Automated information extraction from plant specimen labels using OCR and large language models

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The digitization of herbarium specimens is crucial for advancing biodiversity research and data sharing. However, this process is often hindered by the inefficiency of manual transcription and the technical challenges posed by the massive volume of specimens, heterogeneous label layouts, and the prevalence of handwritten texts. To overcome these bottlenecks, this study proposed an automated pipeline that integrates the PadddleOCR engine with the DeepSeek large language model (LLM) for structured information extraction from specimen labels. The pipeline is designed to extract 16 key metadata fields from both printed and handwritten labels. Evaluated on a benchmark dataset, it achieved a high field-level accuracy of 95.4% for printed labels, demonstrating strong reliability. For handwritten labels, the system maintained functionality while correctly identifying its limitations through a confidence-based quality control mechanism. A key finding was the compensatory role of the LLM, which effectively corrected upstream OCR errors, as evidenced by a weak correlation ( r = 0.32) between OCR confidence and final extraction accuracy. This hybrid architecture ensures data security through local image processing and cost-efficiency via text-only LLM parsing. This work provides a robust, scalable, and practical solution for accelerating the digitization of botanical collections. The method is directly applicable to real-world digitization workflows and promises to significantly enhance the efficiency of biodiversity data creation and sharing.
Full text 863 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Preprint ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e177223 (07 Nov 2025) https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e177223 (07 Nov 2025) Published in: Biodiversity Data Journal https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.14.e177202 Other versions: - Preprint InfoPreprint Info - CiteCite - MetricsMetrics - CommentComment - RelatedRelated - CitedCited ARPHA Preprints doi: 10.3897/arphapreprints.e177223 First posted 07 Nov 2025 Author Juan Wen - Corresponding author Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China Conflict of interest The author has declared that no competing interests exist. This is an open access preprint distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0