Beyond next-word prediction: hierarchical linguistic composition modulates LLM-brain alignment in time

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The internal representations of large language models (LLMs) correlate, or “align”, with human neural activity during language comprehension. One view holds that this alignment reflects shared sensitivity to statistical patterns in LLMs and humans, while others hold that it reflects, at least in part, the emergence of shared linguistic representations in these systems. Here, we investigate whether hierarchical linguistic composition, a property believed to be fundamental to human language, modulates LLM-brain alignment. To this end, we manipulated syntax, compositional semantics, and associative semantics in English sentences that were presented to both an LLM and human participants during an electroencephalography (EEG) experiment. We matched linguistically manipulated stimuli in predictability, which allows us to tease apart alignment induced by linguistic structure from statistical factors. By comparing LLM-EEG alignment scores that were derived using a linear encoding model across predictability-matched conditions, we evaluate how linguistic manipulations modulate the alignment between human EEG reading data and contextual embeddings extracted word-by-word from the hidden layers of GPT2-XL. Three key patterns emerge: (1) increased alignment for word sequences with syntactic structure, (2) decreased alignment for sentences with compositional semantics, and (3) associative semantics does not modulate alignment. These observed linguistic modulations of LLM-EEG alignment take place above and beyond predictability. Our results indicate that associative semantics is encoded similarly by LLMs and the brain, as are at least some aspects of syntactic structure, while compositional semantics is more uniquely encoded in the human brain.
Full text 1,909 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The internal representations of large language models (LLMs) correlate, or “align”, with human neural activity during language comprehension. One view holds that this alignment reflects shared sensitivity to statistical patterns in LLMs and humans, while others hold that it reflects, at least in part, the emergence of shared linguistic representations in these systems. Here, we investigate whether hierarchical linguistic composition, a property believed to be fundamental to human language, modulates LLM-brain alignment. To this end, we manipulated syntax, compositional semantics, and associative semantics in English sentences that were presented to both an LLM and human participants during an electroencephalography (EEG) experiment. We matched linguistically manipulated stimuli in predictability, which allows us to tease apart alignment induced by linguistic structure from statistical factors. By comparing LLM-EEG alignment scores that were derived using a linear encoding model across predictability-matched conditions, we evaluate how linguistic manipulations modulate the alignment between human EEG reading data and contextual embeddings extracted word-by-word from the hidden layers of GPT2-XL. Three key patterns emerge: (1) increased alignment for word sequences with syntactic structure, (2) decreased alignment for sentences with compositional semantics, and (3) associative semantics does not modulate alignment. These observed linguistic modulations of LLM-EEG alignment take place above and beyond predictability. Our results indicate that associative semantics is encoded similarly by LLMs and the brain, as are at least some aspects of syntactic structure, while compositional semantics is more uniquely encoded in the human brain. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Changed "drives" to "modulates" in title for clarity

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0