Dynamics of efficient ensemble coding

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Ensemble coding creates compressed representations of a stimulus array. When discriminating the ensemble average against a reference, however, items in the ensemble with feature values closer to the reference are typically weighed stronger. We have recently shown that this “robust averaging” behavior can be explained as a form of efficient coding, where the sensory encoding precision is dynamically adapted to efficiently represent ensemble stimuli according to their overall distribution relative to a trial-by-trial varying reference. However, the specific mechanisms underlying such dynamic, efficient ensemble coding remain unknown. Here, we demonstrate that the relative timing between the presentation of the reference and the stimulus ensemble strongly affects efficient ensemble coding. We systematically probed participants’ decision behavior for varying time intervals between the presentation of the ensemble and the reference. We found that efficient ensemble coding was only clearly established when reference and ensemble were simultaneously presented. It was much weaker when the ensemble preceded the reference, and largely absent when the ensemble followed the reference. As captured by our model, reduced efficient ensemble coding thereby coincided with decreased decision accuracy in those asynchronous conditions. Our results indicate that any temporal offset between the ensemble and reference stimuli substantially disrupts the dynamic and efficient allocation of coding resource. This suggests that efficient ensemble coding is not the result of a preparatory attentional process nor due to evidence selection at the decision stage. Rather, it arises from a fast interaction between the simultaneously evoked, sensory representations of reference and ensemble stimuli.
Full text 1,881 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Ensemble coding creates compressed representations of a stimulus array. When discriminating the ensemble average against a reference, however, items in the ensemble with feature values closer to the reference are typically weighed stronger. We have recently shown that this “robust averaging” behavior can be explained as a form of efficient coding, where the sensory encoding precision is dynamically adapted to efficiently represent ensemble stimuli according to their overall distribution relative to a trial-by-trial varying reference. However, the specific mechanisms underlying such dynamic, efficient ensemble coding remain unknown. Here, we demonstrate that the relative timing between the presentation of the reference and the stimulus ensemble strongly affects efficient ensemble coding. We systematically probed participants’ decision behavior for varying time intervals between the presentation of the ensemble and the reference. We found that efficient ensemble coding was only clearly established when reference and ensemble were simultaneously presented. It was much weaker when the ensemble preceded the reference, and largely absent when the ensemble followed the reference. As captured by our model, reduced efficient ensemble coding thereby coincided with decreased decision accuracy in those asynchronous conditions. Our results indicate that any temporal offset between the ensemble and reference stimuli substantially disrupts the dynamic and efficient allocation of coding resource. This suggests that efficient ensemble coding is not the result of a preparatory attentional process nor due to evidence selection at the decision stage. Rather, it arises from a fast interaction between the simultaneously evoked, sensory representations of reference and ensemble stimuli. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0