Keywords
a mygdala functional
connectivity; cerebellar
functional connectivity;
chronic pelvic pain;
emotional trauma;
functional magnetic
resonance imaging;
neuro emotional
Technique
2 D. a. MonTI e T al.
function ( acoG Practice Bulletin 2020). c ommon to cPP are
emotional symptoms of anxiety and depression, or physical
or sexual abuse (Meltzer-Brody et al. 2007).
Pain is a process that is mediated by the nervous system
through changes that occur both peripherally and centrally
(c ervero et al. 1994). Using neuroimaging tools, researchers
have begun exploring cnS changes induced by pain and the
effects of various pain therapies ( a dler et al. 1997, Kupers
et al. 2000). observations, including those from our group,
have identified alterations in the brain’s pain matrix during
chronic pain and its modulation through pharmacological
and non-pharmacological therapies (newberg et al. 2011,
Støttrup et al. 2023). Key regions implicated in the pain matrix
include the thalamus, amygdala, sensory areas, prefrontal cor -
tex, and cerebellum. chronic pain also involves changes in
the insular cortex and frontal lobes ( yang et al. 2024). Specific
pain conditions, such as cPP , are associated with disruptions
in the salience network, anterior cingulate gyrus, and sensory
regions (Kutch et al. 2017). Functional connectivity (Fc ) in
these networks is typically heightened, intensifying the inter -
play between pain and emotional responses (Martucci et al.
2015, a s-Sanie et al. 2016).
Patients with chronic pain frequently seek non-pharmacological
and non-surgical management of their symptoms, with overall
limited effectiveness (Urits et al. 2021). This study explores a
novel intervention, the neuro emotional Technique (neT), previ-
ously shown to modulate autonomic nervous system function
and affect emotional connectivity pathways in the brain that
overlap with pain perception. The intervention combines emo -
tional, cognitive, and motor processing in a standardised format
designed to help patients reduce their psychophysiological reac-
tivity to distressing memories, thoughts, and perceptions, includ-
ing those related to pain. We have previously reported on brain
responses to the ne T intervention in distressed cancer patients.
Utilising functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signifi -
cant changes in the brain’s reactivity to distressing stimuli were
demonstrated (Monti et al. 2017, 2018), as well as changes in Fc,
including areas that overlap with pain regulation. Specifically, we
have found changes in the amygdala, cerebellum, and prefrontal
cortex associated with the neT intervention.
Given the overlap between the brain areas previously
observed to be affected by ne T and those involved with chronic
pain, we wanted to assess whether ne T might have a clinical
impact on patients with cPP . Given that chronic pain is often
associated with heightened Fc in networks linking sensory, cer -
ebellar, and emotional regions, we hypothesised that the inter -
vention would result in decreased Fc between these regions.
Furthermore, these reductions in connectivity were anticipated
to be associated with improvements in pain and emotional
symptoms in the treatment group. Thus, our primary outcome
was the change in Fc based on MRI data, and the secondary
outcomes were the self-reported clinical measures of pain per -
ception and emotional status (e.g. anxiety and depression).
Methods
Participants
The study was a prospectively designed study. Subjects
enrolled were adult females with cPP of at least 3 months in
duration. The specific cause of the pelvic pain was not exclu -
sionary, but potential participants were excluded if they had
pelvic surgery or any stimulators implanted. Patients were
excluded if they had any history of significant and active
medical or neurological conditions. Patients were excluded if
they had any other major mental disorder or were actively
participating in another emotional therapy. They were allowed
to continue current treatments for their pelvic pain as long as
there were no substantive changes in the three months prior
to enrolling in the study.
Patients were recruited through the Department of
obstetrics and Gynaecology and from posted advertisements
at the Sidney Kimmel c ancer c entre at Thomas Jefferson
University. This study was also posted on clinicaltrials.gov
(nc T03233594). a s an initial screening, potential participants
were asked to describe their pain on a scale from 0 to 10
with 10 being the worst pain imaginable, and had to have a
score of 7 or higher. This cut-off is at a level considered
severe enough to significantly interfere with daily functioning
which would establish the diagnosis of the patients and opti -
mise the ability to evaluate the effect of the ne T intervention
(Wolpe 1973, Boonstra et al. 2016).
a total of 26 participants met the full criteria for participa -
tion in the study ( Figure 1 and Table 1), a number consistent
with our prior study of ne T in cancer patients which showed
significant findings in Fc (Monti et al. 2018). The subjects
were randomised using a permuted block design into two
parallel groups (IBM SPSS Statistics) that were not significantly
different. The randomisation was performed by the one of
the investigators ( aBn) and provided to the study coordinator
who placed subjects into their respective treatment arms
upon enrolment. Thirteen subjects were assigned to the ne T
intervention group (average age of 43.0 ± 15.7 years) and thir -
teen were assigned to the waitlist control condition (average
age of 42.8 ± 13.6 years). The mean BMI for the ne T group was
22.5 ± 3.9 and for the control group was 26.9 ± 6.6. Patients
had four potential diagnoses – endometriosis, pudendal neu -
ralgia, high tone pelvic floor dysfunction, and interstitial cys -
titis. once enrolled, subjects received a battery of psychological
and pain measures (see below) and the initial MRI scan with
rs-fMRI.
Ethical approval
This study was approved (17D.163) by the Institutional Review
Board of Thomas Jefferson University. a ll procedures per -
formed in this study involving human participants were in
accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional
Review Board of Thomas Jefferson University and with the
1964 Helsinki declaration. Participating women signed an
informed consent form at the first study visit.
NET intervention
The ne T intervention consisted of five sessions which were
approximately one hour in length, typically one per week. a ll
sessions were led by a ne T-certified, licenced psychologist
(aT). o ur previous work suggests that five sessions usually are
sufficient for the intervention to address the distress of a
BRaIn FUnc TIon cHanGeS In cHR onIc Pel VIc PaIn TReaTeD WITH ne T 3
given situation (Monti et al. 2017). The focus of the sessions
was on the subjective experience of the pain and its distress -
ing effects on all dimensions of life. During the desensitisa -
tion aspect of the protocol, while thinking about the
distressing aspects of the pain experience and the cognitions
and emotions associated with it, participants were asked to
do simple breathing exercises. The intervention integrates the
use of acupressure points on the wrists that are thought to
correlate with specific emotional qualities in the Traditional
chinese Medicine system. Targeted acupressure has shown
promise for relieving stress and anxiety ( cho et al. 2021). The
focus of the ne T sessions was on the experience of chronic
pain with an emphasis on stress-related aspects of the pain.
In summary, the ne T protocol for this study targeted the
emotions, cognitions, energy, and autonomic activation
related to stressful aspects of the pain experience.
The participants underwent the same battery of clinical
and fMRI evaluations after the ne T intervention that they
underwent prior to the intervention. The participants who
were placed in the waitlist control group continued usual
care for the cPP between the two scans, and all were offered
the opportunity to undergo the ne T intervention after the
study period. The waitlist period with standard care is also
used to try to balance the patient’s expectation of therapeu -
tic improvement since it is not clear what would be an ade -
quate placebo condition that would match the elements of
ne T without providing a specific therapeutic benefit.
Figure 1. consort flow sheet diagram of the study participants.
Table 1. d emographics for the two study groups.
demographic data
c ontrol net
Mean ± sd Mean ± sd
age 42.8 ± 13.6 43.0 ± 15.7
body mass index 26.9 ± 6.6 22.5 ± 3.9
diagnoses ic-5; eM-2; Ht -4; Pn-8 ic-4; eM-5; Ht -5; Pn-6
back depression inventory 15.9 ± 12.9 13.6 ± 11.0
Physical function 16.2 ± 3.7 16.5 ± 3.9
ic = i nterstitial cystitis; eM = endometriosis; Ht = High tone pelvic floor dys -
function; Pn = Pudendal neuralgia; sd = s tandard deviation.
4 D. a. MonTI e T al.
Psychological assessments
a ll assessments were conducted in the same office environ -
ment and were collected and managed using the computer
based ReDc ap electronic data capture tools hosted at yale
University (Harris et al. 2009, 2019), so that the assessor is not
involved in acquiring this data. a ll participants completed the
Beck Depression Index (Beck et al. 1961), Spielberger State
Trait a nxiety Index Spielberger 1983), and PR oMIS ( c ella et al.
2010, a mtmann et al. 2010) which is a clinical scale that eval -
uates physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep
quality, pain interference, and pain intensity.
fMRI Imaging protocol
Resting-state fMRI data was obtained using the similar pro -
tocol as we have used in prior studies (Monti et al. 2018,
Vedaei et al. 2021). Briefly, all patients were scanned using
a 3 T Siemens Biograph mMR Pe T-MR scanner with a
32-channel head coil. Initially, an anatomical T1-image was
obtained for all subjects to check for any radiological find -
ings of brain abnormality or injury, and for further segmen -
tation and registration steps during data pre-processing.
next, a resting state BolD scan was collected using an e cho
Planar Imaging (ePI) sequence to examine intrinsic Fc of the
brain regions. The following imaging parameters were used:
FoV = 23.6 cm; voxel size = 3 × 3 × 4 mm3; TR = 2.0 s; Te = 30 ms;
slice thickness = 4 mm; number of slices = 34; number of volumes
= 180; and acquisition time = 366 s. During rs-fMRI, the subjects
were instructed to close their eyes, keep their heads still, and
rest quietly without thinking about anything.
Data processing
MRI processing was performed in a manner similar to our prior
studies evaluating Fc with ne T (Monti et al. 2018, Vedaei et al.
2021). a ll rs-fMRI data were preprocessed using Data Processing
& a nalysis for Resting-State Brain Imaging (DPaBI, V5.1_201201;
http://rfmri.org/dpabi) based on Statistical Parametric Mapping
(SPM12; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) running on M aTlaB
R2020b (The Maths Works, Inc., natick, M a, USa ). The
pre-processing steps are summarised here and are similar to
our prior studies of the ne T. each individual T1-weighted struc-
tural image was co-registered to the mean of the realigned ePI
images. a fter this step, all resting-state data were spatially nor -
malised to the ePI template in Montreal neurological Institute
(MnI) space with a resampling voxel size of 3 × 3 × 3 mm.
c orrection for head motion was applied (Vedaei et al. 2022).
Then, signal from white matter and cerebrospinal fluid were
regressed out and filtered with a temporal band-pass of 0.01–
0.08 Hz to reduce the effects of low-frequency drifts and
high-frequency respiratory and cardiac noise.
Functional connectivity analysis
Seed-based voxel-wise Fc analysis was carried out after
band-pass filtering of 0.01–0.08 Hz. The seed regions were cre -
ated as a spherical 5-mm region of interest (R oI) around the
centre of mass coordinates. The seeds used included the follow-
ing that were based on prior studies of the ne T as well as
regions expected to be involved with chronic pain (Monti et al.
2018): a mygdala, a nterior cingulate, c erebellum c rus,
cerebellum, Hippocampus, Insula, Postcentral, Precentral,
Supplementary motor area; all left and right sides. Fc was mea -
sured using Pearson’s correlation coefficient between time series
of the seeds and the rest of the time series in the gray matter
area. For standardisation purpose, a Fisher’s z-transform was
applied to change Fc to Z values and standardised Fc maps
were obtained. These converted z-score maps of Fc are referred
to as the Pearson correlation coefficient maps (Vedaei et al. 2022).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses are performed in an automated manner
with the subjects separated by groups. o ur primary outcome
was the change in Fc based on MRI data, and the secondary
outcomes were the self-reported clinical measures of pain
perception and emotional status (e.g. anxiety and depres -
sion). a nalysis of covariance ( ancoV a ) analysis was executed
to estimate group-by-time interaction between treatment and
control groups and baseline and follow-up scans. Gaussian
Random Field (GRF) was applied for correction of multiple
comparison with p-value voxel < 0.05 and the minimum clus -
ter size was defined 200 voxels. The motion parameters and
age were used as covariates.
Partial correlation analysis was conducted to estimate the
correlation between the neuropsychological scores and the
rs-fMRI metrics, controlling for age and gender as the covari -
ates. The clusters showing significant differences from
ancoV a analysis were selected as regions of interest (R oIs).
The mean of Fc was extracted over the mask of R oIs.
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between the mean
values of seed-based Fc and neurophysiological scores were
generated for all the patients within the nutrition and the
control groups. The linear correlation being considered signif -
icant if p value was less than 0.05.
For the secondary outcomes related to clinical and psycho -
logical measures, a paired t-test was used to compare within
group differences between the pre and post evaluation time
points, and a repeated measures anoV a was used to deter -
mine the group vs time differences (IBM SPSS Statistics).
Discussion
This study evaluated brain Fc in patients with cPP who
received ne T to address both the pain itself as well as the
distressing emotional elements of pain that may contrib -
ute to suffering. The results suggest that the ne T inter -
vention was clinically useful in patients with cPP , with
specific improvements in pain intensity, pain interference,
depression, and anxiety symptoms. clinical improvement
was associated with Fc changes in both affective and pain
regions of the brain. This data is an important step in
understanding the mechanism of treatment effect when
addressing the emotional distress associated with
chronic pain.
There were a number of significant changes observed in
patients treated with the ne T intervention compared to
controls including cerebellar regions, post-central sensory
Table 2. d ifferences in clinical measures in the net and waitlist control group showing significant improvements in the net group with * representing significance
between the net and control groups.
neuropsychological tests
c ontrol net
baseline f ollow-up
Group p-value
baseline f ollow-up
Group p-valueMean ± sd Mean ± sd Mean ± sd Mean ± sd
state trait anxiety inventory
state anxiety 44.5 ± 11.0 45.6 ± 8.7 0.362 40.7 ± 9.0 38.1 ± 8.2 0.180
trait anxiety 49.8 ± 7.5 50.0 ± 8.1 0.468 46.0 ± 8.2 42.5 ± 5.4 0.045
back depression inventory 15.9 ± 12.9 17.2 ± 11.2 0.174 13.6 ± 11.0 8.8 ± 8.5 0.032*
ProMis -29
Physical function 16.2 ± 3.7 15.4 ± 4.2 0.130 16.5 ± 3.9 16.3 ± 5.0 0.349
a nxiety 9.76 ± 2.8 15.4 ± 2.8 0.169 10.0 ± 4.5 7.9 ± 3.2 0.015*
depression 9.7 ± 4.4 10.2 ± 4.5 0.200 7.1 ± 3.5 6.2 ± 3.0 0.080
f atigue 12.5 ± 3.6 13.4 ± 4.3 0.198 14.1 ± 3.7 10.6 ± 4.0 0.002*
sleep quality 11.6 ± 3.1 11.4 ± 3.6 0.390 11.2 ± 4.4 9.9 ± 4.2 0.152
Pain interference 14.3 ± 4.2 12.3 ± 5.3 0.030 12.1 ± 4.6 9.8 ± 5.8 0.021
Pain intensity 5.7 ± 2.4 5.4 ± 2.5 0.183 6.5 ± 1.9 5.2 ± 2.4 0.005*
Abbreviations: sd: s tandard d eviation; net : neuroemotional technique.
Table 3. ancoV a analysis, interaction effect (group-by-time) showing the functional connectivity that was significantly different between
the pre and post scans when the net group was compared to the control group.
seed brain region Voxels Peak Mni coordinates f score (peak value)
c erebellum c rus r Postcentral r 435 39 − 24 39 16.57
c erebellum c rus r c alcarine r 207 15 − 75 9 14.08
c erebellum l Postcentral r 882 51 − 21 60 21.25
c erebellum l Postcentral l 641 −54 − 27 57 16.99
c erebellum r Postcentral r 959 42 − 21 45 19.57
c erebellum r Postcentral l 391 −54 − 27 57 12.20
a mygdala l c ingulate_Mid r 422 −21 − 24 81 15.56
a mygdala l f rontal_inf_t ri l 280 −36 30 15 14.63
a mygdala l Parietal_inf l 204 −60 − 42 39 9.43
a mygdala r f rontal_sup_Medial r 325 6 39 45 15.14
a mygdala r supraMarginal r 287 42 − 39 42 22.77
a mygdala r c ingulate_Mid l 248 −15 − 54 36 13.18
a mygdala r Precentral l 239 −57 − 3 42 14.27
a mygdala r temporal_Pole_sup r 221 60 12 − 9 16.07
a mygdala r Precentral r 212 54 3 24 18.11
a nterior c ingulate l Parietal_inf r 271 36 − 48 54 10.76
a nterior c ingulate r Precuneus l 211 −12 − 51 42 17.17
Hippocampus l f rontal_sup l 324 −21 45 36 13.15
insula l f rontal_inf_t ri l 272 −54 15 39 13.15
insula l Precuneus l 258 −15 − 54 36 24.13
Postcentral l c erebellum l 459 −30 − 63 − 27 19.67
Postcentral r c erebellum l 1848 −30 − 63 − 27 24.71
Precentral l temporal_sup r 398 57 0 − 9 18.84
Precentral l Putamen l 379 −18 12 9 24.97
Precentral l acc_pre l 260 −3 39 6 24.04
Precentral l temporal_Mid l 255 −54 − 21 − 6 14.20
Precentral r f rontal_sup r 239 18 48 48 12.29
Precentral r Pallidum l 205 −21 − 3 −3 12.60
supplementary Motor a rea l Putamen l 288 −21 − 3 3 15.07
supplementary Motor a rea r f rontal_inf_t ri l 283 −48 27 15 13.82
t he values are Grf corrected for a voxel p < 0.05, minimum cluster size of 200 voxels, and corrected for motion parameters and age.
Abbreviations: l: l eft; r: r ight; i nf: i nferior; sup: superior; Mid: Middle; f rontal_inf_t ri: i nferior frontal gyrus, triangular part; acc:
a nterior c ingulate c ortex; Mni: Montreal neurological i nstitute.
6 D. a. MonTI e T al.
regions, the amygdala, the cingulate gyrus, as well as sev -
eral frontal regions. The decreased Fc from the ne T inter -
vention among several motor and pre-motor regions,
particularly with several dopaminergic areas and the fron -
tal regions, may explain some of the clinical effects seen.
o ther studies have revealed heightened connectivity in
these regions in chronic pain patients ( c oppieters et al.
2021; Dorado et al. 2024). Therefore, reducing this connec -
tivity, could arguably be associated with decreased pain
perception. In addition, studies of placebo interventions
Figure 2. (a–e) r epresentative figures of the findings in the table 2 are provided below showing areas that had significant differences in functional connectivity
between the pre and post scans in the net and waitlist control group. ( a bbreviations: l: l eft; r: r ight; i nf: i nferior; sup: superior; Mid: Middle; f rontal_inf_tri:
inferior frontal gyrus, triangular part; acc: a nterior c ingulate c ortex).
BRaIn FUnc TIon cHanGeS In cHR onIc Pel VIc PaIn TReaTeD WITH ne T 7
have typically revealed increased Fc ( a shar et al . 2024).
Thus, the present findings seem more specific for the ne T
intervention.
fMRI studies have revealed that the motor cortex is acti -
vated in response to painful stimuli (Peyron et al. 2000). For
example, when subjects are exposed to noxious heat or elec -
trical shocks, regions within the motor cortex, including the
supplementary motor area (SM a ) and premotor cortex (PMc ),
show increased activity (Peyron et al. 2007). Beyond activa -
tion, the motor cortex also has been shown to modulate pain
perception (eccleston and c rombez 1999). Motor imagery, the
mental simulation of movement without actual execution,
can reduce pain perception (Moseley and Flor 2012). The
motor cortex is connected to descending pain modulation
pathways that inhibit pain signals at the spinal cord level
(Fields 2004). Reducing the connectivity between the motor
cortex and these regions, as found in the present study, may
allow the inhibitory pathways to function more actively
reducing the pain signals.
This study also implicates the cerebellum with the ther -
apeutic effects of ne T. This is consistent with our prior
study of ne T in distressed cancer patients where it was
demonstrated that the cerebellum appears to play an
important role in the modulation of negative or traumatic
emotions. The potential role of the cerebellum in modu -
lating emotions and autonomic reactivity has been sup -
ported by clinical and neuroimaging data (Stoodley and
Schmahmann 2009, 2010).
Relevant to the present study, prior fMRI studies show
that negative emotional stimuli activate the cerebellum, pos -
terior cingulate, and fusiform gyrus (Park et al . 2010,
Schraa-Tam et al. 2012). The mechanism is based in part on
Figure 2. c ontinued.
8 D. a. MonTI e T al.
how regions of the cerebellum are activated by negative or
aversive stimuli independent of regulation of motor or auto -
nomic processes (Utz et al. 2015). The vermis appears to be
involved in forming emotional memories including how
memories are acquired (Supple and Kapp 1993), how they
are stored and retrieved (Sacchetti et al. 2007), and how
they dissipate (Dempesy et al . 1983). o f particular relevance
to the present study, Fc between the cerebellum and emo -
tional regions such as the insula has been correlated with
more intense pain in patients with endometriosis (Szabo
et al. 2022). Thus, reducing such connections may help
reduce the overall salience of the pain signals, and also
enable more effective modulation of pain pathways via
inhibitory processes.
Using MRI techniques similar to the current study, studies
have found functional coherence between the cerebellum
and amygdala, hippocampus, hypothalamus, insula, and ante -
rior cingulate ( a llen et al. 2005, Seeley et al. 2007, Sang et al.
2012). The ne T intervention may be of particular value in
helping people regulate negative emotions and associated
memories because the mechanism of action of this technique
likely affects motor, emotional, and sensory processing.
This relationship is further exemplified by correlations
between the change in Fc in the aforementioned brain
areas and changes on various clinical measures. Fc between
the amygdala and frontal regions was associated with
improvements in pain intensity along with improvements
in various measures of negative emotions. The change in
negative emotions was also correlated with Fc changes
between the amygdala and cingulate gyrus, frontal lobe
including the precentral region, and parietal lobe struc -
tures. The Fc between the frontal lobes and both the insula
and hippocampus were similarly correlated with improve -
ments in negative emotions. Thus, ne T appears to be asso -
ciated with widespread changes in Fc in a number of brain
areas that support pain perception, motor function, and
emotional processing.
Regarding limitations, the current study was exploratory
and the sample size will need to be expanded to confirm the
clinical and Fc changes observed in these patients. Future,
larger studies should include an analysis of covariables such
as age, duration of chronic pain, gender, and other factors.
We used a waitlist control group, however, the next level of
investigation should include an active control group that
accounts for attention and therapeutic time to mitigate
expectation effects.
The results of this study represent the first investigation
into both the Fc changes and clinical effects of neuro
emotional Technique (ne T) in patients with cPP . The findings
suggest that a short course of ne T not only alters brain Fc
Figure 2. c ontinued.
BRaIn FUnc TIon cHanGeS In cHR onIc Pel VIc PaIn TReaTeD WITH ne T 9
but that these changes are directly associated with improve -
ments in clinical symptoms. a practical implication of this
research is that ne T may serve as a valuable therapeutic
intervention, particularly because it targets emotional distress,
which is a common contributor to chronic pain conditions.
This initial study is encouraging and emphasises the need for
larger scale clinical and neurophysiological trials of this poten -
tially important therapeutic approach for patients with cPP .
a n important goal would be to corroborate the present find -
ings and establish the generalisability of the ne T intervention
in this patient population.
Author contributions
a ll authors meet the IcMJe criteria for authorship.
Disclosure statement
a ll authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Funding
This study was funded by a grant from the Marcus Foundation.
Table 4. Pearson correlation analysis results between clinical measures and structures found to have significant changes in functional connectivity (interaction
effect (group*time), showing the correlations that were significantly different between the pre and post scans when the net group was compared to the control
group.
seed brain region clinical test Pearson’s r p-Value
a mygdala l c ingulate_Mid r state a nxiety 0.752 0.012
a mygdala l c ingulate_Mid r depression 0.797 0.006
a mygdala l c ingulate_Mid r a nxiety 0.666 0.035
a mygdala l f rontal_inf_t ri l state a nxiety 0.784 0.007
a mygdala l f rontal_inf_t ri l f atigue 0.683 0.030
a mygdala l f rontal_inf_t ri l sleep Quality 0.865 0.001
a mygdala l f rontal_inf_t ri l Pain i ntensity 0.720 0.019
a mygdala l Parietal_inf l state a nxiety 0.826 0.003
a mygdala l Parietal_inf l trait a nxiety 0.666 0.036
a mygdala l Parietal_inf l sleep Quality 0.793 0.006
a mygdala r f rontal_sup_Medial r trait a nxiety 0.690 0.027
a mygdala r f rontal_sup_Medial r depression 0.636 0.048
a mygdala r f rontal_sup_Medial r f atigue 0.732 0.016
a mygdala r f rontal_sup_Medial r a nxiety 0.643 0.045
a mygdala r supraMarginal r state a nxiety 0.792 0.006
a mygdala r supraMarginal r depression 0.772 0.009
a mygdala r supraMarginal r f atigue 0.688 0.028
a mygdala r supraMarginal r a nxiety 0.779 0.008
a mygdala r c ingulate_Mid l trait a nxiety 0.709 0.022
a mygdala r c ingulate_Mid l f atigue 0.746 0.013
a mygdala r c ingulate_Mid l a nxiety 0.787 0.007
a mygdala r Precentral l state a nxiety 0.838 0.002
a mygdala r Precentral l trait a nxiety 0.656 0.039
a mygdala r Precentral l depression 0.694 0.026
a mygdala r Precentral l f atigue 0.696 0.026
a mygdala r Precentral l a nxiety 0.673 0.033
a mygdala r Precentral l sleep Quality 0.745 0.013
a mygdala r temporal_Pole_sup r depression 0.717 0.020
a mygdala r temporal_Pole_sup r a nxiety 0.640 0.460
a mygdala r Precentral r state a nxiety 0.761 0.011
a mygdala r Precentral r trait a nxiety 0.689 0.027
a mygdala r Precentral r depression 0.680 0.030
a mygdala r Precentral r depression 0.773 0.009
c erebellum c rus r c alcarine r Pain i nterference 0.637 0.048
c erebellum r Postcentral r depression 0.768 0.010
Hippocampus l f rontal_sup l depression 0.717 0.020
insula l inf f ront l state a nxiety 0.852 0.002
insula l inf f ront l trait a nxiety 0.697 0.025
insula l inf f ront l depression 0.728 0.017
insula l inf f ront l depression 0.860 0.001
insula l inf f ront l a nxiety 0.712 0.021
insula l inf f ront l sleep Quality 0.666 0.035
insula l Precuneus l depression 0.664 0.036
insula l Precuneus l a nger 0.677 0.031
Precentral r Pallidum l state a nxiety 0.706 0.023
Precentral r Pallidum l trait a nxiety 0.692 0.027
Precentral r Pallidum l depression 0.767 0.010
suppl Motor a rea l Putamen l trait a nxiety 0.770 0.009
suppl Motor a rea l Putamen l depression 0.759 0.011
suppl Motor a rea l Putamen l f atigue 0.639 0.047
suppl Motor a rea l Putamen l a nxiety 0.733 0.016
suppl Motor a rea r inf f ront l state a nxiety 0.648 0.043
suppl Motor a rea r inf f ront l trait a nxiety 0.704 0.023
suppl Motor a rea r inf f ront l depression 0.670 0.034
t he values are Grf corrected for a voxel p < 0.05, a minimum cluster size of 200 voxels, and corrected for motion parameters, and age.
Abbreviations: l: l eft; r: r ight; i nf: i nferior; sup: superior; Mid: Middle; f rontal_inf_t ri: i nferior frontal gyrus, triangular part.
10 D. a. MonTI e T al.
Data availability statement
Data can be made available upon reasonable request.
References
a dler, l. J., et al., 1997. Regional brain activity changes associated with
fentanyl analgesia elucidated by positron emission tomography.
Anesthesia and Analgesia , 84 (1), 120–126.
a hangari, a., 2014. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: an
updated review. Pain Physician , 17 (2), e141–e147.
a llen, G., et al., 2005. Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebellar-prefrontal
and cerebellar-parietal functional connectivity. NeuroImage, 28 (1),
39–48.
a mtmann, D., et al., 2010. Development of a PR oMIS item bank to mea -
sure pain interference. Pain, 150 (1), 173–182.
a s-Sanie, S., et al., 2016. Functional connectivity is associated with altered
brain chemistry in women with endometriosis-associated chronic pel -
vic pain. The Journal of Pain , 17 (1), 1–13.
a shar, y. K., et al ., 2024. open-label Placebo Injection for chronic Back
Pain With Functional neuroimaging: a Randomized clinical Trial. JAMA
Network Open , 7(9), e2432427.
Beck, a. T., et al., 1961. a n inventory for measuring depression . Archives
of General Psychiatry, 4 , 561–571.
Boonstra, a. M., et al., 2016. c ut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe
pain on the numeric rating scale for pain in patients with chronic
musculoskeletal pain: variability and influence of sex and catastrophiz -
ing. Frontiers in Psychology , 7, 1466.
c ella, D., PR oMIS c ooperative Group., et al., 2010. The Patient-Reported
o utcomes Measurement Information System (PR oMIS) developed and
tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks:
2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 63 (11), 1179–1194.
c ervero, F., Meyer, R. a. and c ampbell, J. n., 1994. a psychophysical study
of secondary hyperalgesia: evidence for increased pain to input from
nociceptors. Pain, 58 (1), 21–28.
cho, y., et al., 2021. effects of meridian acupressure on stress, fatigue, anx -
iety, and self-efficacy of shiftwork nurses in South Korea. International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 18 (8), 4199.
chronic Pelvic Pain: acoG Practice Bulletin, number 218. 2020. Obstetrics
and Gynecology , 135 (3), e98–e109.
c oppieters, I., et al., 2021. enhanced amygdala-frontal operculum func -
tional connectivity during rest in women with chronic neck pain:
a ssociations with impaired conditioned pain modulation. NeuroImage.
Clinical, 30, 102638.
Dempesy, c. W., et al . 1983. Stimulation of the paleocerebellar cortex of
the cat: increased rate of synthesis and release of catecholamines at
limbic sites. Biological Psychiatry , 18(1), 127–132.
Dorado, a., et al., 2024. a ltered endogenous pain-inhibitory function in
older adults with chronic pain is associated with disruptions in func -
tional connectivity during resting state. The Journal of Pain , 25 (11),
104641.
eccleston, c. and c rombez, G., 1999. Pain demands attention: a
cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain.
Psychological Bulletin , 125 (3), 356–366.
Fields, H., 2004. State-dependent opioid control of pain. Nature Reviews.
Neuroscience, 5 (7), 565–575.
Harris, P . a., et al., 2009. Research electronic data capture (ReDc ap)–a
metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing
translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical
Informatics, 42 (2), 377–381.
Harris, P . a., ReDc ap c onsortium., et al., 2019. The ReDc ap consortium:
Building an international community of software platform partners.
Journal of Biomedical Informatics , 95, 103208.
Kupers, R. c., Gybels, J. M. and Gjedde, a., 2000. Positron emission to -
mography study of a chronic pain patient successfully treated with
somatosensory thalamic stimulation. Pain, 87 (3), 295–302.
Kutch, J. J., et al., M aPP Research network. 2017. Brain signature and
functional impact of centralized pain: a multidisciplinary approach to
the study of chronic pelvic pain (M aPP) network study. Pain, 158 (10),
1979–1991.
Martucci, K. T., et al., 2015. The posterior medial cortex in urologic chron -
ic pelvic pain syndrome: detachment from default mode network-a
resting-state study from the M aPP Research network. Pain, 156 (9),
1755–1764.
Meltzer-Brody, S., et al., 2007. Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in
women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstetrics and Gynecology , 109 (4),
902–908.
Monti, D. a., et al., 2017. neuro emotional technique effects on brain
physiology in cancer patients with traumatic stress symptoms: prelim -
inary findings. Journal of Cancer Survivorship: research and Practice , 11
(4), 438–446.
Monti, D. a., et al., 2018. changes in cerebellar functional connectivity
and autonomic regulation in cancer patients treated with the neuro
emotional Technique for traumatic stress symptoms. Journal of Cancer
Survivorship: research and Practice , 12 (1), 145–153.
Moseley, G. l. and Flor, H., 2012. Targeting cortical representations in the
treatment of chronic pain: a review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural
Repair, 26 (6), 646–652.
newberg, a. B., et al., 2011. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized
pilot study of cerebral blood flow patterns employing SPec T imaging
in dental postsurgical pain patients with and without pain relief.
Clinical Therapeutics , 33 (12), 1894–1903.
Park, J. y ., et al., 2010. Integration of cross-modal emotional information
in the human brain: an fMRI study. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the
Study of the Nervous System and Behavior , 46 (2), 161–169.
Peyron, R., et al., 2007. Motor cortex stimulation in neuropathic pain.
c orrelations between analgesic effect and hemodynamic changes in
the brain. a Pe T study. NeuroImage, 34 (1), 310–321.
Peyron, R., laurent, B. and García-larrea, l., 2000. Functional imaging of
brain responses to pain. a review and meta-analysis (2000).
Neurophysiologie Clinique = Clinical Neurophysiology , 30 (5), 263–288.
Raimondo, D., et al., 2023. Prevalence and risk factors of central sensitiza -
tion in women with endometriosis. Journal of Minimally Invasive
Gynecology, 30 (1), 73–80.e1.
Sacchetti, B., Sacco, T. and Strata, P ., 2007. Reversible inactivation of
amygdala and cerebellum but not perirhinal cortex impairs reactivated
fear memories. The European Journal of Neuroscience , 25 (9), 2875–
2884.
Sang, l., et al., 2012. Resting-state functional connectivity of the vermal
and hemispheric subregions of the cerebellum with both the cerebral
cortical networks and subcortical structures. NeuroImage, 61 (4), 1213–
1225.
Schraa-Tam, c. K., et al., 2012. fMRI a ctivities in the emotional cerebellum:
a preference for negative stimuli and goal-directed behavior.
Cerebellum (London, England) , 11 (1), 233–245.
Seeley, W. W., et al., 2007. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for
salience processing and executive control. The Journal of Neuroscience:
The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience , 27 (9), 2349–2356.
Spielberger, c.D., 1983. Manual for the state trait anxiety inventory: STAI
(Form Y) . Palo a lto: c onsulting Psychologists Press.
Stoodley, c. J. and Schmahmann, J. D., 2009. Functional topography in
the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.
NeuroImage, 44 (2), 489–501.
Stoodley, c. J. and Schmahmann, J. D., 2010. e vidence for topographic
organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and
affective processing. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the
Nervous System and Behavior , 46 (7), 831–844.
Støttrup, c. c., et al., 2023. “Visualization” of pain using cerebral 18F-FDG
PeT/c T following surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation.
European Spine Journal: official Publication of the European Spine Society,
the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the
Cervical Spine Research Society , 32 (2), 555–561.
BRaIn FUnc TIon cHanGeS In cHR onIc Pel VIc PaIn TReaTeD WITH ne T 11
Supple, W. F., Jr. and Kapp, B. S., 1993. The anterior cerebellar vermis:
essential involvement in classically conditioned bradycardia in the rab -
bit. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for
Neuroscience, 13 (9), 3705–3711.
Supple, W. F., Jr. and l eaton, R. n., 1990. l esions of the cerebellar vermis
and cerebellar hemispheres: effects on heart rate conditioning in rats.
Behavioral Neuroscience , 104 (6), 934–947.
Szabo, e., et al., 2022. a ltered anterior insula functional connectivity in ad -
olescent and young women with endometriosis-associated pain: pilot
resting-state fMRI study. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology: EJPN:
official Journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society , 41, 80–90.
Urits, I., et al., 2021. a comprehensive review of alternative therapies for the
management of chronic pain patients: acupuncture, Tai chi, osteopathic ma-
nipulative medicine, and chiropractic care. Advances in Therapy, 38 (1), 76–89.
Utz, a., et al., 2015. c erebellar vermis contributes to the extinction of
conditioned fear. Neuroscience Letters, 604, 173–177.
Vedaei, F., et al., 2021. Resting-state functional MRI metrics in patients
with chronic mild traumatic brain injury and their association with
clinical cognitive performance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , 15,
768485.
Vedaei, F., et al., 2022. Identification of chronic mild traumatic brain inju -
ry using resting state functional MRI and machine learning techniques.
Frontiers in Neuroscience , 16, 1099560.
Wolpe, J., 1973. The practice of behavior therapy . o xford: Pergamon
Press.
yang, c. X., et al., 2024. Gray matter abnormalities in patients with chron -
ic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of voxel-based
morphometry studies. World Neurosurgery , 184, e397–e407.