Abstract
The genetic engineering of thermophilic bacteria is constrained by limited availability of thermostable antibiotic resistance markers for selection. Clostridium thermocellum , a promising candidate for consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulosic biomass, requires reliable selection systems that function at elevated temperatures. Here, we systematically evaluated antibiotic susceptibility profiles and identified novel resistance markers for this thermophile through bioinformatic screening and experimental validation. We screened 823 thermophilic genomes against the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database, identifying 1,115 antibiotic resistance genes. From these, we selected candidates with highest homology to resistance determinants for rifampicin, tetracycline, erythromycin, thiamphenicol, and neomycin. We identified three novel antibiotic resistance systems that function in this organism: tetracycline/ tet(45) , erythromycin/ cmeC , and rifampicin/ rbpA . Of these, the rifampicin/rbpA provided the highest selection range , > 10,000-fold. Our results establish rbpA as an outstanding selectable marker for thermophilic genetic engineering and provide a validated workflow for discovering thermostable resistance determinants in high-temperature microorganisms. Importance Thermophilic bacteria like Clostridium thermocellum hold tremendous potential for sustainable biofuel production from plant biomass, but their genetic manipulation has been severely limited by the lack of selection markers that work at high temperatures. Many existing antibiotic resistance systems do not function at thermophilic temperatures, and many approaches to genetic manipulation require multiple antibiotic resistance markers. Currently only two markers are available for C. thermocellum , and only one ( cat ) functions well. The newly-developed rbpA marker functions well in C. thermocellum and is likely to provide dramatic new opportunities for engineering thermophilic host organisms.
Full text
1,994 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Abstract
The genetic engineering of thermophilic bacteria is constrained by limited availability of thermostable antibiotic resistance markers for selection. Clostridium thermocellum, a promising candidate for consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulosic biomass, requires reliable selection systems that function at elevated temperatures. Here, we systematically evaluated antibiotic susceptibility profiles and identified novel resistance markers for this thermophile through bioinformatic screening and experimental validation. We screened 823 thermophilic genomes against the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database, identifying 1,115 antibiotic resistance genes. From these, we selected candidates with highest homology to resistance determinants for rifampicin, tetracycline, erythromycin, thiamphenicol, and neomycin. We identified three novel antibiotic resistance systems that function in this organism: tetracycline/tet(45), erythromycin/cmeC, and rifampicin/rbpA. Of these, the rifampicin/rbpA provided the highest selection range , > 10,000-fold. Our results establish rbpA as an outstanding selectable marker for thermophilic genetic engineering and provide a validated workflow for discovering thermostable resistance determinants in high-temperature microorganisms.
Importance Thermophilic bacteria like Clostridium thermocellum hold tremendous potential for sustainable biofuel production from plant biomass, but their genetic manipulation has been severely limited by the lack of selection markers that work at high temperatures. Many existing antibiotic resistance systems do not function at thermophilic temperatures, and many approaches to genetic manipulation require multiple antibiotic resistance markers. Currently only two markers are available for C. thermocellum, and only one (cat) functions well. The newly-developed rbpA marker functions well in C. thermocellum and is likely to provide dramatic new opportunities for engineering thermophilic host organisms.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.