Abstract
The limited access to taxonomic and biogeographical data on plants across large spatial scales poses challenges for biodiversity researches. Our study explored richness, taxonomic contributions, and biogeographic insights linked to a floristic inventory spanning 56,144 km² of the Caatinga Phytogeographic Domain (CPD), supported by environmental licensing of a water infrastructure project (São Francisco River Transposition Project - PISF). Over fifteen years, we collected specimens of several plant groups (algae, angiosperms, bryophytes, ferns, and lycophytes), compiling taxonomic, ecologic, and biogeographic data of the species in the study area (e.g. threat status, life form, geographic origin, endemism for CPD) which resulted in the checklist and a biodiversity dataset. We compared our number of plant samples or species richness in the study area to the numbers previously known for this area. We used rarefaction curves to asses the increase in species richness in the study area as the number of plant samples increased. We collected 29,247 samples and identified 1,610 species. Herbaceous plants were the dominant group, comprising 40.89% of the species richness. We documented 173 species endemics to the CPD and 16 species mentioned on the Brazilian national list of threatened species. Additionally, our study recorded 284 first occurrences of 110 species in one or more states in the Northeast of Brazil or within the CPD. Collaboratively, we described two new species with specialists, and the donation of duplicate samples to national herbaria resulted in the citation of five paratypes. Our checklist increased the number of specimens previously recorded in the study area by 240% and expanded species richness in this area by approximately 14%. The rarefaction curve computed with our dataset indicated a trend toward stabilization of species numbers in the study area. These findings underscore the importance of primary data from environmental licensing associated with infrastructure projects in addressing gaps in biodiversity knowledge.
Full text
1,352 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Preprint
ARPHA Preprints
https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e159726 (22 May 2025)
https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e159726 (22 May 2025)
Published in: Biodiversity Data Journal https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.13.e159621
Other versions:
- Preprint InfoPreprint Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- CitedCited
ARPHA Preprints
doi:
10.3897/arphapreprints.e159726
First posted
22 May 2025
Authors
Vinicius Messas Cotarelli
- Corresponding author
NEMA/UNIVASF, Petrolina, Brazil
Edson Gomes Moura-Júnior
- Corresponding author
NEMA/UNIVASF, Petrolina, Brazil
NEMA/UNIVASF, Petrolina, Brazil
NEMA/UNIVASF, Petrolina, Brazil
NEMA/UNIVASF, Petrolina, Brazil
NEMA/UNIVASF, Petrolina, Brazil
NEMA/UNIVASF, Petrolina, Brazil
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Supporting agencies
This work was funding by the Brazilian government through the Ministério da Integração e Desenvolvimento Regional (MIDR), as part of the Projeto de Integração do São Francisco environmental licensing requirements (licenses nº 1464/2018 e 1660/2022).
This is an open access preprint distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.