Comparison of "Internet +" CBL and traditional CBL in CPPT teaching mode

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Objective: To study the difference between "Internet +" case-based learning(CBL) and traditional CBL in the CPPT teaching mode and provide foundation and basis for medical teaching reform. Methods: In August 2022, the fourth-year students of the First Clinical College of a medical university received the "Learning Experience" survey, which was conducted to evaluate the teaching satisfaction and learning gain. Results: Both CBL methods have preponderances and weaknesses. "Internet +" CBL is better in teaching satisfaction, understanding and utilization of knowledge, and can effectively improve students' ability to collect and analyze information and improve students' teamwork ability in terms of learning gain. On the basis of being able to complete the syllabus, traditional CBL reduces the study burden before and after class, provides students with more spare time, but challenges students' consciousness. Conclusion: Under the Clinical Pathophysiology &Therapeutics (CPPT) teaching mode, the teaching satisfaction and learning gain of Internet + "CBL" are superior to traditional CBL in different degrees, but Internet + "CBL" increases the burden on students to a certain extent.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0