Racial Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Health Care Workers in Two Large Academic Hospitals

preprint OA: closed
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

Background: Significant racial differences in hesitancy to receive COVID-19 vaccination has been observed in several settings. This hesitancy among healthcare workers (HCWs), who face both occupational and community exposure to COVID-19, has not been well described across racial and ethnic groups.Methods: This cross-sectional survey of HCWs from two large academic hospitals, measured hesitancy to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, defined as not planning on, being unsure about, or planning to delay vaccination. A three-step hierarchical multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between race and vaccine hesitancy controlling for demographic characteristics, employment characteristics and COVID-19 exposure risk, and being up-to-date with routine vaccines.Findings: Among 10,871 HCWs who completed the survey and reported race, 77.2% were White, 8.1% Black, 7.8% Asian, 4.1% other/mixed race and 2.8% Hispanic. Vaccine hesitancy was highest among Black (83.0%) and Hispanic HCWs (63.5%). Reasons for hesitancy included concerns about side effects, newness of the vaccine, and lack of vaccine knowledge. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for vaccine hesitancy was 4.98 (95% CI 4.11-6.03) for Blacks, 2.10 (95% CI 1.63-2.70) for Hispanics, 1.48 (95% CI 1.21-1.82) for other/mixed race respondants, and 1.47 (95% 1.26-1.71) for Asian compared to White HCWs. When adjusting for employment characteristics, COVID-19 exposure risk, and being up-to-date with prior vaccines, AORs were slightly diminished for Black HCWs, but remained stable for HCWs of other racial/ethnic groups.Interpretation: Hesitancy to receive the COVID-19 vaccine is high among HCWs, especially among Black and Hispanic HCWs. Interventions focused on addressing trust in COVID-19 vaccination among HCWs are needed.Funding Statement: The study was funded by the Vaccine Education Center of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.Declaration of Interests: Ms. Browne, Dr. Shen, Dr. Momplaisir, Dr. Green-McKenzie, Dr. Faig, Dr. Frank, and Dr. Offit have no conflicts of interest. Dr. Kuter is a consultant for Moderna. Dr. Feemster is an employee of Merck Research Laboratories.Ethics Approval Statement: The Institutional Review Board at each hospital reviewed the protocol and determined the study was exempt from human subjects’ review.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00