The provision of information on time-lapse imaging: A systematic analysis of UK fertility clinics websites

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This study analyzed 106 UK fertility clinic websites, finding that 67% offer time-lapse imaging but often provide unclear or contradictory information regarding cost, risks, and clinical outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Structured Abstract Research Question This study aims to systematically analyse the provision of information on Time-lapse Imaging (TLI) by UK fertility clinic websites. Design We conducted an analysis of 106 clinic websites that offer fertility treatment to self-funded patients. The analysis aimed to examine whether these clinics offer TLI, the associated cost for patients, and the clarity and quality of the provided information. Results Out of the 106 websites analysed, 71 (67%) claimed to offer TLI, with 17 being NHS clinics and 54 being private clinics. Among these websites, 25 (35.2%) mentioned charging patients between £300 and £850, 25 (35.8%) claimed not to charge patients, and 21 (29.6%) did not provide any cost information for TLI. Although TLI is generally considered safe for patients and embryos, only 21 (29.6%) websites provided information on the associated risks. Furthermore, 64 (90.1%) websites made claims or implied that TLI leads to improved clinical outcomes by enhancing embryo selection. Notably, 34 (47.9%) websites did not mention or provide any links to the HFEA traffic light system. Additionally, 30 (42.2%) websites made claims regarding the effectiveness of TLI that contradicted the assessment of the HFEA, referring to early, mostly unspecified, studies. Conclusions It is crucial to provide patients with clear and accurate information to enable them to make fully informed decisions about TLI, particularly when they are responsible for the associated costs. The findings of this study raise concerns about the reliability and accuracy of the information available on fertility clinic websites, which are typically the primary source of information for patients.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00