Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: A Critical Assessment of Claims, Performance, and Practical Viability

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This assessment reveals Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks outperform MLPs only in symbolic regression, underperform elsewhere due to B-splines, have significant computational overhead, and their dimensionality reduction claims lack rigorous mathematical backing.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

This paper critically assesses Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs), evaluating claims that their learnable univariate activation functions yield superior interpretability and performance. Using fair comparison methodologies that control for parameter counts and computational cost across multiple domains, the authors report that KANs outperform multilayer perceptrons only in symbolic regression, while underperforming on machine learning, computer vision, and natural language processing benchmarks. They attribute much of the gap to B-spline activation functions rather than architectural novelty and note that KANs are substantially slower (reported as 1.36–100×), which limits practical deployment; they also state that theoretical claims about breaking the curse of dimensionality lack rigorous mathematical support. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) have gained significant attention as an alternative to traditional multilayer perceptrons, with proponents claiming superior interpretability and performance through learnable univariate activation functions. However, recent systematic evaluations reveal substantial discrepancies between theoretical claims and empirical evidence. This critical assessment examines KANs' actual performance across diverse domains using fair comparison methodologies that control for parameters and computational costs. Our analysis demonstrates that KANs outperform MLPs only in symbolic regression tasks, while consistently underperforming in machine learning, computer vision, and natural language processing benchmarks. The claimed advantages largely stem from B-spline activation functions rather than architectural innovations, and computational overhead (1.36-100× slower) severely limits practical deployment. Furthermore, theoretical claims about breaking the "curse of dimensionality" lack rigorous mathematical foundation. We systematically identify the conditions under which KANs provide value versus traditional approaches, establish evaluation standards for future research, and propose a priority-based roadmap for addressing fundamental limitations. This work provides researchers and practitioners with evidence-based guidance for the rational adoption of KANs while highlighting critical research gaps that must be addressed for broader applicability.
Full text 11,031 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: A Critical Assessment of Claims, Performance, and Practical Viability | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: A Critical Assessment of Claims, Performance, and Practical Viability Yuntian Hou, Tianrui Ji, Di Zhang, Angelos Stefanidis This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7063327/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) have gained significant attention as an alternative to traditional multilayer perceptrons, with proponents claiming superior interpretability and performance through learnable univariate activation functions. However, recent systematic evaluations reveal substantial discrepancies between theoretical claims and empirical evidence. This critical assessment examines KANs' actual performance across diverse domains using fair comparison methodologies that control for parameters and computational costs. Our analysis demonstrates that KANs outperform MLPs only in symbolic regression tasks, while consistently underperforming in machine learning, computer vision, and natural language processing benchmarks. The claimed advantages largely stem from B-spline activation functions rather than architectural innovations, and computational overhead (1.36-100× slower) severely limits practical deployment. Furthermore, theoretical claims about breaking the "curse of dimensionality" lack rigorous mathematical foundation. We systematically identify the conditions under which KANs provide value versus traditional approaches, establish evaluation standards for future research, and propose a priority-based roadmap for addressing fundamental limitations. This work provides researchers and practitioners with evidence-based guidance for the rational adoption of KANs while highlighting critical research gaps that must be addressed for broader applicability. Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks Neural Networks Machine Learning Deep Learning Interpretability Performance Evaluation Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7063327","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":492614834,"identity":"75605967-5762-4afa-a2c4-e1ccdec24b66","order_by":0,"name":"Yuntian Hou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yuntian","middleName":"","lastName":"Hou","suffix":""},{"id":492614835,"identity":"8bb54c3f-fce1-46ae-9318-a5a5b2badc9c","order_by":1,"name":"Tianrui Ji","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tianrui","middleName":"","lastName":"Ji","suffix":""},{"id":492614836,"identity":"2a71fff6-7e07-4341-803a-2dc0f9d1287e","order_by":2,"name":"Di Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Di","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":492614837,"identity":"ff036eb3-9316-45c7-a9df-9019114c14e4","order_by":3,"name":"Angelos Stefanidis","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Angelos","middleName":"","lastName":"Stefanidis","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-07-07 08:53:34","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7063327/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7063327/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":96916318,"identity":"e190c360-1ccb-45aa-8715-e71907455d11","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-27 14:08:28","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":844386,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ArticleTitleKAN.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7063327/v1_covered_6d55d5eb-0aea-43c6-ad90-76670a1d77d9.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: A Critical Assessment of Claims, Performance, and Practical Viability","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks, Neural Networks, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Interpretability, Performance Evaluation","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7063327/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7063327/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eKolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) have gained significant attention as an alternative to traditional multilayer perceptrons, with proponents claiming superior interpretability and performance through learnable univariate activation functions. However, recent systematic evaluations reveal substantial discrepancies between theoretical claims and empirical evidence. This critical assessment examines KANs' actual performance across diverse domains using fair comparison methodologies that control for parameters and computational costs. Our analysis demonstrates that KANs outperform MLPs only in symbolic regression tasks, while consistently underperforming in machine learning, computer vision, and natural language processing benchmarks. The claimed advantages largely stem from B-spline activation functions rather than architectural innovations, and computational overhead (1.36-100\u0026times; slower) severely limits practical deployment. Furthermore, theoretical claims about breaking the \"curse of dimensionality\" lack rigorous mathematical foundation. We systematically identify the conditions under which KANs provide value versus traditional approaches, establish evaluation standards for future research, and propose a priority-based roadmap for addressing fundamental limitations. This work provides researchers and practitioners with evidence-based guidance for the rational adoption of KANs while highlighting critical research gaps that must be addressed for broader applicability.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: A Critical Assessment of Claims, Performance, and Practical Viability","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-07-30 19:40:46","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7063327/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"ed57cb49-1e80-41ad-a1e5-40b4946620b9","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 30th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-11-26T03:38:59+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-07-30 19:40:46","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7063327","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7063327","identity":"rs-7063327","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0