DESPOT: Direction-Enhanced Scoring POTentials for Scoring of Protein-Ligand Interactions

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Knowledge-based potentials (KBPs) have long been used to score protein–ligand interactions, yet existing formulations remain isotropic, capturing only distance dependencies and neglecting the directional preferences that govern molecular recognition. Here, we introduce Direction-Enhanced Scoring POTentials (DESPOT), an anisotropic knowledge-based framework that unifies pose scoring and binding-site characterisation within a single probabilistic model. The new probabilistic formulation used in DESPOT naturally supports directional modelling through atom type–specific local reference frames and symmetry-aware geometric discretisation. It also supports steric exclusion, encoded as a dedicated void state that explicitly captures the probability that a spatial bin remains unoccupied. The anisotropic interaction profiles learned by DESPOT reveal systematic directional preferences for interactions such as hydrogen bonds, aromatic interactions, and halogen bonds, that extend beyond idealised geometric models. Evaluation on the CASF-2016 benchmark shows that DESPOT sub-stantially outperforms isotropic KBPs in all pose-discrimination and virtual screening tasks ( p ≪ 0.0001 for all enrichment factors), with the largest gains arising from its ability to penalise geometrically implausible poses. Constrained energy minimisation of training structures proves strongly beneficial for the derivation of KBPs, while our train–test leakage analysis reveals that overfitting is an underestimated and understudied issue for KBPs. DESPOT provides a data-driven framework for direction-aware modelling of protein–ligand interactions, with applications in pose scoring, binding-site characterisation, and structure-based design.
Full text 1,813 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Knowledge-based potentials (KBPs) have long been used to score protein–ligand interactions, yet existing formulations remain isotropic, capturing only distance dependencies and neglecting the directional preferences that govern molecular recognition. Here, we introduce Direction-Enhanced Scoring POTentials (DESPOT), an anisotropic knowledge-based framework that unifies pose scoring and binding-site characterisation within a single probabilistic model. The new probabilistic formulation used in DESPOT naturally supports directional modelling through atom type–specific local reference frames and symmetry-aware geometric discretisation. It also supports steric exclusion, encoded as a dedicated void state that explicitly captures the probability that a spatial bin remains unoccupied. The anisotropic interaction profiles learned by DESPOT reveal systematic directional preferences for interactions such as hydrogen bonds, aromatic interactions, and halogen bonds, that extend beyond idealised geometric models. Evaluation on the CASF-2016 benchmark shows that DESPOT sub-stantially outperforms isotropic KBPs in all pose-discrimination and virtual screening tasks (p ≪ 0.0001 for all enrichment factors), with the largest gains arising from its ability to penalise geometrically implausible poses. Constrained energy minimisation of training structures proves strongly beneficial for the derivation of KBPs, while our train–test leakage analysis reveals that overfitting is an underestimated and understudied issue for KBPs. DESPOT provides a data-driven framework for direction-aware modelling of protein–ligand interactions, with applications in pose scoring, binding-site characterisation, and structure-based design. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0