Computer method of biocenotic zoning

2024 · doi:10.1101/2024.11.12.623201
preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text ⓘ

The paper describes an algorithm for dividing a territory or water area into homogeneous zones, where each zone is characterized by communities with similar species structure. It proposes a quantitative statistical indicator to assess the quality of the zoning. The authors illustrate the method with three ecological examples: tree communities in a reserve, nekton in the Sea of Okhotsk, and insect-larvae taxocenes in a forest river, and they discuss difficulties and interpretation issues in zoning results. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Algorithm of dividing a territory or a water area into homogeneous areas is described. This area has its own group of communities, similar to each other in terms of species structure. Quantitative statistical indicator, describing quality of such zoning, is proposed. Three examples are given: tree communities in the reserve, nekton in the Sea of Okhotsk and taxocenes of insect larvae in the forest river. Difficulties in the process and interpretation of zoning results, recipes and ideas to solve these problems are discussed.
Full text 819 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Algorithm of dividing a territory or a water area into homogeneous areas is described. This area has its own group of communities, similar to each other in terms of species structure. Quantitative statistical indicator, describing quality of such zoning, is proposed. Three examples are given: tree communities in the reserve, nekton in the Sea of Okhotsk and taxocenes of insect larvae in the forest river. Difficulties in the process and interpretation of zoning results, recipes and ideas to solve these problems are discussed. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00