Is surgical repair of the fallopian tubes ever appropriate?

Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology · 2009 · vol. 2(3) , pp. 176–85 · PMID:19826575 · W2295683225
article OA: green CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This review examines situations where surgical repair of the fallopian tubes might still be considered for facilitating conception, despite the prevalence of assisted reproductive technologies.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The overall median prevalence of infertility, defined as no conception after more than 12 months of unprotected intercourse with the husband or cohabiting partner in women aged 15 to 44 years, is approximately 9%. About 25% to 33% of female infertility is the result of tubal disease and endometriosis. In view of very successful alternative treatment of tubal factor infertility, the surgical repair of the fallopian tubes is all but obsolete and has been replaced with assisted reproductive technology. This article reviews situations in which surgical repair of the fallopian tubes may facilitate conception.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (3)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-21T06:12:49.409960+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:59.677786+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK