COX–2 is overesxpressed in ovarian endometriosis and might represent a therapeutic target

In: Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2008 · vol. 68(S 01) · doi:10.1055/s-0028-1088624 · W2323166848
OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-02 ⓘ

This study investigated COX-2 expression across various anatomical sites of endometriosis to assess its potential as a therapeutic target.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-20 · read from full text ⓘ

This study investigated the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in endometriotic tissues collected from various anatomical sites, including ovarian, uterine, and peritoneal locations. Immunohistochemical analysis of 60 samples revealed that COX-2 was significantly overexpressed in glandular epithelial cells within ovarian lesions compared to other sites, with a high percentage of positive staining observed in most ovarian cases. The researchers noted a strong correlation between staining intensity and lesion location, highlighting that ovarian endometriosis exhibits distinct molecular characteristics relative to extraovarian forms. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically focusing on the differential expression of COX-2 in ovarian versus other endometriotic implants.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Aims: Recent studies have suggested that cyclooxygenase–2 (COX–2) is involved in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of COX–2 in different anatomical sites of endometriosis
Full text 1,489 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Methods

COX–2 expression was analysed immunohistochemically in 60 samples of endometriotic tissue from different anatomical sites (25 ovarian, 14 uterine, 21 peritoneal/Fallopian tube/omental endometriosis) using a monoclonal antibody against COX–2. Staining results were analysed semiqiantitatively for staining intensity and percent of positive cells.

Results

COX–2 immunoreaction was observed in glandular epithelial cells in 96,5% of all cases; stromal cells were completely negative. COX–2 overexpression (defined as >75% positive stained cells) was seen in 72% of the ovarian and in about 40% of uterine and peritoneal lesions (p<0.05). There was also a sognoficant correlation for staining intensity, favoring ovarian lesions (p<0.0002).

Conclusions

Increased COX–2 expression in the ovarian endometriotic lesions was observed with respect to other extraovarian localizations. Cox–2 inhibitors may be an option in the treatment of symptomatic patients with ovarian endometriosis and might play a role in prevention of ovarian carcinoma in patients who are under risk for ovarian cancer and affected by endometriosis.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-23T06:24:35.503409+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK