Portfolio Optimization in the Gold–Energy Nexus under Non-Gaussian Risk: A Mean–Tsallis Entropy Framework

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This preprint studied how to optimize a commodity-linked portfolio composed in the gold–energy nexus under non-Gaussian downside risk, using a mean–Tsallis entropy framework with an entropic index q that calibrates sensitivity to extreme losses. The author reports extensive Monte Carlo simulations and compares performance against a classical mean–variance benchmark, finding a non-monotonic relationship between q and robustness, where overly large q increases tail-loss penalization and yields overly conservative, less adaptable allocations that worsen realized drawdown and risk-adjusted performance. The caveat explicitly noted in the abstract is that entropy-based optimization should be interpreted as a design and calibration framework reflecting structural trade-offs rather than as a purely maximal-tail-penalization approach. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Financial return distributions in commodity-linked portfolios are well known to exhibit heavy tails, asymmetry, and regime-dependent risk, rendering variance-based optimization frameworks inadequate. This study proposes a Mean–Tsallis Entropy portfolio optimization framework for the gold–energy nexus, explicitly designed to address non-Gaussian downside risk. The entropic index \(q\) is introduced as a calibration parameter governing the sensitivity of the optimization objective to extreme losses rather than as a direct measure of investor risk aversion. Through extensive Monte Carlo simulations and comparative analysis against the classical mean–variance benchmark, we show that portfolio robustness exhibits a non-monotonic relationship with respect to \(q\). While increasing \(q\) mechanically amplifies tail-loss penalization, excessive penalization leads to conservative allocations that degrade adaptability and recovery, resulting in inferior realized drawdown and risk-adjusted performance. An interior range of \(q\) balances tail awareness with portfolio flexibility and consistently delivers superior robustness under heavy-tailed market dynamics. These findings demonstrate that entropy-based portfolio optimization should be interpreted as a design and calibration framework, where performance emerges from structural trade-offs rather than from maximal tail penalization. The proposed approach offers a principled and practically implementable alternative for portfolio construction under non-Gaussian risk.
Full text 11,366 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Portfolio Optimization in the Gold–Energy Nexus under Non-Gaussian Risk: A Mean–Tsallis Entropy Framework | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Portfolio Optimization in the Gold–Energy Nexus under Non-Gaussian Risk: A Mean–Tsallis Entropy Framework Nam Anh Quach This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8996190/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Financial return distributions in commodity-linked portfolios are well known to exhibit heavy tails, asymmetry, and regime-dependent risk, rendering variance-based optimization frameworks inadequate. This study proposes a Mean–Tsallis Entropy portfolio optimization framework for the gold–energy nexus, explicitly designed to address non-Gaussian downside risk. The entropic index \(q\) is introduced as a calibration parameter governing the sensitivity of the optimization objective to extreme losses rather than as a direct measure of investor risk aversion. Through extensive Monte Carlo simulations and comparative analysis against the classical mean–variance benchmark, we show that portfolio robustness exhibits a non-monotonic relationship with respect to \(q\) . While increasing \(q\) mechanically amplifies tail-loss penalization, excessive penalization leads to conservative allocations that degrade adaptability and recovery, resulting in inferior realized drawdown and risk-adjusted performance. An interior range of \(q\) balances tail awareness with portfolio flexibility and consistently delivers superior robustness under heavy-tailed market dynamics. These findings demonstrate that entropy-based portfolio optimization should be interpreted as a design and calibration framework, where performance emerges from structural trade-offs rather than from maximal tail penalization. The proposed approach offers a principled and practically implementable alternative for portfolio construction under non-Gaussian risk. Econometrics Applied Mathematics Entropy-based portfolio optimization Tsallis entropy non-Gaussian risk downside risk calibration gold–energy nexus robust portfolio design Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8996190","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":598566195,"identity":"96b4a917-45f4-4f9d-b3f3-6c838847b9ba","order_by":0,"name":"Nam Anh Quach","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7962-6695","institution":"Hong Bang International University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nam","middleName":"Anh","lastName":"Quach","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-02-28 14:43:48","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8996190/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8996190/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":104401011,"identity":"2bc75f45-1080-46d0-adbd-851873da8d93","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-11 12:11:40","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":600440,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"PortfolioOptimizationintheGold8threvised.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8996190/v1_covered_1cbe6b90-91be-4eb3-9712-0bfd50840663.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePortfolio Optimization in the Gold–Energy Nexus under Non-Gaussian Risk: A Mean–Tsallis Entropy Framework\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Entropy-based portfolio optimization, Tsallis entropy, non-Gaussian risk, downside risk calibration, gold–energy nexus, robust portfolio design","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8996190/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8996190/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eFinancial return distributions in commodity-linked portfolios are well known to exhibit heavy tails, asymmetry, and regime-dependent risk, rendering variance-based optimization frameworks inadequate. This study proposes a Mean\u0026ndash;Tsallis Entropy portfolio optimization framework for the gold\u0026ndash;energy nexus, explicitly designed to address non-Gaussian downside risk. The entropic index \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(q\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e is introduced as a calibration parameter governing the sensitivity of the optimization objective to extreme losses rather than as a direct measure of investor risk aversion.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThrough extensive Monte Carlo simulations and comparative analysis against the classical mean\u0026ndash;variance benchmark, we show that portfolio robustness exhibits a non-monotonic relationship with respect to \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(q\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. While increasing \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(q\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e mechanically amplifies tail-loss penalization, excessive penalization leads to conservative allocations that degrade adaptability and recovery, resulting in inferior realized drawdown and risk-adjusted performance. An interior range of \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(q\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e balances tail awareness with portfolio flexibility and consistently delivers superior robustness under heavy-tailed market dynamics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese findings demonstrate that entropy-based portfolio optimization should be interpreted as a design and calibration framework, where performance emerges from structural trade-offs rather than from maximal tail penalization. The proposed approach offers a principled and practically implementable alternative for portfolio construction under non-Gaussian risk.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Portfolio Optimization in the Gold–Energy Nexus under Non-Gaussian Risk: A Mean–Tsallis Entropy Framework","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-03-03 11:36:18","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8996190/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"bd2cceed-7ea5-4675-a506-75c0281f3ee9","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 3rd, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":63700323,"name":"Econometrics"},{"id":63700324,"name":"Applied Mathematics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-03-03T11:36:18+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-03-03 11:36:18","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8996190","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8996190","identity":"rs-8996190","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0