Prediction of MBS Item Codes for Endometriosis Surgery Using Transvaginal Ultrasound

other OA: bronze public-domain-us
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

Transvaginal ultrasound staging of endometriosis showed weak agreement with Medicare Benefits Schedule item numbers, tending to over-stage but performing well in identifying high surgical complexity.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

This retrospective multicentre study (five countries, six centers) assessed whether an IDEA consensus-based transvaginal ultrasound rASRM score (rASRM-U), collected between August 2018 and November 2019, can predict the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) item codes for endometriosis surgery updated in March 2022. Among 273 patients (219 analyzed after exclusions for incomplete data), predicting MBS item numbers by rASRM-U stage showed weak agreement (weighted Kappa 0.31, 95% CI 0.24–0.38), with rASRM-U tending to predict higher surgical stages (“over-staging”). The paper reports strong sensitivity but low specificity in dichotomized analyses for high versus low surgical complexity, and it explicitly concludes the model cannot accurately predict individual MBS item numbers. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—predicting MBS item codes for endometriosis surgery from transvaginal ultrasound–based rASRM staging.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In March 2022, updates in the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule relating to endometriosis surgery were made relating to item numbers 35637, 35631 and 35632 (division of 35638) and 35641. Updated codes aligned with rASRM Stages 1, 2, 3 and 4 endometriosis respectively. This study aims to assess an IDEA consensus-based ultrasound rASRM predicting MBS item. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective multicentre study conducted across five countries and six centres. Data collection from August 2018 to November 2019 assessing ultrasound staged rASRM (rASRM-U). Subgroup analysis was performed, dichotomizing rASRM-U and MBS items into low and high stages. RESULTS: 273 patients were included, 54 excluded due to incomplete data. 219 remained for analysis. Predicting MBS item by rASRM-U stage showed weak agreement with a weighted Kappa value of 0.31 (0.24 to 0.38, 95% CI). rASRM-U predicted a 0.68 higher surgical stage supporting 'over-staging'. Although generally poor for low-stage item numbers, there was a sensitivity of 0.96 and specificity of 0.44 predicting item 35641. Dichotomised staging shows sensitivity in rASRM-U predicting high-stage of 0.99 with specificity of 0.34 and NPV of 0.95. Prediction of low-stage shows sensitivity of 0.34, specificity of 0.99, and NPV of 0.79. CONCLUSION: The IDEA consensus-based rASRM-U has relatively poor agreement with corresponding MBS item numbers, tending to predict 'higher' stages. This model is unlikely to predict low stages incorrectly. Although unable to accurately predict individual item numbers for endometriosis surgery, this system identifies high versus low surgical complexity when ultrasound and surgical groups are dichotomized; thus, it could allow improved surgical and financial planning.
Full text 1,939 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background and Aims In March 2022, updates in the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule relating to endometriosis surgery were made relating to item numbers 35637, 35631 and 35632 (division of 35638) and 35641. Updated codes aligned with rASRM Stages 1, 2, 3 and 4 endometriosis respectively. This study aims to assess an IDEA consensus-based ultrasound rASRM predicting MBS item.

Materials and methods

Retrospective multicentre study conducted across five countries and six centres. Data collection from August 2018 to November 2019 assessing ultrasound staged rASRM (rASRM-U). Subgroup analysis was performed, dichotomizing rASRM-U and MBS items into low and high stages.

Results

273 patients were included, 54 excluded due to incomplete data. 219 remained for analysis. Predicting MBS item by rASRM-U stage showed weak agreement with a weighted Kappa value of 0.31 (0.24 to 0.38, 95% CI). rASRM-U predicted a 0.68 higher surgical stage supporting ‘over-staging’. Although generally poor for low-stage item numbers, there was a sensitivity of 0.96 and specificity of 0.44 predicting item 35641. Dichotomised staging shows sensitivity in rASRM-U predicting high-stage of 0.99 with specificity of 0.34 and NPV of 0.95. Prediction of low-stage shows sensitivity of 0.34, specificity of 0.99, and NPV of 0.79.

Conclusion

The IDEA consensus-based rASRM-U has relatively poor agreement with corresponding MBS item numbers, tending to predict ‘higher’ stages. This model is unlikely to predict low stages incorrectly. Although unable to accurately predict individual item numbers for endometriosis surgery, this system identifies high versus low surgical complexity when ultrasound and surgical groups are dichotomized; thus, it could allow improved surgical and financial planning. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

rASRM

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-26T06:08:39.051465+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-07-26T06:03:58.823838+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine