Abstract
Background
Dominantly inherited GAA repeat expansions in FGF14 are a common cause of spinocerebellar ataxia (GAA-
FGF14 ataxia; SCA27B, late-onset). Molecular confirmation of FGF14 GAA repeat expansions has thus far
mostly relied on long-read sequencing, a technology that is not yet widely available in clinical laboratories.
Methods
We developed and validated a strategy to detect FGF14 GAA repeat expansions using long-range PCR,
bidirectional repeat-primed PCRs, and Sanger sequencing. We compared this strategy to targeted nanopore
sequencing in a cohort of 22 French Canadian patients and next validated it in a cohort of 53 French index
patients with unsolved ataxia.
Results
Diagnosis was accurately confirmed for all 22 French Canadian patients using this strategy. Method comparison
showed that capillary electrophoresis of long-range PCR products significantly underestimated expansion sizes
compared to nanopore sequencing (slope, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.93]; intercept, 14.58 [95% CI, -2.48 to
31.12]) and gel electrophoresis (slope, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.97]; intercept, 21.34 [95% CI, -27.66 to 40.22]).
The latter techniques yielded similar size estimates. Following calibration with internal controls, expansion size
estimates were similar between capillary electrophoresis and nanopore sequencing (slope: 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92 to
1.04]; intercept: 10.62 [95% CI, -7.49 to 27.71]), and gel electrophoresis (slope: 0.94 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.09];
intercept: 18.81 [95% CI, -41.93 to 39.15]). We identified 9 French patients (9/53; 17%) and 2 of their relatives
who carried an FGF14 (GAA)≥250 expansion.
Conclusion
This novel strategy reliably detected and sized FGF14 GAA expansions. It compared favorably to long-read
sequencing and can readily be implemented in clinical laboratories.
Keywords
spinocerebellar ataxia, late-onset ataxia, trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders, FGF14, genetic
diagnosis, diagnostic protocol, long-range PCR, GAA-FGF14 ataxia
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
4
Introduction
The late-onset cerebellar ataxias (LOCAs) are a group of neurodegenerative conditions that have until recently
largely challenged molecular diagnosis1,2. Despite recent advances in our understanding of the genetic basis of
these conditions, a genetic diagnosis is reached in less than 50% of patients with LOCA3,4. Dominantly inherited
GAA repeat expansions in the first intron of the Fibroblast Growth Factor 14 gene (FGF14) have recently been
reported as a common cause of LOCA (GAA-FGF14 ataxia; SCA27B, late-onset [MIM: 620174]), accounting
for 10 to 61% of unsolved cases in various cohorts5,6. Current data support a pathogenic threshold of (GAA)≥250
repeat units. Core clinical features of GAA-FGF14 ataxia include slowly progressive cerebellar ataxia, early
episodic symptoms, downbeat nystagmus, diplopia, and dizziness/vertigo5. Molecular confirmation of the
FGF14 GAA repeat expansion has thus far mostly relied on long-read sequencing, a technology that is not yet
widely available in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Given the high reported frequency of GAA-FGF14 ataxia,
there is an immediate need to establish a standardized, accessible and validated molecular strategy for
diagnosing this novel repeat expansion disorder in clinical diagnostic laboratories.
Herein, we propose a strategy that combines long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR), bidirectional repeat-
primed PCR (RP-PCR) and Sanger sequencing to detect and resolve FGF14 GAA repeat expansions in clinical
diagnostic settings. We further demonstrate the applicability of this diagnostic approach in a cohort of French
patients with unsolved LOCA.
Methods
Patient enrollment
All participants provided written informed consent. This study was conducted in accordance with the
Declaration of Helsinki.
French Canadian cohort: Patients were recruited at the Montreal Neurological Hospital of the McGill
University Health Centre (Montreal, QC, Canada). The institutional review board of the McGill University
Health Centre approved this study (MPE-CUSM-15-915). The French Canadian participants included 22
patients with GAA-FGF14 ataxia and six controls that were reported previously5. All participants underwent
genotyping of the FGF14 repeat locus by agarose gel electrophoresis of long-range PCR (LR-PCR)
amplification products and targeted long-read nanopore sequencing, as described previously5.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
5
French cohort: Fifty-three index patients with LOCA and two affected relatives were recruited at the Centre
Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (France). The institutional review board of the Centre Hospitalier
Régional Universitaire de Nancy approved this study (2020PI220). Patients were enrolled if meeting the
following inclusion criteria: (a) progressive ataxia with onset at or after age 30; (b) no clinical features
suggestive of multiple system atrophy (MSA); (c) exclusion of acquired causes; and (d) exclusion of known
genetic causes by testing negative on an ataxia gene panel and for common coding and non-coding repeat
expansion disorders. The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)7 was recorded when possible.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was obtained for nine patients with GAA-FGF14 ataxia.
Molecular analysis (Figures 1 and S1)
First step: Fluorescent long-range PCR
The intronic FGF14 GAA repeat locus was amplified by fluorescent long-range PCR (fLR-PCR). fLR-PCR
products were analyzed on an ABI 3130xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using
the GeneScan 1200 Liz Dye Size Standard (catalog no. 4379950, Applied Biosystems). Results were analyzed
using the GeneMapper software (version 6.0, Applied Biosystems). The PCR primers are predicted to amplify a
300 bp fragment based on the reference sequence, which includes 50 GAA triplets. The size of the expansion
was calculated using the following formula: (size of PCR amplification product - 150)/3.
Second step: Bidirectional RP-PCRs
Two RP-PCRs targeting the 5’ end (5’ RP-PCR) and the 3’ end (3’ RP-PCR) of the locus were used in parallel
to ascertain the presence of a GAA expansion at the repeat locus. RP-PCR products were analyzed on an ABI
3130xl DNA Analyzer using the GeneScan 1200 Liz Dye Size Standard. Results were analyzed using the
GeneMapper software. The presence of characteristic saw-toothed products indicated the presence of a GAA
repeat expansion at the FGF14 repeat locus.
Third step: Gel electrophoresis of long-range PCR products and Sanger sequencing
1) Samples with a single normal allele detected on fLR-PCR
Cases with a single normal allele detected by capillary electrophoresis of fLR-PCR products, regardless of their
RP-PCRs profiles, next underwent gel electrophoresis of LR-PCR amplification products using a 1.5% agarose
gel. This step allows for distinguishing cases homozygous for two normal alleles from cases heterozygous for
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
6
one normal allele and one expanded allele that is too large (>400 repeat units, see Results) to be detected by
capillary electrophoresis. The motif of any expansion identified at this stage is determined by the RP-PCR
profiles generated during step 2, with sawtooth profiles indicating GAA expansions and flat profiles indicating
non-GAA expansions. Amplification products were migrated for 3h30 at 150V and 300 mA.
2) Samples with at least one allele of 250 or more repeat units detected on fLR-PCR and no sawtooth
profile or interrupted profile on RP-PCRs.
Cases with at least one allele of 250 or more repeat units and no sawtooth profile or an interrupted profile on
RP-PCRs next underwent Sanger sequencing to determine the sequence and repeat motif of the FGF14 locus.
Sanger sequencing of LR-PCR amplification products was performed using the Applied Biosystems 3130xl
DNA Analyzer. The resulting sequences were analyzed using Sequence Scanner version 1.0 software (Applied
Biosystems).
The primer sequences and experimental conditions are provided in Supplementary Table S1.
Statistical analysis
We compared methods against each other using the Passing-Bablok regression model (R package: mcr).
Confidence interval of the slope that does not include 1 indicate statistically significant evidence of a
proportional bias between two methods. Confidence interval of the intercept that does not include 0 indicate
statistically significant evidence of a systematic bias between two methods. Linear relationship between two sets
of measurements was tested by the CUSUM test of linearity. We used the Bland-Altman analysis to compare
the measurements of the same variable by two methods. Correlations were calculated using the Pearson
correlation coefficient. We analyzed the data in R (version 4.1) and GraphPad Prism 9. P value of <0.05 was
considered significant. All analyses were two-tailed.
Results
FGF14 repeat sizing by fLR-PCR
We first determined how repeat size estimates of larger alleles by fLR-PCR compare and correlate to (1)
targeted long-read nanopore sequencing and (2) LR-PCR estimates by agarose gel electrophoresis estimates. We
used 28 French Canadian participants for whom long-read sequencing data was available and measured repeat
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
7
length by fLR-PCR. Nanopore sizing was performed on size-selected alleles of more than 80 repeat units to
increase coverage depth, as described previously5.
We observed that expansions (GAA)>400 repeat units could not be accurately sized by fLR-PCR, as shown in
Figure 2A, as they fall beyond the limit of detection of capillary electrophoresis. Therefore, such large
expansions needed to be sized by agarose gel electrophoresis of LR-PCR amplification products.
Consistent with what has previously been reported with other trinucleotide repeat expansions8–12, we observed a
significant discrepancy between sizes of larger alleles measured by capillary electrophoresis and long-read
sequencing or agarose gel electrophoresis. We compared methods using the Passing-Bablok regression model13,
and found a statistically significant proportional bias between nanopore sequencing and fLR-PCR (slope, 0.87
[95% CI, 0.81 to 0.93] and intercept, 14.58 [95% CI, -2.48 to 31.12]) and gel electrophoresis and fLR-PCR
(slope, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.97] and intercept, 21.34 [95% CI, -27.66 to 40.22]) (Figure 3A,B). Bland-
Altman analysis confirmed a negative bias of -8.54% (95% limits of agreement, -13.34% to -3.75%) between
fLR-PCR and nanopore sequencing, and of -10.91% (95% limits of agreement, -18.93 to -2.90%) between fLR-
PCR and gel electrophoresis (Figure 3C,D). In comparison, the latter techniques yielded comparable size
estimates (slope, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.11] and intercept, 5.35 [95% CI, -29.98 to 44.57]) (Figure S2A).
Bland-Altman analysis of both techniques showed a positive bias of +2.55% (95% limits of agreement, -6.53%
to 11.63%) (Figure S2B). These results confirm that capillary electrophoresis systematically underestimates size
of expanded alleles compared to nanopore sequencing and gel electrophoresis, and suggest that GAA repeat-
containing DNA fragments migrate faster than predicted. Faster migration of triplet repeat-containing fragments
is thought to result from altered electrophoretic properties of repetition-rich DNA11,12. The systematic
underestimation by capillary electrophoresis resulted in a false negative result in four of 28 participants (14%)
of the French Canadian cohort carrying an FGF14 expansion. To compensate for this underestimation, we used
a set of four alleles whose sizes have been established by long-read sequencing and applied the least squares
Method
to generate a straight line that fits our data and calculated its slope and y-intercept (Table S2).
Application of this correction resulted in expansion size estimates being comparable between nanopore
sequencing and fLR-PCR (slope, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.04] and intercept, 10.62 [95% CI, -7.49 to 27.71]) and
gel electrophoresis and fLR-PCR (slope, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.09] and intercept, 18.81 [95% CI, -41.93 to
39.15]), as assessed by the Passing-Bablok regression model (Figure 3E,F). Bland-Altman analysis showed a
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
8
positive bias of +1.23% (95% limits of agreement, -3.52% to +5.98%) between corrected fLR-PCR and
nanopore sequencing, and a negative bias of -1.27% (95% limits of agreement, -9.16% to +6.61%) between
corrected fLR-PCR and gel electrophoresis (Figure 3G,H). Allele sizing by fLR-PCR was highly reproducible,
with an inter-assay variability of less than 0.3%.
Validation of the diagnostic approach for detection of FGF14 GAA repeat expansions (Figures 1, 2, and
S1)
The variability of the methods used thus far to resolve FGF14 expansions5,6 and the high frequency of GAA-
FGF14 ataxia highlight the need to develop a standardized diagnostic approach that will be accessible and easy
to implement in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Such approach must allow for accurate allele sizing, and
assessment of repeat motif and sequence interruptions, if any. The former point is particularly important given
that (GAA)250-300 alleles appear incompletely penetrant5,6. To address this need, we developed and validated a
three-step strategy combining (1) fLR-PCR, (2) bidirectional RP-PCRs, and (3) agarose gel electrophoresis of
LR-PCR amplification products and Sanger sequencing.
The first step of our proposed strategy involves fLR-PCR amplification of the FGF14 repeat locus. The
identification of two alleles of less than 250 repeat units ends the diagnostic process while any other pattern
triggers additional testing. That includes samples with a single normal allele detected on fLR-PCR, since they
may carry an expansion larger than 400 repeat units that falls beyond the limit of detection of capillary
electrophoresis.
The second step involves bidirectional RP-PCRs targeting the GAA repeat unit at the 5’ end and the 3’ end of
the locus. Bidirectional RP-PCRs allow for comprehensive assessment of the repeat motif over the entire length
of even the larger expansions, and of sequence interruptions and polymorphisms at both ends of the locus. The
identification of characteristic saw-toothed products, indicative of a GAA repeat expansion, in a sample found
to have at least one allele of 250 or more repeat units on fLR-PCR confirms the diagnosis of GAA-FGF14
ataxia and ends the diagnostic process. All other samples are moved to the third step.
As part of the third step, gel electrophoresis of LR-PCR products and Sanger sequencing are used to further
resolve remaining samples. First, gel electrophoresis of LR-PCR products is performed on a 1.5% agarose gel
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
9
for samples with a single allele detected by fLR-PCR, regardless of their RP-PCR profiles. This step allows for
distinguishing cases homozygous for two normal alleles from cases heterozygous for one normal allele and one
expanded allele that is otherwise too large to be detected by capillary electrophoresis. Gel electrophoresis
additionally allows sizing of large expansions. The motif of any expansion is determined by the RP-PCR
profiles generated during step 2, with sawtooth profiles indicating GAA expansions and flat profiles indicating
non-GAA expansions. In case of non-GAA expansions, Sanger sequencing can optionally be performed to
determine the repeat motif of the expansion. Second, Sanger sequencing is performed on samples with at least
one allele of 250 or more repeat units measured by capillary electrophoresis and a flat or atypical profile on RP-
PCRs – indicative of a non-GAA or interrupted expansion – to determine the repeat motif of the FGF14 locus.
We validated this diagnostic strategy in a cohort of 53 index patients with unsolved LOCA that were recruited in
Nancy, France. Using this strategy, we identified nine patients (17%) who carried (GAA)≥250 repeat expansions
in FGF14. The expansion was also present in two affected relatives of one of the index patients. We also
identified a patient compound heterozygous for expansions of 266 and 417 repeat units (Figure 4A: lane 3). RP-
PCRs accurately determined the repeat motif (GAA and non-GAA expansions) of all expanded alleles in the
cohort, as confirmed by forward and reverse Sanger sequencing. While Sanger sequencing of each individual
strand fails to completely sequence expanded alleles, their combination allows for full sequence coverage of
alleles of up to (GAA)500 repeat units.
Our diagnostic approach also allowed for the precise characterization of the sequence of each allele in the
compound heterozygous patient (Figure 4A: lane 3, Figure 4B-D). While the 3’RP-PCR showed a typical
sawtooth pattern, the 5’RP-PCR showed the superposition of two sawtooth profiles shifted by one base pair
(Figure 4C). These profiles suggested that both GAA repeats were out of phase, as a result of the presence of an
insertion or a deletion at the 5’ end of one allele. Sanger sequencing confirmed this hypothesis by showing the
presence of a [(GAA)(GAAA)(GGA)] motif at the 5’ end of one allele and a [(GAA)(GAAA)(GAAA)] motif at
the 5’ end of the second allele causing both alleles to be out of phase by one base pair.
Clinical findings
The main clinical features of the French Canadian and French patients with GAA-FGF14 ataxia are shown in
Table 1. Early episodic features, nystagmus (gaze-evoked horizontal and downbeat) and alcohol intolerance
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
10
were reported with similar frequency in patients from both cohorts. Episodic symptoms were reported in 73% of
the French Canadian and French patients. The mean (±SD) age at the onset of episodic symptoms was 54±9
years and 64±9 years in the French Canadian and the French patients, respectively. The mean age at the onset of
progressive ataxia was 59±10 and 66±10 years, respectively. Nystagmus was observed in 91% and 73% of
patients, respectively. More than half of patients reported that alcohol intake triggered episodes of ataxia or
markedly worsened baseline ataxia. At the chronic stage, the phenotype was characterized by a slowly
progressive pan-cerebellar syndrome with predominant midline involvement. Gait ataxia was observed in 95%
and 100% of French Canadian and French patients, respectively. Appendicular ataxia was observed in 90% of
French Canadian and 91% of French patients. Pyramidal and extrapyramidal features were less frequently
observed (each feature < 20% in the French Canadian cohort and French cohorts). Brain MRI showed mild to
moderate cerebellar atrophy, with more severe involvement of the vermis, in 60% and 44% of patients,
respectively. We observed an inverse correlation between the size of the repeat expansion and the age at disease
onset (22 patients; Pearson correlation coefficient, -0.43; R2=0.18; p=0.048) or the age at onset of ataxia (22
patients, Pearson correlation coefficient, -0.55; R2=0.30; p=0.008) in the French Canadian cohort. In
comparison, the size of the repeat expansion was not significantly associated with age at disease onset (11
patients; Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.07; p=0.85) or the age at onset of ataxia (8 patients, Pearson
correlation coefficient, 0.16; p=0.71) in the French cohort.
We studied the meiotic stability of the GAA repeat expansion in a multigenerational French family. The
transmission of an expanded (GAA)467 allele resulted in expansion in the female germline in two meiotic events
(expansion from 467 triplets to 492 and 510 triplets) (Figure 4A: lanes 6,7, and 8). These results are consistent
with previous reports showing further expansion of expanded alleles in the female germline5,6. In keeping with
the transmission of a larger allele in the offspring, clinical anticipation was observed in this family. Both
offspring developed episodic ataxia and marked alcohol intolerance more than 10 years earlier than their
mother.
Discussion
The recent discovery of dominantly inherited GAA repeat expansions in FGF145,6 as a common cause of LOCA
highlights the need for developing an accessible and standardized diagnostic protocol. To address this need, we
validated a strategy to genotype the FGF14 GAA repeat expansion that can easily be implemented in clinical
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
11
settings. This strategy does not rely on long-read sequencing, a technology that is currently not routinely
available in clinical laboratories. We used this approach in a cohort of 53 French patients and confirmed the
genetic diagnosis in nine patients and two of their relatives.
This step-wise approach was designed to allow for high-throughput screening while not losing sensitivity to
detect expansions. This is a particularly desirable point given the large number of patients with unsolved LOCA
who are likely to undergo testing for the FGF14 GAA repeat expansion. The screening process will end after
the second step for the majority of samples, as can been seen in Figure 1. There are, however, a limited number
of samples that will need to undergo additional testing, namely gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing.
Despite being less automatable and more labor-intensive, these tests are necessary to ensure accurate genotyping
given the high degree of length and sequence polymorphism of the FGF14 repeat locus in the general
population5. Although local policies can vary with regard to reporting, suggested items to be included in the
report are presented in Table S3, depending upon the reason for referral.
We also recommend using bidirectional RP-PCRs targeting both ends of the repeat locus during the second step
to interrogate the sequence motif over the entire length of larger expansions, which cannot otherwise be
achieved with a single RP-PCR. This further allows for a comprehensive assessment of any potential sequence
interruptions and polymorphisms at both ends of the locus. While sequence interruptions are relatively common
in Friedreich ataxia, an autosomal recessive disorder caused by a GAA repeat expansion in the FXN gene14,
their frequency and impact on disease expression remain to be established in GAA-FGF14 ataxia. Current data
support a pathogenic threshold for GAA-FGF14 ataxia of (GAA)≥250 uninterrupted repeat units5,6. Pending
additional data on the effect of interruptions on the pathogenicity of FGF14 expansions, we suggest that alleles
with a minimum repeat tract of 250 uninterrupted triplets be considered pathogenic.
Applying this strategy to a cohort of 53 French patients with unsolved LOCA, we identified nine patients (17%)
who carried at least one (GAA)≥250 expansion as well as two of their affected relatives. The frequency of the
FGF14 GAA expansion in our cohort was similar to that of other reported cohorts of European descent5,6.
Patients from the French Canadian and French cohorts had a similar phenotype that included frequent
nystagmus and episodic symptoms at onset followed by a slowly evolving pan-cerebellar syndrome at an
average age of 59 years in the French Canadian cohort and 66 years in the French cohort. A substantial
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
12
proportion of patients also reported marked alcohol intolerance that could precede development of ataxia by a
number of years in some patients. GAA-FGF14 ataxia is phenotypically similar to SCA615 and the first late-
onset episodic ataxia described thus far. Other genetically defined episodic ataxias, such as episodic ataxia type
1 or 2, often manifest in childhood16–18. The observation of a cerebellar syndrome of late onset associated with
episodic symptoms, downbeat nystagmus and alcohol intolerance should prompt testing for the FGF14 GAA
expansion. As with other repeat expansion disorders19, we found an inverse correlation between the size of the
expansion and the age at onset in the French Canadian cohort. However, we did not observe such correlation in
the French cohort, likely as a result of the small cohort size.
We found expansion in the female germline across two meiotic events in an affected mother carrying a
(GAA)467. Clinical anticipation was observed in the offspring who inherited a (GAA)492 and (GAA)510 allele;
both developed episodic ataxia more than 10 years earlier than their mother. These results further highlight the
instability of the FGF14 repeat locus upon meiotic transmission.
In conclusion, the recent description of GAA-FGF14 ataxia as a common cause of LOCA highlighted the need
to develop a reliable diagnostic test for this novel condition. To address this need, we developed and validated
an approach to diagnose the FGF14 GAA repeat expansion that is reproducible, easy to implement in clinical
settings and does not rely on long-read sequencing. We implemented this protocol in a clinical laboratory and
showed its successful application in a cohort of patients with unsolved LOCA.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
13
Data Availability
The data analyzed in this study can be accessed upon reasonable request to the corresponding authors.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the families for their participation in this project.
This work was supported by the Fondation Groupe Monaco and the Montreal General Hospital Foundation
(grant PT79418). The funders had no role in the conduct of this study. D.P. holds a Fellowship award from the
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: C.B., D.P., B.B., M.R.; Data curation: C.B., D.P., V.R., G.C., M.W., L.L., S.F., M.D., A.G.,
I.B., F.W., F.G., C.R., S.C., M.B., C.P., N.D., M.J.D., F.E., M.F.R., A.H., R.L.P., M.S, H.H., M.C.D., S.Z.,
B.B., M.R.; Formal analysis: C.B., D.P., V.R., G.C., M.W., F.B., F.G., C.R., S.C., M.B., C.P., N.D., M.J.D,
F.E., M.F.R., M.C.D, S.Z., B.B., M.R.; Methodology: C.B., D.P., V.R., G.C., M.W., M.J.D., M.S., M.C.D.,
S.Z., B.B., M.R.; Supervision: C.B., S.Z., B.B., M.R.; Writing-original draft: C.B., D.P., V.R., G.C.; Writing-
review & editing: C.B., D.P., V.R., G.C., M.W., L.L., S.F., M.D., A.G., I.B., F.W., F.G., C.R., S.C., M.B., C.P.,
N.D., M.J.D., F.E., M.F.R., A.H., R.L.P., M.S, H.H., M.C.D., S.Z., B.B., M.R.
Ethics Declaration
All participants provided written informed consent. This study was conducted in accordance with the
Declaration of Helsinki. The institutional review board of the McGill University Health Centre (MPE-CUSM-
15-915) and of the Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (2020PI220) gave ethical approval for
this work.
Conflict of Interest
Matthis Synofzik has received consultancy honoraria from Janssen, Ionis, Orphazyme, Servier, Reata, GenOrph,
and AviadoBio, all unrelated to the present manuscript.
Stephan Zuchner is consultant on drug targets for Aeglea BioTherapeutics and consultant on clinical trial
design for Applied Therapeutics, all of them unrelated to the work in the present manuscript.
Other authors have no relevant financial interests to disclose.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
14
References
1. Giordano I, Harmuth F, Jacobi H, et al. Clinical and genetic characteristics of sporadic adult-onset
degenerative ataxia. Neurology. 2017;89(10):1043-1049. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004311
2. Bogdan T, Wirth T, Iosif A, et al. Unravelling the etiology of sporadic late-onset cerebellar ataxia in a
cohort of 205 patients: a prospective study. J Neurol. 2022;269(12):6354-6365. doi:10.1007/s00415-
022-11253-1
3. Ngo KJ, Rexach JE, Lee H, et al. A diagnostic ceiling for exome sequencing in cerebellar ataxia and
related neurological disorders. Hum Mutat. 2020;41(2):487-501. doi:10.1002/humu.23946
4. Krygier M, Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska M. Milestones in genetics of cerebellar ataxias. Neurogenetics.
2021;22(4):225-234. doi:10.1007/s10048-021-00656-3
5. Pellerin D, Danzi MC, Wilke C, et al. Deep Intronic FGF14 GAA Repeat Expansion in Late-Onset
Cerebellar Ataxia. N Engl J Med. December 2022. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2207406
6. Rafehi H, Read J, Szmulewicz DJ, et al. An intronic GAA repeat expansion in FGF14 causes the
autosomal-dominant adult-onset ataxia SCA50/ATX-FGF14. Am J Hum Genet. December 2022.
doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.11.015
7. Schmitz-Hübsch T, du Montcel ST, Baliko L, et al. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia:
development of a new clinical scale. Neurology. 2006;66(11):1717-1720.
doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92
8. Larsen LA, Grønskov K, Nørgaard-Pedersen B, Brøndum-Nielsen K, Hasholt L, Vuust J. High-
throughput analysis of Fragile X (CGG) n alleles in the normal and premutation range by PCR
amplification and automated capillary electrophoresis. Hum Genet. 1997;100(5-6):564-568.
doi:10.1007/s004390050552
9. Le H, Fung D, Trent RJ. Applications of capillary electrophoresis in DNA mutation analysis of genetic
disorders. Mol Pathol. 1997;50(5):261-265. doi:10.1136/mp.50.5.261
10. Olejniczak M, Kozlowski P, Sobczak K, Krzyzosiak WJ. Accurate and sensitive analysis of triplet
repeat expansions by capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2005;26(11):2198-2207.
doi:10.1002/elps.200410197
11. Dorschner MO, Barden D, Stephens K. Diagnosis of five spinocerebellar ataxia disorders by multiplex
amplification and capillary electrophoresis. J Mol Diagn. 2002;4(2):108-113. doi:10.1016/S1525-
1578(10)60689-7
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
15
12. Kiba Y, Baba Y. Analysis of Triplet-Repeat DNA by Capillary Electrophoresis. In: Capillary
Electrophoresis of Nucleic Acids. New Jersey: Humana Press; :221-229. doi:10.1385/1-59259-116-
7:221
13. Passing H, Bablok. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two
different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies
in clinical chemistry, Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983;21(11):709-720.
doi:10.1515/cclm.1983.21.11.709
14. Nethisinghe S, Kesavan M, Ging H, et al. Interruptions of the FXN GAA Repeat Tract Delay the Age at
Onset of Friedreich’s Ataxia in a Location Dependent Manner. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(14):7507.
doi:10.3390/ijms22147507
15. Durr A. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: polyglutamine expansions and beyond. Lancet Neurol.
2010;9(9):885-894. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70183-6
16. Amadori E, Pellino G, Bansal L, et al. Genetic paroxysmal neurological disorders featuring episodic
ataxia and epilepsy. Eur J Med Genet. 2022;65(4):104450. doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2022.104450
17. Lange LM, Gonzalez‐Latapi P, Rajalingam R, et al. Nomenclature of Genetic Movement Disorders:
Recommendations of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Task Force – An
Update. Mov Disord. 2022;37(5):905-935. doi:10.1002/mds.28982
18. Verriello L, Pauletto G, Nilo A, et al. Epilepsy and episodic ataxia type 2: family study and review of
the literature. J Neurol. 2021;268(11):4296-4302. doi:10.1007/s00415-021-10555-0
19. Depienne C, Mandel J-L. 30 years of repeat expansion disorders: What have we learned and what are
the remaining challenges? Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108(5):764-785. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.03.011
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
16
Table
Table 1: Characteristics of the French Canadian and French cohorts
No.: number, SD: standard deviation, IQR: Interquartile Range, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging
French Canadian cohort
(n=22)
French cohort
(n=11)
Male sex, no. (%) 13 (59%) 4 (36%)
Repeat count of GAA expansion, median
(IQR)
333 (287-392) 370 (313-492)
Age at onset of episodic symptoms (mean
± SD)
54 ± 9 64 ± 9
Age at onset of permanent ataxia (mean
± SD)
59 ± 10 66 ± 10
Inheritance
Familial, no. (%) 17 (77%) 7 (64%)
Sporadic, no. (%) 5 (23%) 3 (36%)
Episodic onset, no. (%) 16 (73%) 8 (73%)
Alcohol intolerance, no. (%) 9/17 (53%) 5/8 (63%)
Nystagmus (gaze-evoked horizontal and
downbeat), no. (%)
20 (91%) 8 (73%)
Episodic diplopia or visual blurring, no.
(%)
15/21 (71%) 5/9 (56%)
Gait ataxia, no. (%) 21 (95%) 10 (100%)
Appendicular ataxia, no. (%) 19/21 (90%) 9 (91%)
Cerebellar dysarthria, no. (%) 8/21 (38%) 7 (64%)
Vertigo or dizziness, no. (%) 8/20 (40%) 5/10 (50%)
Cerebellar atrophy on MRI, no. (%) 12/20 (60%) 4/9 (44%)
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
17
Figure Legends
Figure 1: Testing strategy for the diagnosis of GAA-FGF14 ataxia
The number of samples in the French Cohort of 53 index patients processed at each step is indicated in the red
circles. Normal alleles have (GAA)<250 repeats and expanded alleles have (GAA)≥250 repeats.
*Two expanded alleles are possible
Legend: N allele, normal allele <250 repeat units; LR-PCR, long-range polymerase chain reaction; MW,
molecular weight.
Figure 2: Molecular analysis of the FGF14 repeat locus
(A) Fluorescent long-range PCR of the FGF14 repeat locus of four patients with late-onset cerebellar ataxia;
The calculated number of repeat units of each allele (before correction) is indicated for each of the four patients.
(B) 5’ RP-PCR and 3’RP-PCR of the FGF14 repeat locus of two patients carrying a (GAA)≥250 repeat expansion
in FGF14.
(C) Sanger sequencing of a patient carrying a (GAA)≥250 repeat expansion showing GAA repeats: (GAA)n on
forward strand and (TTC)n on reverse strand.
(D) Agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%), lanes 1 and 8: 2,000 bp molecular weight marker, 2: 17/132 repeat
units, 3: 9/280 repeat units, 4: 9/510 repeat units, 5: 9/313 repeat units, 6: 9/467 repeat units; 7: negative control.
(E) Agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%), lanes 1 and 9: 2,000 bp molecular weight marker, 2: 107/259 repeat
units, 3: 40/132 repeat units, 4: 16/182 repeat units, 5: 8/9 repeat units, 6: 17/319 repeat units; 7: 43/370 repeat
units, 8: 28/94 repeat units.
Figure 3: FGF14 allele size estimates by fluorescent LR-PCR, long-read nanopore sequencing, and
agarose gel electrophoresis.
Passing-Bablok regression (blue lines) with 95% confidence interval (shaded blue areas) for allele size
measured by (A) fLR-PCR and nanopore sequencing, (B) fLR-PCR and gel electrophoresis, (E) fLR-PCR (with
correction) and nanopore sequencing, and (F) fLR-PCR (with correction) and gel electrophoresis. The dashed
black lines show the identity line and the dashed red lines show the pathogenic threshold of (GAA)≥250 repeats.
Bland-Altman plots show the percentage difference between size estimates measured by fLR-PCR and (C)
targeted nanopore sequencing or (D) agarose gel electrophoresis as a function of the average of the two
measurements for each sample. Plots show the percentage difference between size estimates measured by
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
18
corrected fLR-PCR and (G) targeted nanopore sequencing or (H) agarose gel electrophoresis as a function of the
average of the two measurements for each sample. The dashed red lines show the mean bias between two
techniques and the dashed gray lines show the limits of agreement, defined as the mean percentage difference ±
1.96SD.
Figure 4: Molecular analysis of the FGF14 repeat locus in a family with GAA-FGF14 ataxia and a patient
compound heterozygous for two expansions
(A) Agarose gel (1.5%), lanes 1 and 10: 2,000 bp molecular weight marker, 2: 58/300 repeat units, 3: 266/417
repeat units, 4: 9/9 repeat units, 5: 9/50 repeat units, 6: 9/492 repeat units, 7: 9/467 repeat units, 8: 9/510 repeat
units, 9: negative control. The transmission of an expanded (GAA)467 allele resulted in expansion in the female
germline in two meiotic events (expansion from 467 triplets to 492 and 510 triplets), as shown in lanes 7, 6 and
8, respectively.
(B) Fluorescent long-range PCR, (C) 5’ RP-PCR and 3’RP-PCR, and (D) Sanger sequencing of a patient
compound heterozygous for two expanded alleles (266/417 repeat units). (B) On fLR-PCR, the smallest
expansion of 266 repeat units is detected whereas the larger expansion of 417 repeat units is not as it falls
beyond the limit of detection of capillary electrophoresis. (D) Sanger sequencing shows polymorphism at the 5’
end of each expansion. Allele 1: (GAA)(GAAA)(GGA)(GAA)n and allele 2: (GAA)(GAAA)(GAAA)(GAA)n.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
FIRST STEP: Fluorescent LR-PCR
1 N allele
+ 1 expanded
allele*
flat profile
sawtooth
profile
non-GAA
expansions
2 N alleles
Agarose gel 1.5%
1 N allele
Sanger sequencing
affected
THIRD STEP: Gel electrophoresis of LR-PCR products or Sanger
sequencing
n=53
n=39
n=4 n=5
n=1
N=8 n=6
1 N + 1 high
MW band
SECOND STEP: 5’ RP-PCR / 3’ RP-PCR
sawtooth
profile
n=4
n=14
n=4
n=9
not affected n=44
flat
or interrupted
profile
n=1
n=9
to distinguish cases homozygous
for two normal alleles from cases
heterozygous for one normal
allele and one expanded
non-GAA allele
1 N bands or 1 N +
1 high MW band*
n=4
to determine size of
expanded alllele
to determine
repeat motif
* 1 N + 1 high MW band : Sanger sequencing can optionally be performed
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
A
B
D
C
3’ RP-PCR
3’ RP-PCR
5’ RP-PCR
5’ RP-PCR
262107
32117
37 370
9
>400
300
200
400
bp
500
600
1000
1200
2000
1500
800
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9
300
200
400
bp
500
600
1000
1200
2000
1500
800
E
100
d
dd
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
B
D
C
3’ RP-PCR
3’ RP-PCR
5’ RP-PCR
5’ RP-PCR
236107
29017
37 334
9
>400
300
200
400
bp
500
600
1000
1200
2000
1500
800
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
300
200
400
bp
500
600
1000
1200
2000
1500
800
E
100
d
dd
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 87 9
8
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
250 300 350 400 450
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Average triplet repeat count
% Difference
250 300 350 400
250 300 350 400
Agarose gel sizing
(repeat number)
Fluorescent LR−PCR sizing
with correction (repeat number)
250 300 350 400
250 300 350 400
Nanopore sizing
(repeat number)
Fluorescent LR−PCR sizing
with correction (repeat number)
250 300 350 400 450
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Average triplet repeat count
% Difference
200 250 300 350 400
200 250 300 350 400
Agarose gel sizing
(repeat number)
Fluorescent LR−PCR sizing
without correction (repeat number)
200 250 300 350 400
200 250 300 350 400
Nanopore sizing
(repeat number)
Fluorescent LR−PCR sizing
without correction (repeat number)
A
Pearson’s r = 0.99
n = 26
B
Slope: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.81 to 0.93]
Intercept: 14.58 [95% CI: -2.48 to 31.12]
Pearson’s r = 0.97
n = 26
Slope: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.78 to 0.97]
Intercept: 21.34 [95% CI: -27.66 to 40.22]
C D
200 250 300 350 400
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Average triplet repeat count
% Difference
200 250 300 350 400
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Average triplet repeat count
% Difference
E
Pearson’s r = 0.99
n = 26
F
Slope: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.92 to 1.04]
Intercept: 10.62 [95% CI: -7.49 to 27.71]
Pearson’s r = 0.97
n = 26
Slope: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.88 to 1.09]
Intercept: 18.81 [95% CI: -41.93 to 39.15]
G H
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
B
E
C
300
100
400
bp
500
600
1000
1200
2000
1500
800
200
D
3’ RP-PCR
5’ RP-PCR
A
1
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 87 9 10
A B
C
D
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in(which was not certified by peer review)preprint
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 4, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285206doi: medRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.