Coordinate-Based fMRI Meta-Analyses of Episodic Memory Encoding and Retrieval in Depression

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

The paper performs three coordinate-based fMRI meta-analyses to compare brain activity in controls versus people with current, remitted, or subthreshold depression (or at risk for depression) during encoding and retrieval of autobiographical and non-autobiographical episodic memories. Across 21 included fMRI studies analyzed with Seed-based d Mapping (N=506 encoding; N=332 non-autobiographical retrieval; N=423 autobiographical retrieval), depression was associated with reduced activity during encoding in the thalamus, caudate, salience network, frontoparietal executive control network, and motor-related areas, and with stage/content-specific retrieval differences: higher right inferior frontal gyrus activity during non-autobiographical retrieval, and reduced right insula/fusiform activity with increased left anterior cingulate cortex and left middle frontal gyrus activity during autobiographical retrieval. The authors report low between-study heterogeneity and no evidence of publication bias, with the main caveat being that the coordinate-based approach relies on reported activation foci rather than raw images. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Depression is a mood disorder frequently associated with episodic memory impairment. However, it remains unclear whether functional brain activity differs between depressed and non-depressed individuals during encoding or retrieval of autobiographical or non-autobiographical memories. Clarifying these differences is important for refining theoretical models of memory impairment in depression and, potentially, for developing targeted interventions. Methods We conducted three coordinate-based meta-analyses examining encoding and retrieval of autobiographical and non-autobiographical memory in control participants and individuals with current, remitted, or subthreshold depression, or those at risk for depression. Studies were identified via database searches and analysed using Seed-based d Mapping. Results We included coordinates from 21 fMRI studies. During encoding, depression was associated with reduced activity in the thalamus, the caudate, the salience network, the frontoparietal executive control network, and motor-related areas (ten studies, N = 506). During non-autobiographical retrieval, depression was associated with higher activity in the right inferior frontal gyrus (six studies, N = 332). During autobiographical retrieval, depression was associated with reduced activity in the right insula and fusiform gyrus, alongside increased activity in the left anterior cingulate cortex and the left middle frontal gyrus (ten studies, N = 423). Between-study heterogeneity was low and no evidence for publication bias was found. Discussion Our results indicate that depression may be associated with impaired salience integration during encoding and autobiographical retrieval. In contrast, during non-autobiographical retrieval, increased frontal activity suggests a more vigilant or self-monitoring retrieval mode. Functional brain activity changes in depression therefore appear stage- and content-specific.
Full text 2,102 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Depression is a mood disorder frequently associated with episodic memory impairment. However, it remains unclear whether functional brain activity differs between depressed and non-depressed individuals during encoding or retrieval of autobiographical or non-autobiographical memories. Clarifying these differences is important for refining theoretical models of memory impairment in depression and, potentially, for developing targeted interventions.

Methods

We conducted three coordinate-based meta-analyses examining encoding and retrieval of autobiographical and non-autobiographical memory in control participants and individuals with current, remitted, or subthreshold depression, or those at risk for depression. Studies were identified via database searches and analysed using Seed-based d Mapping.

Results

We included coordinates from 21 fMRI studies. During encoding, depression was associated with reduced activity in the thalamus, the caudate, the salience network, the frontoparietal executive control network, and motor-related areas (ten studies, N = 506). During non-autobiographical retrieval, depression was associated with higher activity in the right inferior frontal gyrus (six studies, N = 332). During autobiographical retrieval, depression was associated with reduced activity in the right insula and fusiform gyrus, alongside increased activity in the left anterior cingulate cortex and the left middle frontal gyrus (ten studies, N = 423). Between-study heterogeneity was low and no evidence for publication bias was found.

Discussion

Our results indicate that depression may be associated with impaired salience integration during encoding and autobiographical retrieval. In contrast, during non-autobiographical retrieval, increased frontal activity suggests a more vigilant or self-monitoring retrieval mode. Functional brain activity changes in depression therefore appear stage- and content-specific. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Minor revisions to abstract formatting and author information.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0