Results
To study the recent evolutionary history of human miRNA genes a total of 1918 precursor miRNAs and their mature sequences (miRBase v.22, March 2018) were considered, from which 1904 remained after liftOver conversion to the hg19 assembly (Fig. 1 a, Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. S1). First, we classified these 1904 miRNAs in groups of conservation, according to their evolutionary age, by adapting the categories from Iwama et al. ( 2013 ) and Santpere et al. ( 2016 ). In total, 1623 (85.2%) miRNAs were classified in four different conservation categories: Primates (985, 51.7%), Eutherians (421, 22.1%), Metatheria–Prototheria (63, 3.3%) and conserved beyond mammals (154, 8%). The remaining miRNAs (281, 14.8%) could not be classified due to the absence of data or discrepancies between studies and were excluded from the subsequent analyses (Supplementary Table S1). Fig. 1 Description of human miRNAs in terms of genomic context, evolutionary age groups, expression levels and clustering. a Description of the miRNA hairpin regions identified and analysed in the study. Not all the primary sequences present two mature sequences annotated by miRbase. When the two mature sequences are not given (incomplete annotation), the precursor region is extended from the first mature to the other flanking (Flank) region. b TE-derived miRNA frequencies across conservation groups (Primates, 1; Eutherians, 2; Metatheria and Prototheria, 3; Conserved beyond mammals, 4). c Integrated hosting of miRNAs showing the combination of the different hosting elements that overlap with miRNA sequences. The “Others” group is made with the minor categories (PC + LNC and PC + LNC + TE) that represent less than 1% of the total dataset (Supplementary Table S2). d Number of tissues where the miRNA is expressed across evolutionary ages. e Mean expression level on reads per million (RPM) of miRNAs across evolutionary ages. f Whole genome clustering patterns of miRNAs. The upper plot represents the frequency of miRNAs that belong to a certain cluster in each chromosome (Members) and the frequency of clusters in the whole genome (Clusters). The lower plot represents the miRNA clusters per chromosome, according to the number of members and their frequency among the clustered miRNAs. g Fraction of clustered and isolated miRNAs across evolutionary ages. Intg (Intergenic), LCN (long non-coding RNA), TE (transposable element), PC (protein-coding)
Description of human miRNAs in terms of genomic context, evolutionary age groups, expression levels and clustering. a Description of the miRNA hairpin regions identified and analysed in the study. Not all the primary sequences present two mature sequences annotated by miRbase. When the two mature sequences are not given (incomplete annotation), the precursor region is extended from the first mature to the other flanking (Flank) region. b TE-derived miRNA frequencies across conservation groups (Primates, 1; Eutherians, 2; Metatheria and Prototheria, 3; Conserved beyond mammals, 4). c Integrated hosting of miRNAs showing the combination of the different hosting elements that overlap with miRNA sequences. The “Others” group is made with the minor categories (PC + LNC and PC + LNC + TE) that represent less than 1% of the total dataset (Supplementary Table S2). d Number of tissues where the miRNA is expressed across evolutionary ages. e Mean expression level on reads per million (RPM) of miRNAs across evolutionary ages. f Whole genome clustering patterns of miRNAs. The upper plot represents the frequency of miRNAs that belong to a certain cluster in each chromosome (Members) and the frequency of clusters in the whole genome (Clusters). The lower plot represents the miRNA clusters per chromosome, according to the number of members and their frequency among the clustered miRNAs. g Fraction of clustered and isolated miRNAs across evolutionary ages. Intg (Intergenic), LCN (long non-coding RNA), TE (transposable element), PC (protein-coding)
Next, we classified miRNAs in different genomic contexts by identifying the different elements that overlap their precursor sequences. According to GENCODE 19 (v.29) we found that 483 (~ 25%) miRNAs fell in intergenic regions (Intg), while 1421 (~ 75%) were located either within protein-coding genes (PC) (1217, 63.9%) or long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA; LNC) (204, 10.7%), either presenting a single or multiple overlapping host genes. In our dataset we found that 856 (60%) intragenic miRNAs (protein-coding and lncRNA) overlapped introns of the host sequence, while 545 (38%) were located within exonic regions. The remaining 20 (~ 1%) showed a mixture of intronic/exonic locations (Supplementary Table S1). Further, we used the last release of the RepeatMasker database (Smit et al. 2013 –2015) to identify the different forms of TEs and repetitive sequences that host miRNAs. We found 660 (35%) miRNAs overlapping TEs alone or in combination with other genes, while the remaining 1244 (65%) were either unmasked or overlapping other forms of repetitive sequences and genes. Interestingly, we found a strong correlation between the frequencies of the TE-hosting miRNAs and their evolutionary age, being the primate-specific group the one with the highest presence of miRNAs in this context (440, 23.1%; Fig. 1 b). Alu (67, 6.8%), L1 (54, 5.4%), TcMar (42, 4.2%) and the LTR elements ERV1 and ERVL (36, 3.6%) were found mainly among the primate-specific miRNAs, while hAT (14, 3.3%) and L2 (28, 6.6%) elements were also present in the eutherian group (Supplementary Table S2). It is of interest to note that the contribution of MIR (101, 15.3%) and DNA elements like TcMar (98, 14.8%) and hAT (85, 12.8%) families to the miRNA context is higher than to the whole genome (Supplementary Fig. S2a).
We found that the genomic context increased in complexity when different elements appeared hosting the same miRNA simultaneously. We studied the integrated hosting of miRNAs across the conservation groups considering the different combinations of elements (Fig. 1 c, Supplementary Table S3). This shared hosting evidences the two main sources of miRNAs: PC genes (796; 41.8%) and TEs (193; 10.2%), with 401 miRNAs presenting a combination of both (21%) while, on the other hand, 290 (15.2%) remained in Intg regions and 140 (7.3%) overlapping LNC genes. As expected, the genomic context is associated with the age of miRNAs (Chi square test = 238.25, p = 2.2e−16). This association shows that primate-specific miRNAs present a dominance of overlapping TEs in comparison with non-primate miRNAs, with the TE and TE + PC hosting categories being the major contributors across environments. On the other hand, lncRNAs are highly associated with the miRNA context among the non-primate groups, mainly in the group of miRNAs conserved beyond mammals (Supplementary Fig. S2b).
We made use of the miRNA expression levels in 16 different human tissues extracted from Panwar et al. ( 2017 ) (see Methods) to study their correlation across groups of conservation. As seen in Fig. 1 d, the tissue specificity is higher at lower evolutionary ages, which indicates the limited expression breadth of young miRNAs. Also, the expression levels were correlated with age, having the more conserved miRNAs an overall higher expression that may probably be due to their consolidated role in regulatory networks (Fig. 1 e).
Due to the evolutionary relevance of the miRNA organization in the genome, we revisited the clustering patterns of the miRBase annotations. When studying the closeness between miRNAs, an increment of distances ranging 1–10 kb was found (Supplementary Fig. S2c), which indicates a high accumulation of close miRNAs in certain regions. According to this, we defined that two miRNAs belong to the same cluster when they are located 10 kb or closer from each other. A total of 100 clusters were identified in the whole genome (Fig. 1 f and Supplementary Fig. S3), represented by 352 miRNA members. Two thirds of these clusters (64) were constituted only by two genes, while 36 clusters presented more than two. Two main clustering hotspots were observed in the chromosomes 14 (42) and 19 (46), as previously reported (Muiños-Gimeno et al. 2010 ; Guo et al. 2014 ), while the X chromosome presented a similar amount of clustered miRNAs (57) but more widespread in different smaller groups (Fig. 1 f). A total of 1552 miRNAs were located in isolated regions. We also found a strong correlation between the clustering patterns of miRNAs and groups of conservation (Fig. 1 g). The more conserved miRNAs tend to be found in clusters rather than in isolated regions, something likely related to the conserved role of clustered miRNAs in similar biological processes (Berezikov 2011 ; Wang et al. 2016 ).
Next, in order to compare the analysis based on the miRBase annotation with another source, we made use of the curated and overly conserved human miRNA dataset annotated in MirGeneDB (Fromm et al. 2015 –2020). This database is based on an alternative definition of the miRNA functional regions (Supplementary Fig. S4a) and presents a total of 508 human miRNAs, where 99% (503) sequences are also annotated in the miRBase dataset and included in our analyses. We found that the genomic context exhibited by this subset is highly correlated with the miRBase annotation. The TEs profile mimics the patterns seen above in the extended miRBase dataset: a higher presence of TEs in the primate-specific miRNAs, with a prevalence of the Alu repeats (Supplementary Fig. S4b). The integrated genomic context (Supplementary Fig. S4c) shows what may be expected from a more conserved group of miRNAs: a higher presence of miRNA sequences in ancient conservation groups.
The genetic variation of the miRNA dataset was analysed in the different miRNA functional regions defined by miRBase including a region of the same size on both sides of the precursor (5′ and 3′ flanking regions) using human genetic variation from the 1000 Genomes project (Fig. 1 a; Auton et al. 2015 ). A total of 1994 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were found in 1025 miRNA regions out of 1904 (53.8%). From them, 569 SNPs (28.5%) were located in 466 miRNA precursors (24.5%), from which 212 SNPs (10.6%) were located in 194 mature sequences, and 79 SNPs (4%) were located only in the seed region of 75 miRNAs. However, when considering only the flanking miRNA regions, twice as long as the region occupied by miRNA precursors, 1425 SNPs (71.5%) were found in 559 miRNA flanking regions. Therefore, more than half of the variability found in our miRNA regions comes from the flanking regions.
To study the sequence variation of human miRNAs we analysed the nucleotide diversity of 1904 miRNA precursor sequences described in miRBase in the pooled population sample from the 1000 Genomes project. The genomic context refers to the environment where miRNAs originally emerged, which might be determinant to their level of variation. We calculated the nucleotide diversity (Pi) in the whole precursor sequence by considering the age, location and clustering of the miRNAs (Fig. 2 ). We found significant differences when comparing the Pi of miRNAs in the different contexts (Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.013). Figure 2 a shows that miRNAs harboured by TEs exhibit a significantly higher Pi than in other genomic contexts. Next, we examined the TE-family specific diversity of the hosted miRNAs and wondered which TE families contribute more to this high diversity (Supplementary Fig. S5). We performed a multiple linear regression analysis with the different families as predictors and found that Alu and ERVL are significantly associated with the increase of nucleotide diversity (Alu, p = 0.013; ERVL, p = 5.11e−04). Fig. 2 Nucleotide diversity differences between miRNAs in different annotation categories and functional regions. a Differences between the genomic contexts where the human miRNAs are found. Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni corrected) show that TEs present a significantly higher diversity than other environments (TE vs LNC, p = 0.022; TE vs Intg, p = 0.022. b Differences across miRNA conservation groups. Primate-specific miRNAs (group 1) show a significantly higher diversity in comparison with the others (1 vs 2, p = 0.00057; 1 vs 3, p = 0.0178; 1 vs 4, p = 3.93e.10; Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni corrected). Significant differences are also seen for the miRNAs conserved beyond mammals (group 4) (4 vs 3, p = 0.0178; 4 vs 2, p = 2.6e−05; Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni corrected). c Differences between miRNAs found isolated and organised in clusters. Isolated miRNAs are associated with a significantly higher diversity than the members of clusters (Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons, p = 3.663e−10). d Diversity comparison between the different functional regions identified in the miRNA hairpins. Mean values (right axis) are indicated by a coloured diamond. The seed region (2–8 nucleotides) presents a significantly higher diversity than other conserved regions (seed vs loop, p = 0.0011 and seed vs mat, p = 0.0056; Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni corrected). e SNP density per functional region calculated in the whole miRNA dataset. Mean values (right axis) are indicated by a colored diamond. f Mean nucleotide diversity of the miRNA functional regions across the SNP MAF range. g Mean nucleotide diversity calculated in each relative position of the precursor miRNA. The zoomed region corresponds to the diversity per position found in the mature sequence. Intg (Intergenic), LCN (long non-coding RNA), TE (transposable element), PC (protein-coding), flank (flanking region), pre (precursor), mat (mature)
Nucleotide diversity differences between miRNAs in different annotation categories and functional regions. a Differences between the genomic contexts where the human miRNAs are found. Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni corrected) show that TEs present a significantly higher diversity than other environments (TE vs LNC, p = 0.022; TE vs Intg, p = 0.022. b Differences across miRNA conservation groups. Primate-specific miRNAs (group 1) show a significantly higher diversity in comparison with the others (1 vs 2, p = 0.00057; 1 vs 3, p = 0.0178; 1 vs 4, p = 3.93e.10; Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni corrected). Significant differences are also seen for the miRNAs conserved beyond mammals (group 4) (4 vs 3, p = 0.0178; 4 vs 2, p = 2.6e−05; Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni corrected). c Differences between miRNAs found isolated and organised in clusters. Isolated miRNAs are associated with a significantly higher diversity than the members of clusters (Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons, p = 3.663e−10). d Diversity comparison between the different functional regions identified in the miRNA hairpins. Mean values (right axis) are indicated by a coloured diamond. The seed region (2–8 nucleotides) presents a significantly higher diversity than other conserved regions (seed vs loop, p = 0.0011 and seed vs mat, p = 0.0056; Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni corrected). e SNP density per functional region calculated in the whole miRNA dataset. Mean values (right axis) are indicated by a colored diamond. f Mean nucleotide diversity of the miRNA functional regions across the SNP MAF range. g Mean nucleotide diversity calculated in each relative position of the precursor miRNA. The zoomed region corresponds to the diversity per position found in the mature sequence. Intg (Intergenic), LCN (long non-coding RNA), TE (transposable element), PC (protein-coding), flank (flanking region), pre (precursor), mat (mature)
As expected, the evolutionary age is another determinant factor in the miRNA sequence diversity. We found that Pi presents a clear correlation with the miRNA conservation (Fig. 2 b; see Methods), with significant differences among the different groups (Kruskal–Wallis p = 2.373e−11). The highest diversity was seen in the miRNAs classified as primate-specific (group 1) and the lowest in those conserved beyond mammals (group 4).
Regarding the clustering patterns of miRNAs, we found that diversity differences between clustered and isolated miRNAs reached significant levels (Wilcoxon p = 3.663e−10) (Fig. 2 c) which, as seen before, it might be a reflection of the higher conservation of clusters due to their functionality in cooperative processes (Wang et al. 2016 ; Kabekkodu et al. 2018 ) and also the fact that most of the clustered miRNAs have originated after common duplication events (Hertel et al. 2006 ).
Considering the above, sequence diversity levels of human miRNAs seem to be driven by their location, age and genomic context. These factors might also determine the presence of mutations in miRNA sequences that could affect their expression, hairpin folding and even their ability to bind their target genes and, therefore, be determinant for their evolutionary trajectory. Similar results were obtained when we analysed the MirGeneDB dataset. Supplementary Fig. S4d shows that the miRNAs hosted by TEs and PC exhibit the highest nucleotide diversity. Also, the youngest group (primate-specific) and the isolated miRNAs (Supplementary Fig. S4e, f) show similar patterns as in Fig. 2 b,c.
Next, we wanted to study the integrated contribution of these factors to the observed diversity differences. We applied a multiple linear regression model to the diversity data and the different miRNA categories (genomic context, evolutionary age and clustering). The regression model showed that age (being primate-specific, p = 3.3e−03), clustering (being isolated, p = 3.6e−04) and genomic context (not being intergenic, p = 0.015) are predictors significantly associated with the increase of Pi in human miRNAs.
The analysis of the nucleotide diversity (Pi) across different miRNA regions indicated an overall higher diversity in the precursor and flanking regions compared to the rest of regions (Wilcoxon test p < 0.05). Surprisingly the loop region presented the lowest diversity of the whole miRNA hairpin (Fig. 2 d). This might reflect the importance of this region in the hairpin folding, which is determinant for the processing of the primary sequence. Previous studies (Torruella-Loran et al. 2016 ) showed that the seed is the most conserved region of the miRNA, which has been associated with its functional relevance due its central role in target binding. However, our results showed an overall higher Pi in the seed than in other conserved regions, like the mature (outside seed) and the loop (Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons p = 0.0011 and p = 0.0056, respectively). It is worth noting that this level of diversity in the seed comes from the variation of a small set of miRNAs (75, 2.9%), showing that, indeed, most of the human miRNAs are conserved in their seed. This finding is supported by the diversity levels obtained in the analysis of the MirGeneDB dataset. In this conserved subset, the nucleotide diversity shown by the seed region is lower than the mature region (Supplementary Fig. S4g), something correlated with the higher conservation of this subset. Also, the loop shows a similar diversity than the seed region, suggesting the importance of its role in the hairpin folding. On the other hand, the seed region presented values of SNP density similar to those in the mature outside the seed (Fig. 2 e), which suggests that, considering the values of nucleotide diversity, the seed region is more populated by high frequency variants than the mature region. The region-specific levels of diversity were studied in the whole range of minor allele frequency (MAF), where the seed region was consistently found with diversity levels below the mature region until a frequency ~ 50% (Fig. 2 f). This shows that no bias in the variant content is confounding these results. Overall, these data suggest that the high diversity observed in this set of miRNAs might be a consequence of the specific targeting of positive selection processes, as discussed below.
Previous reports on miRNA targeting (Grimson et al. 2007 ; Wheeler et al. 2009 ) show that not only the seed region but also certain positions in the mature sequence are involved in target binding. To further analyse the variation in the miRNAs, nucleotide diversity was studied at position basis in the whole precursor sequence (Fig. 2 g). As expected, the general pattern shows that the mature sequences are located in a valley of diversity, which confirms their overall conservation. Different levels of diversity are seen in the mature sequence. More specifically a decrease in diversity is seen at the 3′ end, corresponding to the region known as participating in the complementary binding of mRNAs.
The excess of diversity found in the seed region may respond to particular processes of positive selection that generate frequency shifts at population level. These population-specific changes could affect the miRNA binding to the target gene and change the targeting profiles. In this line, we wanted to study the population-specific patterns of diversity found within the miRNA seed regions. In Supplementary Fig. S6 we show the Pi values of the seed regions from a total of 60 miRNAs presenting genetic variants (DAF ≥ 5%) calculated in each of the 26 populations of our study. The clustering pattern of diversity sharing among populations reflects the similarities of demographic and potential evolutionary histories in the same continental group. As expected, African populations (AFR) are clustered separately from the other populations, showing the highest differentiation probably due to the Out-of-Africa event. A higher diversity sharing is seen among the non-African populations. There are some clear continental-specific groups of miRNAs that might be the result of demographic dynamics and/or genetic drift, but also of local processes of positive selection on certain alleles. Considering the group-specific membership of miRNA alleles we found that 37% (22) are exclusively present in AFR, while 13% (8) are found in non-Africans, private or shared among other groups (European (EUR), American (AMR), East Asian (EAS) and South Asian (SAS)). The other alleles are shared between African and non-African populations (50%, 30), being 21 (35%) present in all continents.
Next, mean population differentiation ( F st ) values across all possible population comparisons were calculated for the different miRNA regions (Fig. 3 a). As shown, the seed presents an overall F st score higher than the rest of the mature sequence in almost all the compared groups. This tendency is stronger in comparisons including AFR populations than non-African ones. Although demographic dynamics are generally the main cause in the existing differentiation between populations, the high F st values in the seed, compared to other conserved regions like the mature (outside seed) and the loop, suggest that this region could have been particularly targeted by processes of positive selection. Surprisingly, in contrast with the overall low diversity values seen before, the loop region also exhibits particularly high F st scores in some comparisons, especially in the AFR vs SAS populations. Fig. 3 Analysis of F st values across miRNA regions and candidates. a Mean F st values per miRNA region across all population comparison groups. The F st values were calculated in all the variant regions. b Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) scores distributions, as a measure of the predicted level of deleteriousness of the variants, across miRNA regions. c Manhattan plot showing the mean F st values per miRNA mature sequence in the three comparisons of reference. Two F st thresholds were used to extract the potential miRNA candidates under positive selection (1% and 5%). d Heatmap showing the per-SNP F st values of the variants found in the mature outside seed (14) and seed (10) regions of the top 5% miRNA candidates, where the columns correspond to SNPs and rows to all 243 possible population comparisons
Analysis of F st values across miRNA regions and candidates. a Mean F st values per miRNA region across all population comparison groups. The F st values were calculated in all the variant regions. b Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) scores distributions, as a measure of the predicted level of deleteriousness of the variants, across miRNA regions. c Manhattan plot showing the mean F st values per miRNA mature sequence in the three comparisons of reference. Two F st thresholds were used to extract the potential miRNA candidates under positive selection (1% and 5%). d Heatmap showing the per-SNP F st values of the variants found in the mature outside seed (14) and seed (10) regions of the top 5% miRNA candidates, where the columns correspond to SNPs and rows to all 243 possible population comparisons
Further, we evaluated the potential functionality of the precursor region-specific SNPs by contrasting their overall Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) score distributions, a statistic designed to measure the deleteriousness of human variants (Rentzsch et al. 2019 ). As shown in Fig. 3 b, the CADD scores associated with the loop and seed regions are slightly higher than the rest of the precursor sequence, although non-significant. This evidence reinforces the idea that these regions are specifically implicated in processes potentially involved in adaptive selection.
We wanted to examine the extent to which the top F st scoring SNPs participate in putative signatures of recent positive selection. We focused on signals characterized by the presence of long haplotypes at high (ongoing hard sweeps) and moderate frequencies (soft sweeps) in individual populations, detected by the statistics integrated haplotype score (iHS) (Voight et al. 2006 ) and the number of segregating sites by length (nSL) (Ferrer-Admetlla et al. 2014 ) (see Methods). We pooled the SNP set (100, 16%) that showed extreme F st values (> 99%) in the whole miRNA precursor sequence in all population comparisons, and explored their involvement in selective sweeps. Among these top SNPs we found that 23% and 18% present extreme iHS and nSL scores (≥ 2), respectively, in at least one population, while the proportion of highly scoring SNPs in the whole dataset is only 13.8% (iHS) and 11.5% (nSL). This result suggests that highly differentiated SNPs in miRNAs are more likely to be found in genomic regions that hold signatures consistent with recent positive selection signatures (iHS Chi square test = 11.29, p = 7.77e−04; nSL Chi square test = 6.74, p = 9.38e−03).
Nucleotide changes in regions involved in miRNA sequence processing (pre, loop) and target binding (mature, seed) might affect the regulation of their target genes and, therefore, generate expression variation that could lead to genetic disorders, but also to phenotypic adaptations. Thus, we used the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project catalog (v7) of associated eQTL-eGene pairs to study the potential impact of our miRNA-harbouring top SNPs in gene expression variation (Aguet et al. 2017 ). Among the top 100 SNPs in the precursor sequences, 54% (54) are reported as significant expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTLs) by GTEx, while the 24.7% (154) are found in the whole SNP dataset. Also, we used the most recent release of the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) catalog (v1.0) (Buniello et al. 2019 ) to evaluate the extent to which these highly differentiated SNPs are associated with genetic diseases and traits. In this case, 5% (5) of the top SNPs present significant associations in GWAS studies, while only 1.7% (11) are found in the whole SNP dataset. These results indicate that highly differentiated miRNA-harbouring SNPs are more likely to be reported as significant eQTLs (Chi-square test = 33.994, p = 5.528e−09) and GWAS associated SNPs (Chi square test = 6.7841, p = 9.19e−03), which suggests their implication in expression variation and human diseases.
In order to identify potential candidate miRNA under the selection pressures of local adaptations, we calculated mean F st values in the whole mature sequence. Figure 3 c shows the genome wide distribution of mature-specific F st values in the three comparisons of reference (Utah Europeans (CEU) vs Han Chinese (CHB), CEU vs Yoruba (YRI) and CHB vs YRI), where three miRNAs are found in the top 1% (hsa-miR-1269b, hsa-miR-412-3p, hsa-miR-4707-3p) and 22 above the 5% (Table 1 ). Surprisingly the three most divergent miRNAs belong to conservation groups older than primate-specific, which suggests that these population-specific changes might respond to potential adaptations that affect well-established regulatory pathways. These top candidate miRNAs harbour 10 SNPs within their seed regions (10 miRNAs) and 14 SNPs in other positions of the mature sequence (14 miRNAs). As seen in Fig. 3 d, seed-harbouring SNPs like rs2273626 (hsa-miR-4707-3p) present the most extreme F st scores in the candidate mature sequences and reach top values (> 99.98%) in the whole miRNA distribution. Among these, seven SNPs in both seed (rs6771809, rs77651740, rs28655823, rs2273626, rs2168518, rs7210937, rs3745198) and mature regions (rs56790095, rs73239138, rs404337, rs2155248, rs61992671, rs12451747, rs73410309) were reported by GTEx as significantly associated to gene expression variation. Table 1 Top 5% miRNA candidates under putative positive selection Chr Mature ID Mature SNP Seed SNP Evolutionary Age Genomic Context Max F st Max iHS Max nSL CADD Disease association 1 hsa-miR-4781-3p – rs74085143 Primate PC;TE 0.21 –/1.51 –/1.28 –/7.85 PD1, AD2 2 hsa-miR-6071 rs56790095 – Primate PC;TE 0.21 0.67/– 0.37/– 5.64/– GB3, CRC4,5 2 hsa-miR-6811-3p rs2292879 – Primate PC;TE 0.26 2.73/– 1.73/– 2.71/– – 3 hsa-miR-6826-5p rs115693266 rs6771809 Primate PC 0.27 0.22/1.80 0.88/2.22 2.92/1.01 CRC6, BC7 4 hsa-miR-1269a rs73239138 – Primate TE 0.22 1.84/– 2.12/– 0.70/– GC8, HC9,10,16, CC11, BC12, LC13,14, CRC15 6 hsa-miR-10524-5p – rs77651740 Non-classified TE 0.30 –/1.69 –/1.40 –/NA – 8 hsa-miR-1322 rs59878596 – Non-classified PC 0.23 1.33/– 2.25/– NA/– HC17, ESC18 8 hsa-miR-4472 – rs28655823 Primate Intg 0.36 –/2.02 –/1.38 –/2.87 BC19,20,21, PC21, CC21 8 hsa-miR-8084 rs404337 – Non-classified TE 0.27 1.45/– 1.89/– NA/– BC22, OC23 10 hsa-miR-938 – rs12416605 Primate PC 0.21 –/0.93 –/1.78 –/7.68 GC24,25 11 hsa-miR-1304-3p rs2155248 – Primate PC;TE 0.23 1.72/– 1.13/– 4.44/– GC26, HC27, HNC28, EM29,LC30 12 hsa-miR-196a-3p rs11614913 – Eutherians PC 0.24 1.74/– 1.21/– 18.77/– LC31,38, HC31,33, HNC31, GM32, OC33, BC33,35,37,81, DM134, CAD36, CRC76, GC77,78,79,80 14 hsa-miR-412-3p rs61992671 – Eutherians LNC 0.43 1.44/– 1.33/– 15.52/– OS39, CC40 14 hsa-miR-4707-3p – rs2273626 Eutherians PC 0.57 –/2.33 –/1.22 –/10.85 POAG41, ESC42 15 hsa-miR-4513 – rs2168518 Meta/Prototheria PC 0.59 –/2.09 –/1.40 –/5.01 CAD43,46, LC44,45, GC47, BC48, OSCC49 17 hsa-miR-548 h-5p rs9913045 – Primate PC;TE 0.24 2.56/– 3.28/– 1.31/– GM50 17 hsa-miR-1269b rs12451747 rs7210937 Primate PC;TE 0.33 1.67/1.11 2.23/1.27 0.31/0.39 OPSCC51, LC52 17 hsa-miR-4739 rs73410309 – Primate LNC;TE 0.37 2.01/– 3.08/– 12.73/– PF53, PC54, DM155,56, GC57, AML58 18 hsa-miR-4741 – rs7227168 Eutherians PC 0.27 –/3.37 –/1.74 –/13.31 MY59, HC60, CRC61, CC61 19 hsa-miR-6796-3p – rs3745198 Primate PC 0.35 –/2.39 –/1.63 –/3.67 UR62 20 hsa-miR-646 rs6513497 – Primate LNC;TE 0.22 2.99/– 3.06/– 6.33/– GC63,68, HC64, LAC65, LC66,71, BC67, CRC69, RC70, OS72 22 hsa-miR-3928-5p rs5997893 – Non-classified TE 0.23 1.36/– 2.01/– NA/– HD73, HNC74, OS75 The Max. F st value represents the maximum mean F st of the mature sequence among the three comparisons of reference. The selection test values (iHS and nSL) correspond to the population that exhibit the maximum value of the mature SNP (left) and seed SNP (right). The CADD column provides the predicted deleteriousness scores of the mature SNP (left) and seed SNP (right). Disease association for most of the candidates are indicated in the disease column and some examples are described in the main text: PD Parkinson disease, AD Alzheimer’s disease, GB glioblastoma, CRC colorectal cancer, ESC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, BC breast cancer, GC gastric cancer, HC hepatocellular carcinoma, CC colon cancer, HNC head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, EM endometriosis, LC lung cancer, POAG open-angle glaucoma, ESC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, GM glioma, OC ovarian cancer, DM1 type 1 diabetes mellitus, CAD coronary artery disease, OSCC oral squamous cell carcinoma, OPSCC oral and pharyngeal squamous carcinoma, PF pleural fibrosis, PC prostate cancer, AML acute myeloid leukemia, MY myeloma, UR urolithiasis, LAC laryngeal carcinoma, RC renal carcinoma, OS osteosarcoma, HD Huntington disease. (1) Beecham et al. 2015 , (2) Satoh et al. 2015 , (3) Zhou et al. 2020 , (4,5) Slattery et al. 2018a , b , (6) Kijima et al. 2017 , (7) Danková et al. 2020 , (8) Li et al. 2017 , (9) Min et al. 2017 , (10) Xiong et al. 2015 , (11) Mao et al. 2017, (12) Sarabandi et al. 2021 , (13) Jin et al. 2018 , (14) Wang et al. 2020a , b , c , d , (15) Bu et al. 2015 , (16) Wang et al. 2019a , b , (17) Zhao et al. 2020 , (18) Zhang et al. 2013 , (19) Li et al. 2020 , (20) Wang et al. 2018 , (21) Kim et al. 2012 , (22) Gao et al. 2018 , (23) Chong et al. 2015 , (24) Torruella‐Loran et al. 2019, (25) Arisawa et al. 2012 , (26) Kurata and Lin 2018 , (27) Oura et al. 2019 , (28) Petronacci et al. 2020 , (29) Xu et al. 2017 , (30) Othman et al. 2013 , (31) Liu et al. 2018 , (32) Yang et al. 2020a , b , (33) Choupani et al. 2019 , (34) Ibrahim et al. 2019 , (35) Ahmad and Shah 2020 , (36) Fragoso et al. 2019 , (37) Zhao et al. 2016 , (38) Wang et al. 2017 , (39) Martin-Guerrero et al. 2018 , (40) Zhu et al. 2020a , b , (41) Ghanbari, et al. 2017a , b , (42) Bi et al. 2020 , (43) Mir et al. 2019 , (44) Ghanbari M et al. 2014, (45) Ghanbari M et al. 2017, (46) Li et al. 2015 , (47) Ding et al. 2019 , (48) Li et al. 2019 , (49 Xu et al. 2019 , (50) Ji et al. 2020 , (51) Chen et al. 2016 , (52) Yang et al. 2020a , b , (53) Wang et al. 2019a , b , (54) Wang et al. 2020a , b , c , d , (55) Delić et al. 2016 , (56) Li et al. 2018 , (57) Dong et al. 2015 , (58) Cattaneo et al. 2015 , (59) Zhang et al. 2019 , (60) Liu et al. 2019, (61) Cojocneanu et al. 2020 , (62) Liang et al. 2019 , (63) Cai et al. 2016, (64) Wang et al. 2014 , (65) Yuan et al. 2020, (66) Wang et al. 2020a , b , c , d , (67) Darvishi et al. 2020 , (68) Zhang et al. 2017 , (69) Dai et al. 2017 , (70) Li et al. 2014 , (71) Pan et al. 2016 , (72) Sun et al. 2015 , (73) Reed et al. 2018 , (74) Fadhil et al. 2020 , (75) Xu et al. 2014 , (76) Yan et al. 2017 , (77) Ni et al. 2015 , (78) Yan et al. 2017 , (79) Peng et al., 2010 , (80) Wang et al 2013 , (81) Qi et al. 2015
Top 5% miRNA candidates under putative positive selection
The Max. F st value represents the maximum mean F st of the mature sequence among the three comparisons of reference. The selection test values (iHS and nSL) correspond to the population that exhibit the maximum value of the mature SNP (left) and seed SNP (right). The CADD column provides the predicted deleteriousness scores of the mature SNP (left) and seed SNP (right). Disease association for most of the candidates are indicated in the disease column and some examples are described in the main text: PD Parkinson disease, AD Alzheimer’s disease, GB glioblastoma, CRC colorectal cancer, ESC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, BC breast cancer, GC gastric cancer, HC hepatocellular carcinoma, CC colon cancer, HNC head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, EM endometriosis, LC lung cancer, POAG open-angle glaucoma, ESC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, GM glioma, OC ovarian cancer, DM1 type 1 diabetes mellitus, CAD coronary artery disease, OSCC oral squamous cell carcinoma, OPSCC oral and pharyngeal squamous carcinoma, PF pleural fibrosis, PC prostate cancer, AML acute myeloid leukemia, MY myeloma, UR urolithiasis, LAC laryngeal carcinoma, RC renal carcinoma, OS osteosarcoma, HD Huntington disease. (1) Beecham et al. 2015 , (2) Satoh et al. 2015 , (3) Zhou et al. 2020 , (4,5) Slattery et al. 2018a , b , (6) Kijima et al. 2017 , (7) Danková et al. 2020 , (8) Li et al. 2017 , (9) Min et al. 2017 , (10) Xiong et al. 2015 , (11) Mao et al. 2017, (12) Sarabandi et al. 2021 , (13) Jin et al. 2018 , (14) Wang et al. 2020a , b , c , d , (15) Bu et al. 2015 , (16) Wang et al. 2019a , b , (17) Zhao et al. 2020 , (18) Zhang et al. 2013 , (19) Li et al. 2020 , (20) Wang et al. 2018 , (21) Kim et al. 2012 , (22) Gao et al. 2018 , (23) Chong et al. 2015 , (24) Torruella‐Loran et al. 2019, (25) Arisawa et al. 2012 , (26) Kurata and Lin 2018 , (27) Oura et al. 2019 , (28) Petronacci et al. 2020 , (29) Xu et al. 2017 , (30) Othman et al. 2013 , (31) Liu et al. 2018 , (32) Yang et al. 2020a , b , (33) Choupani et al. 2019 , (34) Ibrahim et al. 2019 , (35) Ahmad and Shah 2020 , (36) Fragoso et al. 2019 , (37) Zhao et al. 2016 , (38) Wang et al. 2017 , (39) Martin-Guerrero et al. 2018 , (40) Zhu et al. 2020a , b , (41) Ghanbari, et al. 2017a , b , (42) Bi et al. 2020 , (43) Mir et al. 2019 , (44) Ghanbari M et al. 2014, (45) Ghanbari M et al. 2017, (46) Li et al. 2015 , (47) Ding et al. 2019 , (48) Li et al. 2019 , (49 Xu et al. 2019 , (50) Ji et al. 2020 , (51) Chen et al. 2016 , (52) Yang et al. 2020a , b , (53) Wang et al. 2019a , b , (54) Wang et al. 2020a , b , c , d , (55) Delić et al. 2016 , (56) Li et al. 2018 , (57) Dong et al. 2015 , (58) Cattaneo et al. 2015 , (59) Zhang et al. 2019 , (60) Liu et al. 2019, (61) Cojocneanu et al. 2020 , (62) Liang et al. 2019 , (63) Cai et al. 2016, (64) Wang et al. 2014 , (65) Yuan et al. 2020, (66) Wang et al. 2020a , b , c , d , (67) Darvishi et al. 2020 , (68) Zhang et al. 2017 , (69) Dai et al. 2017 , (70) Li et al. 2014 , (71) Pan et al. 2016 , (72) Sun et al. 2015 , (73) Reed et al. 2018 , (74) Fadhil et al. 2020 , (75) Xu et al. 2014 , (76) Yan et al. 2017 , (77) Ni et al. 2015 , (78) Yan et al. 2017 , (79) Peng et al., 2010 , (80) Wang et al 2013 , (81) Qi et al. 2015
As seen before, the presence of SNPs in the seed region might lead to variations of the miRNA targeting profiles. To evaluate the degree of change that a single SNP might generate, we adapted the TargetScanHuman (Agarwal et al. 2015 ) pipeline to predict the allele-specific targets of the seed-variant candidates. When comparing the sets of target genes due to the ancestral and derived alleles, we observed that, among the top ten miRNAs with SNPs in their seed, only two present a cosine similarity (see Methods) above 70% (hsa-miR-10524-5p and hsa-miR-4513), while the other candidates fall below 23%. This indicates the dramatic target shift that a single SNP generates and might be involved in regulatory adaptations (Table 2 ). Table 2 Target Scan Human predicted target genes for the seed-variant miRNA candidates Mature ID SNP AA DA Targets (AA) Targets (DA) Overlapping targets Cosine similarity hsa-miR-938 rs12416605 C T 2678 2594 573 0.22 hsa-miR-4472 rs28655823 G C 3257 835 322 0.19 hsa-miR-4513 rs2168518 G A 2532 2693 2118 0.81 hsa-miR-1269b rs7210937 G C 2437 3167 626 0.23 hsa-miR-4707-3p rs2273626 C A 1167 2592 356 0.20 hsa-miR-4741 rs7227168 C T 3665 2231 676 0.23 hsa-miR-4781-3p rs74085143 A G 2339 2724 558 0.22 hsa-miR-6796-3p rs3745198 C G 2331 2855 484 0.19 hsa-miR-6826-5p rs6771809 C T 3191 2032 517 0.20 hsa-miR-10524-5p rs77651740 G T 2853 3332 2234 0.72 Two sets of target genes were predicted for each candidate holding both ancestral (AA) and derived alleles (DA). The overlap between these two lists of target genes is provided and the similarity is estimated with the cosine similarity
Target Scan Human predicted target genes for the seed-variant miRNA candidates
Two sets of target genes were predicted for each candidate holding both ancestral (AA) and derived alleles (DA). The overlap between these two lists of target genes is provided and the similarity is estimated with the cosine similarity
Next, we wanted to examine these candidate miRNAs with SNPs showing the highest population differentiation more in depth. We reviewed the literature looking for particular phenotypes in human populations and potential regulatory processes where these variants might be associated with. Among the ten miRNA candidates with SNPs located in the seed, all except one (hsa-miR-10524-5p) have been related to disease and, specially, with different types of cancers (Table 1 ), showing some of them differences among populations attributable to genetic risk factors, like in breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC) and gastric cancer (GC) (Sung et al. 2021 ). Particularly, three of these miRNAs (hsa-miR-4472, hsa-miR-4513 and hsa-miR-6826-5p) were associated with BC, two (hsa-miR-4472 and hsa-miR-4741) with CRC and two (hsa-miR-938, hsa-miR-4513) with GC. In four out of the nine miRNAs related to disease the miRNA association was linked to the presence of the variant (rs12416605 in hsa-miR-938, rs7210937 in hsa-miR-1269b, rs2168518 in hsa-miR-4513 and rs2273626 in hsa-miR-4707-3p) (Table 1 ). When considering the 14 miRNA candidates with SNPs located in the mature regions we observed that, all except one, for which no previous data have been reported (hsa-miR-6811), have been previously related to disease (Table 1 ). Among the associations with cancers showing differences on their risk among populations, five (hsa-miR-196a-3p, hsa-miR-646, hsa-miR-1269a, hsa-miR-6826-5p and hsa-miR-8084) have been associated with BC, five (hsa-miR-196a-3p, hsa-miR-646, hsa-miR-1269a, hsa-miR-6071 and hsa-miR-6826-5p) with CRC, and four (hsa-miR-196a-3p, hsa-miR-646, hsa-miR-1269a and hsa-miR-1304-3p) with GC. In four out of the 13 miRNAs related to disease the miRNAs association was linked to the presence of the variant (rs11614913 in hsa-miR-196a-3p, rs61992671 in hsa-miR-412-3p, rs6513497 in hsa-miR-646 and rs73239138 in hsa-miR-1269a) (Table 1 ).
In particular, for rs11614913 in hsa-miR-196a-3p ( F st = 0.24) the derived T allele has been associated with a decreased risk of different types of cancers, including breast and gastrointestinal cancers, principally in Asian populations. The frequency of the derived T allele is higher in East Asians (~ 54%) than in Europeans (CEU ~ 44%) and remarkably higher than in Africans (~ 13%) which may explain differences in the presentation of these types of cancer among populations and would agree with selective processes in this SNP. Similarly, for rs12416605 in hsa-miR-938 ( F st = 0.21), the derived T allele has been reported as a protective factor for the susceptibility to suffer a diffuse subtype of GC with the finding of a higher frequency of the T allele in Europeans compared with Asians (~ 29% vs. ~ 2%), which would agree with the reported higher predisposition to GC in Asian populations (Torruella-Loran et al. 2019 ). In this regard, also the T allele of rs73239138 in hsa-miR-1269a ( F st = 0.22) has been significantly associated with a decreased risk of GC in a Chinese population (Table 1 ).
Although most of the literature is centred on cancer diseases, other pathologies showing population differences worldwide have been linked to some of these miRNA candidates and SNPs. The T allele of rs11614913 in hsa-miR-196a-3p (highest frequency in Asian populations: 54%) shows a pleiotropic effect being not only associated with cancer but also with the risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD) (Fragoso et al. 2019 ), as well as the T allele of rs2168518 in hsa-miR-4513 (highest frequency in European populations: 61%), which has been strongly associated with increased susceptibility to CAD and other related pathologies and physiological states showing risk differences among populations such as glucose homeostasis, blood pressure, and age-related macular degeneration (Mir et al. 2019 ; Ghanbari et al. 2014 , 2017a , b ; Li et al. 2015 ).
Additionally, among the SNP candidates with the highest F st scores in the top 1% is rs2273626 ( F st = 0.57), located in the seed region of hsa-miR-4707-3p. A neuroprotective role for the derived T allele in the progression of glaucoma has been reported (Ghanbari et al. 2017a , b ), which goes in line with the negative association of rs2273626 with the disease (Springelkamp et al. 2017 ). This SNP shows a derived allele frequency of ~ 3% in African populations and more than 50% in non-Africans (Fig. 4 a), which would be in agreement with the higher incidence of glaucoma in Africans (Abu-Amero et al. 2015 ). Remarkably, the extended haplotype homozygosity (EHH) decay on this variant indicates the presence of longer haplotypes harbouring the derived allele in non-African populations (Fig. 4 b), which is consistent with the occurrence of positive selection processes favouring the neuroprotective allele since the Out-of-Africa event. Fig. 4 Analysis of signatures of positive selection in the candidate SNP rs2273626. a World wide Minimum Allele Frequency (MAF) distribution of rs2273626. b Extended haplotype homozygosity (EHH) decay in both ancestral and derived alleles of rs2273626 (upper plot) and haplotype patterns around the ancestral and derived alleles (bottom plot) in Utah Europeans (CEU), Han Chinese (CHB) and Peruvian (PEL) population
Analysis of signatures of positive selection in the candidate SNP rs2273626. a World wide Minimum Allele Frequency (MAF) distribution of rs2273626. b Extended haplotype homozygosity (EHH) decay in both ancestral and derived alleles of rs2273626 (upper plot) and haplotype patterns around the ancestral and derived alleles (bottom plot) in Utah Europeans (CEU), Han Chinese (CHB) and Peruvian (PEL) population