Probing Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) Physics: Higgs Boson Precision Measurements at the Future Electron-Positron Collider

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics has been one of the successful theories in describing the existence and interaction of elementary particles, but is fails to answer most key yet open questions, such as the nature of dark matter, matter-antimatter asymmetry and the hierarchy problem. Precision measurement of the Higgs boson is positioned to probe for the new physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM). This review explores how the future electron-positron collider, such as the ILC, FCCee, CEPC and CLIC, have the potential to achieve the unprecedented precision in Higgs boson couplings and self-interactions. A comparative analysis of the future collider designs was made making an emphasis on their capabilities in testing the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) and the Higgs Effective Field Theory (HEFT). A discussion on the collider design considerations was also made stressing that in order to optimize the exploration of BSM, the future electron-positron colliders will be heavily influenced by their luminosities and the beam polarization of both electrons and positrons. Findings from this review suggests that sub-percent precision of Higgs properties has the potential to review subtle deviations from new physics. These results underscores the crucial role of future electron-positron colliders in complimenting the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) for the future discoveries in particle physics.
Full text 2,539 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics has been one of the successful theories in describing the existence and interaction of elementary particles, but is fails to answer most key yet open questions, such as the nature of dark matter, matter-antimatter asymmetry and the hierarchy problem. Precision measurement of the Higgs boson is positioned to probe for the new physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM). This review explores how the future electron-positron collider, such as the ILC, FCCee, CEPC and CLIC, have the potential to achieve the unprecedented precision in Higgs boson couplings and self-interactions. A comparative analysis of the future collider designs was made making an emphasis on their capabilities in testing the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) and the Higgs Effective Field Theory (HEFT). A discussion on the collider design considerations was also made stressing that in order to optimize the exploration of BSM, the future electron-positron colliders will be heavily influenced by their luminosities and the beam polarization of both electrons and positrons. Findings from this review suggests that sub-percent precision of Higgs properties has the potential to review subtle deviations from new physics. These results underscores the crucial role of future electron-positron colliders in complimenting the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) for the future discoveries in particle physics. Supplementary Material File (probing beyond the standard model (bsm).pdf) - Download - 588.12 KB Information & Authors Information Version history Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.

Keywords

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 206views 186downloads Citations Download citation Kaphika, W. S.. Probing Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) Physics: Higgs Boson Precision Measurements at the Future Electron-Positron Collider. Authorea. 11 August 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175494704.41838817/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175494704.41838817/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00