Maternal Misconceptions Against Infant Sunlight Exposure Are Still Bottlenecks in Northwest Ethiopia, by 2022

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

This study assessed Ethiopian mothers' knowledge and practices regarding infant sunlight exposure, finding that maternal age, education, marital status, and family size were associated factors impacting exposure.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

This paper examines whether maternal misconceptions about infant sunlight exposure remain a bottleneck in Northwest Ethiopia as of 2022, using information about prevailing beliefs and constraints affecting infants’ access to sunlight. The key finding is that such misconceptions are still present and continue to impede sunlight exposure, despite the existence of newer knowledge and interventions. A major limitation is that the provided text does not include the detailed study design, measurement approach, sample characteristics, or the authors’ explicitly stated caveats. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sunlight has been used for therapeutic purposes for neonatal jaundice. Exposure to sunlight is vital for the synthesis of vitamin D. Lack of exposure to sunlight is the single most important cause of rickets. Rickets is a major public health problem in many countries of the world, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. Vitamin D deficiency due to low exposure to sunlight, suboptimal exclusive breastfeeding, and low vitamin D intake is one of the health problems in Ethiopia. The implementation of the strategy has remained inconsistent and lacked focus on factors that influence maternal practice, excluding infants from getting adequate sunlight. OBJECTIVE: To assess knowledge, practices, and factors affecting sunlight exposure of infants among women attending Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia, 2022. METHODS: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted through patient interviews at Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from May 2022 to July 2022. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling method. A pretest was conducted on 5% (18) of participants before the actual data collection began. The data were collected by five BSc midwives. Data were entered into EpiData version 4.6.2 and exported to SPSS Software version 25 for further analysis. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to test the association between each independent variable and the dependent variable. At 95% CI, variables with a p-value < 0.05 in the multivariate logistic regression model were considered as associated factors. RESULTS: About 67.5% and 62.1% of the mothers had good knowledge and good practice regarding adequate sunlight exposure, respectively. Mother’s age, mother’s educational status, marital status, and family size were the factors associated with sunlight exposure in multinomial logistic regression. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: According to our study, participants did not have good knowledge and practice regarding sunlight exposure of infants. Therefore, health education focusing on the importance of sunlight exposure is important to improve the knowledge and practice of mothers towards sunlight exposure of their infants.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-20T11:00:21.680559+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0