg;C, and the rings were seeded at 0.5% parasitaemia and 2% hematocrit. To deplete ARK1, parasites were treated with either DMSO (vehicle control) or 250 nM rapamycin for 24 h. Thin Giemsa-stained blood smears were examined periodically under a microscope to quantify the parasitaemia at different parasite stages. For assessment of parasitaemia by flow cytometry, cells were fixed by incubation in a solution containing 1% paraformaldehyde and 0.0075% glutaraldehyde at ambient temperature for 15 min on an end-to-end rocker. Post-fixation, samples were either stored at 4\u0026deg;C or stained immediately with Hoechst 33342 dye at 37\u0026deg;C for 10 min. After staining, samples were washed with FACS buffer and then analysed on either BDverse (BD Biosciences) or BD FACSymphony A1 Flow Cytometers, acquiring between 10,000 and 100,000 events per sample. Data analysis was carried out using FlowJo software version 10.10.0.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eEthics statement (Studies on\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eP. berghei\u003c/b\u003e\u003cb\u003e)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e All animal procedures were approved following an ethical review process and conducted in accordance with the United Kingdom Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, under Home Office Project Licenses (PDD2D5182 and PP3589958). Female CD1 outbred mice (6 to 8 weeks old) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories and used for all experiments carried out in the UK.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePurification of\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eP. berghei\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eschizonts and gametocytes\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBlood-stage parasites were obtained from infected mice on day 4 post-infection and cultured at 37\u0026deg;C with gentle rotation (100 rpm) for 11 or 24 hours. Schizonts were purified the following day using a 60% v/v NycoDenz gradient prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The NycoDenz stock solution consisted of 27.6% w/v NycoDenz in 5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 3 mM KCl, and 0.3 mM EDTA.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGametocyte purification was performed by first infecting phenylhydrazine-treated mice\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, followed by sulfadiazine treatment two days post-infection to enrich for gametocytes. Blood was collected on day 4 post-infection, and gametocyte-infected cells were purified using a 48% v/v NycoDenz gradient in PBS, prepared from the same NycoDenz stock solution. Gametocytes were collected from the interface and subsequently activated for downstream assays\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eGeneration of\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eP. berghei\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003etransgenic parasites\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGFP-tagging constructs were generated using the p277 plasmid vector and transfected into parasites as previously described\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. A schematic representation of the wild-type \u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003e locus, the GFP-tagging constructs, and the recombined \u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003e locus is shown in Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;2a. Correct integration of the \u003cem\u003egfp\u003c/em\u003e sequence at the \u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003e locus was confirmed by diagnostic PCR using primer 1 (intArk1tg) and primer 2 (ol492), as indicated in Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;2b. The expression of native ARK1-GFP was confirmed by Western blot analysis (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;2c).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo investigate the function of ARK1, a promoter trap strategy was employed using double homologous recombination to generate a conditional knockdown line (\u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e). The knockdown construct was derived from the P\u003cem\u003eama1\u003c/em\u003e plasmid (pSS368), in which \u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003e was placed under the control of the \u003cem\u003eama1\u003c/em\u003e promoter, as previously described\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. A schematic representation of the endogenous \u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003e locus, the targeting constructs, and the recombined \u003cem\u003eark1\u003c/em\u003e locus is shown in Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;5a. Diagnostic PCR was performed to confirm successful integration, as outlined in Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;5a. Integration at the 5\u0026prime; locus was verified using primers intPTD31_5 (Primer 1) and 5\u0026prime;-intPTD (Primer 2), while integration at the 3\u0026prime; end was confirmed using primers intPTD31_3 (Primer 3) and 3\u0026prime;-intPTama1 (Primer 4) (Extended Data Fig.\u0026nbsp;5b). Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;3. Transfections were carried out by electroporation using \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e ANKA line 2.34 for GFP-tagging experiments and ANKA line 507cl1 expressing GFP for generation of the knockdown line\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eGeneration of dual tagged parasite lines (\u003c/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eP. berghei\u003c/b\u003e\u003cb\u003e)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo generate dual-labelled parasites, ARK1-GFP parasites were mixed in equal proportions with either NDC80-mCherry, ARK2-mCherry, or kinesin-8B-mCherry labelled parasites and co-injected into mice. Four to five days post-infection, when gametocytaemia was high, Anopheles mosquitoes were allowed to feed on the infected mice. Mosquitoes were examined for oocyst development and sporozoite formation at days 14 and 21 post-feeding. Infected mosquitoes were then used to infect na\u0026iuml;ve mice via mosquito bite-back. Blood-stage infection was assessed 4\u0026ndash;5 days later by Giemsa-stained blood smear microscopy. In this way, parasites expressing both ARK1-GFP and either NDC80-mCherry, ARK2-mCherry, or kinesin-8B-mCherry were obtained. Gametocytes from these mixed lines were purified, and fluorescence microscopy was performed as described below to examine protein co-localisation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP. berghei\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003ephenotype analyses\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eInfections were initiated by intraperitoneal injection of approximately 50,000 \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e parasites from WT-GFP or \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e lines into mice. Asexual stages and gametocyte production were monitored on Giemsa-stained thin smears. Four to five days post-infection, exflagellation and ookinete conversion were assessed using a Zeiss AxioImager M2 microscope with an AxioCam ICc1 digital camera. For mosquito transmission assays, 30\u0026ndash;50 \u003cem\u003eAnopheles stephensi\u003c/em\u003e (SD 500) mosquitoes were allowed to feed for 20 min on anaesthetised, infected mice with ~\u0026thinsp;15% asexual parasitaemia and comparable gametocyte levels (as determined by Giemsa-stained smears). To evaluate midgut infection, ~\u0026thinsp;15 mosquito guts were dissected on day 7, 14 and 21 post-feeding, and oocysts were counted using a 63\u0026times; oil immersion objective on the same microscope setup. Sporozoites in oocysts were counted on day 14 and day 21 post feeding. Salivary glands were isolated on day 21 to count the sporozoites. Bite-back experiments were performed 21 days post-feeding using na\u0026iuml;ve mice, and blood smears were examined after 3\u0026ndash;4 days. All experiments were conducted at least three times to assess the phenotype.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eImmunofluorescence Assay (IFAs)\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e - Immunofluorescence assays (IFA) were conducted on thin blood smears following a previously described protocol\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. In brief, air-dried smears were fixed for 2 min using ice cold 1:1 mixture of methanol and acetone. The smears were dried to remove any traces of methanol/acetone followed by blocking with 3% BSA for 45 minutes at room temperature. Samples were incubated with primary antibodies for 12 h at 4\u0026deg;C. After thorough washing with 1X PBS, Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies were added and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Smears were then mounted with VectaShield medium (Vector Laboratories Inc.) containing DAPI for nuclear staining. Microscopy was performed using a LSM980 AR confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss) or Zeiss Axio Observer microscope and image processing was carried out using Zeiss ZEN Blue (versions 3.1 or 3.9). Representative z-stack images were selected for figure preparation unless indicated otherwise. IFA or U-ExM (described below) with MSP1 or GAP45 antibodies was performed to assess segmentation in schizonts that had been treated with 10 \u0026micro;M E64 at ~\u0026thinsp;42 h.p.i (cycle 1) for 4\u0026ndash;5 hours to prevent egress and allow complete maturation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e - Purified gametocytes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in microtubule-stabilising buffer on poly-L-lysine\u0026ndash;coated slides (Sigma), permeabilised with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, and blocked with 10% goat serum and 3% BSA in PBS. Primary antibodies\u0026mdash;rabbit anti-GFP (1:250, Thermo Fisher) and mouse anti\u0026ndash;α-tubulin (1:1000, Sigma)\u0026mdash;were diluted in 1% BSA and 10% goat serum in PBS and incubated for 1 h. Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit and Alexa Fluor 568 anti-mouse secondary antibodies (1:1000, Invitrogen) were applied for 45 min in the dark. Slides were washed with PBS between steps, mounted with Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Labs), and sealed. Images were acquired using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope with a 63\u0026times; oil immersion objective and AxioCam ICc1 camera. Fluorescence was adjusted using Axiovision (Rel. 4.8) software. Experiments were repeated at least three times, and 20\u0026ndash;30 cells per stage were analysed. See figure legends for additional details.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003elive-cell imaging\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eLive imaging was carried out with minor modifications to previously described protocols\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. HA-PfARK1-loxP parasites were synchronized at the ring stage and treated with either DMSO or 250 nM rapamycin for 24 hours. Schizonts (cycle 1) were subsequently purified and co-cultured with fresh erythrocytes at 2% hematocrit in RPMI1640 complete medium in the presence of 25 nM PKG inhibitor ML10 \u003csup\u003e23,24\u003c/sup\u003e. ML10 was removed after 4\u0026ndash;6 hours and parasites were plated onto \u0026micro;-slide, 2-well ibiTreat chambers (ibidi, 80286) pre-coated with 0.5 mg/mL concanavalin A. The slides were maintained at 37\u0026deg;C in a humidified chamber with 5% CO₂. Imaging was performed using a Zeiss Axio Observer microscope, capturing frames every 3 seconds for a minimum duration of 30 min and the acquired time-lapse videos were processed and analyzed using Axio Vision software (version 4.8.2) or ZEN blue 3.1 or 3.9.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP. berghei\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003elive cell imaging\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo examine PbARK1-GFP expression during erythrocytic development, parasites cultured in schizont medium were imaged at various stages, including ring, trophozoite, schizont, and merozoite. Purified gametocytes were assessed for GFP expression and localisation at multiple time points (0 and 1\u0026ndash;15 min) following activation in ookinete medium. For nuclear staining, Hoechst dye was used during live-cell imaging. Zygote and ookinete stages were analysed over a 24-hour culture period. Images were acquired using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope equipped with a 63\u0026times; oil immersion objective and an AxioCam ICc1 digital camera (Carl Zeiss) using autoexposure settings. Fluorescence signals were adjusted using Axiovision (Rel. 4.8) software to reduce background fluorescence while maintaining detection sensitivity; representative images are shown in the figures. All imaging experiments were performed in at least three independent replicates, and 30\u0026ndash;50 cells were analysed per stage to determine PbARK1-GFP localisation. For additional details, refer to the figure legends.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP. berghei\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003estructured illumination microscopy\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFormaldehyde-fixed (4%) gametocytes were stained with Hoechst dye, and 2 \u0026micro;l of the cell suspension was placed on a microscope slide and covered with a 50 \u0026times; 34 mm coverslip to form a thin, immobilised cell monolayer. Imaging was performed using structured illumination microscopy (SIM) on a Zeiss Elyra PS.1 microscope with either a Zeiss Plan-Apochromat 63\u0026times;/1.4 oil immersion or Zeiss C-Apochromat 63\u0026times;/1.2 W Korr M27 water immersion objective, as previously described\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eUltrastructure expansion microscopy\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eU-ExM was performed largely following previously published protocols\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR45\" citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. In brief, to prepare U-ExM samples of \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e schizonts, 12mm coverslips were placed in a 24-well plate and coated with poly-D-lysine (Gibco, A3890401, 0.1 mg/mL) for 1 h at 37\u0026deg;C, followed by three washes with ultrapure water. \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e schizonts were seeded onto the coverslips and incubated for 30 min at 37\u0026deg;C. Unattached cells were removed gently, and the remaining cells were fixed using 4% (v/v) formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at 37\u0026deg;C. After fixation, coverslips were rinsed with prewarmed PBS and incubated for 12h at 37\u0026deg;C in 1.4% (v/v) formaldehyde and 2% (v/v) acrylamide in PBS. A monomer solution consisting of 19% (w/w) sodium acrylate (Sigma-Aldrich, 408220), 10% (v/v) acrylamide (Sigma-Aldrich, A3553), and 2% (v/v) N,N\u0026prime;-methylenebisacrylamide (Sigma-Aldrich, M7279) in PBS was prepared 24 h in advance and stored at \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;20\u0026deg;C. For polymerization, 5 \u0026micro;L of 10% (v/v) TEMED (Sigma-Aldrich, T9281) and 5 \u0026micro;L of 10% (w/v) APS (Sigma-Aldrich, A3678) were mixed with 90 \u0026micro;L of the thawed monomer solution. The gel mix (35 \u0026micro;L) was pipetted onto parafilm squares pre-cooled at \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;20\u0026deg;C and the coverslip was placed over the drop. Gels were allowed to polymerize for 1 h at 37\u0026deg;C. Polymerized gels were transferred to denaturation buffer (200 mM SDS, 200 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 9) and shaken for 15 min at room temperature, then incubated at 95\u0026deg;C for 90 min. Denatured gels were expanded by sequential incubations in water (30 min each, repeated thrice) with gentle shaking. Expanded gels were equilibrated in PBS for 15 min and blocked in 3% BSA/PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Incubation with primary antibody (details in Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;4) was carried out for 12h at room temperature on a shaker, followed by three 10 min washes with PBST. Gels were then incubated with secondary antibodies, 405 NHS Ester (Thermo Fisher, A30000) and SYTOX/Hoechst in PBS for 2.5 h in the dark with gentle shaking followed by three PBST washes and final equilibration in MilliQ water (30 min, repeated thrice).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor imaging, \u0026micro;-slide 2-well ibiTreat chambers (ibidi, 80286) were coated with poly-D-lysine (0.5 mL, 1 h at 37\u0026deg;C), rinsed with MilliQ water, and used to mount the gels cell side down. Imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM980 confocal microscope with a 63X oil immersion objective (NA 1.4). Z-stacks (0.5 \u0026micro;m intervals) were captured and processed using ZEN Blue (versions 3.1 or 3.9). Deconvolution was performed using Zen Deconvolution tool kit. U-ExM images are displayed as maximum intensity projections of full z-slices unless indicated otherwise.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo prepare U-ExM samples of \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e male gametocytes, purified and 8 min- and 15 min-activated gametocytes were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PHEM buffer (60 mM PIPES, 25 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, pH6.9) at room temperature for 15 min. Fixed samples were attached to 10 mm round Poly-D-Lysine coated coverslips for 15 min. Coverslips were incubated overnight at 4\u0026deg;C in 1.4% formaldehyde (FA)/ 2% acrylamide (AA). Gelation was performed in ammonium persulfate (APS)/TEMED (10% each)/monomer solution (23% sodium acrylate; 10% AA; 0,1% BIS-AA in PBS) on ice for 5 min and at 37\u0026deg;C for 30 min. Gels were denatured for 15 min at 37\u0026deg;C and for 90 min at 95\u0026deg;C in denaturation buffer (200 mM SDS, 200 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 9.0, in water). After denaturation, gels were incubated in distilled water overnight for complete expansion. The following day, circular gel pieces with a diameter of ~\u0026thinsp;13 mm were excised, and the gels were washed in PBS three times for 15 min to remove excess water. The gels were then incubated in blocking buffer (3% BSA in PBS) at room temperature for 30 min, incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-a-tubulin antibody (T9026, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:500 dilution) and/or anti-GFP antibody (A11122, Invitrogen, 1:500 dilution) in blocking buffer (1:500 dilution) at 4\u0026deg;C overnight and washed three times for 15 min in wash buffer (0.5% v/v TWEEN-20 in PBS). The gels were incubated with 8 \u0026micro;g/ml Atto 594 NHS ester (08741, Merck), 10 \u0026micro;g/ml Hoechst 33342 (H1399, Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11001, Invitrogen, 1:500 dilution) and Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11004, Invitrogen, 1:500 dilution) in PBS at 37\u0026deg;C for 3 hours followed by three washes of 15 min each in wash buffer (blocking and all antibody incubation steps were performed with gentle shaking). The gels were then washed three times for 15 min with wash buffer and expanded overnight in ultrapure water. The expanded gel was placed in a 35 mm glass bottom dish (MATTEK) with the 14 mm glass coated with Poly-D-Lysine and mounted with an 18 \u0026times; 18 mm coverslip to prevent the gel from sliding and to avoid drifting while imaging. High-resolution confocal microscopy images were acquired using a Zeiss Celldiscoverer 7 with Airyscan using a Plan-Apochromat 50 \u0026times;/1.2NA Water objective, with 405, 488 and 561 nm lasers. Confocal z-stacks were acquired using line scanning and the following settings: 55 \u0026times; 55 nm pixel size, 170 nm z-step, 2.91 \u0026micro;s/pixel dwell time, 850 gain and 3.5% (405 nm), 4.5% (488 nm) and 5.0% (561 nm) laser powers. The z-stack images were processed and analysed using Fiji (Version 1.54f) \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCalculation of the expansion factor for the U-ExM of male gametocytes\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe expansion factor for the U-ExM of male gametocytes was calculated by comparing axoneme diameters from two types of images (U-ExM and TEM). The diameters were measured using Fiji (Version 1.54f) \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The average diameter of the axoneme in NHS-stained U-ExM images of male gametocytes activated for 8 min was 933.83 nm (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;12), while the average diameter in TEM images of male gametocytes activated for 8 min was 188.50 nm (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8). We used the calculated expansion factor of 4.954 for the analysis.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eElectron microscopy of male gametocytes\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e gametocytes activated for 8 min and 15 min were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer and processed for electron microscopy\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Briefly, samples were post-fixed in 1% aqueous osmium tetroxide, treated en bloc with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate, dehydrated in graded ethanol series and embedded in Spurr's epoxy resin. Thin sections were stained with lead citrate prior to examination in a Tecnai G2 12 BioTwin (FEI UK, UK) or a Jeol JEM-1400Flash (JEOL, Japan) electron microscope.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eLiver stage parasite imaging\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e liver-stage imaging, 100,000 Hepatocelluar carcinoma cells (HepG2) were seeded onto glass coverslips in 48 well plate. Salivary glands from \u003cem\u003eAnopheles stephensi\u003c/em\u003e mosquitoes infected with PbARK1-GFP parasites were dissected and homogenized using a pestle to release sporozoites. The sporozoites were gently pipetted onto the HepG2 cell monolayer and incubated at 37\u0026deg;C with 5% CO₂ in complete minimum Eagle\u0026rsquo;s medium The culture medium was replaced 2 hours post-infection and subsequently changed daily. For live-cell imaging, Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes) was added to a final concentration of 1 \u0026micro;g/ml to stain host and parasite nuclei. Infected cells were imaged at, 48-, and 64 -hours post-infection using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope equipped with a 63\u0026times; oil immersion objective and an AxioCam ICc1 digital camera (Carl Zeiss) using autoexposure settings. and Leica Application Suite X software. Each experiment was performed in triplicate, and 20\u0026ndash;30 infected cells were analysed per time point to assess PbARK1-GFP localisation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eImmunoblotting\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e - Immunoblotting was performed as described previously\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e using primary antibodies (Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;4) and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and protein bands were visualized using either SuperSignal\u0026trade; West Pico or Femto chemiluminescent substrates (Pierce, USA) using X-ray films.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e - Purified gametocytes were lysed in buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 1% NP-40. After lysis, Laemmli buffer was added, and samples were boiled for 10 min at 95\u0026deg;C, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 \u0026times; g for 5 min. The supernatants were separated on a 4\u0026ndash;12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Biosciences). Immunoblotting was performed using the Western Breeze Chemiluminescence Anti-Rabbit Kit (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s protocol. An anti-GFP polyclonal antibody (Invitrogen) was used at a 1:1,250 dilution to detect PbARK1-GFP.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eQuantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e - Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (G Biosciences) followed by purification with the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Cat. No. 74104). cDNA synthesis was performed using RevertAid H Minus Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo scientific, EP0451) and 1 \u0026micro;g of DNase-treated RNA as the template. Quantitative PCR was conducted using the CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). Reactions were normalized using 18S rRNA as the internal control. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;ΔΔCt\u003c/sup\u003e method. Primer sequences used for the qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;3.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e - Total RNA was extracted from gametocytes using the RNA Purification Kit (Stratagene), and cDNA was synthesised using the RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems). qPCR was performed with 80 ng of RNA using SYBR Green Fast Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast system. Cycling conditions were: 95\u0026deg;C for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95\u0026deg;C for 3 s and 60\u0026deg;C for 30 s. Primers were designed using Primer3 (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://primer3.ut.ee/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://primer3.ut.ee/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e). Each gene was tested in three biological and technical replicates. \u003cem\u003ehsp70\u003c/em\u003e (PBANKA_081890) and \u003cem\u003earginyl-tRNA synthetase\u003c/em\u003e (PBANKA_143420) were used as reference genes. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;3.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eTranscriptome analysis using RNA-seq\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eTotal RNA was extracted from activated gametocytes and schizonts of \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e WT-GFP and \u003cem\u003eark1PTD\u003c/em\u003e parasites (three biological replicates each) using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen), vacuum-concentrated, and transported in RNA-stable tubes (Biomatrica). Strand-specific mRNA libraries were prepared with the TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (paired-end, 150 bp reads). Read quality was assessed with FASTQC, and trimming of low-quality reads and adapter sequences was done using Trimmomatic\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Reads were mapped to the \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e ANKA genome (PlasmoDB release 40) using HISAT2 v2.1.0\u003csup\u003e51\u003c/sup\u003e, and gene counts were generated with FeatureCounts\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Low-expression genes (CPM\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;1) were excluded. Data were normalized using the TMM method (EdgeR\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e), transformed with voom (limma\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e), and analysed for differential expression using DESeq2\u003csup\u003e55\u003c/sup\u003e. Genes with fold-change\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;2 and FDR\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 were considered differentially expressed.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eImmunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e purified schizonts and gametocytes (activated for 1.5 to 2 min) were crosslinked using formaldehyde (10-min incubation with 1% formaldehyde, followed by 5-min incubation in 0.125M glycine solution and 3 washes with PBS (pH 7.5). Immunoprecipitation was performed using crosslinked protein and a GFP-Trap_A Kit (Chromotek) following the manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instructions. Proteins bound to the GFP-Trap_A beads were digested using trypsin and the peptides were analysed by LC-MS/MS and subsequently visualised using both Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and enrichment visualised using a volcano plot\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eEvolutionary bioinformatics\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eOur predicted proteome set was based on a version previously used (see Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;5). Phyletic profiles for ARK1-3 and INCENP were partially derived from previous studies\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Sequence searches for missing orthologues were performed with the HHPred webserver from MPI-toolkit\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and the hmmer package\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, as previously described\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. For the larger gene families like Aurora kinases, we used IQ-tree-based maximum-likelihood phylogenetics (standard setting - model finding, 1000 bootstraps\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e) to check the validity of bidirectional-best-blast (BBH) hits amongst our genome sets on an ad hoc basis. Off note, we could not reliably generate a single phylogenetic tree harbouring all three ARKs within the Aurora kinase orthologous group (OG), suggesting that ARK2 and ARK3 are either extremely divergent or not Aurora kinases. Similarly, for the INCENP gene family, multiple alignments were generally too divergent and short to infer any consistent phylograms. All sequences used for this study can be found in Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;5.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAlphaFold3 modelling\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eCo-folds of 3D protein structures for ARK1 and the extended IN-box of either INCENP1 or 2 were modelled using the AlphaFold3 webserver (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://alphafoldserver.com/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://alphafoldserver.com/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) with standard settings (seed set to 100) \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec24\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData availability\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe RNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive with accession number: PRJNA1309997.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eContributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRT, PS, and ECT conceptualised the project. AN and PS performed the \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e experiments. MZ, SLP, AM, ER, and RT performed the \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e live-cell imaging. RY, DJF, and SV performed the TEM observation. RY and MZ performed the \u003cem\u003eP. berghei\u003c/em\u003e U-ExM observation. MZ, AE, and DB performed the qPCR experiment. SA and KGLR performed the RNAseq analysis. RT, DB, ARB, and ECT performed the proteomics analysis. ECT performed the bioinformatics analysis. AN, RY, MZ, DJF, SLP, AM, ARB, SV, KGLR, DSG, AAH, ECT, PS, and RT performed formal analysis. AN, RY, MZ, DJF, SA, SLP, AM, ECT, and RT performed visualization. RT, PS, and ECT acquired funding. RT, PS, and ECT supervised the project. AN, RY, MZ, AAH, ECT, PS, and RT wrote the manuscript draft. All the authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRT is supported by ERC advance grant funded by UKRI Frontier Science (EP/X024776/1), MRC UK (MR/K011782/1), and BBSRC (BB/L013827/1, BB/X014681/1). MZ, DB, and AM were supported as research fellows by (EP/X024776/1). RY and DSG are supported by BBSRC (BB/X014681/1). SLP is supported by Wellcome DBT India Alliance/Team Science (IA/TSG/21/1/600261). AAH is supported by the Francis Crick Institute (FC001097), which receives core funding from the Cancer Research UK (FC001097), the UK Medical Research Council (FC001097), and the Wellcome Trust (FC001097). KGLR is supported by the NIH/NIAID (R01 AI136511) and the University of California, Riverside NIFA-Hatch-225935. ECT was supported by a personal fellowship from the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), the Netherlands (grant no. VI. Veni.202.223). Studies on \u003cem\u003eP. falciparum\u003c/em\u003e were also supported by a Team Science grant (IA/TSG/21/1/600261) to PS, RT, and TSKP from DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance and funds from NII core. PS is a recipient of J.C. Bose Fellowship. We thank the School of Life Sciences Imaging (SLIM) for providing access to confocal and SIM microscopy and Dr Robert Markus for technical assistance. We thank the Nanoscale and Microscale Research Centre (nmRC) for providing access to instrumentation and Dr Michael W. Fey, Dr Julie Watts and Ms Nicola J. Weston for technical assistance. For Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. We thank Cleidiane Zampronio at Warwick University for mass spectrometry methods and Bio Support Unit, University of Nottingham for maintenance of mice used in this study.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuttery, D. S., Zeeshan, M., Ferguson, D. J. P., Holder, A. A. \u0026amp; Tewari, R. Division and Transmission: Malaria Parasite Development in the Mosquito. \u003cem\u003eAnnu Rev Microbiol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e76\u003c/strong\u003e, 113-134 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1146/annurev-micro-041320-010046\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSinden, R. E. Mitosis and meiosis in malarial parasites. \u003cem\u003eActa Leiden\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e60\u003c/strong\u003e, 19-27 (1991).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSinden, R. E., Canning, E. U., Bray, R. S. \u0026amp; Smalley, M. E. Gametocyte and gamete development in Plasmodium falciparum. \u003cem\u003eProc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e201\u003c/strong\u003e, 375-399 (1978).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZeeshan, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Plasmodium SAS4: basal body component of male cell which is dispensable for parasite transmission. \u003cem\u003eLife Sci Alliance\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e5\u003c/strong\u003e (2022). https://doi.org:10.26508/lsa.202101329\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarmena, M., Earnshaw, W. C. \u0026amp; Glover, D. M. The Dawn of Aurora Kinase Research: From Fly Genetics to the Clinic. \u003cem\u003eFront Cell Dev Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e3\u003c/strong\u003e, 73 (2015). https://doi.org:10.3389/fcell.2015.00073\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarmena, M., Ruchaud, S. \u0026amp; Earnshaw, W. C. Making the Auroras glow: regulation of Aurora A and B kinase function by interacting proteins. \u003cem\u003eCurr Opin Cell Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e21\u003c/strong\u003e, 796-805 (2009). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.ceb.2009.09.008\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHochegger, H., Hegarat, N. \u0026amp; Pereira-Leal, J. B. Aurora at the pole and equator: overlapping functions of Aurora kinases in the mitotic spindle. \u003cem\u003eOpen Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e3\u003c/strong\u003e, 120185 (2013). https://doi.org:10.1098/rsob.120185\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhang, X. Aurora kinases. \u003cem\u003eCurr Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e18\u003c/strong\u003e, R146-148 (2008). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.004\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi, H.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Dictyostelium Aurora kinase has properties of both Aurora A and Aurora B kinases. \u003cem\u003eEukaryot Cell\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e7\u003c/strong\u003e, 894-905 (2008). https://doi.org:10.1128/EC.00422-07\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZeeshan, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Plasmodium ARK2 and EB1 drive unconventional spindle dynamics, during chromosome segregation in sexual transmission stages. \u003cem\u003eNat Commun\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e14\u003c/strong\u003e, 5652 (2023). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-023-41395-3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVader, G., Medema, R. H. \u0026amp; Lens, S. M. The chromosomal passenger complex: guiding Aurora-B through mitosis. \u003cem\u003eJ Cell Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e173\u003c/strong\u003e, 833-837 (2006). https://doi.org:10.1083/jcb.200604032\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHadders, M. A. \u0026amp; Lens, S. M. A. Changing places: Chromosomal Passenger Complex relocation in early anaphase. \u003cem\u003eTrends Cell Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e32\u003c/strong\u003e, 165-176 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.tcb.2021.09.008\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSolyakov, L.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Global kinomic and phospho-proteomic analyses of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. \u003cem\u003eNat Commun\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e2\u003c/strong\u003e, 565 (2011). https://doi.org:10.1038/ncomms1558\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTewari, R.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The systematic functional analysis of Plasmodium protein kinases identifies essential regulators of mosquito transmission. \u003cem\u003eCell Host Microbe\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e8\u003c/strong\u003e, 377-387 (2010). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.chom.2010.09.006\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhang, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Uncovering the essential genes of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum by saturation mutagenesis. \u003cem\u003eScience\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e360\u003c/strong\u003e (2018). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.aap7847\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReininger, L., Wilkes, J. M., Bourgade, H., Miranda-Saavedra, D. \u0026amp; Doerig, C. An essential Aurora-related kinase transiently associates with spindle pole bodies during Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic schizogony. \u003cem\u003eMol Microbiol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e79\u003c/strong\u003e, 205-221 (2011). https://doi.org:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07442.x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWyss, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The three Plasmodium falciparum Aurora-related kinases display distinct temporal and spatial associations with mitotic structures in asexual blood stage parasites and gametocytes. \u003cem\u003emSphere\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e9\u003c/strong\u003e, e0046524 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1128/msphere.00465-24\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBerry, L.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Toxoplasma gondii chromosomal passenger complex is essential for the organization of a functional mitotic spindle: a prerequisite for productive endodyogeny. \u003cem\u003eCell Mol Life Sci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e75\u003c/strong\u003e, 4417-4443 (2018). https://doi.org:10.1007/s00018-018-2889-6\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCollins, C. R.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Robust inducible Cre recombinase activity in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum enables efficient gene deletion within a single asexual erythrocytic growth cycle. \u003cem\u003eMol Microbiol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e88\u003c/strong\u003e, 687-701 (2013). https://doi.org:10.1111/mmi.12206\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSebastian, S.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e A Plasmodium calcium-dependent protein kinase controls zygote development and transmission by translationally activating repressed mRNAs. \u003cem\u003eCell Host Microbe\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e12\u003c/strong\u003e, 9-19 (2012). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.chom.2012.05.014\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiffner, B.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Atlas of Plasmodium falciparum intraerythrocytic development using expansion microscopy. \u003cem\u003eElife\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e12\u003c/strong\u003e (2023). https://doi.org:10.7554/eLife.88088\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi, J.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Disruption of Plasmodium falciparum kinetochore proteins destabilises the nexus between the centrosome equivalent and the mitotic apparatus. \u003cem\u003eNat Commun\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e15\u003c/strong\u003e, 5794 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-024-50167-6\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRessurreicao, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Use of a highly specific kinase inhibitor for rapid, simple and precise synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium knowlesi asexual blood-stage parasites. \u003cem\u003ePLoS One\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e15\u003c/strong\u003e, e0235798 (2020). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.pone.0235798\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBaker, D. A.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e A potent series targeting the malarial cGMP-dependent protein kinase clears infection and blocks transmission. \u003cem\u003eNat Commun\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e8\u003c/strong\u003e, 430 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-017-00572-x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEkka, R., Gupta, A., Bhatnagar, S., Malhotra, P. \u0026amp; Sharma, P. Phosphorylation of Rhoptry Protein RhopH3 Is Critical for Host Cell Invasion by the Malaria Parasite. \u003cem\u003emBio\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e11\u003c/strong\u003e (2020). https://doi.org:10.1128/mBio.00166-20\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSilvie, O.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e A role for apical membrane antigen 1 during invasion of hepatocytes by Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. \u003cem\u003eJ Biol Chem\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e279\u003c/strong\u003e, 9490-9496 (2004). https://doi.org:10.1074/jbc.M311331200\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJanse, C. J., Ramesar, J. \u0026amp; Waters, A. P. High-efficiency transfection and drug selection of genetically transformed blood stages of the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei. \u003cem\u003eNat Protoc\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e, 346-356 (2006). https://doi.org:10.1038/nprot.2006.53\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNair, S. C.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e A Plasmodium yoelii HECT-like E3 ubiquitin ligase regulates parasite growth and virulence. \u003cem\u003eNat Commun\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e8\u003c/strong\u003e, 223 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-017-00267-3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBushell, E.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Functional Profiling of a Plasmodium Genome Reveals an Abundance of Essential Genes. \u003cem\u003eCell\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e170\u003c/strong\u003e, 260-272 e268 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.030\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSegura-Pena, D.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The structural basis of the multi-step allosteric activation of Aurora B kinase. \u003cem\u003eElife\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e12\u003c/strong\u003e (2023). https://doi.org:10.7554/eLife.85328\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBerry, L.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The conserved apicomplexan Aurora kinase TgArk3 is involved in endodyogeny, duplication rate and parasite virulence. \u003cem\u003eCell Microbiol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e18\u003c/strong\u003e, 1106-1120 (2016). https://doi.org:10.1111/cmi.12571\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarmena, M. \u0026amp; Earnshaw, W. C. The cellular geography of aurora kinases. \u003cem\u003eNat Rev Mol Cell Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e4\u003c/strong\u003e, 842-854 (2003). https://doi.org:10.1038/nrm1245\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarmena, M., Wheelock, M., Funabiki, H. \u0026amp; Earnshaw, W. C. The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): from easy rider to the godfather of mitosis. \u003cem\u003eNat Rev Mol Cell Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e13\u003c/strong\u003e, 789-803 (2012). https://doi.org:10.1038/nrm3474\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBallmer, D. \u0026amp; Akiyoshi, B. Dynamic localization of the chromosomal passenger complex in trypanosomes is controlled by the orphan kinesins KIN-A and KIN-B. \u003cem\u003eElife\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e13\u003c/strong\u003e (2024). https://doi.org:10.7554/eLife.93522\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZeeshan, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Plasmodium kinesin-8X associates with mitotic spindles and is essential for oocyst development during parasite proliferation and transmission. \u003cem\u003ePLoS Pathog\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e15\u003c/strong\u003e, e1008048 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.ppat.1008048\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKomaki, S.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Molecular convergence by differential domain acquisition is a hallmark of chromosomal passenger complex evolution. \u003cem\u003eProc Natl Acad Sci U S A\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e119\u003c/strong\u003e, e2200108119 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1073/pnas.2200108119\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTrager, W. \u0026amp; Jensen, J. B. Cultivation of erythrocytic stages. \u003cem\u003eBull World Health Organ\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e55\u003c/strong\u003e, 363-365 (1977).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLambros, C. \u0026amp; Vanderberg, J. P. Synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stages in culture. \u003cem\u003eJ Parasitol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e65\u003c/strong\u003e, 418-420 (1979).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBeetsma, A. L., van de Wiel, T. J., Sauerwein, R. W. \u0026amp; Eling, W. M. Plasmodium berghei ANKA: purification of large numbers of infectious gametocytes. \u003cem\u003eExp Parasitol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e88\u003c/strong\u003e, 69-72 (1998). https://doi.org:10.1006/expr.1998.4203\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBillker, O.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Calcium and a calcium-dependent protein kinase regulate gamete formation and mosquito transmission in a malaria parasite. \u003cem\u003eCell\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e117\u003c/strong\u003e, 503-514 (2004). https://doi.org:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00449-0\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuttery, D. S.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Genome-wide functional analysis of Plasmodium protein phosphatases reveals key regulators of parasite development and differentiation. \u003cem\u003eCell Host Microbe\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e16\u003c/strong\u003e, 128-140 (2014). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.chom.2014.05.020\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTonkin, C. J.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Localization of organellar proteins in Plasmodium falciparum using a novel set of transfection vectors and a new immunofluorescence fixation method. \u003cem\u003eMol Biochem Parasitol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e137\u003c/strong\u003e, 13-21 (2004). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.05.009\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZeeshan, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Plasmodium NEK1 coordinates MTOC organisation and kinetochore attachment during rapid mitosis in male gamete formation. \u003cem\u003ePLoS Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e22\u003c/strong\u003e, e3002802 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002802\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRashpa, R. \u0026amp; Brochet, M. Expansion microscopy of Plasmodium gametocytes reveals the molecular architecture of a bipartite microtubule organisation centre coordinating mitosis with axoneme assembly. \u003cem\u003ePLoS Pathog\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e18\u003c/strong\u003e, e1010223 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.ppat.1010223\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBertiaux, E.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Expansion microscopy provides new insights into the cytoskeleton of malaria parasites including the conservation of a conoid. \u003cem\u003ePLoS Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e19\u003c/strong\u003e, e3001020 (2021). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001020\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYanase, R.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Divergent Plasmodium kinases drive MTOC, kinetochore and axoneme organisation in male gametogenesis. \u003cem\u003eLife Sci Alliance\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e8\u003c/strong\u003e (2025). https://doi.org:10.26508/lsa.202403056\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchindelin, J.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. \u003cem\u003eNat Methods\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e9\u003c/strong\u003e, 676-682 (2012). https://doi.org:10.1038/nmeth.2019\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFerguson, D. J.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Maternal inheritance and stage-specific variation of the apicoplast in Toxoplasma gondii during development in the intermediate and definitive host. \u003cem\u003eEukaryot Cell\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e4\u003c/strong\u003e, 814-826 (2005). https://doi.org:10.1128/EC.4.4.814-826.2005\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRawat, R. S.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Protein kinase PfPK2 mediated signalling is critical for host erythrocyte invasion by malaria parasite. \u003cem\u003ePLoS Pathog\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e19\u003c/strong\u003e, e1011770 (2023). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011770\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBolger, A. M., Lohse, M. \u0026amp; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. \u003cem\u003eBioinformatics\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e30\u003c/strong\u003e, 2114-2120 (2014). https://doi.org:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKim, D., Langmead, B. \u0026amp; Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. \u003cem\u003eNat Methods\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e12\u003c/strong\u003e, 357-360 (2015). https://doi.org:10.1038/nmeth.3317\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiao, Y., Smyth, G. K. \u0026amp; Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. \u003cem\u003eBioinformatics\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e30\u003c/strong\u003e, 923-930 (2014). https://doi.org:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRobinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. \u0026amp; Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. \u003cem\u003eBioinformatics\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e26\u003c/strong\u003e, 139-140 (2010). https://doi.org:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRitchie, M. E.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. \u003cem\u003eNucleic Acids Res\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e43\u003c/strong\u003e, e47 (2015). https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkv007\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLove, M. I., Huber, W. \u0026amp; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. \u003cem\u003eGenome Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e15\u003c/strong\u003e, 550 (2014). https://doi.org:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZeeshan, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e A novel SUN1-ALLAN complex coordinates segregation of the bipartite MTOC across the nuclear envelope during rapid closed mitosis in Plasmodium berghei. \u003cem\u003eElife\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e14\u003c/strong\u003e (2025). https://doi.org:10.7554/eLife.106537\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTromer, E. C., van Hooff, J. J. E., Kops, G. \u0026amp; Snel, B. Mosaic origin of the eukaryotic kinetochore. \u003cem\u003eProc Natl Acad Sci U S A\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e116\u003c/strong\u003e, 12873-12882 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1073/pnas.1821945116\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEddy, S. R. Accelerated Profile HMM Searches. \u003cem\u003ePLoS Comput Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e7\u003c/strong\u003e, e1002195 (2011). https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSoding, J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. \u003cem\u003eBioinformatics\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e21\u003c/strong\u003e, 951-960 (2005). https://doi.org:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti125\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZeeshan, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Real-time dynamics of Plasmodium NDC80 reveals unusual modes of chromosome segregation during parasite proliferation. \u003cem\u003eJ Cell Sci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e134\u003c/strong\u003e (2020). https://doi.org:10.1242/jcs.245753\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTrifinopoulos, J., Nguyen, L. T., von Haeseler, A. \u0026amp; Minh, B. Q. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. \u003cem\u003eNucleic Acids Res\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e44\u003c/strong\u003e, W232-235 (2016). https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkw256\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAbramson, J.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e630\u003c/strong\u003e, 493-500 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-portfolio","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Nature Portfolio","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":false,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Plasmodium, Aurora kinase, chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), INCENP, spindle, karyokinesis, male gametogony, MTOC, cytokinesis, transmission","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7473364/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7473364/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eMitosis in \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e spp., the causative agent of malaria, is fundamentally different from model eukaryotes, proceeding via a bipartite microtubule organising centre (MTOC) and lacking canonical regulators such as Polo and Bub1 kinases. During schizogony, asynchronous nuclear replication produces a multinucleate schizont, while rapid male gametogony generates an octaploid nucleus before gamete formation. Here, we identify Aurora-related kinase 1 (ARK1) as a key component of inner MTOC and spindle formation, controlling kinetochore dynamics and driving mitotic progression. Conditional ARK1 depletion disrupts spindle biogenesis, kinetochore segregation, karyokinesis and cytokinesis in both stages, and affects parasite transmission. Interactome analysis reveals ARK1 as the catalytic core of a non-canonical chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) containing two divergent inner centromere proteins (INCENPs) but lacking Survivin and Borealin. Comparative genomics indicates this CPC architecture arose early in Apicomplexa, replacing canonical centromere-targeting modules. These findings uncover a distinct mitotic machinery in \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e and identify the ARK1\u0026ndash;INCENP interface as a potential multistage target for malaria therapeutic intervention.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Plasmodium ARK1 regulates spindle formation during atypical mitosis and forms a divergent chromosomal passenger complex","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-25 09:37:33","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7473364/v1","editorialEvents":[],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-communications","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"NCOMMS","sideBox":"Learn more about [Nature Communications](http://www.nature.com/ncomms/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://mts-ncomms.nature.com/","title":"Nature Communications","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature Communications","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4930e2db-1ded-410f-ba0f-c8c128546a04","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 25th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":54270894,"name":"Biological sciences/Microbiology/Parasitology/Parasite biology"},{"id":54270895,"name":"Biological sciences/Microbiology/Cellular microbiology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-27T08:07:51+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-7473364","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69460-7","journal":{"identity":"nature-communications","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Nature Communications"},"publishedOn":"2026-02-26 05:00:00","publishedOnDateReadable":"February 26th, 2026"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-25 09:37:33","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41467-026-69460-7","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69460-7","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7473364","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7473364","identity":"rs-7473364","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}