The Vicarage Iconoclast: Whitehead, Leibniz, Relativity and the Quantum

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This philosophical dialogue critiques Alfred North Whitehead's metaphysical system, arguing its interpretations of quantum mechanics, relativity, and Leibniz are undermined by his focus on subjective experience and simultaneity.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This manuscript critically examines Alfred North Whitehead’s metaphysical system as it relates to quantum mechanics, relativity, and Leibnizian philosophy, presented through an extended philosophical dialogue. It challenges Whitehead’s core assumptions, particularly his interpretations of quantum discontinuity, internal relations, and the structure of spacetime. The author argues that Whitehead’s metaphysics, rooted in subjective experience, prehension, and the primacy of simultaneity, is undermined by its misreading of both modern physics and Leibniz’s metaphysics of substance and relation. Whitehead’s rejection of continuous becoming and motion, his treatment of actual occasions as discrete experiential events, and his notion of “eternal objects” are scrutinized in the context of process philosophy and critiques from contemporary physics. The dialogue also engages with recent reinterpretations, notably those of Carey Carlson, Florian Vermeiren, and Michael Epperson, addressing causal set theory, quantum potentia, and decoherence in light of Whiteheadian metaphysics. The manuscript ultimately questions the coherence of Whitehead’s system under relativistic constraints and critiques the theological and holistic presuppositions underlying his cosmology, and, by implication, any cosmologies assuming a wave function for the whole universe.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0