Patterns of Responding on the Work Ability Index Following a Compensable Injury

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

This study provided an updated analysis of the _Work Ability Index_ in a sample of 208 individuals undergoing vocational assessment following a compensable personal injury. Participants reported a median of three medical conditions, and the majority (147 out of 208) had between 100 and 354 days off work in the past year. Self-rated physical capacity was typically “rather poor,” while mental capacity was rated as “moderate.” These domains were significantly related. Strong associations were also found between current work ability and estimated work impairment (γ =.869), and between estimated future work ability and both current work ability (γ =.732) and estimated impairment (γ =.841). The analysis, which treated each WAI item as ordinal, revealed coherent internal relationships across items, supporting the relevance of the individual components. These findings underscore the complexity of work ability following injury and challenge the psychometric justification for summing item scores into a total index.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0