Stratified Fréchet Distance: A Stratified Evaluation Framework for Conditional Time Series Generation Models
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary
Stratified Fréchet Distance (SFD) is introduced to address limitations of FID by evaluating conditional time series generation models across data strata, revealing condition-dependent quality gaps and localized temporal failures not captured by aggregated scores.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), the standard metric for evaluating deep generative models, aggregates all data into a single score and thereby masks quality degradation in safety-critical minority conditions and in specific temporal regions of generated time series. We trace this dilution problem to a single cause—the absence of stratification—and propose Stratified Fréchet Distance (SFD), which partitions evaluation data into strata along a chosen axis and computes the Fréchet distance within each stratum. The choice of axis determines the diagnosis: stratifying by operating condition detects minority-condition failures (generalizing the existing Conditional FID), by temporal segment localizes late-cycle quality breakdown, and by their cross-product yields a two-dimensional condition×time quality map. Comparing SFD at different granularities further enables quantitative detection of inter-condition confounding. Experiments on four battery datasets (161 cells) with CVAE models show that SFD detects condition-dependent quality gaps of 1.97× where FID registers only 1.01×, with up to 79× higher sensitivity for minority conditions. Condition×time stratification reveals that the largest gap (8.69×) occurs in the latter half of 35∘C degradation curves—a physically interpretable failure to reproduce accelerated high-temperature degradation. Granularity comparison further detects temperature–C-rate (charge/discharge rate) confounding (T/J = 1.72×), providing actionable guidance on which conditioning variables a generative model should include. These findings are robust across three feature extractors and four datasets.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0