Integrating macroecology with temporal and trait-based perspectives : toward better attribution of human drivers to diversity changes

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

The ongoing biodiversity crisis presents a complex challenge for ecological science. Despite a consensus on general biodiversity decline, identifying clear trends remains difficult due to variability in data, methodologies, and scales of analysis. To enhance our understanding of ongoing biodiversity changes and address discrepancies in biodiversity trend detection, we propose integrating macroecological theory with temporal and trait-based perspectives. ● First, analyzing temporal changes in macroecological patterns, such as species accumulation curves, can reconcile and synthesize conflicting observations of biodiversity change, enabling quantification of diversity shifts across scales. ● Second, diversity patterns across scales are linked to three proximate components: abundance, evenness, and spatial aggregation. Investigating temporal changes in these components provides deeper insights into how human activities directly influence biodiversity trends. ● Third, incorporating species traits into the analysis of these macroecological patterns improves our understanding of human impacts on biodiversity by elucidating the links between species characteristics and their responses to environmental changes. We discuss the limitations and challenges of this integrative approach and highlight how it offers a comprehensive framework for understanding the drivers of biodiversity change across scales. This framework facilitates a more nuanced understanding of how human activities impact biodiversity, ultimately paving the way for more informed actions to mitigate biodiversity loss across spatial and temporal scales.
Full text 2,531 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Context. The ongoing biodiversity crisis presents a complex challenge for ecological science. Despite a consensus on general biodiversity decline, identifying clear trends remains difficult due to variability in data, methodologies, and scales of analysis. Ideas. To enhance our understanding of ongoing biodiversity changes and address discrepancies in biodiversity trend detection, we propose integrating macroecological theory with temporal and trait-based perspectives. First, analyzing temporal changes in diversity scaling relationships, such as species accumulation curves or distance decay, can reconcile and synthesize conflicting observations of biodiversity change, enabling quantification of diversity shifts from local to regional spatial scales. Second, diversity patterns across scales are linked to three proximate components: abundance, evenness, and spatial aggregation of species. Investigating temporal changes in these components provides deeper insights into how human activities directly influence biodiversity trends. Third, incorporating species traits into the analysis of these macroecological patterns improves our understanding of human impacts on biodiversity by elucidating the links between species characteristics and their responses to environmental changes. Case study. We illustrate this integration in forest and farmland birds in France, highlighting how studying diversity changes across scales, and decomposing temporal change in different components can help to elucidate the mechanisms driving diversity change. Conclusions. We discuss the limitations and challenges of this integrative approach and highlight how it offers a comprehensive framework for understanding the drivers of biodiversity change across scales. This framework facilitates a more nuanced understanding of how human activities impact biodiversity, ultimately paving the way for more informed actions to mitigate biodiversity loss across spatial and temporal scales. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X24P61 Subjects Life Sciences

Keywords

Diversity Trends, Macroecological theory, global change, conservation, traits Dates Published: 2024-11-26 05:16 Last Updated: 2025-10-10 23:42 Older Versions License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0