Abstract
The immersiveness of virtual reality requires a look into the benefits of diegetic and non-diegetic interface designs. The first area to look at is whether a diegetic or non-diegetic interface helps users complete tasks in a faster period of time. The next area is whether a diegetic or non-diegetic interface helps users retain more information. This study looked at how users performed with two separate interfaces. The diegetic was a watch, and the non-diegetic, a pop-up floating display. The users were tested across two scenarios to complete different tasks and given two post-trial questionnaires, the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ). Both displays were given an A- rating from the SUS. On the SSQ, the diegetic interface caused less symptoms of simulator sickness than the non-diegetic interface. The users with the non-diegetic display outperformed those with the diegetic display in terms of completion time in every scenario except for the introduction. The non-diegetic display required a longer initial period to learn, but was easier to use afterwards. Both displays required the user to access them the same number of times, thus neither afforded the user any benefit at remembering their tasks and current goals.
Full text
6,493 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Diegetic and Non-Diegetic User Interface and User Experience Design in Virtual Reality | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 7 July 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Diegetic and Non-Diegetic User Interface and User Experience Design in Virtual Reality Authors : Joshua Murphy and Abdelwahab Hamam 0000-0003-3653-8884 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175187523.36276813/v1 361 views 190 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract The immersiveness of virtual reality requires a look into the benefits of diegetic and non-diegetic interface designs. The first area to look at is whether a diegetic or non-diegetic interface helps users complete tasks in a faster period of time. The next area is whether a diegetic or non-diegetic interface helps users retain more information. This study looked at how users performed with two separate interfaces. The diegetic was a watch, and the non-diegetic, a pop-up floating display. The users were tested across two scenarios to complete different tasks and given two post-trial questionnaires, the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ). Both displays were given an A- rating from the SUS. On the SSQ, the diegetic interface caused less symptoms of simulator sickness than the non-diegetic interface. The users with the non-diegetic display outperformed those with the diegetic display in terms of completion time in every scenario except for the introduction. The non-diegetic display required a longer initial period to learn, but was easier to use afterwards. Both displays required the user to access them the same number of times, thus neither afforded the user any benefit at remembering their tasks and current goals. Supplementary Material File (allimages.pdf) Download 2.18 MB File (diegetic and non-diegetic user interface and user experience design in virtual reality_submitted.pdf) Download 2.33 MB File (images.zip) Download 2.19 MB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 07 July 2025 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords diegetic non-diegetic remote education user experience user interface virtual reality Authors Affiliations Joshua Murphy Florida Polytechnic University View all articles by this author Abdelwahab Hamam 0000-0003-3653-8884 [email protected] Florida Polytechnic University View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 361 views 190 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Joshua Murphy, Abdelwahab Hamam. Diegetic and Non-Diegetic User Interface and User Experience Design in Virtual Reality. Authorea . 07 July 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175187523.36276813/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.175187523.36276813/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a00e0e5888a11b23',t:'MTc3OTY0NDExNw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.