Development of Comorbidity Index for In-hospital Mortality for Patients Underwent Coronary Artery Revascularization
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Background For myocardial revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting (CAGB) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are two common modalities but with high in-hospital mortality. A comorbidity index is useful to predict mortality or can be used with other covariates to develop point-scoring systems. This study aimed to develop specific comorbidity indices for patients who underwent coronary artery revascularization. Methods Patients who underwent CABG or PCI were identified in the National Inpatient Sample database between Q4 2015-2020. Patients of age<40 were excluded for congenital heart defects. Patients were randomly sampled into experimental (70%) and validation (30%) groups. Thirty-eight Elixhauser comorbidities were identified and included in multivariable regression to predict in-hospital mortality. Weight for each comorbidity was assigned and single indices, Li CABG Mortality Index (LCMI) and Li PCI Mortality Index (LPMI), were developed. Results Mortality prediction by LCMI approached adequacy ( c -statistic=0.691, 95% CI=0.682-0.701) and was comparable to multivariable regression with comorbidities ( c -statistic=0.685, 95% CI=0.675-0.694). LCMI prediction performed significantly better than Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) ( c -statistic=0.621, 95% CI=0.611-0.631) and can be further improved by adjusting age ( c -statistic=0.721, 95% CI=0.712-0.730). LPMI moderately predicted in-hospital mortality ( c -statistic=0.666, 95% CI=0.660-0.672) and performed significantly better than ECI ( c -statistic=0.610, 95% CI=0.604-0.616). LPMI performed better than the all-comorbidity multivariable regression ( c -statistic=0.658, 95% CI=0.652-0.663). After age adjustment, LPMI prediction was significantly increased and was approaching adequacy ( c -statistic=0.695, 95% CI=0.690-0.701). Conclusions LCMI and LPMI effectively predicted in-hospital mortality. These indices were validated and performed superior to ECI. The adjustment of age increased their predictive power to adequacy, implicating potential clinical application.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00